Objective: Deficits in social cognition (mentalization) and other cognitive deficits have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and may influence treatment response. This study examined the impact of cognitive function on treatment response of patients with MDD after 8 weeks of medication and whether the impact was mediated by mentalization. Methods: Cognitive function (memory, attention, executive function, processing speed) and mentalization were measured in 28 patients with MDD at baseline using neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. The treatment response was defined as the rate of improvement in symptom severity and global function. Results: Multiple regression analyses, controlling for mentalization and cognitive function, separately revealed that delayed recall was a negative predictor of functional improvement after 8 weeks of treatment, while mentalization was a positive predictor. A single mediation model using PROCESS macro showed that delayed recall and Digit Span backward indirectly affected functional improvement, mediated by mentalization. When age at onset was controlled for as a covariate, the mediating effect lost significance, and the direct effect of delayed recall on functional improvement was still significant. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, our results provide evidence that patients with MDD and low memory (delayed recall) at baseline may benefit more from short-term pharmacological treatments.

Objective: Deficits in social cognition (mentalization) and other cognitive deficits have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and may influence treatment response. This study examined the impact of cognitive function on treatment response of patients with MDD after 8 weeks of medication and whether the impact was mediated by mentalization. Methods: Cognitive function (memory, attention, executive function, processing speed) and mentalization were measured in 28 patients with MDD at baseline using neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. The treatment response was defined as the rate of improvement in symptom severity and global function. Results: Multiple regression analyses, controlling for mentalization and cognitive function, separately revealed that delayed recall was a negative predictor of functional improvement after 8 weeks of treatment, while mentalization was a positive predictor. A single mediation model using PROCESS macro showed that delayed recall and Digit Span backward indirectly affected functional improvement, mediated by mentalization. When age at onset was controlled for as a covariate, the mediating effect lost significance, and the direct effect of delayed recall on functional improvement was still significant. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, our results provide evidence that patients with MDD and low memory (delayed recall) at baseline may benefit more from short-term pharmacological treatments.

Objective: Deficits in social cognition (mentalization) and other cognitive deficits have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and may influence treatment response. This study examined the impact of cognitive function on treatment response of patients with MDD after 8 weeks of medication and whether the impact was mediated by mentalization. Methods: Cognitive function (memory, attention, executive function, processing speed) and mentalization were measured in 28 patients with MDD at baseline using neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. The treatment response was defined as the rate of improvement in symptom severity and global function. Results: Multiple regression analyses, controlling for mentalization and cognitive function, separately revealed that delayed recall was a negative predictor of functional improvement after 8 weeks of treatment, while mentalization was a positive predictor. A single mediation model using PROCESS macro showed that delayed recall and Digit Span backward indirectly affected functional improvement, mediated by mentalization. When age at onset was controlled for as a covariate, the mediating effect lost significance, and the direct effect of delayed recall on functional improvement was still significant. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, our results provide evidence that patients with MDD and low memory (delayed recall) at baseline may benefit more from short-term pharmacological treatments.

Objective: Deficits in social cognition (mentalization) and other cognitive deficits have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and may influence treatment response. This study examined the impact of cognitive function on treatment response of patients with MDD after 8 weeks of medication and whether the impact was mediated by mentalization. Methods: Cognitive function (memory, attention, executive function, processing speed) and mentalization were measured in 28 patients with MDD at baseline using neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. The treatment response was defined as the rate of improvement in symptom severity and global function. Results: Multiple regression analyses, controlling for mentalization and cognitive function, separately revealed that delayed recall was a negative predictor of functional improvement after 8 weeks of treatment, while mentalization was a positive predictor. A single mediation model using PROCESS macro showed that delayed recall and Digit Span backward indirectly affected functional improvement, mediated by mentalization. When age at onset was controlled for as a covariate, the mediating effect lost significance, and the direct effect of delayed recall on functional improvement was still significant. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, our results provide evidence that patients with MDD and low memory (delayed recall) at baseline may benefit more from short-term pharmacological treatments.

Objective: Deficits in social cognition (mentalization) and other cognitive deficits have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and may influence treatment response. This study examined the impact of cognitive function on treatment response of patients with MDD after 8 weeks of medication and whether the impact was mediated by mentalization. Methods: Cognitive function (memory, attention, executive function, processing speed) and mentalization were measured in 28 patients with MDD at baseline using neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. The treatment response was defined as the rate of improvement in symptom severity and global function. Results: Multiple regression analyses, controlling for mentalization and cognitive function, separately revealed that delayed recall was a negative predictor of functional improvement after 8 weeks of treatment, while mentalization was a positive predictor. A single mediation model using PROCESS macro showed that delayed recall and Digit Span backward indirectly affected functional improvement, mediated by mentalization. When age at onset was controlled for as a covariate, the mediating effect lost significance, and the direct effect of delayed recall on functional improvement was still significant. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, our results provide evidence that patients with MDD and low memory (delayed recall) at baseline may benefit more from short-term pharmacological treatments.

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in South Korea, imposing substantial physical, emotional, and financial burdens on patients and society. Despite the high burden of symptom and complex care needs of HF patients, palliative care and hospice services remain underutilized in South Korea due to cultural, institutional, and knowledge-related barriers. This position statement from the Korean Society of Heart Failure emphasizes the need for integrating palliative and hospice care into HF management to improve quality of life and support holistic care for patients and their families. By clarifying the role of palliative care in HF and proposing practical referral criteria, this position statement aims to bridge the gap between HF and palliative care services in South Korea, ultimately improving patient-centered outcomes and aligning treatment with the goals and values of HF patients.

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Background: Islet transplantation holds promise for treating selected type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, yet the scarcity of human donor organs impedes widespread adoption. Porcine islets, deemed a viable alternative, recently demonstrated successful longterm survival without zoonotic risks in a clinically relevant pig-to-non-human primate islet transplantation model. This success prompted the development of a clinical trial protocol for porcine islet xenotransplantation in humans. Methods: A single-center, open-label clinical trial initiated by the sponsor will assess the safety and efficacy of porcine islet transplantation for diabetes patients at Gachon Hospital. The protocol received approval from the Gachon Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) under the Investigational New Drug (IND) process. Two diabetic patients, experiencing inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin treatment and frequent hypoglycemic unawareness, will be enrolled. Participants and their family members will engage in deliberation before xenotransplantation during the screening period. Each patient will receive islets isolated from designated pathogen-free pigs. Immunosuppressants and systemic infection prophylaxis will follow the program schedule. The primary endpoint is to confirm the safety of porcine islets in patients, and the secondary endpoint is to assess whether porcine islets can reduce insulin dose and the frequency of hypoglycemic unawareness. Conclusion A clinical trial protocol adhering to global consensus guidelines for porcine islet xenotransplantation is presented, facilitating streamlined implementation of comparable human trials worldwide.

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved empagliflozin for reducing cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, limited data are available on the generalizability of empagliflozin to clinical practice. Therefore, we evaluated real-world eligibility and potential cost-effectiveness based on a nationwide prospective HF registry. Methods: A total of 3,108 HFrEF and 2,070 HFpEF patients from the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry were analyzed. Eligibility was estimated by inclusion and exclusion criteria of EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (EMPEROR-Reduced) and EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (EMPEROR-Preserved) trials and by FDA & EMA label criteria. The cost-utility analysis was done using a Markov model to project the lifetime medical cost and quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Results: Among the KorAHF patients, 91.4% met FDA & EMA label criteria, while 44.7% met the clinical trial criteria. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of empagliflozin was calculated at US$6,764 per QALY in the overall population, which is far below a threshold of US$18,182 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness benefit was more evident in patients with HFrEF (US$5,012 per QALY) than HFpEF (US$8,971 per QALY). Conclusion There is a large discrepancy in real-world eligibility for empagliflozin between FDA & EMA labels and clinical trial criteria. Empagliflozin is cost-effective in HF patients regardless of ejection fraction in South Korea health care setting. The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in real-world HF patients should be further investigated for a broader range of clinical applications.

Background: The benefits of transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are uncertain because of the limited availability of device selection. This study aimed to compare the procedural differences and the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of TRA and TFA for bifurcation PCI using secondgeneration drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods: Based on data from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry III, a retrospective registry of 2,648 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI with second-generation DES from 21 centers in South Korea, patients were categorized into the TRA group (n = 1,507) or the TFA group (n = 1,141). After propensity score matching (PSM), procedural differences, in-hospital outcomes, and device-oriented composite outcomes (DOCOs; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) were compared between the two groups (772 matched patients each group). Results: Despite well-balanced baseline clinical and lesion characteristics after PSM, the use of the two-stent strategy (14.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.001) and the incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes, primarily driven by access site complications (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.015), were significantly lower in the TRA group than in the TFA group. At the 5-year follow-up, the incidence of DOCOs was similar between the groups (6.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.639). Conclusion The findings suggested that TRA may be safer than TFA for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DESs. Despite differences in treatment strategy, TRA was associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes as those of TFA. Therefore, TRA might be the preferred access for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DES.