1.Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Yeunji LEE ; Eunyoung LEE ; Bumhee PARK ; Gil Ho LEE ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Choong-Kyun NOH ; Kee Myung LEE
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):59-68
Background/Aims:
Early diagnosis of esophageal cancer (EC) remains challenging despite the increasing frequency of endoscopic screenings globally. The rapidly increasing number of endoscopic screenings performed over a certain period might influence diagnostic performance. This study evaluated the association between the number of endoscopic screenings and EC detection rates in a nationwide cohort.
Methods:
This retrospective population-based study used the Korean National Cancer Screening Program database, comprising 32,774,742 males and females aged ≥40 years between 2015and 2019. Negative binomial regression model and least-squares mean evaluation were used to assess the association between month of the year and EC detection rates.
Results:
This study enrolled 28,032,590 participants who underwent upper endoscopy. The number of participants in the fourth quarter (October to December: 10,923,142 [39.0%]) was 2.1 times higher than that in the first quarter (January to March: 5,085,087 [18.1%]); this trend continued for all 5 years. Contrarily, detection rates for EC in the fourth quarter (0.08/1,000 person) were half that in the first quarter (0.15/1,000 person). The odds of detecting EC were lowest in November; in 2015 the odds were 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.79; p=0.001) times lower and in 2016, they were 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.68; p<0.001) times lower compared to January. The predicted detection rates showed a decreasing trend toward the end of the year (p>0.05 for all).
Conclusions
The workload of endoscopists increased excessively with the rising number of endoscopies toward the end of the year, which was reflected by the decreased EC detection rates during this period.
2.The Potential Role of the Rapid Urease Test with the Sweeping Method in the Gray Zone of the Urea Breath Test after Helicobacter pylori Eradication
Ji Hyun KIM ; Ji Min KIM ; Bumhee PARK ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Kee Myung LEE ; Gil Ho LEE ; Choong-Kyun NOH
Gut and Liver 2025;19(3):355-363
Background/Aims:
Although the urea breath test (UBT) is widely used as a representative monitoring test after Helicobacter pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur because of the gray zone related to its cutoff value. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the rapid urease test (RUT), the RUT with sweeping method, and the UBT, and to investigate the role of the sweeping method in the gray zone of UBT values.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients who received standard first-line H. pylori eradication treatments (n=216). All participants underwent to testing using the sweeping method and UBT on the same day. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed to compare the two methods.
Results:
The sensitivity (0.537 vs 0.806, p=0.002) and accuracy (0.843 vs 0.870, p=0.026) of the UBT were inferior to those of the sweeping method. A total of 31 individuals tested positive for H. pylori according to the UBT, whereas 54 individuals tested positive according to the sweeping method. In the group for which the gold standard definition indicated H. pylori positivity but UBT results were negative (n=31), all individuals had a UBT value under 2.5‰. In the multivariate logistic regression model, a UBT value of 1.4‰ to 2.5‰ increased the risk of false-negative results by 6.5 times (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.077 to 20.288; p=0.001).
Conclusions
After H. pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur for individuals undergoing the UBT, primarily for values below the UBT cutoff. The RUT with the sweeping method can potentially help detect H. pylori in the gray zone of the UBT, improving diagnostic accuracy.
3.Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Yeunji LEE ; Eunyoung LEE ; Bumhee PARK ; Gil Ho LEE ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Choong-Kyun NOH ; Kee Myung LEE
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):59-68
Background/Aims:
Early diagnosis of esophageal cancer (EC) remains challenging despite the increasing frequency of endoscopic screenings globally. The rapidly increasing number of endoscopic screenings performed over a certain period might influence diagnostic performance. This study evaluated the association between the number of endoscopic screenings and EC detection rates in a nationwide cohort.
Methods:
This retrospective population-based study used the Korean National Cancer Screening Program database, comprising 32,774,742 males and females aged ≥40 years between 2015and 2019. Negative binomial regression model and least-squares mean evaluation were used to assess the association between month of the year and EC detection rates.
Results:
This study enrolled 28,032,590 participants who underwent upper endoscopy. The number of participants in the fourth quarter (October to December: 10,923,142 [39.0%]) was 2.1 times higher than that in the first quarter (January to March: 5,085,087 [18.1%]); this trend continued for all 5 years. Contrarily, detection rates for EC in the fourth quarter (0.08/1,000 person) were half that in the first quarter (0.15/1,000 person). The odds of detecting EC were lowest in November; in 2015 the odds were 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.79; p=0.001) times lower and in 2016, they were 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.68; p<0.001) times lower compared to January. The predicted detection rates showed a decreasing trend toward the end of the year (p>0.05 for all).
Conclusions
The workload of endoscopists increased excessively with the rising number of endoscopies toward the end of the year, which was reflected by the decreased EC detection rates during this period.
4.The Potential Role of the Rapid Urease Test with the Sweeping Method in the Gray Zone of the Urea Breath Test after Helicobacter pylori Eradication
Ji Hyun KIM ; Ji Min KIM ; Bumhee PARK ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Kee Myung LEE ; Gil Ho LEE ; Choong-Kyun NOH
Gut and Liver 2025;19(3):355-363
Background/Aims:
Although the urea breath test (UBT) is widely used as a representative monitoring test after Helicobacter pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur because of the gray zone related to its cutoff value. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the rapid urease test (RUT), the RUT with sweeping method, and the UBT, and to investigate the role of the sweeping method in the gray zone of UBT values.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients who received standard first-line H. pylori eradication treatments (n=216). All participants underwent to testing using the sweeping method and UBT on the same day. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed to compare the two methods.
Results:
The sensitivity (0.537 vs 0.806, p=0.002) and accuracy (0.843 vs 0.870, p=0.026) of the UBT were inferior to those of the sweeping method. A total of 31 individuals tested positive for H. pylori according to the UBT, whereas 54 individuals tested positive according to the sweeping method. In the group for which the gold standard definition indicated H. pylori positivity but UBT results were negative (n=31), all individuals had a UBT value under 2.5‰. In the multivariate logistic regression model, a UBT value of 1.4‰ to 2.5‰ increased the risk of false-negative results by 6.5 times (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.077 to 20.288; p=0.001).
Conclusions
After H. pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur for individuals undergoing the UBT, primarily for values below the UBT cutoff. The RUT with the sweeping method can potentially help detect H. pylori in the gray zone of the UBT, improving diagnostic accuracy.
5.Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Yeunji LEE ; Eunyoung LEE ; Bumhee PARK ; Gil Ho LEE ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Choong-Kyun NOH ; Kee Myung LEE
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):59-68
Background/Aims:
Early diagnosis of esophageal cancer (EC) remains challenging despite the increasing frequency of endoscopic screenings globally. The rapidly increasing number of endoscopic screenings performed over a certain period might influence diagnostic performance. This study evaluated the association between the number of endoscopic screenings and EC detection rates in a nationwide cohort.
Methods:
This retrospective population-based study used the Korean National Cancer Screening Program database, comprising 32,774,742 males and females aged ≥40 years between 2015and 2019. Negative binomial regression model and least-squares mean evaluation were used to assess the association between month of the year and EC detection rates.
Results:
This study enrolled 28,032,590 participants who underwent upper endoscopy. The number of participants in the fourth quarter (October to December: 10,923,142 [39.0%]) was 2.1 times higher than that in the first quarter (January to March: 5,085,087 [18.1%]); this trend continued for all 5 years. Contrarily, detection rates for EC in the fourth quarter (0.08/1,000 person) were half that in the first quarter (0.15/1,000 person). The odds of detecting EC were lowest in November; in 2015 the odds were 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.79; p=0.001) times lower and in 2016, they were 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.68; p<0.001) times lower compared to January. The predicted detection rates showed a decreasing trend toward the end of the year (p>0.05 for all).
Conclusions
The workload of endoscopists increased excessively with the rising number of endoscopies toward the end of the year, which was reflected by the decreased EC detection rates during this period.
6.The Potential Role of the Rapid Urease Test with the Sweeping Method in the Gray Zone of the Urea Breath Test after Helicobacter pylori Eradication
Ji Hyun KIM ; Ji Min KIM ; Bumhee PARK ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Kee Myung LEE ; Gil Ho LEE ; Choong-Kyun NOH
Gut and Liver 2025;19(3):355-363
Background/Aims:
Although the urea breath test (UBT) is widely used as a representative monitoring test after Helicobacter pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur because of the gray zone related to its cutoff value. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the rapid urease test (RUT), the RUT with sweeping method, and the UBT, and to investigate the role of the sweeping method in the gray zone of UBT values.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients who received standard first-line H. pylori eradication treatments (n=216). All participants underwent to testing using the sweeping method and UBT on the same day. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed to compare the two methods.
Results:
The sensitivity (0.537 vs 0.806, p=0.002) and accuracy (0.843 vs 0.870, p=0.026) of the UBT were inferior to those of the sweeping method. A total of 31 individuals tested positive for H. pylori according to the UBT, whereas 54 individuals tested positive according to the sweeping method. In the group for which the gold standard definition indicated H. pylori positivity but UBT results were negative (n=31), all individuals had a UBT value under 2.5‰. In the multivariate logistic regression model, a UBT value of 1.4‰ to 2.5‰ increased the risk of false-negative results by 6.5 times (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.077 to 20.288; p=0.001).
Conclusions
After H. pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur for individuals undergoing the UBT, primarily for values below the UBT cutoff. The RUT with the sweeping method can potentially help detect H. pylori in the gray zone of the UBT, improving diagnostic accuracy.
7.Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Yeunji LEE ; Eunyoung LEE ; Bumhee PARK ; Gil Ho LEE ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Choong-Kyun NOH ; Kee Myung LEE
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):59-68
Background/Aims:
Early diagnosis of esophageal cancer (EC) remains challenging despite the increasing frequency of endoscopic screenings globally. The rapidly increasing number of endoscopic screenings performed over a certain period might influence diagnostic performance. This study evaluated the association between the number of endoscopic screenings and EC detection rates in a nationwide cohort.
Methods:
This retrospective population-based study used the Korean National Cancer Screening Program database, comprising 32,774,742 males and females aged ≥40 years between 2015and 2019. Negative binomial regression model and least-squares mean evaluation were used to assess the association between month of the year and EC detection rates.
Results:
This study enrolled 28,032,590 participants who underwent upper endoscopy. The number of participants in the fourth quarter (October to December: 10,923,142 [39.0%]) was 2.1 times higher than that in the first quarter (January to March: 5,085,087 [18.1%]); this trend continued for all 5 years. Contrarily, detection rates for EC in the fourth quarter (0.08/1,000 person) were half that in the first quarter (0.15/1,000 person). The odds of detecting EC were lowest in November; in 2015 the odds were 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.79; p=0.001) times lower and in 2016, they were 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.68; p<0.001) times lower compared to January. The predicted detection rates showed a decreasing trend toward the end of the year (p>0.05 for all).
Conclusions
The workload of endoscopists increased excessively with the rising number of endoscopies toward the end of the year, which was reflected by the decreased EC detection rates during this period.
8.The Potential Role of the Rapid Urease Test with the Sweeping Method in the Gray Zone of the Urea Breath Test after Helicobacter pylori Eradication
Ji Hyun KIM ; Ji Min KIM ; Bumhee PARK ; Sun Gyo LIM ; Sung Jae SHIN ; Kee Myung LEE ; Gil Ho LEE ; Choong-Kyun NOH
Gut and Liver 2025;19(3):355-363
Background/Aims:
Although the urea breath test (UBT) is widely used as a representative monitoring test after Helicobacter pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur because of the gray zone related to its cutoff value. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the rapid urease test (RUT), the RUT with sweeping method, and the UBT, and to investigate the role of the sweeping method in the gray zone of UBT values.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients who received standard first-line H. pylori eradication treatments (n=216). All participants underwent to testing using the sweeping method and UBT on the same day. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed to compare the two methods.
Results:
The sensitivity (0.537 vs 0.806, p=0.002) and accuracy (0.843 vs 0.870, p=0.026) of the UBT were inferior to those of the sweeping method. A total of 31 individuals tested positive for H. pylori according to the UBT, whereas 54 individuals tested positive according to the sweeping method. In the group for which the gold standard definition indicated H. pylori positivity but UBT results were negative (n=31), all individuals had a UBT value under 2.5‰. In the multivariate logistic regression model, a UBT value of 1.4‰ to 2.5‰ increased the risk of false-negative results by 6.5 times (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.077 to 20.288; p=0.001).
Conclusions
After H. pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur for individuals undergoing the UBT, primarily for values below the UBT cutoff. The RUT with the sweeping method can potentially help detect H. pylori in the gray zone of the UBT, improving diagnostic accuracy.
9.Reliability of partial-mouth periodontal examinations for diagnosing periodontal disease
Bohee KANG ; Jae Suk JUNG ; Sunjin KIM ; Geum Hee CHOI ; Heelim LEE ; Bumhee PARK ; Hyelynn JEON ; Suk JI
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2025;55(4):273-284
Purpose:
This study investigated the reliability of partial-mouth periodontal examinations (PMPEs) for 1) identifying the presence of periodontitis, 2) staging periodontal disease, and 3) reflecting mean clinical parameters.
Methods:
All patients were diagnosed using 8 different exam types: (A) full-mouth periodontal examination (FMPE), (B) Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) codes, (C) panoramic radiographs only, (D) clinical parameters only, (E) 6 teeth, including the first molar (#11, #16, #26, #31, #36, #46), (F) CPITN index teeth (#11, #16, #17, #26, #27, #31, #36, #37, #46, #47), (G) Ramfjord teeth (#16, #21, #24, #36, #41, #44), and (H) 10 modified Ramfjord teeth, including all first premolars and first molars (#16, #14, #21, #24, #26, #36, #34, #41, #44, #46). Case definitions were established according to the criteria outlined in the 2018 American Academy of Periodontology/European Federation of Periodontology classification of periodontal diseases. The accuracy of diagnosis and diagnostic performance were assessed using the kappa coefficient and area under the curve (AUC)/receiver operating characteristic analyses, respectively. To compare the mean clinical parameters, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated between 4 types of PMPEs (E, F, G, H) and FMPE.
Results:
In total, 218 subjects (130 female, 88 male) were included in this study. Exam type F achieved perfect agreement (kappa coefficient: 1.0) in identifying the presence of periodontitis, and it showed almost perfect agreement in staging periodontal disease (0.85≤ kappa ≤0.98) except for the healthy category, with AUCs ≥0.97. Exam type H demonstrated the highest correlations of all mean clinical parameters with FMPE (ICCs ≥0.96).
Conclusions
PMPEs using the CPITN index teeth can be an excellent alternative for diagnosing periodontitis and staging its severity.
10.Linking the Supplementary Motor Network and Executive Function in Developing Brain
Dong-Gyun HAN ; Bumhee PARK ; Seulgi LEE ; Haemi CHOI ; Yeeun KIM ; Seungmin LEE ; Min-Hyeon PARK
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2025;23(4):579-589
Objective:
Essential development of the frontal lobe occurs during childhood and adolescence, affecting various executive function (EF) domains. Of the frontal areas, the supplementary motor area (SMA) located in the medial frontal cortex, is involved in various high-order EFs which include inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility.However, it remains unclear how the functional network of the SMA is associated with EF development.
Methods:
We assessed Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) score and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 6- to 17-year-old children and adolescents to identify age differences in SMA functional connectivity (FC) associated with EF.
Results:
A total of 112 children and adolescents (62 males; mean [standard deviation] age, 12.21 [2.98] years) were included. After adjusting for sex, we discovered significant evidence in the older group that 300 FCs between the SMA and numerous regions of the brain, including the frontal, occipital, parietal, temporal, limbic, and cerebellar areas, were negatively correlated with the WCST subcategories (false discovery rate < 0.05).
Conclusion
This finding underscores the SMA’s pivotal role in executive dysfunction during developmental stages.Interestingly, this significant connectivity was absent in younger participants, highlighting the age range of 11−12 as a critical turning point for brain functional alterations involved in EF development. Since the crucial role of SMA in refining EF development has been underappreciated, this work has the potential to provide insight into both the nature of the functional alteration of SMA and the differences in individuals’ EF development trajectories.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail