Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Benzamides ; Treatment Outcome ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy* ; Remission Induction ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*

Objective: To analyze and compare therapy responses, outcomes, and incidence of severe hematologic adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: Data of patients with chronic phase CML diagnosed between January 2006 and November 2022 from 76 centers, aged ≥18 years, and received initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy within 6 months after diagnosis in China were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the bias of the initial TKI selection, and the therapy responses and outcomes of patients receiving initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy were compared. Results: A total of 4 833 adult patients with CML receiving initial imatinib (n=4 380) or flumatinib (n=453) therapy were included in the study. In the imatinib cohort, the median follow-up time was 54 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-85] months, and the 7-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.2%, 88.4%, 78.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. The 7-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 71.8%, 93.0%, and 96.9%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 13-25) months in the flumatinib cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.4%, 86.5%, 58.4%, and 46.6%, respectively. The 2-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 80.1%, 95.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. The PSM analysis indicated that patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) and higher probabilities of FFS than those receiving the initial imatinib therapy (all P<0.001), whereas the PFS (P=0.230) and OS (P=0.268) were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe hematologic adverse events (grade≥Ⅲ) was comparable in the two cohorts. Conclusion: Patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had higher cumulative incidences of therapy responses and higher probability of FFS than those receiving initial imatinib therapy, whereas the incidence of severe hematologic adverse events was comparable between the two cohorts.
Adult ; Humans ; Adolescent ; Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects* ; Incidence ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Pyrimidines/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; Benzamides/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/drug therapy* ; Aminopyridines/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of flumatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: The clinical data of 56 CML patients treated with flumatinib from January 2020 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 35 new diagnosed CML patients treated with flumatinib (group A), 10 patients with imatinib/dasatinib intolerance (group B) and 11 patients with imatinib/dasatinib resistance (group C) switched to flumatinib treatment, respectively. The molecular response and adverse effects of flumatinib treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: In group A, the early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months was 40.0%, and the major molecular response (MMR) at 6 and 12 months was 43.7% and 46.2%, respectively. In group B, the EMR was 50.0% at 3 months, and the MMR was 70.0% and 66.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Among evaluable patients, 6 cases in group B achieved molecular response of 4.5 (MR4.5) at 12 months after switching to flumatinib treatment. In group C, 3 cases who switched from imatinib resistance to flumatinib achieved MR4.5 at 12 months, but 2 cases who switched from dasatinib resistance to flumatinib failed. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) scores for patients in the medium-risk/high-risk group compared with those in the low-risk group for 3-month EMR (18.8% vs 57.9%), 6-month MMR (15.4% vs 63.2%) and 12-month MR4.5 (15.4% vs 69.2%) (P =0.036, P =0.012,P =0.015). The most common adverse effect in group A was thrombocytopenia, accounting for 54.5%, and 22.8% (8/35) patients discontinued the drug due to haematological adverse effects. Compared with patients who did not discontinue the drug or whose recovery time from discontinuation due to haematological toxicity was <1 month, patients whose recovery time from discontinuation was ≥1 month had a significantly worse 3-month EMR, 6-month MMR and 12-month MR4.5 (P =0.028, P =0.021, P =0.002). CONCLUSIONS Flumatinib has better molecular response and tolerance in patients with primary, imatinib/dasatinib-intolerant or resistant CML. Medium-risk/high-risk in ELTS score and time to recovery from discontinuation due to haematological toxicity ≥1 month are important factors influencing achievement of better molecular response in flumatinib treatment.
Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use* ; Dasatinib/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Benzamides/therapeutic use* ; Chronic Disease ; Treatment Outcome ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*

This study aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effecctiveness of Qizhi Weitong Granules in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Specifically, two commonly used clinical protocols for the treatment of functional dyspepsia were selected: Qizhi Weitong Granules+Mosapride vs Mosapride alone(control). Meta-analysis of previous clinical studies was performed to examine the efficacy and safety, and pharmacoeconomic evaluation was carried out according to the results of the Meta-analysis. The cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out to elucidated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER), and the sensitivity was analyzed with tornado dia-gram and Monte Carlo simulation. The willingness-to-pay threshold of patients for functional dyspepsia was investigated and compared with the ICER to evaluate whether Qizhi Weitong Granules was cost-effective. The result showed that the effective rate of Qizhi Weitong Granules combined with Mosapride in the treatment of functional dyspepsia was 95.49%, which was higher than that of Mosapride alone(73.30%)(OR=8.52, 95%CI[4.36, 16.64])(P<0.000 1). The two groups showed no significant difference in safety. The price of Qizhi Weitong Granules+Mosapride was higher than that of Mosapride alone. The ICER was 640.29 CNY, 1 506.67 CNY lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold. The sensitivity analysis showed that the analysis results were relatively stable. Thus, Qizhi Weitong Granules+Mosapride is safe, effective, and economical in the treatment of functional dyspepsia, which should be further promoted in clinical settings.
Benzamides ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Dyspepsia/drug therapy* ; Economics, Pharmaceutical ; Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Morpholines ; Treatment Outcome

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A total of 10%‒15% of DLBCL cases are associated with myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog(MYC) and/or B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) translocation or amplification. BCL2 inhibitors have potent anti-tumor effects in DLBCL; however, resistance can be acquired through up-regulation of alternative anti-apoptotic proteins. The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor chidamide can induce BIM expression, leading to apoptosis of lymphoma cells with good efficacy in refractory recurrent DLBCL. In this study, the synergistic mechanism of chidamide and venetoclax in DLBCL was determined through in vitro and in vivo models. We found that combination therapy significantly reduced the protein levels of MYC, TP53, and BCL2 in activated apoptotic-related pathways in DLBCL cells by increasing BIM levels and inducing cell apoptosis. Moreover, combination therapy regulated expression of multiple transcriptomes in DLBCL cells, involving apoptosis, cell cycle, phosphorylation, and other biological processes, and significantly inhibited tumor growth in DLBCL-bearing xenograft mice. Taken together, these findings verify the in vivo therapeutic potential of chidamide and venetoclax combination therapy in DLBCL, warranting pre-clinical trials for patients with DLBCL.
Aminopyridines ; Animals ; Benzamides ; Biological Phenomena ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic ; Down-Regulation ; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology* ; Mice ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism* ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/therapeutic use* ; Sulfonamides ; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic imatinib (made in China) in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia chronic phase(CML-CP). METHODS: Fifty-seven newly diagnosed CML-CP patients who did not receive any other anti-CML treatment were treated by domestic imatinib 400 mg once a day. The hematological, cytogenetic and molecular reactions and safety were observed and evaluated after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were treated for ≥3 and 6 months, among which 50 patients were treated for ≥12 months. After 3 months of treatment, 49 patients underwent hematological examination, 47 patients (95.9%) achieved complete hematological response (CHR), 49 patients underwent cytogenetic examination, 39 patients (79.6%) achieved major cytogenetic response (MCyR), and 12 patients (24.5%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). 49 patients underwent the level of BCR-ABL test, including 41 patients (83.7%) with BCR-ABL CONCLUSION In the real world, Domestics imatinib mesylate is effective and safe in the treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP patients, but long-term follow-up data are still necessary to verify its long-term efficacy.
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Benzamides/therapeutic use* ; China ; Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics* ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use* ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Piperazines ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

PROSPER is an international Phase III trial demonstrating the beneficial role of enzalutamide, an androgen receptor antagonist, in prolonging metastasis-free survival in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The trial showed that the median metastasis-free survival was 21.9 months longer for those treated with enzalutamide (36.6 months) compared to those treated with placebo (14.7 months). Enzalutamide also showed prolonged time to PSA progression, PSA response, and time to initiating additional antineoplastic therapy although overall survival is not yet reached. Enzalutamide is the second antiandrogen (next to apalutamide) that has gained the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) label indication for use in the setting of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Benzamides ; Humans ; Male ; Nitriles ; Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use* ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy*

Despite impressive survival benefits with immunotherapy in patients with various solid tumors, the full potential of these agents in prostate cancer has yet to be realized. Sipuleucel-T demonstrated a survival benefit in this population, indicating that prostate cancer is an immunoresponsive disease; however, these results have not been matched by other agents. A large trial with ipilimumab in prostate cancer failed to meet its primary objective, and small trials with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not yield a significant improvement in overall response. However, several late-stage clinical trials are underway with other vaccines in prostate cancer. Reports of clinical benefit with immunotherapies, particularly when used in combination or a select population, have provided the framework to develop sound clinical trials. Understanding immunogenic modulation, antigen spread, biomarkers, and DNA-repair defects will also help mold future strategies. Through rational patient selection and evidence-based combination approaches, patients with prostate cancer may soon derive durable survival benefits with immunotherapies.
Animals ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Benzamides ; CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Ipilimumab/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Nitriles ; Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives* ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Tissue Extracts/administration & dosage*

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the feasibility of imatinib reintroduction in gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST) with high recurrence risk after imatinib adjuvant therapy failure.

METHODSClinical and follow-up data of 24 recurrent GIST patients with high recurrence risk receiving imatinib standard dose reintroduction(400 mg/d or 600 mg/d) after stopping imatinib adjuvant treatment more than 3 months in Department of GI Oncology of Peking University Cancer Hospital from August 2005 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The objective response rate(ORR), relapse-free survival(RFS) of imatinib reintroduction were evaluated and the difference of efficacy in patients receiving different imatinib adjuvant therapy duration were compared.

RESULTSOf 24 patients, 21 were male and 3 were female. The median age was 53 years(39-72 years). Mutation detection of tumor tissues before imatinib therapy showed 20 patients had c-Kit exon 11 mutation,3 patients exon 9 mutation and 1 patient c-Kit/PDGFRA wild type mutation. The median recurrence time was 14 months in all the patients (95%CI:7.9-20.0) and in those patients receiving imatinib adjuvant therapy for 1 or 2 years (9 patients in each group, 95%CI:11.1-16.9 and 8.2-19.8 respectively). The median recurrence time of 3 patients receiving imatinib adjuvant therapy for 3 years was 24, 41 and 54 months respectively. Of 2 patients receiving imatinib adjuvant therapy for 5 years, the median recurrence time was 4 and 18 months. Only one patient received imatinib adjuvant therapy for 6 years, and the recurrence time was 6 months. Twenty patients with exon 11 mutation and 1 patient with wide type received imatinib treatment at a dose of 400 mg daily, and 3 patients with exon 9 mutation received the dosage of 600 mg per day. Among the patients receiving imatinib reintroduction, 11 patients(45.8%) got partial response(PR), 12 patients(50.0%) had stable disease and 1 patient had progression disease. The response rate in patients receiving imatinib adjuvant therapy for 1 year(6/9, 67%) was significantly higher than that in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for ≥2 years(3/15, 20%)(P=0.036). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of imatinib reintroduction was 31 months in all the patients(95%CI:23.6-38.4). The median PFS in patients receiving imatinib adjuvant therapy for 1 year(9 cases), 2 years (9 cases) and ≥3 years (6 cases) was 50 months(95%CI:27.3-72.7), 26 months(95%CI:10.7-41.3) and fall short of median PFS. No significant difference was observed among three groups(P=0.295).

CONCLUSIONSImatinib reintroduction is still effective to GIST after imatinib adjuvant therapy failure. The different imatinib adjuvant therapy duration can influence the benefit of imatinib reintroduction.

Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Benzamides ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Exons ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; drug therapy ; genetics ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Piperazines ; Pyrimidines ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo investigate the efficacy of targeted therapy combined with surgery in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST).

METHODSClinicopathological and followed-up data of 318 patients with recurrent and metastatic GIST admitted in Zhongshan Hospital between January 2000 and December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into four groups: surgery group (operation alone, 44 cases), target therapy group (imatinib alone, 108 cases), target therapy combined with surgery group (imatinib plus operation, 139 cases), other therapy group (chemotherapy, Chinese medicine and others, 27 cases). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of four groups were compared.

RESULTSThe baseline informations, such as age, gender, primary site, et al, were not significantly different (all P>0.05), but the recurrent and metastatic site was significantly different among 4 groups (P=0.000). The medial PFS of surgery group, target therapy group, target therapy combined with surgery was 16(95%CI: 4.9 to 27.0) months, 44 (95%CI: 30.9 to 57.1) months, 35 (95%CI: 26.5 to 43.5) months, respectively, and the latter 2 groups had significantly longer PFS than surgery group(P=0.000), while no significant difference was found between target therapy group and target combined with surgery group (P=0.251). The median OS of surgery group, target therapy group, target therapy combined with surgery, and other therapy group was 24 (95%CI: 9.0 to 39.0) months, 69(95%CI: 40.8 to 97.2) months, 92(95%CI: 78.0 to 106.0) months, 12(95%CI: 9.5 to 14.5) months. Target therapy group and target therapy combined with surgery group had significantly longer OS than surgery and other therapy groups (P=0.000), while the target therapy combined with surgery group had significantly longer OS than target therapy group(P=0.028).

CONCLUSIONTarget therapy combined with surgery can prolong the survival of recurrent and metastatic GIST patients.

Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Benzamides ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; drug therapy ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Piperazines ; Pyrimidines ; Retrospective Studies