1.Report and literature review of three cases of adrenal anastomotic hemangioma
Changsheng ZHANG ; Jing HU ; Jinsong ZHANG ; Qi LIU ; Huixing YUAN ; Hao XU ; Baolong QIN
Journal of Modern Urology 2025;30(8):695-700
Objective To summarize and analyze the clinical features,imaging manifestations,pathological characteristics,treatment approaches,and prognosis of adrenal anastomotic hemangioma(AH),so as to enhance the clinical understanding of this disease.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3 adrenal AH patients treated in Tongji Hospital during Jan.2012 and Dec.2024.Relevant literature was reviewed.Results All patients were male,aged 34-56 years,with a maximum tumor diameter of 2.0-5.0 cm.All tumors were solitary.No patients presented with special clinical manifestations.Biochemical tests indicated tumors with no endocrine function.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed circular mixed density shadows with uneven edge enhancement.Two patients underwent laparoscopic partial adrenal resection,and one patient received robot-assisted laparoscopic partial adrenal resection.Postoperative pathological results of all three cases indicated AH.Immunohistochemistry showed CD31(+),CD34(+),and ERG(+).No recurrence was found in a postoperative follow-up of 1-45 months.A total of 22 cases of adrenal AH were reported in the literature and our center,with onset age ranging from 34 to 83 years.The patients included 17 males and 5 females,with a maximum tumor diameter of 0.6-8.8 cm.Among them,2 cases were multifocal and the tumors were located in the kidneys,beside kidneys,or in the inferior vena cava.Two cases showed clinical manifestations of lower back pain.During the follow-up of 156 months,no recurrence or metastasis was observed.Conclusion Adrenal AH is a rare benign tumor,which mainly occurs in middle-aged and elderly people with no clinical symptoms and endocrine function.Imaging can easily mistake it for pheochromocytoma or well differentiated vascular sarcoma,and the diagnosis mainly relies on pathological examination.It should be distinguished from pheochromocytoma and well differentiated vascular sarcoma.Surgery is the main treatment method and the prognosis is good.
2.Report and literature review of three cases of adrenal anastomotic hemangioma
Changsheng ZHANG ; Jing HU ; Jinsong ZHANG ; Qi LIU ; Huixing YUAN ; Hao XU ; Baolong QIN
Journal of Modern Urology 2025;30(8):695-700
Objective To summarize and analyze the clinical features,imaging manifestations,pathological characteristics,treatment approaches,and prognosis of adrenal anastomotic hemangioma(AH),so as to enhance the clinical understanding of this disease.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3 adrenal AH patients treated in Tongji Hospital during Jan.2012 and Dec.2024.Relevant literature was reviewed.Results All patients were male,aged 34-56 years,with a maximum tumor diameter of 2.0-5.0 cm.All tumors were solitary.No patients presented with special clinical manifestations.Biochemical tests indicated tumors with no endocrine function.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed circular mixed density shadows with uneven edge enhancement.Two patients underwent laparoscopic partial adrenal resection,and one patient received robot-assisted laparoscopic partial adrenal resection.Postoperative pathological results of all three cases indicated AH.Immunohistochemistry showed CD31(+),CD34(+),and ERG(+).No recurrence was found in a postoperative follow-up of 1-45 months.A total of 22 cases of adrenal AH were reported in the literature and our center,with onset age ranging from 34 to 83 years.The patients included 17 males and 5 females,with a maximum tumor diameter of 0.6-8.8 cm.Among them,2 cases were multifocal and the tumors were located in the kidneys,beside kidneys,or in the inferior vena cava.Two cases showed clinical manifestations of lower back pain.During the follow-up of 156 months,no recurrence or metastasis was observed.Conclusion Adrenal AH is a rare benign tumor,which mainly occurs in middle-aged and elderly people with no clinical symptoms and endocrine function.Imaging can easily mistake it for pheochromocytoma or well differentiated vascular sarcoma,and the diagnosis mainly relies on pathological examination.It should be distinguished from pheochromocytoma and well differentiated vascular sarcoma.Surgery is the main treatment method and the prognosis is good.
3.Spinal cord electrical stimulation with neurophysiological monitoring for treatment of high-risk diabetic foot
Zhitao LI ; Wenhan LI ; Shaoya YIN ; Baolong LIU ; Nan QIN ; Xin LIU
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2024;36(3):298-302
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a single-session implantation of spinal cord electrical stimulation with neurophysiological monitoring a spinal cord electrical stimulator under general anesthesia with neurophysiological monitoring for the treatment of high-risk diabetic foot.Methods:The clinical data of seven patients with high-risk diabetic foot who underwent spinal cord electrical stimulation in neurosurgery ward nine of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital from May 2022 to May 2023 were collected. The operation was performed under general anesthesia with the "C" arm X ray machine guidance and neurophysiological monitoring. The arterial diameter and peak flow rate of lower extremity, lower extremity skin temperature (calf skin temperature, foot skin temperature), visual analog scale (VAS), continuous distance of movement, blood glucose level and toe wound were compared between patients before and after surgery.Results:A total of seven patients with high-risk diabetic foot were included. The diameters and peak flow rates of femoral artery, popliteal artery, anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and dorsal foot artery in both lower limbs were significantly improved after surgery. All patients had different degrees of lower limb pain before operation. After operation, VAS score decreased significantly (1.1±0.9 vs. 6.8±3.4), the pain was significantly relieved, and the calf skin temperature and foot skin temperature were significantly higher than those before surgery [calf skin temperature (℃): 33.3±0.9 vs. 30.9±0.7, foot skin temperature (℃): 31.4±0.8 vs. 29.1±0.6], fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose were significantly lower than those before surgery [fasting blood glucose (mmol/L): 7.6±1.4 vs. 10.5±1.2, postprandial blood glucose (mmol/L): 9.3±2.3 vs. 13.5±1.1], the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.01). The lower limb movement of all seven patients was significantly improved after surgery, including one patient who needed wheelchair travel before surgery, and one patient who had intermittent claudication before surgery. Among them, one patient needed wheelchair travel and one patient had intermittent claudication before surgery. All patients could walk normally at 2 weeks after operation. Among the seven patients, two patients had the diabetic foot wound ulceration before surgery, which could not heal for a long time. One month after surgery, blood flow around the foot wound recovered and the healing was accelerated. The wound was dry and crusted around the wound, and the wound healed well. Conclusion:For diabetic high-risk foot patients who are intolerant to diabetic peripheral neuralgia and local anesthesia spinal cord electrical stimulation test, one-time implantation of spinal cord electrical stimulator under general anesthesia under neurophysiological monitoring can effectively alleviate peripheral neuralgia and other diabetic foot related symptoms, improve lower limb blood supply, and reduce the risk of toe amputation. Clinical practice has proved the effectiveness of this technique, especially for the early treatment of diabetic high-risk foot patients.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail