Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors are rare and diverse malignancies, accounting for approximately 5% of all ovarian cancers. Primarily affecting young women, these tumors present unique challenges, particularly in balancing effective treatment with fertility preservation. Early diagnosis is common due to the rapid tumor growth and symptoms such as abdominal pain and distension, leading to favorable prognoses when combined with the high chemosensitivity of platinum-based regimens. Fertility-sparing surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for stage I disease, often followed by close surveillance to minimize the long-term toxicities of chemotherapy. Pathology is pivotal for diagnosis, incorporating immunohistochemical markers to differentiate malignant ovarian germ cell tumors subtypes, including dysgerminomas, yolk sac tumors, and immature teratomas. Advanced imaging modalities like ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography are essential for staging, monitoring treatment response, and detecting recurrences. Despite high cure rates, long-term follow-up is crucial to manage late toxicities, such as gonadal dysfunction and secondary malignancies. Recurrent malignant ovarian germ cell tumors present significant therapeutic challenges. High-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell transplantation offers promise in select cases, while the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery and radiotherapy is limited to specific indications. Emerging targeted therapies and novel approaches, such as KIT inhibitors for dysgerminomas with KIT mutations, remain experimental, with limited success reported so far. The rarity and heterogeneity of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors impede large-scale research efforts, underscoring the need for greater understanding of their molecular and genetic landscape to develop more effective and personalized therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of patients having treatments for newly diagnosed advanced stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series of women affected by advanced stage (stage IIIB or more) LGSC undergoing surgery in a single oncologic center between January 2000 and December 2017. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. RESULTS: Data of 72 patients were retrieved. Primary cytoreductive surgery was attempted in 68 (94.4%) patients: 19 (27.9%) had residual disease (RD) >1 cm after primary surgery. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) was attempted in 15 of these 19 (78.9%) patients and the remaining 4 patients having not primary debulking surgery. Twelve out of 19 (63.1%) patients having IDS had RD. After a mean (±standard deviation) follow-up was 61.6 (±37.2) months, 50 (69.4%) and 22 (30.5%) patients recurred and died of disease, respectively. Via multivariate analysis, non-optimal cytoreduction (hazard ratio [HR]=2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16–6.70; p=0.021) and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (FIGO) stage IV (HR=3.15; 95% CI=1.29–7.66; p=0.011) were associated with worse disease-free survival. Via multivariate analysis, absence of significant comorbidities (HR=0.56; 95% CI=0.29–1.10; p=0.093) and primary instead of IDS (HR=2.95; 95% CI=1.12–7.74; p=0.027) were independently associated with an improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: LGSC is at high risk of early recurrence. However, owing to the indolent nature of the disease, the majority of patients are long-term survivors. Further prospective studies and innovative treatment modalities are warranted to improve patients care.
Comorbidity ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ; Disease-Free Survival ; Drug Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Obstetrics ; Ovarian Neoplasms* ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Survivors