1.Decisional Trade-offs in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, and Active Surveillance
Hyunho HAN ; Youngdeuk CHOI ; Woong Kyu HAN ; Jihee JUNG ; Ayoung YOO ; Hyunji YOON ; Siyeong LEE ; Changhwa HYUN ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Ik Jae LEE ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jeongmi LEE ; Jae Young JEONG ; Hyung Ho LEE ; Young Ae KIM ; Jung Eun KIM ; Songhee EUN ; Sung Uk LEE ; Jinha JEONG ; Moonsoo RA
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2025;23(2):112-118
Purpose:
To evaluate patient‐reported experiences of 3 primary treatments for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer—radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT), and active surveillance (AS)—based on cross‐sectional data from a prospective registry, and to explore how these findings can inform a structured shared decision making (SDM) framework.
Materials and Methods:
Men with clinical stage cT3aN0M0 or lower were enrolled. Those who underwent RP or RT were surveyed 6–24 months posttreatment; men on AS had 6–60 months of follow‐up. All participants completed the EORTC QLQ‐PR25 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Prostate Cancer Module), capturing urinary, bowel, hormonal, and sexual function. The Kruskal‐Wallis test evaluated group differences, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results:
Among 542 patients, 435 underwent RP, 73 received RT (43% with androgen deprivation therapy), and 34 were on AS. RP patients reported higher rates of urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction, whereas RT patients had more severe urinary irritative and bowel symptoms. AS generally preserved baseline sexual function but still involved some urinary complaints and anxiety regarding disease progression. These findings underscore the distinct trade‐offs among the 3 management strategies, emphasizing the importance of individualized SDM that accounts for functional priorities and patient values.
Conclusion
Each treatment modality poses unique impacts on quality of life. Incorporating these patient‐reported data into SDM discussions can improve alignment between clinical recommendations and patient preferences, potentially reducing decisional regret and enhancing long‐term outcomes.
2.Clinicopathological Correlation of Lupus Nephritis.
Sun Jin YOU ; Joon Sung PARK ; Jee Hyun KIM ; Su Kyoung PARK ; Sang Cheol BAE ; Gheun Ho KIM ; Chong Myung KANG ; Moon Hyang PARK ; Chang Hwa LEE
Korean Journal of Nephrology 2009;28(5):410-417
PURPOSE: Clinical treatment for lupus nephritis largely depends upon histological renal biopsy classification. But it has been reported that serologic biochemical markers are not strongly associated with pathologic classification. The aim of this study is to see whether serologic markers could predict pathologic class of lupus nephritis for appropriate treatment. METHODS: We investigated 67 patients, who underwent renal biopsy with lupus nephritis at Hanyang University Hospital between January, 2005 and August, 2007. Biological markers for this study are hematuria, proteinuria, serologic data of lupus activity and azotemia. They were retrospectively analyzed from patients grouped by ISN/RPS 2003 lupus nephritis classification. RESULTS: Total 67 patients (men 5, women 62) were enrolled and the mean age of the patients was 30.6+/-9 years. The number of patient group by pathologic classification was 4 cases for class II, 15 cases for class III, 30 cases for class IV and 15 cases for class V. Spot urine protein to creatinine ratio more than 3 increased in class IV group statistically (p=.007). C3 level decreased more in class IV group than class III, V groups. Ten patients showed azotemia, and 9 of them were class IV group (p=.048). CONCLUSION: The patients with more increased proteinuria, decreased C3 level and azotemia showed more frequently in class IV group. Hence those three biological markers may be a clinical clue to pathologic diagnosis.
Azotemia
;
Biomarkers
;
Biopsy
;
Creatinine
;
Female
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Lupus Nephritis
;
Proteinuria
;
Retrospective Studies
3.Comparison of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Boys with or without Comorbid Tic Disorders.
Jeewook CHOI ; Myung Ho LIM ; Changhwa LEE ; Jin Kyun PARK ; Jungwoo SON ; Se Hoon SHIM ; In Kyu YU ; Hyun Soo KHANG ; Bumseok JEONG
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2008;47(5):493-502
OBJECTIVES: Diffuse tensor imaging (DTI) was applied to explore the difference in regional distribution and extent of white matter (WM) abnormalities in boys with Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) versus boys with comorbid ADHD and tic disorders. METHODS: Fifteen boys with ADHD (mean age 9.3+/-1.8), 24 ADHD boys with chronic tic disorder or Tourette's disorder (9.9+/-1.2) and 9 age-, gender-matched controls (9.2+/-1.8) received DTI assessments. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) maps of WM were compared between groups with a voxel-wise analysis after intersubject registration to MNI space. RESULTS: Both groups, ADHD group and ADHD with tic disorder group, commonly showed decreased FA than healthy control group in left cerebellar middle peduncle and right frontal lobe, increased FA in right middle occipital WM. In the common areas of left cerebellar middle peduncle and right middle occipital WM, comorbid group showed broader areas of significant FA. The comorbid group also showed increased FA in right cerebellar peduncle, additionally. CONCLUSION: The findings in ADHD group support previous ADHD hypothesis of the functional abnormalities in corticocerebellar circuit, and suggest that ADHD might have more complicated pathology of neuronal circuit including occipital visual system. The comorbid group showed common areas of overlapping but more extensive abnormalities and also had additional WM abnormalities. ADHD with chronic tic disorders may represent a severe form of ADHD with additional regions of abnormal connectivity.
Anisotropy
;
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
;
Diffusion
;
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
;
Frontal Lobe
;
Humans
;
Neurons
;
Tic Disorders
;
Tics
;
Tourette Syndrome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail