1.Clinical outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of functional anorectal pain
Hongyan ZHENG ; Fan LIU ; Bangguo CHENG ; Xu LIN ; Min NI
Chinese Journal of Digestion 2025;45(2):117-123
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and effects on emotional state, anorectal physiological function, serum inflammation factors and neurotransmitters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on functional anorectal pain (FAP) patients, and to explore the potential therapeutic mechanisms.Methods:From September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, a total of 50 FAP patients who were admitted to Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the treatment group (20 cases) and the control group (20 cases) according to a random number table and relevant exclusion criteria. The treatment group received rTMS treatment and the control group received sham rTMS treatment. The Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) score, Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, high-resolution anorectal manometry data (anal resting pressure, anal squeeze pressure, initial sensation shreshold, defecation shreshold, defecation urgency shreshold, and tolerance shreshold), and the levels of serum inflammatory factors (interleukin(IL)-4, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α) and 5-hydroxytryptamin(5-HT) were recorded before and after treatment. Independent sample t-test, paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The VAS, HAMA, and HAMD scores of the treatment group after treatment were lower than those before treatment (3.85±2.23 vs. 6.85±1.98, 4.40±3.39 vs. 8.75±6.60, and 7.10±6.56 vs. 12.85±7.20), and were also lower than those of the control group after treatment(6.50±1.76, 8.20±6.65, 12.10±6.80), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=5.68, 4.72, 6.06; -4.17, -2.27, -2.37; P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001; <0.001, =0.028, and =0.023). The initial sensation shreshold, defecation shreshold, defecation urgency shreshold, and tolerance shreshold of the treatment group after treatment were higher than those before treatment(30.00(30.00, 46.00) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. 23.00(18.50, 29.00) mmHg, 50.00(44.50, 60.00) mmHg vs. 37.00(30.75, 51.50) mmHg, (74.30±16.02) mmHg vs. (63.70±22.21) mmHg, 119.00(100.00, 148.00) mmHg vs. 98.00 (69.50, 153.00) mmHg), and the tolerance shreshold of the treatment group after treatment was higher than that of the control group after treatment(119.00 (100.00, 148.00) mmHg vs. 102.00(84.50, 111.50) mmHg), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=–3.14 and –2.86, t=-4.02, Z=-2.84 and -2.11; P=0.002, 0.004, 0.001, 0.004, and 0.035). Additionally, the 5-HT level of the treatment group after treatment was higher than that before treatment (1 549.41 (1 320.21, 1 640.03) μg/L vs. 1 081.52(874.36, 1 626.79) μg/L), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-2.88, P=0.004). Conclusion:The rTMS treatment can effectively relieve the pain, anxiety and depression, improve visceral sensitivity, and influence the neurotransmitter level of brain-gut axis in FAP patients.
2.Clinical outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of functional anorectal pain
Hongyan ZHENG ; Fan LIU ; Bangguo CHENG ; Xu LIN ; Min NI
Chinese Journal of Digestion 2025;45(2):117-123
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and effects on emotional state, anorectal physiological function, serum inflammation factors and neurotransmitters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on functional anorectal pain (FAP) patients, and to explore the potential therapeutic mechanisms.Methods:From September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, a total of 50 FAP patients who were admitted to Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the treatment group (20 cases) and the control group (20 cases) according to a random number table and relevant exclusion criteria. The treatment group received rTMS treatment and the control group received sham rTMS treatment. The Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) score, Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, high-resolution anorectal manometry data (anal resting pressure, anal squeeze pressure, initial sensation shreshold, defecation shreshold, defecation urgency shreshold, and tolerance shreshold), and the levels of serum inflammatory factors (interleukin(IL)-4, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α) and 5-hydroxytryptamin(5-HT) were recorded before and after treatment. Independent sample t-test, paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The VAS, HAMA, and HAMD scores of the treatment group after treatment were lower than those before treatment (3.85±2.23 vs. 6.85±1.98, 4.40±3.39 vs. 8.75±6.60, and 7.10±6.56 vs. 12.85±7.20), and were also lower than those of the control group after treatment(6.50±1.76, 8.20±6.65, 12.10±6.80), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=5.68, 4.72, 6.06; -4.17, -2.27, -2.37; P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001; <0.001, =0.028, and =0.023). The initial sensation shreshold, defecation shreshold, defecation urgency shreshold, and tolerance shreshold of the treatment group after treatment were higher than those before treatment(30.00(30.00, 46.00) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. 23.00(18.50, 29.00) mmHg, 50.00(44.50, 60.00) mmHg vs. 37.00(30.75, 51.50) mmHg, (74.30±16.02) mmHg vs. (63.70±22.21) mmHg, 119.00(100.00, 148.00) mmHg vs. 98.00 (69.50, 153.00) mmHg), and the tolerance shreshold of the treatment group after treatment was higher than that of the control group after treatment(119.00 (100.00, 148.00) mmHg vs. 102.00(84.50, 111.50) mmHg), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=–3.14 and –2.86, t=-4.02, Z=-2.84 and -2.11; P=0.002, 0.004, 0.001, 0.004, and 0.035). Additionally, the 5-HT level of the treatment group after treatment was higher than that before treatment (1 549.41 (1 320.21, 1 640.03) μg/L vs. 1 081.52(874.36, 1 626.79) μg/L), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-2.88, P=0.004). Conclusion:The rTMS treatment can effectively relieve the pain, anxiety and depression, improve visceral sensitivity, and influence the neurotransmitter level of brain-gut axis in FAP patients.
3.Compared analysis of CT features and pathology of pulmonary solitary fibrous tumor
Xuemei ZHANG ; Bangguo LI ; Lingwen ZENG ; Meng WANG ; Shuo WU ; Nianlan CHENG ; Xianli LUO
Journal of Practical Radiology 2018;34(12):1857-1859
Objective To compare the CT features and pathology of pulmonary solitary fibrous tumor (SFT),to improve the diagnosis and differential diagnosis.Methods CT images and corresponding pathological results of 14 cases with pulmonary SFT were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among the 14 cases,6 were in the right lung and other 8 were in the left.The maximum diameters of tumors were ranged from 2.5 cm to 20.0 cm,and 6 cases were over 10.0 cm.All 14 cases represented as irregular solid nodule or mass,4 as unclear boundary and 1 as lobulation.Most of the cases showed heterogeneous and progressive enhancement.The light microscopy showed that tumor tissues were mainly composed of collagen fibers and spindle cells with different proliferation degrees,and 3 cases showed atypia cells.There were abundant blood vessels in the intercellular substance.Immunohistochemistry were done in 13 cases,presenting Bcl-2,CD99 and Vimentin positive expressions in all cases and CD34 expression in 9.Conclusion The CT features of pulmonary SFT are related to pathological features.CT scan is important in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of pulmonary SFT,and obvious inhomogeneous map-like and progressive enhancement should be considered for the diagnosis of SFT.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail