Purpose: Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection. Materials and Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations. Results: Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (p=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of nonTCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (p=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers. Conclusion Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.

Purpose: Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection. Materials and Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations. Results: Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (p=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of nonTCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (p=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers. Conclusion Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.

Purpose: Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection. Materials and Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations. Results: Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (p=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of nonTCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (p=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers. Conclusion Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.

Purpose: Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection. Materials and Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations. Results: Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (p=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of nonTCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (p=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers. Conclusion Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.

Purpose: Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection. Materials and Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations. Results: Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (p=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of nonTCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (p=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers. Conclusion Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.

Background: and Purpose The influence of imaging features of brain frailty on outcomes were investigated in acute ischemic stroke patients with minor symptoms and large-vessel occlusion (LVO). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry of consecutive patients with acute (within 24 h) minor (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score=0–5) ischemic stroke with anterior circulation LVO (acute minor LVO). Brain frailty was stratified according to the presence of an advanced white-matter hyperintensity (WMH) (Fazekas grade 2 or 3), silent/old brain infarct, or cerebral microbleeds. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Results: In total, 1,067 patients (age=67.2±13.1 years [mean±SD], 61.3% males) were analyzed. The proportions of patients according to the numbers of brain frailty burdens were as follows: no burden in 49.2%, one burden in 30.0%, two burdens in 17.3%, and three burdens in 3.5%. In the Cox proportional-hazards analysis, the presence of more brain frailty burdens was associated with a higher risk of 1-year primary outcomes, but after adjusting for clinically relevant variables there were no significant associations between burdens of brain frailty and 1-year vascular outcomes. For individual components of brain frailty, an advanced WMH was independently associated with an increased risk of 1-year primary outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03–1.71) and stroke (aHR=1.32, 95% CI=1.00–1.75). Conclusions The baseline imaging markers of brain frailty were common in acute minor ischemic stroke patients with LVO. An advanced WMH was the only frailty marker associated with an increased risk of vascular events. Further research is needed into the association between brain frailty and prognosis in patients with acute minor LVO.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, conclusively evaluating possible associations between COVID-19 vaccines and potential adverse events was of critical importance. The National Academy of Medicine of Korea established the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Research Center (CoVaSC) with support from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency to investigate the scientific relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and suspected adverse events. Although determining whether the COVID-19 vaccine was responsible for any suspected adverse event necessitated a systematic approach, traditional causal inference theories, such as Hill's criteria, encountered certain limitations and criticisms. To facilitate a systematic and evidence-based evaluation, the United States Institute of Medicine, at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, offered a detailed causality assessment framework in 2012, which was updated in the recent report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) in 2024.This framework, based on a weight-of-evidence approach, allows the independent evaluation of both epidemiological and mechanistic evidence, culminating in a comprehensive conclusion about causality. Epidemiological evidence derived from population studies is categorized into four levels—high, moderate, limited, or insufficient—while mechanistic evidence, primarily from biological and clinical studies in animals and individuals, is classified as strong, intermediate, weak, or lacking. The committee then synthesizes these two types of evidence to draw a conclusion about the causal relationship, which can be described as “convincingly supports” (“evidence established” in the 2024 NASEM report), “favors acceptance,” “favors rejection,” or “inadequate to accept or reject.” The CoVaSC has established an independent committee to conduct causality assessments using the weightof-evidence framework, specifically for evaluating the causality of adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccines. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the weight-ofevidence framework and to detail the considerations involved in its practical application in the CoVaSC.