Objective: To confirm the reactive anti-TP ELISA screening results in blood donor samples, and analyze implementaion of re-examination among reactive donors, so as to provide data support for effectively formulating re-examination strategies. Methods: Confirmation tests were performed on 331 samples (including 224 cases with dual-reagent reactivity and 107 cases with single-reagent reactivity) using treponema pallidum particle agglutination assays (TPPA). A total of 136 blood samples were collected from blood donors who have previously tested for anti-TP ELISA with single-reagent reactivity and voluntarily applied for re-examination from 2020 to 2024. Infectious disease indicators were detected in accordance with the "Technical Operating Procedures of Blood Stations (2019 Edition)". Among them, anti-TP screening was performed using ELISA reagents from two different manufacturers, and HBV/HCV/HIV nucleic acid testing was conducted using an individual donation nucleic acid testing (ID-NAT) mode. Supplementary tests (WB or TPPA) were conducted on samples with anti-TP ELISA single-reagent reactivity. A two-sided Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the differences of the positive rates of anti-TP among different groups or reagents. Results: Among the 331 samples, the confirmed positive rate was 93.75% (210/224) for dual-reagent reactive samples, and 2.8% (3/107) for single-reagent reactive samples. The confirmed positive rates of double reagent reactive samples with different reagent combinations were 91.7% (95% CI: 85.6%-95.5%), 95.6% (95% CI: 85.2%-98.8%), 96.6% (95% CI: 86.2%-97.3%) respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ =1.597, P=0.463). From 2020 to 2024, 994 donors showed anti-TP ELISA single-reagent reactive results. Among them, 136 (136/994, 13.68%) donors voluntarily applied for re-examination. After the first round of re-examination, 88 (88/136, 64.71%) donors passed the re-examination, and 18 donors were permanently deffered (18/136, 13.24%). Among the permanently quarantined donors, 12 donors remained anti-TP ELISA single-reagent reactive, including 8 confirmed positive for TP-specific antobodies and 4 with indeterminate results. The remaining 6 donors converted to dual-reagent reactive. Conclusion: The dual-reagent reactive results in anti-TP ELISA has a high true positive rate, and the corresponding blood donors can be directly deffered. The majority of single-reagent reactive anti TP-ELISA results are false positives. Timely confirmation or supplementary testing allows prompt notification of evaluation results to blood donors, and reduces unnecessary follow-up examinations. This helps improve the quality of blood donor services and management efficiency, as well as prevent blood donor attrition.

Supercooling preservation technology, as a groundbreaking innovation in the field of organ preservation, significantly reduces the metabolic rate of cells and inhibits ice crystal formation by placing organs in a low-temperature environment near or below the freezing point. This technology extends the preservation time of organs and maintains their biological activity. Compared with the traditional low-temperature preservation at 4 °C, supercooling preservation effectively avoids cell damage and the accumulation of metabolic products, demonstrating significant advantages in the preservation of cells, tissues and organs. In recent years, important progress has been made in the optimization of cryoprotectants, the application of antifreeze proteins, the improvement of vitrification technology, and the development of nanotechnology-based rewarming techniques. These advancements provide new pathways to address the challenges of toxicity, ice crystal formation and uneven rewarming rates during supercooling preservation. This review summarizes the basic principles of supercooling preservation, the application of key technologies, and their practical effects in organ transplantation. It also analyzes the challenges of toxicity and rewarming efficiency, aiming to provide theoretical support and research directions for the future optimization of organ low-temperature preservation technology and its clinical application.