Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries. Materials and Methods: Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an opensource registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers. Results: A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767–0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763–0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743–0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669–0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all p<0.001). Conclusion ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.

Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries. Materials and Methods: Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an opensource registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers. Results: A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767–0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763–0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743–0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669–0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all p<0.001). Conclusion ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.

Background: Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery. Methods: Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil. Results: Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group. Conclusions Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.

Background: Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery. Methods: Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil. Results: Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group. Conclusions Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.

Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries. Materials and Methods: Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an opensource registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers. Results: A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767–0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763–0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743–0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669–0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all p<0.001). Conclusion ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.

Background: Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery. Methods: Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil. Results: Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group. Conclusions Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.

Background: Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery. Methods: Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil. Results: Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group. Conclusions Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.

Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries. Materials and Methods: Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an opensource registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers. Results: A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767–0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763–0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743–0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669–0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all p<0.001). Conclusion ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.

Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries. Materials and Methods: Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an opensource registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers. Results: A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767–0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763–0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743–0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669–0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all p<0.001). Conclusion ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.

Electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitoring has emerged as a pivotal advancement in anesthesia, offering enhanced precision and reliability in assessing neuromuscular blockade. This review describes the physiological foundations of EMG, the methodologies for quantifying compound muscle action potential, and the comparative utility of EMG over traditional acceleromyography. Clinical applications across various muscle sites—specifically the adductor pollicis, first dorsal interosseous, and abductor digiti minimi—are explored, emphasizing inter-muscle variability and its implications for dosing of reversal agents. EMG-based monitoring is associated with reduced calibration time, improved stability against signal drift, and superior prevention of residual neuromuscular blockade. However, EMG monitoring presents unique challenges, including signal artifacts and device-specific variations in response thresholds. Recent comparative studies have demonstrated the importance of understanding device-specific characteristics to optimize clinical interpretations. Collectively, this evidence supports the use of EMG as a standard modality for perioperative neuromuscular management. Its accurate and reproducible signals, combined with broad clinical compatibility, present a compelling case for widespread adoption in routine anesthetic practice.