Purpose: While MRI-based tumor regression grade (mrTRG) has shown promise in evaluating pathologic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in rectal cancer, its ability to predict pathologic complete response remains limited.This study aimed to enhance mrTRG’s diagnostic performance in predicting ypT0–1N0 status, a key factor in considering non-radical management after CCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: This retrospective study included 430 patients with LARC who underwent radical resection following CCRT at a single referral hospital between April 2018 and September 2024. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors associated with achieving ypT0–1N0 status. The diagnostic performances of mrTRG1–2 alone and in combination with other factors were assessed by comparing sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), negative-predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Ninety-three patients (21.6%) achieved ypT0–1N0. In the multivariable analysis, fungating type, cT1–2, and mrTRG1–2 were independent predictors for ypT0–1N0. Integrating mrTRG with gross tumor type yielded the highest AUC of 0.689 among the combined models. For predicting ypT0–1N0, the combination of mrTRG and gross tumor type improved PPV (79.2% vs. 41.5% for mrTRG alone) while also demonstrating enhanced sensitivity compared with ycT0–1N0, the conventional MRI-based predictor (40.9% vs. 22.6%). Conclusion This study demonstrated that combining mrTRG and gross tumor type improved the PPV of mrTRG in predicting ypT0–1N0 after CCRT in LARC. Further studies are warranted to validate the role of gross tumor type in refining predictive systems for selecting candidates for non-radical treatment.

Metastatic spine cancer (MSC), a common complication of advanced malignancies, poses significant challenges due to pain, neurological deficits, and mechanical instability. While radiation therapy is a cornerstone of treatment, the role of spine surgery is evolving, fueled by advances in surgical techniques and radiation modalities such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This review examines the evolving role of spine surgery in MSC management, focusing on separation surgery, surgical innovations, and future directions. The treatment paradigm for MSC shifted with the advent of SBRT, which delivers high-dose precision radiation, improving local control even in radioresistant tumors. This advancement enabled the adoption of separation surgery, a technique aimed at creating a safe margin between the tumor and neural structures without extensive tumor resection, followed by SBRT to achieve tumor regression. Separation surgery reduces morbidity, shortens operative times, and achieves comparable local control rates to traditional corpectomy procedures. Innovations like minimally invasive surgery, stereotactic navigation, and cement-augmented instrumentation have improved surgical safety and outcomes. Emerging technologies, such as machine learning for predictive modeling and augmented reality for surgical navigation, hold potential for improving decision-making and procedural accuracy. Spine surgery remains integral to MSC treatment, especially for high-grade metastatic epidural spinal cord compression and mechanical instability. Integrating advanced technologies and multidisciplinary collaboration is key to optimizing patient outcomes. Comprehensive, patient-centered strategies addressing both oncological and mechanical aspects can improve survival and quality of life for patients with MSC.

Subglottic stenosis (SGS) and tracheal stenosis (TS) are rare conditions that can cause significant breathing difficulties and, if not properly managed, may lead to life-threatening complications. Despite their clinical importance, debate continues regarding the optimal management of adult SGS and TS, and no comprehensive guidelines have been established to date. The Korean Bronchoesophagological Society appointed a task force to develop clinical practice guidelines with the goal of providing evidence-based recommendations for managing SGS and TS in adults. The task force conducted a systematic review of the relevant literature by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using predefined search terms aligned with key clinical questions. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, which also informed the formulation and reporting of the recommendations. The strength of each recommendation reflects the guideline panel’s confidence that the benefits of an intervention outweigh its risks for eligible patients. After drafting the guidelines, feedback was obtained through Delphi questionnaires completed by members of the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society. Ultimately, the committee developed 17 evidence-based recommendations across four categories: initial evaluation, medical management, surgical treatment, and postoperative management and rehabilitation. These guidelines aim to support clinicians in delivering optimal care to adult patients with SGS and TS.

This case describes a male with a history of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) who had a concomitant branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm under long-term surveillance. During follow-up, new high-risk radiologic features developed within the pancreatic cyst, raising concern for malignant transformation and ultimately leading to surgical resection. However, final histopathologic examination revealed recurrent type 1 AIP rather than malignant progression of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, a finding that represents an uncommon and diagnostically challenging manifestation. This case suggests that when new imaging changes are observed during surveillance of pancreatic cystic lesions, clinicians should consider not only malignant transformation but also the possibility of recurrence or coexistence of underlying diseases such as AIP.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Background: Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) alters spinal anatomy, impacting the feasibility and dimensions of surgical corridors for oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). This study aimed to compare the morphometric characteristics of OLIF corridors between patients with left- and right-apex curves, focusing on corridor dimensions, psoas muscle asymmetry, and segmental artery positioning. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 80 patients with DLS (left apex: n = 43; right apex: n = 37) was conducted. Corridor angles and distances, psoas muscle cross-sectional areas, and segmental artery locations were measured at L2–3, L3–4, and L4–5 using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multivariate regression analysis identified key anatomical predictors of corridor variation at L2–3. Results: Regardless of the apex direction, the left-sided corridor was consistently larger across all levels. Corridor angles were significantly greater on the left side in both groups (left apex: L2–3, 39.7° vs. 13.5°; L3–4, 38.3° vs. 11.9°; L4–5, 38.6° vs. 6.9°;right apex: L2–3, 53.7° vs. 18.1°; L3–4, 43.1° vs. 18.5°; L4–5, 28.6° vs. 11.9°). Psoas muscle areas were larger on the concave side of the curve (left apex: 125.7 mm2 vs. 67.9 mm2 ; right apex: 125.4 mm2 vs. 77.4 mm2 ). Segmental artery positioning exhibited curvedependent asymmetry at L2–3 (left apex: 8.8 mm vs. 7.9 mm; right apex: 9.6 mm vs. 8.0 mm). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that in the left apex group, the left psoas area (β = −0.132) and segmental artery distances were significant predictors of corridor angle variation (R2 = 0.517). In the right apex group, psoas asymmetry (β = 0.123) and sagittal alignment (β = −0.851) were associated with corridor differences. Conclusions OLIF corridors in DLS patients demonstrate consistent left-sided dominance, regardless of apex direction. Psoas muscle asymmetry and segmental artery positioning contribute to corridor variations. While the left-sided approach remains standard, right-sided access may be feasible in select cases, particularly at L4–5. These findings provide insights for optimizing preoperative planning and surgical decision-making in DLS patients.

Purpose: Since 1995, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA) has been periodically conducting nationwide surveys on patients with surgically treated gastric cancer. This study details the results of the survey conducted in 2023. Materials and Methods: The survey was conducted from March to December 2024 using a standardized case report form. Data were collected on 86 items, including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, and surgical outcomes. The results of the 2023 survey were compared with those of previous surveys. Results: Data from 12,751 cases were collected from 66 institutions. The mean patient age was 64.6 years, and the proportion of patients aged ≥71 years increased from 9.1% in 1995 to 31.7% in 2023. The proportion of upper-third tumors slightly decreased to 16.8% compared to 20.9% in 2019. Early gastric cancer accounted for 63.1% of cases in 2023.Regarding operative procedures, a totally laparoscopic approach was most frequently applied (63.2%) in 2023, while robotic gastrectomy steadily increased to 9.5% from 2.1% in 2014.The most common anastomotic method was the Billroth II procedure (48.8%) after distal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction (51.9%) after proximal gastrectomy in 2023.However, the proportion of esophago-gastrostomy with anti-reflux procedures increased to 30.9%. The rates of post-operative mortality and overall complications were 1.0% and 15.3%, respectively. Conclusions The results of the 2023 nationwide survey demonstrate the current status of gastric cancer treatment in Korea. This information will provide a basis for future gastric cancer research.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.