BACKGROUND:Ankle fracture complicated with deltoid ligament injury is clinically common,and one stage repair of deltoid ligament with internal fracture fixation has gradually become a main therapeutic method,which can significantly reduce the long-term complications of ankle joint.In recent years,new progress has been made in anatomical structure characteristics and dynamic biomechanical research of deltoid ligament,thus greatly improving repairing techniques for injury in the deep layer of deltoid ligament,but there are still some controversies.OBJECTIVE:To explore the clinical efficacy of suture anchor and medial malleolus repair in the treatment of ankle joint fractures with the deep layer of deltoid ligament.METHODS:A total of 56 patients with ankle joint fractures and complete fracture of the deep and superficial layer of deltoid ligament treated in Affiliated Haikou Hospital,Xiangya School of Medicine,Central South University from January 2017 to January 2022 were selected,and they were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods in repairing the deep layer of deltoid ligament with suture anchor:suture anchor repair group(n=32)and medial malleolus repair group(n=24).The medial clear space of ankle joint and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score of patients in the two groups were evaluated before and after operative treatment.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)All the 56 patients finished the surgery smoothly and were followed up for more than 12 months after operation.Their ankle fracture healed,and the time for fracture healing was 8-12 weeks,with a mean of 10.5 weeks.(2)The medial clear space of ankle joint in the two groups 12 months after operation was remarkably narrower than that before operation,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.001).The medial clear space of ankle joint in the two groups maintained a normal range 12 months after operation,and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).(3)The AOFAS scale of patients in the two groups 6 and 12 months after operation was obviously bigger than that before operation(P＜0.001),but there was no statistically significant difference in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score of patients between the two groups at corresponding time points(P＞0.05).(4)It is concluded that both suture anchor and medial malleolus repair in the treatment of injury in the deep layer of deltoid ligament can recover the medial clear space of ankle joint,effectively keep the stability of ankle,and thus achieve good clinical efficacy.

BACKGROUND:Ankle fracture complicated with deltoid ligament injury is clinically common,and one stage repair of deltoid ligament with internal fracture fixation has gradually become a main therapeutic method,which can significantly reduce the long-term complications of ankle joint.In recent years,new progress has been made in anatomical structure characteristics and dynamic biomechanical research of deltoid ligament,thus greatly improving repairing techniques for injury in the deep layer of deltoid ligament,but there are still some controversies.OBJECTIVE:To explore the clinical efficacy of suture anchor and medial malleolus repair in the treatment of ankle joint fractures with the deep layer of deltoid ligament.METHODS:A total of 56 patients with ankle joint fractures and complete fracture of the deep and superficial layer of deltoid ligament treated in Affiliated Haikou Hospital,Xiangya School of Medicine,Central South University from January 2017 to January 2022 were selected,and they were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods in repairing the deep layer of deltoid ligament with suture anchor:suture anchor repair group(n=32)and medial malleolus repair group(n=24).The medial clear space of ankle joint and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score of patients in the two groups were evaluated before and after operative treatment.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)All the 56 patients finished the surgery smoothly and were followed up for more than 12 months after operation.Their ankle fracture healed,and the time for fracture healing was 8-12 weeks,with a mean of 10.5 weeks.(2)The medial clear space of ankle joint in the two groups 12 months after operation was remarkably narrower than that before operation,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.001).The medial clear space of ankle joint in the two groups maintained a normal range 12 months after operation,and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).(3)The AOFAS scale of patients in the two groups 6 and 12 months after operation was obviously bigger than that before operation(P＜0.001),but there was no statistically significant difference in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score of patients between the two groups at corresponding time points(P＞0.05).(4)It is concluded that both suture anchor and medial malleolus repair in the treatment of injury in the deep layer of deltoid ligament can recover the medial clear space of ankle joint,effectively keep the stability of ankle,and thus achieve good clinical efficacy.

Objective: PLASMIC score was evaluated its value in differential diagnosis between the patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and those with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) . Method: Twenty-four patients with TTP and 41 cases with DIC were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The platelet count, average red blood cell volume, indirect bilirubin, creatinine and prothrombin time international normalised ratio were collected, and then PLASMIC scores were calculated. Results: According to the risk classification of PLASMIC score, three (12.5%) TTP patients had moderate risk, and the rest 21 (87.5%) cases had high risk. In DIC patients, 92.7% cases were in low risk group, 4.9% at moderate risk, and only one case had high risk. Of these 65 patients, the sensitivity and the specificity to TTP of the high risk of the scoring system were 87.5% and 97.6%, respectively. Conclusion The patients with high risk of PLASMIC score correlated well with clinical TTP diagnosis. The scoring system showed to be an excellent diagnostic model to distinguish TTP patients from those with DIC.

BACKGROUND: The metal implant internal fixation exhibits good effect for femoral neck fractures of young patients, but few studies report the metal implant treatment for femoral neck fracture in the aged patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare different implant treatments for osteoporotic hip fractures in senile patients. METHODS: A total of 237 aged patients with osteoporotic hip fracture, aged from 60 to 96 years old, were recruited from the hospital between January 1998 and December 2008. There were 32 cases treated by cannulated screw internal fixation, 23 cases by anatomical plate internal fixation, 41 cases by dynamic hip screw internal fixation, 111 cases by bipolar femoral head replacement, and 30 cases by total hip replacement. Comparison of the incidence of complications and the recovery of hip function were performed in each group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Cannulated screws, anatomical plates, dynamic hip screw internal fixation showed a higher complication rate significantly than bipolar femoral head replacement and total hip arthroplasty (P < 0.01); the good and excellent effect rate in cannulated screw, femoral end plate, and dynamic hip screw fixation was significantly lower than that in bipolar femoral head replacement and total hip arthroplasty (P < 0.001, P < 0.01). The results suggested that artificial joint replacement (bipolar femoral head replacement or total hip replacement) is the optimal choice for aged osteoporotic femoral neck fracture, cannulated screw fixation is suitable for Garden I, dynamic hip screw fixation and proximal femoral anatomical plate fixation fit for intertrochanteric fractures of Jensen-Evans I-Ⅱ; Jensen-Evans Ⅱ-Ⅲ osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures joint replacement is the ideal choice.