OBJECTIVE<p>To discuss the clinical presentation and management of idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis that presented with multiple cranial neuropathies.p>METHODS<p>This is a case report.p>CASE PRESENTATION<p>A 37-year-old female presented with right-sided headache and ipsilateral cranial nerve (CN) I, II, III, IV, and V deficits which improved with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Six months later she developed bilateral blurring of vision with pain on eye movement, which progressed to severe bilateral affectation that prompted admission and treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone therapy followed by prolonged oral steroid treatment which was gradually tapered. Recurrence was treated with oral steroids and azathioprine. Diagnostic modalities included an initial cranial contrast computed tomography (CT) scan which was inconclusive; contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) clinched the diagnosis, as well as demonstrated thickening of the optic nerve perineurium. Visual field analysis 30-2 as well as optic nerve head optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to support the diagnosis and document optic nerve affectation. Biologic testing was used to rule out tuberculosis, syphilis, fungal infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and rheumatoid arthritis. The patient had complete vision recovery in the left eye but only partial vision recovery in the right eye.p>CONCLUSIONS<p>Pachymeningitis should be a diagnostic consideration in patients with headache and multiple cranial neuropathies. Clinicians should always perform independent evaluation of diagnostic modalities with the patient’s clinical presentation in mind. Pachymeningitis can involve the perineurium through contiguous spread of the lesion and present as optic perineuritis as well, with more insidious progression and lasting deficits than isolated optic perineuritis.p>
Human ; Female ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Cranial Nerve Diseases ; Meningitis

OBJECTIVE<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">This study compared the demographics, clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of retinoblastoma patients seen at medical institutions in the Philippines between two time periods: 2010 to 2015 and 2016 to 2020.p>METHODS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">This was a multicenter, analytical, cohort study using review of medical charts and databases of retinoblastoma patients seen in 11 medical institutions from 2010 to 2020.p>RESULTS<p>There were 636 patients (821 eyes) included in this study: 330 patients were seen in 2010 to 2015 while 306 in 2016 to 2020. More cases per annum were seen in the latter timeline. The number of patients with unilateral disease was not significantly different between the two time periods (p=0.51). Age at onset of symptom, age at initial consultation, and delay in consult were also not significantly different between the two time periods (p > 0.05). Patients had significantly different distributions of intraocular grades (p < 0.0001) and systemic staging (p < 0.0001) between the two time periods. Enucleation was the most common surgical treatment performed in both timelines. There was significant difference in the status of patients based on the need for systemic chemotherapy (p < 0.01). There was significant difference in outcome between the two time periods, including the proportions of living and deceased patients.p>CONCLUSION<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">This study compared the most comprehensive data on retinoblastoma patients in the country. There was no improvement in early health seeking behavior based on similar age at initial consult and delay in consult. Enucleation remained the most common treatment mode as opposed to chemotherapy due to similar percentage of patients with unilateral disease, an indication for enucleation rather than chemotherapy.p>
Human ; Retinoblastoma ; Philippines ; Epidemiology ; Treatment ; Therapeutics