1.How People Decide to Protect Their Health: A Protection Motivation Theory–Theory of Reasoned Action Perspective
Changhyun NAM ; Ho Yeol YU ; Juyoung LEE ; Elizabeth WACHIRA
Korean Journal of Health Promotion 2026;26(1):32-40
Background:
This study investigated how perceived knowledge, threat, and coping appraisals, moral obligation, and social approval influence voluntary mask-wearing intentions within an integrated framework combining Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA). Understanding the drivers of protective behaviors after mandates are lifted is essential for sustaining public health practices. In the United States—where mask wearing is not culturally normative—such behaviors rely on internal motivations rather than external enforcement.
Methods:
Using data from a nationwide online survey of 360 U.S. adults, structural equation modeling was employed to test relationships among perceived knowledge, threat appraisal, coping appraisal, moral obligation, social approval, and behavioral intention.
Results:
Perceived knowledge significantly predicted both coping and threat appraisals. Coping appraisal influenced moral obligation, while threat appraisal affected both moral obligation and social approval. Among all predictors, only moral obligation significantly predicted behavioral intention, which in turn predicted protective behavior.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the central role of moral obligation and coping appraisal as key drivers of voluntary health protective intentions. The integrated PMT–TRA model provides actionable insights for sustaining motivation in low-threat contexts and offers guidance for shaping future public health strategies.
2.Modified application of SAMe-TT2R2 scoring system in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation for the selection of oral anticoagulants
Seong Won JEON ; Nuri LEE ; Ki Hong LEE ; Minjeong HA ; Changhyun KIM ; Yoo Ri KIM ; Nam Sik YOON ; Hyung Wook PARK
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2024;39(3):458-468
Background/Aims:
The SAMe-TT2R2 score is used for assessing anticoagulation control (AC) quality with warfarin. However, it is hard to apply SAMe-TT2R2 score in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), because it has not been proven in those populations. This study aimed to validate the SAMe-TT2R2 score in Asian patients with AF and suggest a modified SAMe- TT2R2 score for this population.
Methods:
We analyzed 710 Korean patients with AF who were using warfarin. The AC quality was assessed as the mean time in therapeutic range (TTR). Each component of SAMe-TT2R2 score was evaluated for the relationship with AC. Further clinical factors that predict AC were analyzed. Identified factors were re-assorted and constructed as SA2Me-TTR scoring system.
Results:
Of the components of the SAMe-TT2R2 score, female, age, and rhythm control were associated with AC. Heart failure and renal insufficiency were newly identified factors associated with AC. The modified SA2Me-TTR score was reconstructed with the relevant risk factors (S, female gender, 1 point; A, age < 60 yr, 2 points; Me, medical history of heart failure, 1 point; T, treatment for rhythm control, 1 point; T, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, 1 point; R, renal insufficiency, 1 point). The modified SA2Me-TTR score demonstrated an excellent relationship with the grading of AC. The modified SA2Me-TTR score ≤ 1 identified patients with good AC (hazard ratio 2.46, 95% CI 1.75–3.47).
Conclusions
The modified SA2Me-TTR score was useful for guiding oral anticoagulants selection in Asian patients with AF.
3.Framingham risk score and risk of incident chronic kidney disease: A community-based prospective cohort study
Changhyun LEE ; Hae Ryong YUN ; Young Su JOO ; Sangmi LEE ; Joohwan KIM ; Ki Heon NAM ; Jong Hyun JHEE ; Jung Tak PARK ; Tae Hyun YOO ; Shin Wook KANG ; Seung Hyeok HAN
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2019;38(1):49-59
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease share several common risk factors. The Framingham risk score is hypothesized to predict chronic kidney disease development. We determined if the Framingham risk scoring system can correctly predict incident chronic kidney disease in the general population. METHODS: This study included 9,080 subjects who participated in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study between 2001 and 2014 and had normal renal function. The subjects were classified into low- (< 10%), intermediate- (10–20%), and high- (> 20%) risk groups based on baseline Framingham risk scores. The primary endpoint was de novo chronic kidney disease development (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up duration of 8.9 ± 4.3 years, 312 (5.3%), 217 (10.8%), and 205 (16.9%) subjects developed chronic kidney disease in the low, intermediate, and high risk groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis after adjustment for confounding factors showed the hazard ratios for the high- and intermediate risk groups were 2.674 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.197–3.255) and 1.734 (95% CI, 1.447–2.078), respectively. This association was consistently observed irrespective of proteinuria, age, sex, obesity, or hypertension. The predictive power of this scoring system was lower than that of renal parameters, such as eGFR and proteinuria, but increased when both were included in the prediction model. CONCLUSION: The Framingham risk score predicted incident chronic kidney disease and enhanced risk stratification in conjunction with traditional renal parameters in the general population with normal renal function.
Cardiovascular Diseases
;
Cohort Studies
;
Epidemiology
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Genome
;
Glomerular Filtration Rate
;
Hypertension
;
Obesity
;
Prospective Studies
;
Proteinuria
;
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
;
Risk Factors

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail