Background: There is a growing demand for extending dosing intervals of dupilumab injections in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) due to treatment burden and side effects. However, studies on successful dose reduction in real-world settings are lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy of a patient-centered dupilumab tapering regimen and to propose guidelines for target patients, appropriate intervals, and timing for tapering. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included moderate to severe adult AD patients who underwent at least 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment. Interval prolongation was considered in controlled patients assessed by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and serum inflammatory markers after at least 40 weeks of treatment with a standard regimen. Logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to compare repetitive measurements over time between the two groups. Results: A total of 52 patients were included with 11 patients extending intervals to 3–4 weeks without flare-ups. The mean duration of dupilumab treatment before tapering was 53.27 weeks. The tapering group exhibited significantly lower body mass index. All patients of the tapering group showed EASI scores under 4 and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels under 1,000 IU/mL at week 40. EASI scores and IgE levels remained consistently low after dose reduction, with a mean follow-up time of 14.36 months. Conclusion Patients with extended dosing intervals demonstrated sustained effectiveness. Dose tapering might be a valuable option for non-obese patients with positive clinical response characterized by an EASI score under 4 and IgE levels under 1,000 at week 40.

Background: Various treatments exist for addressing volume loss in atrophic scars. Although laser therapy has gained traction in treating atrophic scars, it is associated with side effects, such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation or erythema. Additionally, not all types of atrophic scars respond optimally to laser therapy, even after multiple sessions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of punch elevation for atrophic scars that yielded unsatisfactory outcomes after repeated laser treatment sessions. Methods: Seven patients with atrophic scars on their facial area underwent punch elevation, concurrently supplemented by fractional CO2 laser application to the scar margins. Improvement in volume restoration of atrophic scars was assessed via investigator evaluation and 3-dimensional (3D) image analysis. Results: After 1 month, median volume (interquartile range) of depression improved from 4.39 mm3 (2.23∼9.90 mm3 ) to 1.97 mm3 (1.46∼7.50 mm3 ), indicating a statistically significant difference post-punch elevation (p=0.018). No serious adverse events were reported during follow-up. Conclusion The efficacy of the punch elevation was objectively evaluated. Punch elevation is a safe and effective therapeutic avenue for atrophic scars that exhibit resistance to laser or alternative interventions.