Objective:To investigate the effects of preoperative enteral nutrition on nutrition-related complications and gastrointestinal function in esophageal cancer patients by administering EN before surgery.Methods:A total of 215 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy at Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Among them, 145 patients received enteral nutrition preconditioning, while 70 patients received traditional nutritional support. The nutritional risk was assessed according to the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002), and the patients were categorized into non-nutritional risk group (NRS2002<3) and nutritional risk group (NRS2002≥3). Patients in the traditional nutritional support group with NRS2002<3 were provided with a regular diet three days prior to surgery, whereas those with NRS2002≥3 received intravenous fat emulsion amino acid glucose for nutritional support. In the enteral nutrition preconditioning group, patients with NRS2002<3 received 500 mL/d of enteral nutrition suspension orally in addition to their regular diet for 3 days preoperatively; those with NRS2002≥3 received received 1000 mL/d of enteral nutrition suspension orally or via gastric tube. Postoperative hospital stay, time to gas passage and defecation, hospital expenses, gastrointestinal dysfunction incidence including diarrhea, abdominal distension and constipation, postoperative routine blood indicators, anastomotic fistula occurrence as well as infectious complications such as pneumonia and wound infection were compared between groups. Measurement data with normal distribution was expressed as Mean±SD, independent sample t-test was used on comparison between groups. Counting data was expressed as case(%), χ2 test was used on comparison between groups, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results:The incidence of anastomotic leakage and infectious complications in the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group was 4.83% (7/145) and 4.83% (7/145), respectively, showing no statistically significant differences compared to the traditional nutrition support group [2.86% (2/70) and 8.57% (6/70)] ( χ2=0.46 and 1.16, P=0.499 and 0.280, respectively). The incidences of gastrointestinal dysfunction and overall complications in the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group were 5.52% (8/145) and 13.10% (19/145), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the traditional nutrition support group [37.14% (26/70) and 45.71% (32/70)] ( χ2=35.47 and 27.75, both P<0.001). Postoperative outcomes in the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group, including hospital stay (14.05±3.75 days), time to first flatus (25.75±5.03 hours), time to first defecation (49.25±5.98 hours), and hospitalization costs (85,200±13,500 CNY), were significantly better than those in the traditional nutrition support group [(16.46±4.79 days, 31.53±6.55 hours, 63.45±11.43 hours, and 93,500±20,100 CNY)] ( t=3.70, 6.52, 9.77, and 3.17, all P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in routine postoperative blood tests between the two groups (all P>0.05). Stratified analysis revealed that among patients with preoperative nutritional risk, the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group demonstrated superior outcomes in hospitalization costs (82,300±11,000 CNY), time to first flatus (26.17±5.69 hours), time to first defecation (50.31±5.59 hours), overall complication rate (15.79%), and gastrointestinal dysfunction rate (7.89%) compared to the traditional nutrition support group [100,800±28,800 CNY, 31.42±6.29 hours, 60.80±9.89 hours, 54.55%, and 40.91%] ( t=2.89, P=0.008; t=3.32, P=0.002; t=4.57, P<0.001; χ2=9.97, P=0.002; χ2=9.49, P=0.002). Similarly, among patients without preoperative nutritional risk, the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group showed better results in hospital stay (13.69±3.83 days), time to first flatus (25.60±4.80 hours), time to first defecation (48.87±6.10 hours), overall complication rate (12.15%), and gastrointestinal dysfunction rate (4.67%) compared to the traditional nutrition support group [16.60±4.36 days, 31.58±6.73 hours, 64.67±11.98 hours, 41.67%, and 35.42%] ( t=4.19, t=5.56, t=8.65, χ2=17.23, χ2=25.72, all P<0.001). Conclusion:Enteral nutrition pre-adaptation positively impacts post-esophagectomy nutrition-related complications and gastrointestinal dysfunction.nutrtional support before surgery can't be neglected.

Objective:To investigate the effects of preoperative enteral nutrition on nutrition-related complications and gastrointestinal function in esophageal cancer patients by administering EN before surgery.Methods:A total of 215 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy at Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Among them, 145 patients received enteral nutrition preconditioning, while 70 patients received traditional nutritional support. The nutritional risk was assessed according to the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002), and the patients were categorized into non-nutritional risk group (NRS2002<3) and nutritional risk group (NRS2002≥3). Patients in the traditional nutritional support group with NRS2002<3 were provided with a regular diet three days prior to surgery, whereas those with NRS2002≥3 received intravenous fat emulsion amino acid glucose for nutritional support. In the enteral nutrition preconditioning group, patients with NRS2002<3 received 500 mL/d of enteral nutrition suspension orally in addition to their regular diet for 3 days preoperatively; those with NRS2002≥3 received received 1000 mL/d of enteral nutrition suspension orally or via gastric tube. Postoperative hospital stay, time to gas passage and defecation, hospital expenses, gastrointestinal dysfunction incidence including diarrhea, abdominal distension and constipation, postoperative routine blood indicators, anastomotic fistula occurrence as well as infectious complications such as pneumonia and wound infection were compared between groups. Measurement data with normal distribution was expressed as Mean±SD, independent sample t-test was used on comparison between groups. Counting data was expressed as case(%), χ2 test was used on comparison between groups, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results:The incidence of anastomotic leakage and infectious complications in the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group was 4.83% (7/145) and 4.83% (7/145), respectively, showing no statistically significant differences compared to the traditional nutrition support group [2.86% (2/70) and 8.57% (6/70)] ( χ2=0.46 and 1.16, P=0.499 and 0.280, respectively). The incidences of gastrointestinal dysfunction and overall complications in the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group were 5.52% (8/145) and 13.10% (19/145), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the traditional nutrition support group [37.14% (26/70) and 45.71% (32/70)] ( χ2=35.47 and 27.75, both P<0.001). Postoperative outcomes in the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group, including hospital stay (14.05±3.75 days), time to first flatus (25.75±5.03 hours), time to first defecation (49.25±5.98 hours), and hospitalization costs (85,200±13,500 CNY), were significantly better than those in the traditional nutrition support group [(16.46±4.79 days, 31.53±6.55 hours, 63.45±11.43 hours, and 93,500±20,100 CNY)] ( t=3.70, 6.52, 9.77, and 3.17, all P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in routine postoperative blood tests between the two groups (all P>0.05). Stratified analysis revealed that among patients with preoperative nutritional risk, the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group demonstrated superior outcomes in hospitalization costs (82,300±11,000 CNY), time to first flatus (26.17±5.69 hours), time to first defecation (50.31±5.59 hours), overall complication rate (15.79%), and gastrointestinal dysfunction rate (7.89%) compared to the traditional nutrition support group [100,800±28,800 CNY, 31.42±6.29 hours, 60.80±9.89 hours, 54.55%, and 40.91%] ( t=2.89, P=0.008; t=3.32, P=0.002; t=4.57, P<0.001; χ2=9.97, P=0.002; χ2=9.49, P=0.002). Similarly, among patients without preoperative nutritional risk, the enteral nutrition pre-adaptation group showed better results in hospital stay (13.69±3.83 days), time to first flatus (25.60±4.80 hours), time to first defecation (48.87±6.10 hours), overall complication rate (12.15%), and gastrointestinal dysfunction rate (4.67%) compared to the traditional nutrition support group [16.60±4.36 days, 31.58±6.73 hours, 64.67±11.98 hours, 41.67%, and 35.42%] ( t=4.19, t=5.56, t=8.65, χ2=17.23, χ2=25.72, all P<0.001). Conclusion:Enteral nutrition pre-adaptation positively impacts post-esophagectomy nutrition-related complications and gastrointestinal dysfunction.nutrtional support before surgery can't be neglected.

Objective To explore the impact of blood-activatingand qi-nourishing therapy on the hypercoagulable state of rats after femur fracture.Methods One hundred and twenty SD rats were randomly divided into 4 groups,namely normal group,model group,low-molecular-weight heparin(LMWH) group,combination group (LMWH + Tongmai Decoction),30 rats in each group.The rat model of femur fracture was established.After successful modeling,LMWH group was given subcutaneous injection of LMWH 600 U/kg,and the combination group was given subcutaneous injection of LMWH 600 U/kg together with gastric gavage of Tongmai Decoction,the model group was given subcutaneous injection of the same volume of normal saline.The treatment lasted for 1-7 days after the surgery.The pathologic features of the left great saphenous vein were observed by HE staining method,and the relative volume,thickness and quantity of the blood vessels were also measured.The plasma D-dimer (D-D) and fibrinogen (FIB) levels were determined by biochemical analyzer,and the plasma levels of whole blood viscosity at low shear rate (WBV-lsr) and whole blood viscosity at high shear rate (WBV-hsr) were measured with hemodynamic detector.Results On day 7 after the modeling,less endothelium cells,agglomerative red cells,and large thrombi were found in the great saphenous vein tissue section of the model group under microscope.Compared with the normal group,the levels of D-D,FIB,WBV-lsr and WBV-hsr in the model group at various time points were increased,the difference being significant (P ＜ 0.05).After 7-day treatment,the levels of D-D,FIB,WBV-lsr and WBV-hsr in LMWH group and combination group were lower than those of the odel group,and the decrease in the combination group was superior to LMWH group(P ＜ 0.05).The blood vessel endothelium cells in the combination group were arranged neatly with same cellular width while without enlargement or swelling,the effect being superior to that of LMWH group.Conclusion Blood-activating and Qi-nourishing therapy can effectively relieve hypercoagulable state of rats after femur fracture.