Objective To investigate the potential profile of self-management behavior in patients with sudden deafness,the characteristics and influencing factors of different categories of patients,and provide reference for clin-ical management.Methods A total of 205 patients with sudden deafness who were hospitalized in the Department of Otology of a Grade 3 hospital in Beijing were selected by convenience sampling method from August 2023 to June 2024.Date were collected using the general situation questionnaire,self-management status assessment scale for sudden deafness patient and social support rating scale.Mplus 8.0 was used for potential profile analysis,and SPSS 26.0 was used for single factor analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis.Results A total of 200 valid ques-tionnaires were collected.Patients were divided into 3 categories according to their self-management level,which were respectively named as"high management—good self-efficacy group"(n=52,26.00％),"moderate manage-ment—symptoms of special concern group"(n=101,50.50％),and"low management-lack of information acquisi-tion group"(n=47,23.50％).Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that education level,sleep disorder and social support level were the influencing factors of different self-management categories in patients with sudden deaf-ness.Conclusion The overall self-management ability of patients with sudden deafness is at a moderate level and with significant heterogeneity.Education level,sleep disorders,and social support serve as stratification criteria for categorizing different patient groups and formulating corresponding intervention strategies.Priority should be given to providing information support to the"low-management group with information deficiency",implementing targe-ted interventions for the"moderate-management group with symptom focus",and fully leveraging the self-efficacy of the"high-management group with good self-efficacy"to regulate their self-management level.

Objectives:To describe the use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering drugs, and evaluate the effects on blood pressure, blood glucose and blood lipids controls required by Chinese Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases (the guideline) in a community-based cohort of individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease. To analyze the association of the uses of antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering drugs, and the comprehensive control of blood pressure, blood glucose and blood lipids with cardiovascular disease. Methods:From the CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY), those who were at high risk for cardiovascular disease and aged 40-75 years as of January 1, 2013 in in Yinzhou District of Ningbo, Zhejiang Province were selected as study subjects. The information about their antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering drug uses between 2013 and 2015 was collected, and blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid measurements were conducted during the follow-up. The study constructed two kinds of comprehensive scores: the comprehensive medication score based on the guideline requirement for the treatment of hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia, dividing the study participants into the compliancy group and non-compliancy group; and the comprehensive control score based on the guideline requirement for blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipids control, dividing the study participants into better control group, moderate control group, and poor control group. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the association of the comprehensive medication score and comprehensive control score with cardiovascular disease. The incidence data of cardiovascular disease were collected from January 1, 2015 (baseline time) to August 31, 2020 (follow up end time).Results:A total of 79 734 participants at high risk for cardiovascular disease were included in the study, in whom 68.4%, 27.4%, and 4.2% had 1, 2, or 3 cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia), respectively. In the participants with hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia from 2013 to 2015, the proportions of those who had two years of medication compliancy records were 66.0%, 67.4%, and 13.9%, respectively. In the hypertension patients, 59.2% had better blood pressure control, in the diabetes patients, 28.7% had better blood glucose control, and in the patients with hyperlipidemia, 27.4% had better blood lipid control. After a median follow-up of 5.66 years, 4 088 cardiovascular disease cases or deaths occurred. After multivariate adjustment, compared with the non-compliancy group, the compliancy group had lower risk for cardiovascular disease ( HR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96). Compared with the better control group, the poor control group had an increased risk for cardiovascular disease ( HR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.53-1.81). In the moderate control group, the risk increased significantly in the diabetes patients ( HR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.56), while no additional risk for cardiovascular disease was observed in non-diabetes patients ( HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16). Conclusions:Compliancy to the medication required by the guideline is associated with lower risk for cardiovascular disease. However, it is still necessary to improve the medication compliancy in people at high risk in primary prevention, especially in the patients with hyperlipidemia, due to their low taking rate of lipid-lowering drugs. Additionally, as the requirement of the guideline becomes more stringent, the management of disease has met more challenges. Notably, diabetes patients who have not met the guideline requirement are at high risk for cardiovascular disease, to whom the disease management should be strengthened.

Objectives:To describe the use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering drugs, and evaluate the effects on blood pressure, blood glucose and blood lipids controls required by Chinese Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases (the guideline) in a community-based cohort of individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease. To analyze the association of the uses of antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering drugs, and the comprehensive control of blood pressure, blood glucose and blood lipids with cardiovascular disease. Methods:From the CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY), those who were at high risk for cardiovascular disease and aged 40-75 years as of January 1, 2013 in in Yinzhou District of Ningbo, Zhejiang Province were selected as study subjects. The information about their antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering drug uses between 2013 and 2015 was collected, and blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid measurements were conducted during the follow-up. The study constructed two kinds of comprehensive scores: the comprehensive medication score based on the guideline requirement for the treatment of hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia, dividing the study participants into the compliancy group and non-compliancy group; and the comprehensive control score based on the guideline requirement for blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipids control, dividing the study participants into better control group, moderate control group, and poor control group. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the association of the comprehensive medication score and comprehensive control score with cardiovascular disease. The incidence data of cardiovascular disease were collected from January 1, 2015 (baseline time) to August 31, 2020 (follow up end time).Results:A total of 79 734 participants at high risk for cardiovascular disease were included in the study, in whom 68.4%, 27.4%, and 4.2% had 1, 2, or 3 cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia), respectively. In the participants with hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia from 2013 to 2015, the proportions of those who had two years of medication compliancy records were 66.0%, 67.4%, and 13.9%, respectively. In the hypertension patients, 59.2% had better blood pressure control, in the diabetes patients, 28.7% had better blood glucose control, and in the patients with hyperlipidemia, 27.4% had better blood lipid control. After a median follow-up of 5.66 years, 4 088 cardiovascular disease cases or deaths occurred. After multivariate adjustment, compared with the non-compliancy group, the compliancy group had lower risk for cardiovascular disease ( HR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96). Compared with the better control group, the poor control group had an increased risk for cardiovascular disease ( HR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.53-1.81). In the moderate control group, the risk increased significantly in the diabetes patients ( HR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.56), while no additional risk for cardiovascular disease was observed in non-diabetes patients ( HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16). Conclusions:Compliancy to the medication required by the guideline is associated with lower risk for cardiovascular disease. However, it is still necessary to improve the medication compliancy in people at high risk in primary prevention, especially in the patients with hyperlipidemia, due to their low taking rate of lipid-lowering drugs. Additionally, as the requirement of the guideline becomes more stringent, the management of disease has met more challenges. Notably, diabetes patients who have not met the guideline requirement are at high risk for cardiovascular disease, to whom the disease management should be strengthened.

This article analyzes the shortcomings of the traditional administrative ward rounds model in public hospitals and explores the innovative use of the comprehensive ward rounds model as an important tool to strengthen the party's comprehen-sive leadership over public hospitals and promote high-quality hospital development.By optimizing organizational leadership and selecting appropriate ward round targets,optimizing content indicators and designing scientific processes,optimizing information feedback and timely tracking and supervising,and optimizing evaluation and assessment while emphasizing the use of results,the comprehensive ward rounds model aims to address key and challenging issues that affect the medical experience of the people and the sustainable development of hospitals.It aims to break down the barriers to cross-organizational and cross-level business collab-oration,further improve the modern management system of hospitals,support the optimization and strengthening of departments,fundamentally enhance the quality of medical services,and empower the high-quality development of hospitals.

Objective To investigate the potential profile of self-management behavior in patients with sudden deafness,the characteristics and influencing factors of different categories of patients,and provide reference for clin-ical management.Methods A total of 205 patients with sudden deafness who were hospitalized in the Department of Otology of a Grade 3 hospital in Beijing were selected by convenience sampling method from August 2023 to June 2024.Date were collected using the general situation questionnaire,self-management status assessment scale for sudden deafness patient and social support rating scale.Mplus 8.0 was used for potential profile analysis,and SPSS 26.0 was used for single factor analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis.Results A total of 200 valid ques-tionnaires were collected.Patients were divided into 3 categories according to their self-management level,which were respectively named as"high management—good self-efficacy group"(n=52,26.00％),"moderate manage-ment—symptoms of special concern group"(n=101,50.50％),and"low management-lack of information acquisi-tion group"(n=47,23.50％).Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that education level,sleep disorder and social support level were the influencing factors of different self-management categories in patients with sudden deaf-ness.Conclusion The overall self-management ability of patients with sudden deafness is at a moderate level and with significant heterogeneity.Education level,sleep disorders,and social support serve as stratification criteria for categorizing different patient groups and formulating corresponding intervention strategies.Priority should be given to providing information support to the"low-management group with information deficiency",implementing targe-ted interventions for the"moderate-management group with symptom focus",and fully leveraging the self-efficacy of the"high-management group with good self-efficacy"to regulate their self-management level.

This article analyzes the shortcomings of the traditional administrative ward rounds model in public hospitals and explores the innovative use of the comprehensive ward rounds model as an important tool to strengthen the party's comprehen-sive leadership over public hospitals and promote high-quality hospital development.By optimizing organizational leadership and selecting appropriate ward round targets,optimizing content indicators and designing scientific processes,optimizing information feedback and timely tracking and supervising,and optimizing evaluation and assessment while emphasizing the use of results,the comprehensive ward rounds model aims to address key and challenging issues that affect the medical experience of the people and the sustainable development of hospitals.It aims to break down the barriers to cross-organizational and cross-level business collab-oration,further improve the modern management system of hospitals,support the optimization and strengthening of departments,fundamentally enhance the quality of medical services,and empower the high-quality development of hospitals.

Objective:To explore the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the relationship to efficacy of camrelizumab in treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Clinical data of patients with NSCLC who received camrelizumab in at the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from December 2020 to December 2022 were collected, and the efficacy of camrelizumab and the occurrence of irAEs were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into irAEs group and non-irAEs group according to whether they developed irAEs. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the 2 groups were compared.Results:A total of 48 patients were entered in the analysis, including 41 males (85.4%) and 7 females (14.6%), with an age of (65.9±7.4) years; the median treatment cycle was 9 (6, 14); the overall ORR was 52.1% (25/48), the DCR was 83.3% (40/48), and the median PFS was 11 months. Among the 48 patients, 34 patients (70.8%) had 59 times of irAEs, of which 8 patients (16.7%) had at least one irAE of grade ≥3. The median time of irAEs occurrence was 5 (3, 7) treatment cycles. The irAEs with an incidence of >10% included reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP), thyroid injury, skin injury, lung injury, liver injury, and blood toxicity, with the incidences of 37.5% (18/48), 18.8 (9/48), 16.7% (8/48), 12.5% (6/48), 10.4% (5/48), and 10.4% (5/48), respectively. Compared with non-irAEs group, patients in the irAEs group had higher ORR and DCR [64.7% (22/34) vs. 3/14, 91.2% (31/34) vs. 9/14] and longer median PFS (12.0 months vs. 7.0 months, hazard ratio=0.418, 95% confidence interval: 0.193-0.905), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions:The common irAEs of camrelizumab in treatment for patients with NSCLC was RCCEP, and fewer serious irAEs occurs. To a certain extent, patients who experience irAEs during camrelizumab treatment may predict a more pronounced therapeutic response.

Objective:To explore the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the relationship to efficacy of camrelizumab in treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Clinical data of patients with NSCLC who received camrelizumab in at the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from December 2020 to December 2022 were collected, and the efficacy of camrelizumab and the occurrence of irAEs were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into irAEs group and non-irAEs group according to whether they developed irAEs. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the 2 groups were compared.Results:A total of 48 patients were entered in the analysis, including 41 males (85.4%) and 7 females (14.6%), with an age of (65.9±7.4) years; the median treatment cycle was 9 (6, 14); the overall ORR was 52.1% (25/48), the DCR was 83.3% (40/48), and the median PFS was 11 months. Among the 48 patients, 34 patients (70.8%) had 59 times of irAEs, of which 8 patients (16.7%) had at least one irAE of grade ≥3. The median time of irAEs occurrence was 5 (3, 7) treatment cycles. The irAEs with an incidence of >10% included reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP), thyroid injury, skin injury, lung injury, liver injury, and blood toxicity, with the incidences of 37.5% (18/48), 18.8 (9/48), 16.7% (8/48), 12.5% (6/48), 10.4% (5/48), and 10.4% (5/48), respectively. Compared with non-irAEs group, patients in the irAEs group had higher ORR and DCR [64.7% (22/34) vs. 3/14, 91.2% (31/34) vs. 9/14] and longer median PFS (12.0 months vs. 7.0 months, hazard ratio=0.418, 95% confidence interval: 0.193-0.905), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions:The common irAEs of camrelizumab in treatment for patients with NSCLC was RCCEP, and fewer serious irAEs occurs. To a certain extent, patients who experience irAEs during camrelizumab treatment may predict a more pronounced therapeutic response.

Cannabis is a traditional industrial crop that has been used for thousands of years for medicines， foods， and textiles. Due to its active components， cannabis has attracted extensive attention in the pharmaceutical industry at home and abroad. Currently， 55 countries around the world have legalized medical marijuana， and two provinces in China， Yunnan and Heilongjiang， can legally cultivate and process industrial hemp. However， the low content of cannabidiol （CBD） in industrial hemp is not conducive to subsequent development and research. Based on this， the author took medicinal cannabis， defined by CHEN Shilin′s team as tetrahydrocannabinol （THC） content<0.3% and high CBD content， as the research object， and reviewed four aspects of the active ingredients of medicinal cannabis， the isolation and purification technology of CBD， the development and application of cannabinoid-related products and the breeding methods of medicinal cannabis. Through combing， it is suggested that subsequent research should focus on excavation of genes of CBD synthesis， molecular breeding of evolutionary cannabis by gene editing technology， development of green extraction process， discovery of more active ingredients， and high yield of CBD through synthetic biology and cell-free system， with a view to provide reference for the development and application of medicinal cannabis in China.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumor in adults and is poorly controlled. Previous studies have shown that both macrophages and angiogenesis play significant roles in GBM progression, and co-targeting of CSF1R and VEGFR is likely to be an effective strategy for GBM treatment. Therefore, this study developed a novel and selective inhibitor of CSF1R and VEGFR, SYHA1813, possessing potent antitumor activity against GBM. SYHA1813 inhibited VEGFR and CSF1R kinase activities with high potency and selectivity and thus blocked the cell viability of HUVECs and macrophages and exhibited anti-angiogenetic effects both in vitro and in vivo. SYHA1813 also displayed potent in vivo antitumor activity against GBM in immune-competent and immune-deficient mouse models, including temozolomide (TMZ) insensitive tumors. Notably, SYHA1813 could penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and prolong the survival time of mice bearing intracranial GBM xenografts. Moreover, SYHA1813 treatment resulted in a synergistic antitumor efficacy in combination with the PD-1 antibody. As a clinical proof of concept, SYHA1813 achieved confirmed responses in patients with recurrent GBM in an ongoing first-in-human phase I trial. The data of this study support the rationale for an ongoing phase I clinical study (ChiCTR2100045380).