Non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer worldwide, accounting for approximately 80%-85% of all lung cancer cases. Despite the clinical benefits of traditional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, challenges such as the high rate of postoperative recurrence and resistance of some patients to chemotherapy and targeted therapies limit their effectiveness, necessitating the exploration of more effective treatment options. In recent years, immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), has revolutionized NSCLC treatment and significantly improved the survival prognosis of some patients. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy is limited by tumor immune escape, drug resistance, and immune-related adverse events(irAEs), which have not been effectively addressed. Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), as a traditional therapeutic approach, has shown unique advantages in NSCLC treatment, with studies indicating its ability to enhance immune responses, regulate immune checkpoints, and improve the tumor microenvironment(TME), thus boosting the efficacy of immunotherapy. Additionally, the multi-target and multi-pathway effects of TCM help mitigate the side effects of immunotherapy, further improving efficacy and safety. This review summarizes the latest research progress of TCM in NSCLC immunotherapy, focusing on the research results of TCM in enhancing the effect of immunotherapy by regulating immune cells, optimizing the immune microenvironment, and being applied with ICIs, etc. The latest research progress of TCM in alleviating irAEs is also elucidated. The aim is to provide theoretical support for the clinical application of TCM in the prevention and treatment of NSCLC and the research and development of new drugs and promote the optimization and development of combined immunotherapy and TCM treatment models.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy* ; Lung Neoplasms/therapy* ; Immunotherapy/methods* ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use* ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Animals ; Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects*

Brain metastasis has emerged as a significant challenge in the comprehensive management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in those harboring driver gene mutations. Traditional treatments such as radiotherapy and surgery offer limited clinical benefits and are often accompanied by cognitive dysfunction and a decline in quality of life. In recent years, novel small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and other pathways have been developed, effectively penetrating the blood-brain barrier while enhancing intracranial drug concentrations and improving patient outcomes. This advancement has transformed the treatment landscape for brain metastases in NSCLC. Consequently, the Lung Cancer Medical Education Committee of the Chinese Medical Education Association and the Brain Metastasis Collaboration Group of the Lung Cancer Youth Expert Committee of the Beijing Medical Reward Foundation have jointly initiated and formulated the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Gene Alterations in China (2025 Edition). This guideline integrates the latest research findings with clinical experience, adhering to multidisciplinary treatment principles, and encompasses aspects such as diagnosis, timing of intervention, and systemic and local treatment options for driver gene positive NSCLC brain metastases. Additionally, it proposes individualized treatment strategies tailored to different driver gene types, aiming to provide clinicians with a reference to enhance the overall diagnostic and therapeutic standards for NSCLC brain metastases in China.
.
Humans ; Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology* ; China ; Lung Neoplasms/genetics*

The mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) gene, located on human chromosome 7, plays a crucial role in the regulation of physiological processes such as cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis. The MET gene is one of the key drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with various forms of abnormalities including MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations, MET gene amplification, MET fusions, MET protein overexpression, MET activating mutations and etc. With an increasing understanding of the mechanisms underlying MET abnormalities, therapeutic strategies targeting these abnormalities have gained significant attention, and numerous studies have confirmed that NSCLC patients with MET abnormalities can derive substantial benefits from such treatments. Lung Cancer Specialty Committee of Chinese Elderly Health Care Association organized a panel of experts to provide professional recommendations on current clinical issues in the diagnosis and treatment of MET-aberrant NSCLC, combining clinical practice experiences and evidence-based medical evidences. The "Expert Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment of NSCLC with MET Abnormalities (2025 Version)" has been formulated to provide standardized guidances for clinical practice in China, with the aim of optimizing the treatment outcomes.
.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/metabolism* ; Consensus ; Mutation

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the cornerstone of treatment for driver gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance is inevitable, and the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Histological transformation is a rare but emerging cause of acquired resistance to immunotherapy, with only sporadic case reports documented to date. Here, we report the first case of lung adenocarcinoma that underwent histological transformation to atypical carcinoid following first-line therapy with ICIs combined with chemotherapy, highlighting the critical role of histological lineage switching in mediating NSCLC resistance to ICIs. Notably, the patient harbored a rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion mutation. Subsequent targeted therapy with Selpercatinib after histological transformation demonstrated favorable efficacy, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy for atypical carcinoid patients with co-occurring rare driver mutations. This case provides a potential therapeutic option for atypical carcinoid patients with rare mutations.
.
Humans ; Carcinoid Tumor/drug therapy* ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/immunology* ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Immunotherapy ; Lung Neoplasms/immunology* ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics* ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret/genetics*

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies play a pivotal role in the comprehensive treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) generally exhibits a more favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy compared with lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). The aim of this study is to elucidate how baseline cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated endothelial cells (TAECs) influence the differential therapeutic outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment in SCC versus ADC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected pretreatment biopsy samples from 104 patients with stage II-III NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NAIC) at Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023. Tissue microarrays were constructed using an automated arrayer, and multiplex immunofluorescence staining (α-SMA/CD31/CK/DAPI) was performed to identify CAFs (α-SMA+/CK-) and TAECs (CD31+/CK-). Quantitative analyses included CAFs and TAECs densities, the nearest neighbor distance (NND) between CAFs and TAECs, and their spatial proximity (30 μm). Differences in major pathological response (MPR) between groups, defined as residual viable tumor cells ≤10% in resected specimens after neoadjuvant therapy, were assessed using the χ² test. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to analyze intergroup differences in quantitative indicators, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of immune-related markers for MPR in the NAIC cohort. RESULTS: Among the 104 NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, 35 underwent NAIC and 69 received NAC. Overall, patients with SCC were more likely to achieve MPR compared with those with ADC (50.0% vs 22.4%, P=0.006). This trend persisted in the NAIC subgroup (72.7% vs 30.8%, P=0.038), whereas no significant difference in MPR rates was observed between SCC and ADC in the NAC subgroup. At baseline, prior to NAIC or NAC, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expression, CAFs and TAECs densities, CAFs-TAECs NND, and CAFs-TAECs proximity (30 μm) showed no significant differences between SCC and ADC. In patients with SCC receiving NAIC, baseline PD-L1/PD-1 expression, CAFs density, and TAECs density showed not significant differences between MPR and NMPR groups. However, the CAFs-TAECs distance was significantly greater in the MPR group (NND: 31.2 vs 24.7 μm, P=0.038), and the number of TAECs within 30 μm of CAFs was significantly lower (proximity: 1.1 vs 3.6, P=0.038). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that low TAECs density was associated with MPR following NAIC (OR=36.00, 95%CI: 2.68-1486.88, P=0.019). Furthermore, ROC analysis demonstrated that baseline CAFs-TAECs NND and proximity (30 μm) exhibited strong predictive performance for MPR in SCC patients treated with NAIC, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893, sensitivity of 0.857, and specificity of 1.000. CONCLUSIONS CAFs are more spatially distant from TAECs and more prone to MPR after NAIC in SCC, which may be related to the reduced interaction of CAFs with TAECs and reduced tumor-associated angiogenesis.
Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/therapy* ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Endothelial Cells/drug effects* ; Aged ; Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/drug effects* ; Immunotherapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy* ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy* ; Adult

Lung cancer stands as the primary cause of cancer-related mortalities globally, presenting a severe menace to human health. In individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations serve as crucial oncogenic drivers. NSCLC with KRASG12C mutation is among the most prevalent subtypes. Currently, the detection methods for KRAS mutations predominantly concentrate on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing platforms. The diverse derivative technologies of these two platforms each exhibit distinct merits and demerits in terms of testing performance and detection throughput, and find significant applications in tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy. In targeted therapies, KRASG12C targeted drugs, including Sotorasib, Adagrasib, Fulzerasib, Garsorasib, and Glecirasib, have demonstrated certain therapeutic efficacies in clinical trials and have obtained marketing approval. To tackle drug resistance and enhance patient's prognoses, combination therapeutic strategies that integrate targeted agents with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2) inhibitors, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies have emerged. This paper systematically reviews the advancements in the diagnosis and targeted therapy of NSCLC with KRASG12C mutation, aiming to offer a reference for the selection of clinical treatment regimens and subsequent research.
.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics* ; Mutation ; Molecular Targeted Therapy

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), a novel class of antineoplastic agents, combines tumor-specific targeting with potent cytotoxic activity. In recent years, ADC has achieved notable advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly within therapeutic sequencing after failure of first-line therapy or the emergence of resistance. This paper will systematically review the efficacy and safety evidence of representative ADC in NSCLC, and further to discuss progress and challenges in ADC structural optimization, toxicity management, biomarker identification, and combination strategies, aiming to provide a comprehensive theoretical foundation and practical reference for clinical practice and future research.
.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy* ; Immunoconjugates/chemistry* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects* ; Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry*

BACKGROUND: Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to bring survival benefits to patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations in PACIFIC study (evaluating durvalumab in patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC who did not have disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy). We aimed to explore whether locally advanced inoperable patients with EGFR mutations benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the optimal treatment regimen. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 31, 2022 and performed a meta-analysis based on a Bayesian framework, with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 1156 patients were identified in 16 studies that included 6 treatment measures, including CRT, CRT followed by durvalumab (CRT-Durva), TKI monotherapy, radiotherapy combined with TKI (RT-TKI), CRT combined with TKI (CRT-TKI), and TKI combined with durvalumab (TKI-Durva). The PFS of patients treated with TKI-containing regimens was significantly longer than that of patients treated with TKI-free regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.66). The PFS of TKI monotherapy was significantly longer than that of CRT (HR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.50-0.87) but shorter than RT-TKI (HR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.17-2.67). Furthermore, the PFS of RT-TKI or CRT-TKI were both significantly longer than that of CRT or CRT-Durva. RT-TKI ranked first in the Bayesian ranking, with the longest OS (60.8 months, 95% CI = 37.2-84.3 months) and the longest PFS (21.5 months, 95% CI, 15.4-27.5 months) in integrated analysis. CONCLUSIONS: For unresectable stage III EGFR mutant NSCLC, RT and TKI are both essential. Based on the current evidence, RT-TKI brings a superior survival advantage, while CRT-TKI needs further estimation. Large randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to explore the appropriate application sequences of TKI, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. REGISTRATION PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; No. CRD42022298490.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy* ; ErbB Receptors/genetics* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Mutation/genetics* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use*

The study investigated the effect of casticin on the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) H322 cells and explored its molecular mechanism. Firstly, the cell counting kit-8(CCK-8) assay, colony formation assay, and EdU assay were used to detect the effect of casticin on the proliferation capacity of H322 cells under different concentrations and treatment durations. Then, glucose uptake, lactate production, extracellular pH, and oxygen consumption of H322 cells were measured before and after casticin treatment to analyze its impact on glycolysis in NSCLC H322 cells. Finally, real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR(RT-qPCR) and Western blot assays were performed to explore glycolysis-related molecules affected by casticin. The experiments showed that casticin inhibited the proliferation of NSCLC H322 cells in a dose-and time-dependent manner, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations(IC_(50)) of 28.64 and 19.41 μmol·L~(-1) after 48 and 72 hours of treatment, respectively. Casticin also inhibited glucose uptake and lactate production in H322 cells, while increasing extracellular pH and oxygen consumption. Further investigation revealed that casticin inhibited the expression of glycolysis-related molecules, including glucose transporter 1(GLUT1), hexokinase 2(HK2), aldolase A(ALDOA), pyruvate kinase M2(PKM2), and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α(HIF-1α). Overexpression of HIF-1α was found to reverse the inhibitory effects of casticin on H322 cell proliferation and glycolysis. These findings suggest that casticin may regulate cellular glycolysis by inhibiting the expression of HIF-1α, thereby inhibiting the proliferation of NSCLC H322 cells. This study identifies a potential drug for the treatment of NSCLC and provides a direction for further research.
Humans ; Cell Proliferation/drug effects* ; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/genetics* ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/physiopathology* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Glucose/metabolism* ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Glycolysis/drug effects*

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide, with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the majority of cases. Patients with NSCLC have achieved great survival benefits from immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently used for palliation of cancer-associated symptoms, as supportive care for non-cancer-associated symptoms, and for management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and prognostic significance of glucocorticoid use in advanced patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: The study searched publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database up to March 1st, 2022, and conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effects of glucocorticoid use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs through the available data. The study calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: This study included data from 25 literatures that were mainly retrospective, with 8713 patients included. Patients taking GCs had a higher risk for tumor progression and death compared with those not taking GCs (PFS: HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33-1.86, P <0.001; OS: HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.41-1.88, P <0.001). GCs used for cancer-associated symptoms caused an obviously negative effect on both PFS and OS (PFS: HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29, P <0.001; OS: HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.52-2.04, P <0.001). However, GCs used for irAEs management did not negatively affect prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-1.00, P = 0.050; OS: HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.83, P = 0.005), and GCs used for non-cancer-associated indications had no effect on prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.63-1.32, P = 0.640; OS: HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.59-1.41, P = 0.680). CONCLUSIONS In advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, the use of GCs for palliation of cancer-associated symptoms may result in a worse PFS and OS, indicating that they increase the risk of tumor progression and death. But, in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, the use of GCs for the management of irAEs may be safe, and the use of GCs for the treatment of non-cancer-associated symptoms may not affect the ICIs' survival benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to be careful and evaluate indications rationally before administering GCs in individualized clinical management.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy* ; Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies