Objective To explore the latent profile features of emotional intelligence and their impact on mental health among kindergarten teachers. Methods A total of 1 114 kindergarten teachers were selected as research subjects using a convenience sampling method. The scores of emotional intelligence and mental health were assessed with the Emotional Intelligence Scale and General Health Questionnaire, respectively. Results The scores of emotional intelligence and mental health were (5.9±1.0) and (22.2±8.2), respectively. Latent profile analysis showed that there were four potential profiles of emotional intelligence among kindergarten teachers, which were labelled as the deficient profile, weak profile, competent profile, and balanced profile, accounting for 8.8%, 25.0%, 40.5% and 25.7%, respectively. The results of multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that kindergarten teachers with parenting experience were less likely to be classified as the deficient and weak profiles than those without parenting experience (both P<0.05), and more likely to be classified into the competent profile (P<0.01). Kindergarten teachers with junior professional titles were more likely to be classified as the deficient profile than those with senior titles (P<0.05). Those working <10 h/d were less likely to be in the deficient or weak profiles than those working >12 h/d (both P<0.05). The Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars 􀱽 ² test indicated differences in mental health scores among the four potential profiles of emotional intelligence (P<0.01), with the competent profile showing the best mental health and the deficient profile the worst. Conclusion The kindergarten teachers have good levels of emotional intelligence and mental health, with heterogeneity in emotional intelligence characteristics. Parenting experience, professional title, and daily working hours were influencing factors for emotional intelligence latent profile classification.

Objective To explore the relationships among post traumatic stress disorder(PTSD),gratitude and posttraumatic growth (PTG) for terminal cancer patients.Methods Totally 119 advanced cancer patients were investigated with the self-demographic questionnaire,posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI),the PTSD cheeklist-civilian version (PCL-C) and the Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-6).Results For terminal cancer patients,the total score of PCL-C was 34.02±12.49.The scores on re-experience,avoidance/numbness,hypervigilance were 9.79±3.78,13.85±5.68,10.36±3.80.The total score of gratitude was 29.37±7.48.The total score of PTG was 51.34± 13.57.The scores of life appreciation,personal relationship and self-strength were 8.00± 2.99,21.18± 5.84,22.16± 6.10.The total scores of PTG were significantly statistical significance among different PTSD groups(F=16.267,P＜0.01)and gratitude groups(F=43.674,P＜0.0 1).The total scores of PCL-C (r=-0.694,P＜0.01),re-experience (r=-0.664,P＜0.01),avoidance/numbness (r=-0.671,P＜0.01),hypervigilance (r=0.753,P＜0.01) and gratitude(r=-0.611,P＜0.01) were all correlated with PTG.The total score of PCL-C and gratitude could explain 66.6％ variation of PTG.For the relationship between PTSD and PTG,the moderation effect of gratitude was not significant (P ＞0.05).Conclusion The gratitude and PTSD were important influence factors for terminal cancer patients' PTG,while the moderation effect of gratitude was not significant,so in clinical intervention we should pay more attentions to the actual effects of gratitude,and we should not pursuit gratitude education blindly.