Backward-upward-rightward pressure(BURP)maneuver can improve glottic view and increase the success rate of intubation when direct laryngoscopy is used to solve difficult endotracheal intuba-tion,but some studies believe that it can worsen glottic view.With the wide application of video-laryngosco-py,the clinical value of BURP technique has again aroused controversy.This article reviews the definition,method,basic principle of BURP maneuver,effect of the BURP maneuver to improve glottic view during the using laryngoscopy,in order to provide reference for the solution of difficult erdotracheal intubation.

The latest advance of sedation for critically ill adult patients in intensive care unit (ICU) was reviewed in order to provide certain clinical information for the ICU physicians about sedation. Guidelines, clinical research, Meta-analysis, and reviews in recent years were collected using electronic data base. Discussions included: ① the definition of light sedation, and its effects on clinical outcome, stress, sleep and delirium; ② light sedation strategies included: the target population, the target sedation strategy and daily sedation interruption, clinical assessment and monitoring of sedation, selection of sedative drugs, light sedation extenuation; ③ light sedation strategies and pain, agitation, delirium control bundles; ④ the problems and prospects of light sedation. Light sedation is the main principle of currently ICU sedation strategy in critically ill adult patients. Goal-directed light sedation should be considered as a routine therapy in most clinical situation, and its goal should be achieved as early as possible in the early stage of sedation. Routine use of benzodiazepines should be avoided, especially in patients with or at a risk of delirium. Prevention and treatment of agitation with a combination of non-pharmacologic or pharmacologic methods; ICU specification rules for pain, agitation and delirium prevention and treatment should be made. Light sedation is the main ICU sedation strategy in adult patients now, but must be individualized for each patient.

Objective To evaluate the effect of mild hypothermia on the recovery from cisatracurium blockade during the recovery from anesthesia in patients .Methods Thirty ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients , aged 18-64 yr , with body mass index 18-25 kg/m2 , scheduled for elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia ,were enrolled in the study .The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the body temperature recorded when cisatracurium infusion was stopped at the end of surgery .The body temperature 36.0-36.9 ℃served as normothermia group (group N , n=14 ) and 34.0-35.9 ℃ served as mild hypothermia group (group H , n= 16 ) . The body temperature was measured by a thermocouple placed in the nasopharynx . Neuromuscular function was monitored by measuring the evoked mechanical response of the adductor pollicis muscle to supramaximal train-of-four (TOF) stimulation (frequency 2 Hz ,wave length 0.2 ms ,intensity 50 mA ,interval 15 s) of the ulnar nerve at the wrist using TOF-Watch SX? .Cisatracurium was intravenously infused at 1-3μg·kg-1 ·min-1 during surgery to maintain neuromuscular block with 1%

Objective To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on minimal induced dose of propofol and cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation.Methods A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted.Sixty patients who underwent elective laparoscopic surgery were randomly divided into the dexmedetomidine group (treatment group) and control group.Patients in treatment group were given dexmedetomidine at dose of 0.1 μg/kg · min for 10 min before anesthesia induction,and then infused with 0.4 μg/kg · h until the end.Sodium chloride injection was infused at the same rate in control group.After 10 minutes from the start of dexmedetomidine or sodium chloride injection,propofol was infused by 0.4 mg/kg · min.The dosage of propofol used was recorded when eyelash reflex disappearing,and BIS value in 40 to 60.Propofol was infusion at the same rate,and laryngoscope was incubated at 2 minutes after fentanyl and rocuronium were given.The alertness/sedation (OAA/S scores),mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate,pluse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and BIS values were recorded at baseline (before dexmedetomidine or sodium chloride injection infusion),5 and 10 minutes after dexmedetomidine or sodium chloride injection infusion,at the time of eyelash reflex disappearing,before endotracheal intubation,placing the laryngoscope,1,3 and 5 min after intubation.Results OAA/S scores and BIS values in the treatment group were significantly lower than that of control group at 5 minutes and 10 minutes after the dexmedetomidine or sodium chloride injection infusion(P ＜0.05).MAP in treatment group was higher than that of control group at the time of eyelash reflex disappearing,before endotracheal intubation,placing the laryngoscope,1,3 and 5 minutes after intubation (P ＜0.05).Heart rate in treatment group was lower than that of control group at 5 and 10 minutes after dexmedetomidine or sodium chloride injection infusion and before the endotracheal intubation(P ＜ 0.05).There was no significant difference in terms of SpO2 between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).When patients consciousness disappeared and BIS values were in 40-60,the minimum induced dose of propofol was (88.00 ± 25.91) mg in treatment group and (117.33 ± 25.45) mg in control group.The dosage of propofol treatment group was obviously less than control group (t =4.423,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine reduces the minimum induced dose of propofol while maintaining more stable hemodynamic changes during anesthesia induction.However,there has no obvious inhibition effect on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of nalmefene antagonizing postoperative respiratory depression induced by opioids.Methods Two hundred and forty ASA Ⅰ orⅡpatients aged 18-64 yr with body weight fluctuating within 20% of the standard body weight were included in this multicenter,randomized,double-blind,positive drug-controlled study.Anesthesia was induced with etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and TCI of sufentanil(effect-site concentration 0.4.ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.6mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained at 35-45 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane+ sufentanil TCI(Ce=0.1-0.4 ng/ml).Patients undergoing neurosurgery and liver or kidney operation were excluded.The operation time was within 3 h.The residual effects of muscle relaxants were reversed after operation.The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=120 each):group Ⅰneloxone andgroup Ⅱ nalmefene.Naloxone 0.1 mg or nalmefene 0.25 μg/kg was injected iv over 30 s and was repeated 5 min later if necessary until the respiratory rate＞10 bpm,PETCO2＜45 mm Hg and apnea time＜15 s.The total amount of naloxone was≤0.4 mg while that of nalmefene≤1 μg/kg.BP,HR,SpO2,PETCO2,respiratory rate and apnea time were recorded immediately before and at 2 and 5 min after haloxone/nalmefene administration and then every 5 min until 5 min after extubation.The recovery of spontaneous breathing within 30 min after naloxone/nalmefene administration,extubation time and Ramsay sedation score at 5 min after extubation were recorded.The patients were also observed for adverse reactions.Results Spontaneous breathing recovered within 30 min after naloxone/nalmefene administration in all patients in both groups.The extubation time was significantly shorter in nalmefene group than in naloxone group.There was no significant difference in Ramsay sedation score,BP,HR,SpO2 and incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups.Conclusion Nalmefene is better than naloxone in antagonizing opioid-induced postoperative respiratory depression.

Objective To investigate the effects of inhalation of different concentrations of sevoflurane on pulmonary inflammatory response in rats. Methods One hundred and twenty adult Wistar rats of both sexes weighing 200-250 g were randomly divided into 4 groups: Ⅰ control group breathing room air (group C, n = 12);Ⅱ oxygen group breathing 40% O2(group O, n = 36);Ⅲ and Ⅳ sevoflurane groups breathing 1.5% and 3.0% sevoflurane in 40% O2 respectively (group S1, S2, n = 36). Group Ⅱ was further divided into 3 subgroups according to the duration of 40% O2 inhalation 4 h, 8 h and 10 h. Group Ⅲ and Ⅳ were further divided into 3 subgroups ( n = 12 each) breathing sevoflurane for 4 h, 8 h and 8 h followed by 2 h O2 (40%) inhalation. The animals were sacrificed at the end of O2 or/and sevoflurane inhalation. Broncho-alveolar lavage was performed in 6 animals in each subgroup. The TNF-α concentration in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid was determined. The TNF-α mRNA expression and MPO activity in the lung tissue were measured in the other 6 animals in each subgroup. Results Inhalation of 1.5% or 3.0% sevoflurane for 4 or 8 h did not induce inflammatory response in the lung as compared with animals breathing room air or 40% O2 . Conclusion Exposure to sevoflurane does not induce pulmonary inflammatory response in rats breathing spontaneously.

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV) in monitoring blood volume during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopy operation. Methods Twenty-two ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients ( 12 male, 10 female) aged 18-60 yr undergoing thoracoscopy operation under general anesthesia were studied. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam, sufentanil, propofol and rocuronium and maintained with TCI of propofol and remifentanil and intermittent iv boluses of vecoronium. Robertshow double-lumen endobronchial tube was inserted. Correct position of the tube was verified by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The patients were mechani40 mm Hg. Radial artery was cannulated and connected to FloTrac pressure transducer and Vigileo monitor. A loading dose of 6% HES 5 ml/kg was infused over 10 min. MAP, HR, CO and SVV were recorded before and at 3 min after loading dose. The change rate of SVV (SVV) and CI (△CI) were calculated. Increase in CI by 11% was considered effective volume expansion. The ROC curve for SVV in determining the volume expansion efficacy was plotted. The area under the curve for SVV and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results (1) CO were significantly increased while SVV decreased after a loading dose of HES. (2) During two-lung ventilation 12 patients responded to the 6% HES loading dose.SVV correlated with△CI ( - 0.710, P ＜ 0.05). The volume expansion efficacy was determined by SVV 11.5 % (sensitivity = 82 %, specificity = 92 % ). The area under the curve for SVV and 95% confidance interval were 0.880 (0.580-0.987). (3) During one-lung ventilation 11 patients responded to the 6 % HES loading dose. SVV correlated with CI ( - 0.668 , P ＜ 0.05). The volume expansion efficacy was determined by SVV 9.5 % ( sensitivity = 77 %, specificity = 63 % ). The area under the curve for SVV and 95% confidance interval were 0.971 (0.917-1.024). Conclusion One-lung ventilation does not alter the ability of SVV in monitoring blood volume in patients undergoing thoracoscopy operation.

Objective To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in patients after lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracoscope (VAT) .Methods Fifty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes aged 20-76 yr weighing 45-90 kg undergoing elective lobectomy via VAT were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 25 each): patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group and thoracic PVB group. PVB was performed according to the method described by Jamieson et al and Richardson et al. Paravertebral catheter was placed at T7-8 after induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation. A loading dose of 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml was administered via PVB catheter at 30 min before the end of operation. PVB was then controlled by the patients with 0.2% ropivacaine (bolus dose 8.0 ml, lockout interval 30 min). In PCIA group a loading dose of sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg was given iv at 30 mln before the end of operation. Sufentanil 1.0 μg/ml was used. PCIA included a bolus of 2 ml with a 15 min lockout interval and background infusion 2 ml/h. Numeric rating scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10 = most severe pain) was used to assess the intensity of pain. NRS score, MAP, HR and SpO2 were recorded before operation (T0 ,baseline), 30 min after withdrawal of chest tube (Ti) and at 24, 48 and 72 h after operation (T2, T3, T4). Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume first second (FEV1.0) were measured and FVC/FEV1.0 ratio was calculated after chest tube was withdrawn. Blood cortisone and glucose concentrations were determined at To, T1 and T4. Requirement for rescue analgesics and side effects were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in MAP, HR, SpO2 and NRS at rest between the 2 groups.NRS at coughing and blood cortisone and glucose concentrations were significantly lower and the postoperative FEV1.0 was significantly higher in PVB group than in PCIA group. The requirement for rescue analgesics and side effects were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusion Thoracic PVB can provide better postoperative analgesia with little side effects.

Objective To investigate the efficacy of centrally fixed eyeball for assessment of the depth of anesthesia in premature infants undergoing outpatient fundus examination. Methods Fifty eight premature infants undergoing examination of fundus of eyes were enrolled in this study. Their gestational age (from the first day of last menstruation period to birth) + after birth age (from birth to the day when examination of fundus of eyes was performed) = 44-64 weeks. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Ⅰ group body movement (group M, n = 27) and Ⅱ group centrally fixed eyeball (group E, n = 31). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane inhalation. The patients were breathing spontaneously. The eyelids were kept open with speculum after induction of anesthesia. The EC50 of sevoflurane concentration which could inhibit body movement or make eyeballs centrally fixed was determined by up-and-down sequential experiment. The initial isoflurane concentration was 3% in both groups. Each time the isoflurane concentration was increased/decreased by 0.5 %. 95 % confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The lowest SpO2, respiratory rate and coughing during maintenance of anesthesia were recorded. Results The EC50 of sevoflurane (95% CI) was 2.9% (2.2%-3.6%) in group M and 3.4%(2.6%-4.6%) in group E. Examination was successfully completed in all patients. No respiratory depression and coughing occurred during examination and no vomiting and coughing were observed during feeding at 1 h after recovery from anesthesia. No body movement occurred in 15 patients whose eyeballs were centrally fixed in group E. Conclusion Centrally fixed eyeball can be used as sign of appropriate depth of anesthesia for fundus examination in premature infants.

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of BIS value for monitoring the depth of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide in children. Methods Seventy-two ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ children aged 1-14 yr undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly assigned into 3 groups ( n = 24 each) :sevoflurane group (group S), sevoflurane + 30% N2O group (group SN1 )and sevoflurane + 60% N2O (group SN2 ). Anesthesia was induced with atropine, lidocaine, propofol, rocuronium and remifentanil. After tracheal intubation, the patients were mechanically ventilated. PETCO2 was maintained at 35-45 mm Hg. Anesthesia was maintained with 2.5% sevoflurane combined with 0, 30% and 60% nitrous oxide in group S, SN1 and SN2 respectively. The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (CETSev) was maintained at 2.5%, 2.0% and 1.5%. Each CETSev was maintained for at least 10 min after the begining of the surgery. Then the CETSev was modified to maintain BIS value at 40-60. BIS value was recorded before anesthesia induction and each stable CETSev. CETSev was recorded at maintaining BIS value of 40-60 for at least 20 min ( C50 ).Results BIS value and C50 were significantly lower in group SN2 than in group S and SN1 ( P ＜ 0.05), while no significant difference was found between group S and SN1 ( P ＞ 0.05). BIS value was negatively correlated with CETSev in all 3 groups (r = -0.736, -0.817, -0.729, P ＜ 0.01).There was no significant difference in the correlation coefficients among the 3 groups ( P ＞ 0.05 ). Conclusion BIS value can accurately reflect the depth of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia in children.