Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using various approaches, including posterior, lateral, and direct anterior approaches.The most beneficial method is controversial. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This study compared patient satisfaction after bilateral THA using the direct anterior and lateral approaches on the same patient, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Materials and Methods: This study examined 30 patients who underwent bilateral THA: two with femoral neck fractures, 18 with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, six with borderline dysplasia-induced hip osteoarthritis, and four with degenerative hip osteoarthritis.Without distinguishing between the left and right sides, THA was performed randomly using the direct anterior approach on one side and the lateral approach on the other. The results of THA were compared using different approaches on the same patient, and patient satisfaction was evaluated. Results: Surgery using the direct anterior approach for THA showed favorable results in terms of the initial postoperative pain compared to surgery using the lateral approach. On the other hand, there was no significant difference observed after one month post-surgery. Among the participants, three preferred the direct anterior approach; four preferred the lateral approach, and 23 reported no preference. Conclusion In THA, the direct anterior approach may offer advantages in terms of initial postoperative pain and rehabilitation compared to the lateral approach. Nevertheless, the pain and joint function one month after surgery were similar between the two approaches.Therefore, the choice of approach should be determined by the surgeon's preference or experience, as both methods appear rational.

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using various approaches, including posterior, lateral, and direct anterior approaches.The most beneficial method is controversial. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This study compared patient satisfaction after bilateral THA using the direct anterior and lateral approaches on the same patient, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Materials and Methods: This study examined 30 patients who underwent bilateral THA: two with femoral neck fractures, 18 with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, six with borderline dysplasia-induced hip osteoarthritis, and four with degenerative hip osteoarthritis.Without distinguishing between the left and right sides, THA was performed randomly using the direct anterior approach on one side and the lateral approach on the other. The results of THA were compared using different approaches on the same patient, and patient satisfaction was evaluated. Results: Surgery using the direct anterior approach for THA showed favorable results in terms of the initial postoperative pain compared to surgery using the lateral approach. On the other hand, there was no significant difference observed after one month post-surgery. Among the participants, three preferred the direct anterior approach; four preferred the lateral approach, and 23 reported no preference. Conclusion In THA, the direct anterior approach may offer advantages in terms of initial postoperative pain and rehabilitation compared to the lateral approach. Nevertheless, the pain and joint function one month after surgery were similar between the two approaches.Therefore, the choice of approach should be determined by the surgeon's preference or experience, as both methods appear rational.

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using various approaches, including posterior, lateral, and direct anterior approaches.The most beneficial method is controversial. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This study compared patient satisfaction after bilateral THA using the direct anterior and lateral approaches on the same patient, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Materials and Methods: This study examined 30 patients who underwent bilateral THA: two with femoral neck fractures, 18 with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, six with borderline dysplasia-induced hip osteoarthritis, and four with degenerative hip osteoarthritis.Without distinguishing between the left and right sides, THA was performed randomly using the direct anterior approach on one side and the lateral approach on the other. The results of THA were compared using different approaches on the same patient, and patient satisfaction was evaluated. Results: Surgery using the direct anterior approach for THA showed favorable results in terms of the initial postoperative pain compared to surgery using the lateral approach. On the other hand, there was no significant difference observed after one month post-surgery. Among the participants, three preferred the direct anterior approach; four preferred the lateral approach, and 23 reported no preference. Conclusion In THA, the direct anterior approach may offer advantages in terms of initial postoperative pain and rehabilitation compared to the lateral approach. Nevertheless, the pain and joint function one month after surgery were similar between the two approaches.Therefore, the choice of approach should be determined by the surgeon's preference or experience, as both methods appear rational.

Background/Aims: Based on their anatomy, cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) are classified into intrahepatic, hilar, and distal CCAs. Although the diagnosis and treatment of each type of CCA are thought to be different, real-world data studies on the current practice are limited. Therefore, this study was designed to capture the current practice of diagnosing and treating perihilar CCA in Korea. Methods: We conducted a survey using an online platform. The questionnaire consisted of 18 questions designed to evaluate the current practice of diagnosing and treating perihilar CCA in Korea. The targets of this survey were biliary endoscopists who are members of the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association. Results: In total, 119 biliary endoscopists completed the survey. Of the respondents, 89.9% thought that the use of the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) system is necessary to classify CCA. Approximately half of the respondents would recommend surgery or chemotherapy until patients were 80 years of age. For the pathological diagnosis of CCA, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biopsy was the most preferred modality. Routine preoperative biliary drainage was performed by 44.5% of the respondents. For operable CCAs, 64.7% of the respondents preferred endoscopic biliary drainage using plastic stents. For palliative biliary drainage, 69.7% of the respondents used plastic stents. For palliative endoscopic biliary drainage using metal stents, 63% of the respondents preferred the stent-in-stent method. Conclusions A new coding system using the ICD-11 is needed for classifying CCAs. Guidelines for diagnosing and treating CCA based on the clinical situation in Korea are needed.

Background and Objectives: The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a “no-stent zone.”Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. Methods: This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)–free rate. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency. Conclusions DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLRfree survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.

Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Background and Objectives: The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a “no-stent zone.”Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. Methods: This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)–free rate. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency. Conclusions DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLRfree survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.

Background: s/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Background and Objectives: The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a “no-stent zone.”Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. Methods: This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)–free rate. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency. Conclusions DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLRfree survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.