BACKGROUND:Arthroscopic single-row fixation with knotless suture bridge fixation techniques have been commonly used in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries,but the clinical efficacy in rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis is unclear.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic single-row fixation versus knotless suture bridge fixation in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis.METHODS:One hundred and twenty-two patients with rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis who underwent arthroscopic treatment admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2018 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into two groups according to the treatment plan.There were 63 patients with single-row fixation(single-row group)and 59 patients with knotless suture-bridge fixation(suture-bridge group).The visual analog scale scores for pain,University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,Constant-Murley score,and shoulder range of motion were compared between the two groups at the preoperative and 1 year postoperative periods.Rotator cuff re-tears were evaluated at 1 year postoperatively using the Sugaya staging criteria.The occurrence of complications was recorded in both groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)All patients received more than 1-year follow-up.No complications such as incision infection and nerve injury occurred in both groups after surgery.(2)Postoperative visual analog scale scores,University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,Constant-Murley scores,and shoulder range of motion were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively in both groups compared with the preoperative period(P＜0.05).Visual analog scale scores,University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,Constant-Murley scores,and shoulder range of motion were better in the suture-bridge group than in the single-row group 1 year postoperatively(P＜0.05).(3)At 1 year postoperatively,the re-tear rate in the single-row group[22％(14/63)]was significantly higher than that in the suture-bridge group[7％(4/59)],and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(x2=5.777,P=0.016).(4)It is indicated that arthroscopic single-row fixation and knotless suture bridge fixation for rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis both yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes,but knotless suture bridge fixation was more clinically effective,with a lower rate of postoperative retear.

BACKGROUND:Arthroscopic single-row fixation with knotless suture bridge fixation techniques have been commonly used in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries,but the clinical efficacy in rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis is unclear.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic single-row fixation versus knotless suture bridge fixation in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis.METHODS:One hundred and twenty-two patients with rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis who underwent arthroscopic treatment admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2018 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into two groups according to the treatment plan.There were 63 patients with single-row fixation(single-row group)and 59 patients with knotless suture-bridge fixation(suture-bridge group).The visual analog scale scores for pain,University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,Constant-Murley score,and shoulder range of motion were compared between the two groups at the preoperative and 1 year postoperative periods.Rotator cuff re-tears were evaluated at 1 year postoperatively using the Sugaya staging criteria.The occurrence of complications was recorded in both groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)All patients received more than 1-year follow-up.No complications such as incision infection and nerve injury occurred in both groups after surgery.(2)Postoperative visual analog scale scores,University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,Constant-Murley scores,and shoulder range of motion were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively in both groups compared with the preoperative period(P＜0.05).Visual analog scale scores,University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,Constant-Murley scores,and shoulder range of motion were better in the suture-bridge group than in the single-row group 1 year postoperatively(P＜0.05).(3)At 1 year postoperatively,the re-tear rate in the single-row group[22％(14/63)]was significantly higher than that in the suture-bridge group[7％(4/59)],and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(x2=5.777,P=0.016).(4)It is indicated that arthroscopic single-row fixation and knotless suture bridge fixation for rotator cuff injuries combined with osteoporosis both yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes,but knotless suture bridge fixation was more clinically effective,with a lower rate of postoperative retear.