Purpose: Osteosynthesis of a clavicular fracture can obtain good clinical results even with conservative treatment. The development of surgical techniques and improvements in internal fixation have led to the use of metal plates and screws. Although there are intramedullary nails or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis that can reduce soft tissue damage, these techniques are not used often because most require a skin incision about the length of the metal plate to be inserted. This study compared the postoperative pain to determine the appropriate injection depth. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-institute, single-blind, randomized study was designed. The patients in the study had clavicular fractures and who underwent the removal of implant. The patients judged to have difficulty indicating pain were excluded.Ropivacaine was injected between plate fixation and muscle suturing. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use, and additional pain medication usage were measured after surgery and every 4 hours. Results: Thirty-four clavicle shaft fracture patients were classified into 16 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 18 in the muscle injection group. Seventeen implant removal patients were divided into eight patients in the subcutaneous injection group and another nine in the muscle injection group. In the fracture group, the mean VAS for the subcutaneous injection group was 4.20±2.68 immediately after surgery, 4.47±1.85 at 4 hours, 1.93±1.44 at 24 hours, and 1.60±1.35 at 48 hours. The mean VAS for the muscle injection group was 4.23±1.59 immediately after surgery, 3.00±1.47 at 4 hours, 1.69±1.03 at 24 hours, and 1.31±1.11 at 48 hours; the mean VAS score was not statistically significant in the two groups (p=0.332). In the implant removal group, the mean VAS for the subcutaneous injection group was 4.75±1.58 immediately after surgery, 3.75±1.04 at 4 hours, 1.75±0.89 at 24 hours, and 1.75±0.89 at 48 hours. The mean VAS for the muscle injection group was 3.78±1.20 immediately after surgery, 3.22±0.83 at 4 hours, 1.89±1.17 at 24 hours, and 1.11±1.01 at 48 hours; the mean VAS score was not statistically significant in the two groups (p=0.181). Conclusion The postoperative VAS pain score and PCA usage were not statistically significant regardless of the ropivacaine injection site in clavicular surgery, but each group had significantly different VAS pain scores and PCA usage according to time after surgery. In addition, the muscle injection group tended to have a lower average VAS than the subcutaneous injection group in the implant removal patient group.

Purpose: Osteosynthesis of a clavicular fracture can obtain good clinical results even with conservative treatment. The development of surgical techniques and improvements in internal fixation have led to the use of metal plates and screws. Although there are intramedullary nails or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis that can reduce soft tissue damage, these techniques are not used often because most require a skin incision about the length of the metal plate to be inserted. This study compared the postoperative pain to determine the appropriate injection depth. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-institute, single-blind, randomized study was designed. The patients in the study had clavicular fractures and who underwent the removal of implant. The patients judged to have difficulty indicating pain were excluded.Ropivacaine was injected between plate fixation and muscle suturing. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use, and additional pain medication usage were measured after surgery and every 4 hours. Results: Thirty-four clavicle shaft fracture patients were classified into 16 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 18 in the muscle injection group. Seventeen implant removal patients were divided into eight patients in the subcutaneous injection group and another nine in the muscle injection group. In the fracture group, the mean VAS for the subcutaneous injection group was 4.20±2.68 immediately after surgery, 4.47±1.85 at 4 hours, 1.93±1.44 at 24 hours, and 1.60±1.35 at 48 hours. The mean VAS for the muscle injection group was 4.23±1.59 immediately after surgery, 3.00±1.47 at 4 hours, 1.69±1.03 at 24 hours, and 1.31±1.11 at 48 hours; the mean VAS score was not statistically significant in the two groups (p=0.332). In the implant removal group, the mean VAS for the subcutaneous injection group was 4.75±1.58 immediately after surgery, 3.75±1.04 at 4 hours, 1.75±0.89 at 24 hours, and 1.75±0.89 at 48 hours. The mean VAS for the muscle injection group was 3.78±1.20 immediately after surgery, 3.22±0.83 at 4 hours, 1.89±1.17 at 24 hours, and 1.11±1.01 at 48 hours; the mean VAS score was not statistically significant in the two groups (p=0.181). Conclusion The postoperative VAS pain score and PCA usage were not statistically significant regardless of the ropivacaine injection site in clavicular surgery, but each group had significantly different VAS pain scores and PCA usage according to time after surgery. In addition, the muscle injection group tended to have a lower average VAS than the subcutaneous injection group in the implant removal patient group.

Purpose: Osteosynthesis of a clavicular fracture can obtain good clinical results even with conservative treatment. The development of surgical techniques and improvements in internal fixation have led to the use of metal plates and screws. Although there are intramedullary nails or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis that can reduce soft tissue damage, these techniques are not used often because most require a skin incision about the length of the metal plate to be inserted. This study compared the postoperative pain to determine the appropriate injection depth. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-institute, single-blind, randomized study was designed. The patients in the study had clavicular fractures and who underwent the removal of implant. The patients judged to have difficulty indicating pain were excluded.Ropivacaine was injected between plate fixation and muscle suturing. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use, and additional pain medication usage were measured after surgery and every 4 hours. Results: Thirty-four clavicle shaft fracture patients were classified into 16 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 18 in the muscle injection group. Seventeen implant removal patients were divided into eight patients in the subcutaneous injection group and another nine in the muscle injection group. In the fracture group, the mean VAS for the subcutaneous injection group was 4.20±2.68 immediately after surgery, 4.47±1.85 at 4 hours, 1.93±1.44 at 24 hours, and 1.60±1.35 at 48 hours. The mean VAS for the muscle injection group was 4.23±1.59 immediately after surgery, 3.00±1.47 at 4 hours, 1.69±1.03 at 24 hours, and 1.31±1.11 at 48 hours; the mean VAS score was not statistically significant in the two groups (p=0.332). In the implant removal group, the mean VAS for the subcutaneous injection group was 4.75±1.58 immediately after surgery, 3.75±1.04 at 4 hours, 1.75±0.89 at 24 hours, and 1.75±0.89 at 48 hours. The mean VAS for the muscle injection group was 3.78±1.20 immediately after surgery, 3.22±0.83 at 4 hours, 1.89±1.17 at 24 hours, and 1.11±1.01 at 48 hours; the mean VAS score was not statistically significant in the two groups (p=0.181). Conclusion The postoperative VAS pain score and PCA usage were not statistically significant regardless of the ropivacaine injection site in clavicular surgery, but each group had significantly different VAS pain scores and PCA usage according to time after surgery. In addition, the muscle injection group tended to have a lower average VAS than the subcutaneous injection group in the implant removal patient group.

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) were more susceptible to poor outcomes owing to respiratory muscle weakness and immunotherapy. Several studies conducted in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic reported higher mortality in patients with MG compared to the general population. This study aimed to investigate the clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with MG and to compare these parameters between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in South Korea. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study, which was conducted at 14 tertiary hospitals in South Korea, reviewed the medical records and identified MG patients who contracted COVID-19 between February 2022 and April 2022. The demographic and clinical characteristics associated with MG and vaccination status were collected. The clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infection and MG were investigated and compared between the vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Results: Ninety-two patients with MG contracted COVID-19 during the study. Nine (9.8%) patients required hospitalization, 4 (4.3%) of whom were admitted to the intensive care unit. Seventy-five of 92 patients were vaccinated before contracting COVID-19 infection, and 17 were not. During the COVID-19 infection, 6 of 17 (35.3%) unvaccinated patients were hospitalized, whereas 3 of 75 (4.0%) vaccinated patients were hospitalized (P < 0.001). The frequencies of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were significantly lower in the vaccinated patients than in the unvaccinated patients (P = 0.019 and P = 0.032, respectively). The rate of MG deterioration was significantly lower in the vaccinated patients than in the unvaccinated patients (P = 0.041). Logistic regression after weighting revealed that the risk of hospitalization and MG deterioration after COVID-19 infection was significantly lower in the vaccinated patients than in the unvaccinated patients. Conclusion This study suggests that the clinical course and prognosis of patients with MG who contracted COVID-19 during the dominance of the omicron variant of COVID-19 may be milder than those at the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic when vaccination was unavailable. Vaccination may reduce the morbidity of COVID-19 in patients with MG and effectively prevent MG deterioration induced by COVID-19 infection.

Objective: Dysphagia is a common clinical condition characterized by difficulty in swallowing. It is sub-classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the mouth and pharynx, and esophageal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction. Dysphagia can have a significant negative impact one’s physical health and quality of life as its severity increases. Therefore, proper assessment and management of dysphagia are critical for improving swallowing function and preventing complications. Thus a guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment and management in patients with dysphagia. Methods: Nineteen key questions on dysphagia were developed. These questions dealt with various aspects of problems related to dysphagia, including assessment, management, and complications. A literature search for relevant articles was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and one domestic database of KoreaMed, until April 2021. The level of evidence and recommendation grade were established according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Results: Early screening and assessment of videofluoroscopic swallowing were recommended for assessing the presence of dysphagia. Therapeutic methods, such as tongue and pharyngeal muscle strengthening exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing therapy, were effective in improving swallowing function and quality of life in patients with dysphagia. Nutritional intervention and an oral care program were also recommended. Conclusion This guideline presents recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, including rehabilitative strategies.

These cases imply that the videofluoroscopic AP view helps the evaluation of the vocal fold movement in patients with vocal fold paralysis on laryngoscopy.

Background: Although the scallop sign is considered the most important risk factor for extensor tendon ruptures (ETRs) in patients with osteoarthritis of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), previous reports provide a limited understanding of the changes at DRUJ, as risk factors were examined in plain radiographs of the wrist. The aim of this study was to assess the changes of DRUJ using axial images of computed tomography (CT) in patients with DRUJ osteoarthritis and associated ETRs and to evaluate the relationship between the changes of DRUJ and ETRs. Methods: Twelve patients with ETRs due to osteoarthritis of the DRUJ were enrolled. The changes of DRUJ were examined on axial images of CT and the following 8 parameters were measured: width of radius, anteroposterior (AP) length of radius, width of sigmoid notch (SN), AP length of SN, AP length of ulnar head, subluxation length of ulnar head, dorsal inclination of SN, and distance from Lister’s tubercle to SN. Radiological parameters of the DRUJ were measured in 60 control wrists without trauma or osteoarthritis, and the patient and control groups were statistically compared. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the patient and control groups in all the radiological parameters except for the AP length of SN and AP length of ulnar head. The width of radius, AP length of radius, width of SN, subluxation length of ulnar head, and dorsal inclination of SN were greater and the distance from Lister’s tubercle to SN was smaller in the patient group than in the control group. The width of SN, dorsal inclination of SN, and distance from Lister’s tubercle to SN were statistically significant risk factors among the 8 parameters. Conclusions ETRs due to osteoarthritis of the DRUJ was related to the changes of DRUJ, especially the changes around SN of the distal radius. In addition to the existing risk factors, a decreased distance from Lister’s tubercle to SN and increased dorsal inclination of SN were identified as new risk factors. Axial images of CT were effective to evaluate degenerative changes at the DRUJ.

Purpose: Septic arthritis of the knee is an orthopedic emergency that requires early diagnosis and surgical treatment. This study examined the effectiveness of drain insertion and irrigation in the treatment of septic arthritis of the knee under local anesthesia. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on nine cases (eight patients) diagnosed with septic arthritis of the knee from September 2017 to February 2020 and treated with drain insertion and irrigation under local anesthesia. After penetrating through the superolateral portal to the superomedial portal and inserting the drain, daily irrigation of approximately 3 L of normal saline was done. The following were investigated: age, sex, underlying disease, cause, degree of osteoarthritis, time from diagnosis to surgery, duration of hospitalization, duration of normalization of C-reactive protein, and smear and culture. Results: The initial white blood cell count of joint fluid was 71,472±51,667/mm3 (32,400–203,904/mm3 ), and polymorphic leukocytes were 91.1%±2.6% (86%–95%). The average time from diagnosis to surgery was 8.3±1.3 hours (6–10 hours), and the irrigation period was 8.2±3.2 days (4–15 days). The average length of hospitalization was 20.8±8.7 days (9–37 days). There was no reoperation or recurrence. Smear and culture tests were not identified. Conclusion In the treatment of septic arthritis of the knee, the insertion of a drain tube and irrigation under local anesthesia is a relatively fast and simple method to reduce pain by repetitive draining of purulent joint fluid and can be used as an alternative treatment for patients with a risk of general or spinal anesthesia.

Objective: It is difficult to predict medical outcomes for acute pyelonephritis (APN) in women. A delay in diagnosis and treatment results in rapid progression to circulatory collapse, multiple organ failure, and death. We investigated the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in APN patients hospitalized through the emergency room. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated women with APN presenting in the emergency room from January 2014 to May 2018. Inflammatory biomarkers, including PCT and NLR, were measured, and the severity of pyelonephritis was assessed using the Surviving Sepsis Campaign definitions (Sepsis-3). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with septic shock and the prediction for septic shock was compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: A total of 357 female patients with APN were included. The median level of PCT and NLR was higher in the septic shock group compared with other groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age and PCT were risk factors for septic shock. When the ROC curve of septic shock was compared, PCT showed a higher area under the curve than NLR (NLR 0.65 vs. PCT 0.80). Conclusion The initial NLR in the emergency room showed significant differences depending on the severity as classified by Sepsis-3 definitions. However, NLR was not found to be associated with septic shock in female patients with APN.

Objective: It is difficult to predict medical outcomes for acute pyelonephritis (APN) in women. A delay in diagnosis and treatment results in rapid progression to circulatory collapse, multiple organ failure, and death. We investigated the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in APN patients hospitalized through the emergency room. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated women with APN presenting in the emergency room from January 2014 to May 2018. Inflammatory biomarkers, including PCT and NLR, were measured, and the severity of pyelonephritis was assessed using the Surviving Sepsis Campaign definitions (Sepsis-3). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with septic shock and the prediction for septic shock was compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: A total of 357 female patients with APN were included. The median level of PCT and NLR was higher in the septic shock group compared with other groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age and PCT were risk factors for septic shock. When the ROC curve of septic shock was compared, PCT showed a higher area under the curve than NLR (NLR 0.65 vs. PCT 0.80). Conclusion The initial NLR in the emergency room showed significant differences depending on the severity as classified by Sepsis-3 definitions. However, NLR was not found to be associated with septic shock in female patients with APN.