1.A comparative study on the operative outcomes of a novel technique of continuous versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Martinez Marlon P. ; Bisnar Carlo C. ; Letran Jason L.
Philippine Journal of Urology 2014;24(1):18-26
OBJECTIVE: Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is the most technically challenging part in open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORRP). Traditionally, it is accomplished using interrupted anastomotic sutures. The objective of this study is to describe our surgical technique of continuous VUA and compare its outcomes with that of interrupted VUA as performed by a single surgeon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 235 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent ORRP since February 2000 to June 2013 were included. They were divided into Group 1 (n=121) using interrupted VUA and Group 2 (n=114) using our technique of continuous VUA. Primary outcome measures to be evaluated include several operative parameters with respect to operative time, blood loss, anastomotic integrity, hospital stay, continence, potency and occurrence of VUA stenosis. Analysis was done using Welch's t-test and Fisher's exact test. All the statistical tests were performed using SPSS 20.0. P-values less than 0.05 indicate statistically significant difference.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent continuous VUA (Group 2) had significantly less operative time (210.05 ± 1.91 vs 251.37 ± 2.74 mins, P<0.001), anastomotic time (20.86 ± 0.49 vs 41.46 ± 0.58 mins, P<0.001), estimated blood loss (510.81 ±10.11 vs 623.89 ±26.60 ml, P<0.001), need for transfusion (7.89% vs 27.27%, P<0.001), number of days prior to drain removal (3.13 ± 0.05 vs 6.15 ± 0.11, P<0.001), number of days of hospital stay (3.44 ± 0.06 vs 6.36 ± 0.11, P<0.001), leakage per voiding cystourethrogram (0.88% vs 5.76%, P=0.035), number of days prior to urethral catheter removal (10.05 ± 0.12 vs 14.94 ± 0.2, P<0.001) and number of weeks to gain continence (7.05 ± 0.26 vs 12.46 ± 0.31, P<0.001). There were two cases of VUA stenosis for each of the two groups. There was no reported occurrence of pelvic infection, urinoma and acute urinary retention after catheter removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique of continuous VUA for ORRP provides better outcome compared to standard interrupted VUA.
Human ; Male ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Prostatectomy
2.A comparative study on the operative outcomes of a novel technique of continuous versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Marlon P. MARTINEZ ; Carlo C. BISNAR ; Jason L. LETRAN
Philippine Journal of Urology 2014;24(1):18-26
OBJECTIVE: Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is the most technically challenging part in open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORRP). Traditionally, it is accomplished using interrupted anastomotic sutures. The objective of this study is to describe our surgical technique of continuous VUA and compare its outcomes with that of interrupted VUA as performed by a single surgeon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 235 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent ORRP since February 2000 to June 2013 were included. They were divided into Group 1 (n=121) using interrupted VUA and Group 2 (n=114) using our technique of continuous VUA. Primary outcome measures to be evaluated include several operative parameters with respect to operative time, blood loss, anastomotic integrity, hospital stay, continence, potency and occurrence of VUA stenosis. Analysis was done using Welch's t-test and Fisher's exact test. All the statistical tests were performed using SPSS 20.0. P-values less than 0.05 indicate statistically significant difference.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent continuous VUA (Group 2) had significantly less operative time (210.05 ± 1.91 vs 251.37 ± 2.74 mins, P
Human
;
Male
;
Aged
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasms
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
Anastomosis, Surgical
;
Prostatectomy
3.First series of bladder reinnervation in the philippines: Setting a new trend in the treatment of spina bifida neurogenic voiding dysfunction.
David T. BOLONG ; Edgardo TAN ; Carlo C. BISNAR
Philippine Journal of Urology 2007;17(2):64-71
Neurogenic voiding dysfunction in spina bifida is a major problem affecting overall health and quality of life. Various approaches to restore normal voiding pattern have limited access. A newly developed technique called bladder reinnervation or artificial somatic-automatic reflex pathway provides an interesting alternative to traditional therapy. Microanastomosis of an intact lumbar ventral root to the third sacral ventral root is undertaken to bypass the pathological etiology of spina bifida. This intervention treats the cause of neurogenic voiding dysfunction and not just the end organ - the bladder. We present the initial results of the first four spina bifida patients who underwent bladder reinnervation in the Philippines and its effect on bladder capacity, detrussor pressure, bladder compliance, postvoid residual, bowel and bladder habits and prevention of urinary tract infection.
X
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail