Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as the standard treatment for severe aortic stenosis, demonstrating comparable efficacy to traditional surgery in low and intermediate-risk patients. However, the bioprosthetic valves utilized in TAVR have a limited lifespan, and bioprosthetic valve failure, including calcification, rupture or infection may develop, leading to poor clinical outcomes. Elevated blood pressure has been identified as a key factor in aortic valve calcification, and its role in bioprosthetic valve failure is gaining increasing attention. Hypertension may accelerate the calcification process and exacerbate valve failure due to increased mechanical stress on the valve, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, and enhanced thrombus formation. Furthermore, elevated blood pressure interacts with prosthesis mismatch and paravalvular leak, jointly affecting valve durability. This review explores the impact of elevated blood pressure on bioprosthetic valve calcification and failure after TAVR, and emphasizes the importance of blood pressure control, optimized preoperative assessment, and appropriate valve selection in reducing valve failures.
Humans ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects* ; Calcinosis/etiology* ; Bioprosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery* ; Aortic Valve/surgery* ; Hypertension/physiopathology*

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the one-year outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) using SAPIEN 3 valve for treating mitral bioprosthetic valve failure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 26 patients with mitral bioprosthetic valve failure who underwent ViV-TMVR at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, between November 2022 and July 2024. The age of patients was 71.5 (64.5, 74.5) years, and 69.2% were female. Bioprosthetic valve failure occurred at (9.7±3.7) years after initial surgical implantation, with the most common failure mode being mixed stenosis and regurgitation (53.8%). The SAPIEN 3 valve was implanted via either a transseptal or transapical approach. Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, immediately post-procedure, and at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 score, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The procedure was performed via the transseptal approach in 21 patients (80.8%) and the transapical approach in 5 patients (19.2%). All procedures were technically successful. No paravalvular leakage was observed immediately post-procedure, and mitral valve hemodynamics improved significantly. At the 1-year follow-up, 2 patients had died. Two patients (8.3% of survivors) were of NYHA functional class Ⅲ, and KCCQ-12 score improved to (88.4±14.6) points (both P<0.01). Echocardio-graphy at 1 year postoperatively showed significant reductions in peak mitral valve velocity [to (2.29±0.32) m/s] and mean transvalvular pressure gradient [to (9.5±3.5) mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa] compared to baseline (both P<0.05). No moderate or severe mitral regurgitation or paravalvular leakage was observed. The proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary hypertension decreased from 65.4% preoperatively to 13.0% at 1 year (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS ViV-TMVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve for mitral biopro-sthetic valve failure is associated with high procedural success, significantly improved valve hemodynamics of the mitral value, alleviation of pulmonary hypertension, enhanced quality of life, and a low rate of complications at 1 year after the operation.
Humans ; Female ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged ; Bioprosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Mitral Valve/surgery* ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods* ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Failure ; Treatment Outcome ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery*

Currently, as the key raw material of artificial biological heart valve, bovine pericardium is mainly depend on import and has become a "bottleneck" challenge, greatly limiting the development of domestic biological heart valve. Therefore, the localization of bovine pericardium is extremely urgent. In this study, the pericardium of Sichuan yak was compared with that of Australian cattle in terms of fundamental properties and anti-calcification performance. The results demonstrated that the appearance and thickness of yak pericardium were more advantageous than the Australian one. Sichuan yak pericardium and Australian cattle pericardium had comparable performance in shrinkage temperature, mechanical test and anti-calcification test. This study preliminarily verifies the feasibility of substitution of Australian cattle pericardium by Sichuan yak pericardium and promotes the progression of bovine pericardium localization with data support.
Animals ; Australia ; Bioprosthesis ; Cattle ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Pericardium

INTRODUCTION: Since there are limited studies about the return-to-work experiences of Filipino amputees, this study will be able to contribute to studies that delve deeper into the lower extremity amputees’ experiences and put into light the factors that may be present in relation to their return to work. METHODS: This study utilized a qualitative phenomenological design. Participants who were willing to join the study were all gathered for a focus group discussion conducted by a hired interviewer. The researchers adapted Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method for analyzing the data. RESULTS: Factors that allowed amputees to have a successful return to work experience were motivation to continue with life, positive impact of lower extremity prosthesis, and rehabilitation. Factors that hindered the successful return to work of amputees were social barriers, work environment, negative self-image, discrimination from the community, and ft of prosthesis. CONCLUSION Employment was possible after amputation among amputees who were provided with prosthesis at UERMMMCI, since most of the respondents of this study were employed. Positive and negative factors that infuenced their return to work were also identifed. Non-compliance to rehabilitation limited the usage of prosthesis resulting in not being able to return to work.
Bioprosthesis

Bioprosthesis ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; Humans ; Prosthesis Failure ; Treatment Outcome

In the present study, the performance of the liquid nitrogen frozen and thinned bovine pericardium was studied and compared with the porcine pericardium. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the bovine pericardium were observed and tested by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and tensile test respectively. In all conditions, porcine pericardium was selected as a control group. The results showed that there was little difference in the performance of bovine pericardium after being frozen by liquid nitrogen. The secant modulus and ultimate strength of the thinned bovine pericardium were similar to those of porcine pericardium, however, the elastic modulus was a little higher than porcine pericardium. The study suggested that the performance of the thinned bovine pericardium was similar to those of porcine pericardium. It was easy for the thinned bovine pericardium to obtain a relatively ideal thickness and expected performance, therefore, the thinned bovine pericardium can be used as the materials of transcatheter aortic valve leaflets.
Animals ; Aortic Valve ; Bioprosthesis ; Cattle ; Elastic Modulus ; Freezing ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Nitrogen ; Pericardium ; physiology ; Swine

BACKGROUND: Scarce data have been reported on the efficacy of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement. METHODS: From 2001 and 2014, 146 consecutive patients (69.3±9.4 years, 84 females) who underwent bioprosthetic heart valve replacement concomitant with AF ablation were assessed. We evaluated long-term rhythm and valve-related outcomes. RESULTS: During 49.1 months of follow-up (interquartile range, 22.5–96.8 months), 7 in-hospital and 49 (6.7% per person-year) post-discharge deaths occurred. The thromboembolic event-free survival rate at 5 years was 79.2%±3.5%. The freedom from AF recurrence rate at 5 years was 59.8%±4.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that old age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.11; p=0.002), previous cardiac operation (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22–7.43; p=0.02), and a large left atrial (LA) dimension (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00–1.05; p=0.045) were significantly associated with AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: The overall long-term clinical outcomes in these predominantly elderly patients undergoing AF ablation concomitantly with bioprosthetic valve replacement were satisfactory; however, AF recurrence was frequent. Older age, a history of prior cardiac surgery, and large LA size were associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence.
Aged ; Anticoagulants ; Atrial Fibrillation ; Bioprosthesis ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Freedom ; Heart Valves ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Recurrence ; Thoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of the frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) in elderly patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: A total of 154 elderly patients (≥ 75 years) (78.7 ± 3.6 years; men:women = 78:76) who underwent aortic valve replacement with stented bioprosthesis between 2001 and 2018 were enrolled. The FI-L was calculated as the proportion of abnormal results out of 32 items based on laboratory tests, pulse rate and blood pressure. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included operative mortality and aortic valve-related events (AVREs) during follow-up. The predictive values of FI-L for the early and late outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 40 months (interquartile, 15–74). RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 3.9% (n = 6). Late death occurred in 29 patients. The overall survival (OS) rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 83.3%, 59.0%, and 41.6%, respectively. The AVREs occurred in 28 patients and the freedom rates from AVREs at 5, 10, and 15 years were 79.4%, 72.7%, and 52.9%, respectively. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that FI-L was a significant factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.075; 95% confidence interval, 1.040–1.111). A minimal P value approach showed that a FI-L of 25% was the best cutoff value to predict OS after SAVR. CONCLUSION: The FI-L is significantly associated with early and long-term outcomes after SAVR in elderly patients. Frailty rather than a patient's age should be considered in the decision-making process for SAVR in elderly patients.
Aged ; Aortic Valve Stenosis ; Aortic Valve ; Bioprosthesis ; Blood Pressure ; Follow-Up Studies ; Freedom ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mortality ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Stents

BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) has been developed as an alternative surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SU-AVR through an assessment of hemodynamic performance and safety. METHODS: From December 2014 to June 2016, a total of 12 consecutive patients with severe AS underwent SU-AVR. The endpoints were overall survival and valve-related complications (paravalvular leakage, valve thrombosis, migration, endocarditis, and permanent pacemaker implantation). The mean follow-up duration was 18.1±8.6 months. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 77.1±5.8 years and their mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 9.2±17.7. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 94.5±37.3 minutes and 54.9±12.5 minutes, respectively. Follow-up echocardiography showed good prosthesis function with low transvalvular pressure gradients (mean, 13.9±8.6 mm Hg and peak, 27.2±15.0 mm Hg) at a mean of 9.9±4.2 months. No cases of primary paravalvular leakage, valve thrombosis, migration, or endocarditis were reported. A new permanent pacemaker was implanted in 1 patient (8.3%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 83.3%±10.8%. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with SU-AVR demonstrated excellent early clinical outcomes with good hemodynamic results. However, there was a high incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to the rate for conventional AVR, which is a problem that should be solved.
Aortic Valve Stenosis ; Aortic Valve ; Bioprosthesis ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Echocardiography ; Endocarditis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Incidence ; Prostheses and Implants ; Surgeons ; Survival Rate ; Thrombosis

BACKGROUND: The question of which type of prosthetic aortic valve leads to the best outcomes in patients in their 60s remains controversial. We examined the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement in sexagenarians according to the type of prosthesis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 270 patients in their 60s who underwent first-time aortic valve replacement from 1995 to 2011. Early and late mortality, major adverse valve-related events, anticoagulation-related events, and hemodynamic outcomes were assessed. The mean follow-up duration was 58.7±44.0 months. RESULTS: Of the 270 patients, 93 had a mechanical prosthesis (mechanical group), and 177 had a bioprosthesis (tissue group). The tissue group had a higher mean age and prevalence of preoperative stroke than the mechanical group. The groups had no differences in the aortic valve mean pressure gradient (AVMPG) or the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) at 5 years after surgery. In a sub-analysis limited to prostheses in the supra-annular position, the AVMPG was higher in the tissue group, but the LVMI was still not significantly different. There was no early mortality. The 10-year survival rate was 83% in the mechanical group and 90% in the tissue group. The type of aortic prosthesis did not influence overall mortality, cardiac mortality, or major adverse valve-related events. Anticoagulation-related events were more common in the mechanical group than in the tissue group (p=0.034; hazard ratio, 4.100; 95% confidence interval, 1.111–15.132). CONCLUSION: The type of aortic prosthesis was not associated with hemodynamic or clinical outcomes, except for anticoagulation-related events.
Aortic Valve ; Bioprosthesis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemodynamics* ; Humans ; Mortality ; Prevalence ; Prostheses and Implants* ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke ; Survival Rate