INTRODUCTION

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are both prevalent globally. The diagnosis and management of ACS in ESRD is difficult because the interplay of cardiovascular and renal disease is complicated. The guidelines for ACS may not be applicable to the ESRD population because the trials from which these are drawn mostly excluded ESRD patients.

To determine the clinical profile and outcomes of CKD patients on dialysis admitted for ACS in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH).

We did a retrospective cohort study and employed a retrospective review of electronic medical records among ESRD patients presenting with ACS in PGH from May 2021 to November 2023. The collected data was analyzed using univariate and bivariate statistics using PRISM software.

A total of 48 patients with ESRD were admitted for ACS in this study – 8 with STEMI and 40 with NSTEMI. The mean age was 61 years old and 33 (68.8%) were male. Among those with STEMI, six (75%) presented with Kilip II or more. While among those with NSTEMI, 17 (42.5%) had a GRACE score >140 and 27 (67.5%) had an NSTEMI TIMI risk score >2. On average, the patients were on hemodialysis for 31 months prior to admission. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (91.7%) and heart failure (83.3%). On admission, 18 (37.5%) presented with SBP >160, 7 (14.6%) patients presented with shock, and 4 (8.3%) patients presented with cardiac arrest. 38 (79.2%) patients had anemia on admission. 21 (43.8%) patients had left ventricular hypertrophy on electrocardiogram while 34 (70.8%) patients had cardiomegaly on chest radiography. The average left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram was 46% and 27 (90%) patients had segmental wall motion abnormalities. The most common angiographic finding was 3-vessel coronary artery disease seen in 50% of patients. Almost all patients received dualantiplatelet therapy, high dose statin, and beta-blocker. The mortality rate was high at 43.8% with cardiovascular causes being the most common cause of death.

This study demonstrates the high mortality rate among patients with ESRD presenting with ACS. Our study portrays that patients with ESRD present with higher risk features including abnormalities in vital signs, laboratories, imaging, high prognostications score, and high in-hospital morbidity.

BACKGROUND

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the Philippines. Despite strong recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), local data reveal low rates of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and early invasive strategies due to financial constraints and system inefficiencies. The recent expansion of the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) AMI benefits package presents an opportunity to improve access to appropriate care. A standardized, evidence-based national clinical pathway is needed to guide healthcare providers and ensure consistent, high-quality care of AMI across various healthcare settings.

To develop a standardized, evidence-based national clinical pathway for the management of AMI patients eligible under the PHIC IHD-AMI benefits package.

Existing AMI clinical pathways from nine public and private hospitals in the Philippines were collected and reviewed. A multidisciplinary Technical Working Group (TWG) appraised current guidelines using the AGREE II tool and evaluated the collected pathways to identify strengths, gaps and variations in practice. A draft pathway was created and refined through consensus-building with cardiology experts and stakeholders to develop the final pathway.

The final national AMI clinical pathway integrates evidence-based best practices and accounts for differences in institutional resources. It standardizes the use of ECG and cardiac biomarkers for diagnosis, provides clear criteria and timelines for reperfusion therapy, defines indications for coronary angiography and PCI, and recommends optimal medical therapy and cardiac rehabilitation.

The national AMI clinical pathway is a critical step toward improving the quality, equity and efficiency of AMI care in the Philippines. Developed through a collaborative, evidence-based process, it aligns clinical management with international standards while addressing local healthcare system realities. Adoption by PHIC as a quality standard is expected to enhance guideline adherence, inform health policy and financing, and drive improvements in health outcomes. Continued implementation support, monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure its impact, particularly in under-resourced or geographically isolated settings.

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Filipinos. The guideline-recommended treatment for AMI includes emergency care, early electrocardiogram, emergent coronary angiogram and angioplasty, intensive care, medical management and cardiac rehabilitation. However, the cost of treatment is very high and not affordable for most Filipinos. To address this, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) released the ischemic heart disease – acute myocardial infarction (IHD-AMI) Benefits Package under Circular No. 2024-0032 on December 21, 2024. This package significantly increased the insurance coverage for AMI to include invasive procedures and cardiac rehabilitation. The UP-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) was the first to implement this package. This paper documents the initial planning, system changes and innovations undertaken by UP-PGH to support implementation.

This qualitative descriptive study used retrospective document review to detail revision of the existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pathway and development of the AMl pathway, restructuring of patient flow and upgrades in infrastructure and hospital capabilities. Meeting minutes from the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and UP-PGH were reviewed to describe the hospital's preparation and implementation process.

UP-PGH established an efficient, evidence-based ACS and AMI pathway. Hospital protocols, staffing, infrastructure and equipment were aligned to implement the PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package. Key steps included resources upgrade, stakeholder consultations, pathway redesign, workflow development, process alignment and monitoring systems.

The PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package can be successfully implemented in a tertiary hospital with catheterization laboratory. The documented process at UP-PGH can serve as a model for other institutions planning to utilize the package.

BACKGROUND

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the Philippines. Despite strong recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), local data reveal low rates of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and early invasive strategies due to financial constraints and system inefficiencies. The recent expansion of the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) AMI benefits package presents an opportunity to improve access to appropriate care. A standardized, evidence-based national clinical pathway is needed to guide healthcare providers and ensure consistent, high-quality care of AMI across various healthcare settings.

To develop a standardized, evidence-based national clinical pathway for the management of AMI patients eligible under the PHIC IHD-AMI benefits package.

Existing AMI clinical pathways from nine public and private hospitals in the Philippines were collected and reviewed. A multidisciplinary Technical Working Group (TWG) appraised current guidelines using the AGREE II tool and evaluated the collected pathways to identify strengths, gaps and variations in practice. A draft pathway was created and refined through consensus-building with cardiology experts and stakeholders to develop the final pathway.

The final national AMI clinical pathway integrates evidence-based best practices and accounts for differences in institutional resources. It standardizes the use of ECG and cardiac biomarkers for diagnosis, provides clear criteria and timelines for reperfusion therapy, defines indications for coronary angiography and PCI, and recommends optimal medical therapy and cardiac rehabilitation.

The national AMI clinical pathway is a critical step toward improving the quality, equity and efficiency of AMI care in the Philippines. Developed through a collaborative, evidence-based process, it aligns clinical management with international standards while addressing local healthcare system realities. Adoption by PHIC as a quality standard is expected to enhance guideline adherence, inform health policy and financing, and drive improvements in health outcomes. Continued implementation support, monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure its impact, particularly in under-resourced or geographically isolated settings.

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Filipinos. The guideline-recommended treatment for AMI includes emergency care, early electrocardiogram, emergent coronary angiogram and angioplasty, intensive care, medical management and cardiac rehabilitation. However, the cost of treatment is very high and not affordable for most Filipinos. To address this, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) released the ischemic heart disease – acute myocardial infarction (IHD-AMI) Benefits Package under Circular No. 2024-0032 on December 21, 2024. This package significantly increased the insurance coverage for AMI to include invasive procedures and cardiac rehabilitation. The UP-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) was the first to implement this package. This paper documents the initial planning, system changes and innovations undertaken by UP-PGH to support implementation.

This qualitative descriptive study used retrospective document review to detail revision of the existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pathway and development of the AMl pathway, restructuring of patient flow and upgrades in infrastructure and hospital capabilities. Meeting minutes from the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and UP-PGH were reviewed to describe the hospital's preparation and implementation process.

UP-PGH established an efficient, evidence-based ACS and AMI pathway. Hospital protocols, staffing, infrastructure and equipment were aligned to implement the PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package. Key steps included resources upgrade, stakeholder consultations, pathway redesign, workflow development, process alignment and monitoring systems.

The PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package can be successfully implemented in a tertiary hospital with catheterization laboratory. The documented process at UP-PGH can serve as a model for other institutions planning to utilize the package.

INTRODUCTION

The sudden designation as a COVID-19 Referral Center at the beginning of the pandemic brought about immense change to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (CCL) services of a National Referral Center for tertiary care. As a proactive strategy to determine actions that can be undertaken should an unforeseen event ever happen again, this study was done to explore the impact of COVID-19 to the institution’s CCL caseload, and to review the challenges, innovations and adjustments made by the CCL to become pandemic-capable and crisis-ready.

A qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted, with the first phase describing the CCL census starting from the baseline pre-COVID year of 2019 to the pandemic years of 2020-2022, and the second phase involving Key Informant Interviews (KII) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with the hospital and CCL healthcare staff.

The study revealed a large reduction in the urgent, elective and overall number of cases of the CCL in the first year, but has seen a steady increase in subsequent years. Surges of COVID variants were also seen to affect the CCL caseload. The following were noted to be the key elements in the CCL’s transformation to become COVID-19 capable: (a) changes in operations and patient selection, (b) appropriate use of PPE, (c) strict adherence to an infection control protocol, and (d) staffing modifications to reduce infectivity and protect staff availability.

The preparation of the hospital’s CCL to become a pandemic capable laboratory has been difficult and faced many challenges. However, the innovations and adjustments done through efforts and ingenuity of the CCL healthcare team allowed continuous delivery of the highest level of care to patients in spite of the changing pandemic landscape. These changes were duly documented as a basis for response to possible future global and/or national healthcare crises.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Heart Failure (HF) remains a major health concern worldwide. In the Philippine General Hospital (PGH), HF is consistently a top cause of mortality and readmissions among adults. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published guidelines for interventions that improve quality of life and survival, but they are underused and untested for local acceptability. Hospitals overseas used order sets created from these guidelines, which resulted in a considerable decrease in in-hospital mortality and healthcare costs. We aimed to develop an order set for adult patients with acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to the PGH Emergency Department (ED) to improve care outcomes.

This study utilized a mixed methods approach to create the AHF order set. ESC and ACC HF guidelines were appraised using the AGREE II tool. Class I interventions for AHF were included in the initial order set. Through focused group discussions (FGD), clinicians and other care team members involved in the management of AHF patients at PGH ED modified and validated the order set. Stakeholders were asked to use online Delphi and FGD to get a consensus on how to amend, approve, and carry out the order given.

Upon review of HF guidelines, 29 recommendations on patient monitoring, initial diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions were adopted in the order set. Orders on subspecialty referrals and ED disposition were introduced. The AHF patient was operationally defined in the setting of PGH ED. The clinical orders fit the PGH context, ensuring evidence-based, cost-effective, and accessible care responsiveness to patients’ needs and suitable for local practice. Workflow changes due to COVID-19 were considered. Potential barriers to implementation were identified and addressed. The final order set was adopted for implementation through stakeholder consensus.

The PGH developed and adopted its own AHF order set that is locally applicable and can potentially optimize outcomes of care.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of admission and mortality in a tertiary care hospital in the Philippines. The significant burden of the disease necessitates that evidence-based care set by international and local guidelines be met to improve service delivery and quality of care (QOC). Institution-specific QOC studies showed gaps between guideline recommendations and compliance. Development and utilization of a clinical pathway are among the identified strategies to improve compliance. It is also crucial for implementation of standard-of-care set specific to a hospital setting based on its needs and resources. METHODS: This is a descriptive research on the development of a clinical pathway for ACS appropriate for the emergency room setting of a tertiary care hospital from March 2021 to August 2022. Local QOC studies and evidence behind the latest international guideline recommendations on the management of ACS were reviewed to create the interim ACS Pathway. Two-level content validation of the interim pathway was done: internal validation with the consultants and fellows of the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and external validation through focused group discussions with different hospital units and stakeholders to assess applicability and feasibility based on the resources of the setting, identify hindrances, and propose solutions in its implementation. RESULTS: An evidence-based clinical pathway for ACS that encompasses identification and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome with judicious use of locally available and feasible resources applicable for local emergency room hospital setting was created. CONCLUSION Review of local QOC studies and interdepartmental collaboration are necessary components in developing institution-specific clinical pathway for ACS.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Critical Pathways ; Quality of Health Care

Background and Objectives: Heart Failure (HF) remains a major health concern worldwide. In the Philippine General Hospital (PGH), HF is consistently a top cause of mortality and readmissions among adults. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published guidelines for interventions that improve quality of life and survival, but they are underused and untested for local acceptability. Hospitals overseas used order sets created from these guidelines, which resulted in a considerable decrease in in-hospital mortality and healthcare costs. We aimed to develop an order set for adult patients with acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to the PGH Emergency Department (ED) to improve care outcomes. Methods: This study utilized a mixed methods approach to create the AHF order set. ESC and ACC HF guidelines were appraised using the AGREE II tool. Class I interventions for AHF were included in the initial order set. Through focused group discussions (FGD), clinicians and other care team members involved in the management of AHF patients at PGH ED modified and validated the order set. Stakeholders were asked to use online Delphi and FGD to get a consensus on how to amend, approve, and carry out the order given. Results: Upon review of HF guidelines, 29 recommendations on patient monitoring, initial diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions were adopted in the order set. Orders on subspecialty referrals and ED disposition were introduced. The AHF patient was operationally defined in the setting of PGH ED. The clinical orders fit the PGH context, ensuring evidence-based, cost-effective, and accessible care responsiveness to patients’ needs and suitable for local practice. Workflow changes due to COVID-19 were considered. Potential barriers to implementation were identified and addressed. The final order set was adopted for implementation through stakeholder consensus. Conclusion The PGH developed and adopted its own AHF order set that is locally applicable and can potentially optimize outcomes of care.
Quality Improvement ; Critical Pathways

Thyroid storm and thionamide-induced agranulocytosis are both rare and serious medical emergencies. We report a case of a patient in which these two rare events simultaneously occurred. A 33-year-old male, maintained on Methimazole for Graves’ Disease, presented with fever, throat pain, and uncontrolled thyrotoxic symptoms. Methimazole was promptly discontinued. Thyroid storm was alternatively treated with lithium, hydrocortisone, and propranolol. Agranulocytosis was managed supportively with GCSF and empiric antibiotics. Lithium was maintained until after radioablation. When thionamides are contraindicated, lithium is a viable option for the acute management of thyroid storm and a bridge to definitive therapy.
Methimazole ; Lithium