Objective:To examine the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on postoperative complications of immediate deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.Methods:Data was collected from 185 patients underwent immediate DIEP reconstruction during November 2006 to March 2020 Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All the patients were female, aging (43.0±7.8) years (range: 29 to 61 years). The series included with a total of 187 flaps (2 bilateral, 183 unilateral). Included patients were divided into 2 groups: immediate DIEP reconstruction requring or not requring post-mastectomy radiation therapy (71 cases (71 flaps) in PMRT group, 114 cases (116 flaps) in control group). The aesthetic outcome were measured by Kroll score system and compared between the groups by t test. The complications included partial flap loss, minor necrosis were analyzed between the groups by χ 2 test, while the influence of the other correlation factors on complication occurrence was analyzed by Logistic analysis. Results:The controll groups showed better aesthetic results (2.21±0.55 vs. 2.47±0.82, t=-2.593, P=0.010). Complication rate in PMRT group was higher than that in control group (19.7% (15/71) vs. 4.2% (4/116), χ2=15.079, P<0.01). The complication rate was not correlated with age, body mass index, perforator number, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions:Correlation was observed between adjuvant radiotherapy and post-operative complication of the DIEP flap. However, the complication occurrence and aesthetic results remain in the acceptable range. The other factors such as age, body mass index, perforator number, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered as prognosis factor of post-operative complication of the DIEP flap.

Objective:To examine the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on postoperative complications of immediate deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.Methods:Data was collected from 185 patients underwent immediate DIEP reconstruction during November 2006 to March 2020 Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All the patients were female, aging (43.0±7.8) years (range: 29 to 61 years). The series included with a total of 187 flaps (2 bilateral, 183 unilateral). Included patients were divided into 2 groups: immediate DIEP reconstruction requring or not requring post-mastectomy radiation therapy (71 cases (71 flaps) in PMRT group, 114 cases (116 flaps) in control group). The aesthetic outcome were measured by Kroll score system and compared between the groups by t test. The complications included partial flap loss, minor necrosis were analyzed between the groups by χ 2 test, while the influence of the other correlation factors on complication occurrence was analyzed by Logistic analysis. Results:The controll groups showed better aesthetic results (2.21±0.55 vs. 2.47±0.82, t=-2.593, P=0.010). Complication rate in PMRT group was higher than that in control group (19.7% (15/71) vs. 4.2% (4/116), χ2=15.079, P<0.01). The complication rate was not correlated with age, body mass index, perforator number, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions:Correlation was observed between adjuvant radiotherapy and post-operative complication of the DIEP flap. However, the complication occurrence and aesthetic results remain in the acceptable range. The other factors such as age, body mass index, perforator number, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered as prognosis factor of post-operative complication of the DIEP flap.

Objective:To investigate the current trend of breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy and provide reference for the improvement of breast cancer clinical guideline in the future.Methods:Questionnaires of cross-sectional survey were sent to 110 hospitals (breast cancer surgery quantity surpassing 200) between July 2018 and September 2018. The stages and subtypes, therapeutic regimen, treatment assession, operation choice and preforming of patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy were recorded.Results:Neoadjuvant treatment has been performed in all of the 110 hospitals. The total number of breast patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy was about 14 550 (17.0% in surgical patients) in 2017. For all of the neoadjuvant patients, the proportion of stageⅡ patients was less than 30% in 81 hospitals, and the proportion of stage Ⅲ was more than 50% in 84 hospitals. The numbers of estrogen receptor (ER) (+ )/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) (-), ER (-)/HER-2 (+ ) and triple negative subtype breast cancer patients were 3 550 (24.4%), 6 024 (41.4%) and 4 991 (34.3%), respectively. Patient′s scruples of relatively delayed operation and weak will of breast conservation after neoadjuvant therapy were the majority reasons for neoadjuvant therapy restriction. Anthracycline followed by taxane was the most usual neoadjuvant therapeutic regimens in 53.6% hospitals, and anthracycline plus taxane was the first choice in 42.7% hospitals. Chemotherapy with targeting therapy was recommended to HER-2 positive neoadjuvant patients in 80.9% hospitals. To assess treatment outcome of neoadjuvant treatment, 42.7% hospitals used MRI in more than 50% patients while the usage rate of MRI was less than 20% in 37.3% hospitals. The proportions of hospital using repeat-marking, tattoo and metal clip as the first method to identify the primary tumor region and lymph nodes were 60.0%, 29.1% and 10.9%, respectively. Breast-conservation rate after neoadjuvant therapy was less than 20% in 87.3% hospitals.Conclusions:Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer is widely performed in most hospitals in China, while the proportion of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable breast cancer is still low. Meanwhile, the idea of achieving de-escalation operation through neoadjuvant treatment is not promoted and the therapeutic evaluation method of neoadjuvant treatment needs further studies to improve.

Objective:To investigate the current trend of breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy and provide reference for the improvement of breast cancer clinical guideline in the future.Methods:Questionnaires of cross-sectional survey were sent to 110 hospitals (breast cancer surgery quantity surpassing 200) between July 2018 and September 2018. The stages and subtypes, therapeutic regimen, treatment assession, operation choice and preforming of patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy were recorded.Results:Neoadjuvant treatment has been performed in all of the 110 hospitals. The total number of breast patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy was about 14 550 (17.0% in surgical patients) in 2017. For all of the neoadjuvant patients, the proportion of stageⅡ patients was less than 30% in 81 hospitals, and the proportion of stage Ⅲ was more than 50% in 84 hospitals. The numbers of estrogen receptor (ER) (+ )/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) (-), ER (-)/HER-2 (+ ) and triple negative subtype breast cancer patients were 3 550 (24.4%), 6 024 (41.4%) and 4 991 (34.3%), respectively. Patient′s scruples of relatively delayed operation and weak will of breast conservation after neoadjuvant therapy were the majority reasons for neoadjuvant therapy restriction. Anthracycline followed by taxane was the most usual neoadjuvant therapeutic regimens in 53.6% hospitals, and anthracycline plus taxane was the first choice in 42.7% hospitals. Chemotherapy with targeting therapy was recommended to HER-2 positive neoadjuvant patients in 80.9% hospitals. To assess treatment outcome of neoadjuvant treatment, 42.7% hospitals used MRI in more than 50% patients while the usage rate of MRI was less than 20% in 37.3% hospitals. The proportions of hospital using repeat-marking, tattoo and metal clip as the first method to identify the primary tumor region and lymph nodes were 60.0%, 29.1% and 10.9%, respectively. Breast-conservation rate after neoadjuvant therapy was less than 20% in 87.3% hospitals.Conclusions:Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer is widely performed in most hospitals in China, while the proportion of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable breast cancer is still low. Meanwhile, the idea of achieving de-escalation operation through neoadjuvant treatment is not promoted and the therapeutic evaluation method of neoadjuvant treatment needs further studies to improve.

Objective: To investigate the current status of breast reconstruction surgery in China and analyze the specific views of Chinese doctors on the relationship between radiotherapy and breast reconstruction surgery. Methods: A total of 110 medical institutions nationwide with more than 200 cases of breast cancer surgery yearly were selected into this questionnaire survey. The questionnaire survey included basic information of the surgeons and their hospitals, information of breast cancer surgeries in 2017, types of reconstruction surgery and specific views on the relationship between radiotherapy and reconstruction surgery. Results: In total, 110 hospitals participated in the survey, 96(87.3%) had undergone breast reconstruction surgery. Reconstruction with implants accounted for 65.7% of the total reconstruction surgery and the proportion of autologous reconstruction was 20.1%. For patients who probably required postoperative radiotherapy, the preferred surgical procedure in the surveyed hospitals was implant based reconstruction surgery. For those who were confirmed to receive postoperative radiotherapy or had undergone radiotherapy after total mastectomy, autologous tissue reconstruction was recommended. Postoperative radiotherapy was a negative factor for immediate breast reconstruction, and most hospitals believed that radiotherapy exerted slight effect on surgery. The proportion of delay-immediate breast reconstruction reached 66% and 86% of hospitals preferred to replace with the prosthesis at 6 months after radiotherapy. Patients with local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery could also receive immediate reconstruction and implant reconstruction was the preferred surgical procedure. Conclusions The proportion of breast reconstruction in China is relatively low and Chinese doctors still lack of technical mastery. In the face of conflict with radiotherapy, the regime selected by Chinese doctors is not in accordance with those recommended by the guideline and consensus, prompting that more professional training should be delivered for Chinese doctors to further promote the development of breast reconstruction in China.

Objective: To investigate the current trends of breast reconstruction(BR) after mastectomy in China. Methods: A list of hospitals with more than 200 cases of breast cancer surgery per year nationwide was obtained, and 110 institutions were selected according to the geographical distribution. The research was conducted in the form of a questionnaire survey, and 92.3% (169/183) of the questions were single-choice questions. Information such as demographics of surgeons and hospitals, number of mastectomy and BR, type and timing of BR was included in the survey. Survey formal notification letter was issued by the China Anti-Cancer Association Breast Cancer Committee and Chinese College of Surgeons, Committee of Mammary Surgeons. Questionnaires were sent to the respondents of each center by email. The survey time range was from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. All data were completely collected before September 7, 2018. Results: A total of 110 units participated in the survey. In total, 87.3% (96/110) of the hospitals have conducted BR surgery. The BR after mastectomy was 10.7% (6 534/61 099), among this, implant BR accounted for 65.7%(4 296/6 534), autologous BR accounted for 20.1% (1 312/6 534), and autologous combined implant BR accounted for 14.2% (927/6 534). Immediate reconstruction accounted for 67.6% (4 417/6 534) of BR, while delayed BR accounted for 32.4% (2 097/6 534). In 2017, 77.8% (35/45) of the plastic surgery departments cooperated with general surgery departments. General BR could be conducted after mastectomy accounted for 83.6% (92/110). The proportion of reconstruction was positively correlated with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (r=0.311, P=0.002). The one-step implant-based BR(IBBR) was the most preferred type in immediate BR. Two-step IBBR was the most preferred method in delayed BR. Hospitals that routinely evaluated aesthetics after BR accounted for 64.6% (62/96), while only 16.7% (16/96) of hospitals used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The most commonly used PROM tool was BREAST-Q. Conclusions The overall BR in China is on upward trend, but gap between China and the developed countries still exists. Breast surgery departments should strengthen further cooperation with plastic surgery departments. Simultaneously, the aesthetics evaluation and PROM after BR should be put a high premium.

Objective: To explore the current clinical practice of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) in China. Methods: The current survey was sponsored by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Committee of Breast Cancer Society and Chinese Society of Breast Surgeons. A survey was mailed to 110 hospitals in China, which have more than 200 breast cancer operations performed in 2017. The survey mainly included questions on the clinical practice of IBBR, sociodemographic and geographical factors associated with IBBR practice, reasons and concerns for selecting IBBR, type and timing of breast reconstruction, and the complications of IBBR. Data were analyzed using χ² test, Fisher′s exact test or Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. Results: IBBR was available in 86.4% (95/110) included hospitals. It was predominantly performed breast reconstruction surgery, the proportion of IBBR in all the breast reconstruction was 65.75% (4 296/6 534). However, the rate of IBBR in all the patients received mastectomy was only 7.06% (4 296/60 877). Among all the included hospitals, the number of implant reconstructions performed in 2017 was 24 (57.5) cases (M(Q_R), range: 2-565 cases). Factors associated with the performance of IBBR including regional per capita gross domestic product (H=10.47, P=0.005) and annual surgery volume (H=8.30, P=0.016). The main reasons for choosing IBBR were relatively simple surgical procedure, short learning curve and short operation time. The effects of adjuvant radiotherapy on prosthesis, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were the main concerns for implant reconstruction. Compared with delay reconstruction, a higher proportion of IBBR was observed in immediate reconstruction (83.1% vs. 62.0%, χ²=12.522, P=0.000). In all, 10.5% (10/95) hospitals reported more than 10% grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ capsular contracture. The incidence of infections need surgical intervention was reported between 10% and 20% by 4.2% (4/95) hospitals. Hospitals with 6% to 10% implant rupture and 6% to 15% implant removal were 1.1% (1/95) and 4.2% (4/95) respectively. Conclusions IBBR was the most common used surgery in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, the proportion of IBBR in patients after mastectomy was still low. Reginal economy, surgery volume of hospitals, lack of specialty training program and the concern about complications and patient′s satisfaction were the factors affecting the development of IBBR.

To investigate the current trends of breast reconstruction ( BR ) after mastectomy in China. Methods A list of hospitals with more than 200 cases of breast cancer surgery per year nationwide was obtained, and 110 institutions were selected according to the geographical distribution. The research was conducted in the form of a questionnaire survey, and 92.3%(169／183) of the questions were single?choice questions. Information such as demographics of surgeons and hospitals, number of mastectomy and BR, type and timing of BR was included in the survey. Survey formal notification letter was issued by the China Anti?Cancer Association Breast Cancer Committee and Chinese College of Surgeons, Committee of Mammary Surgeons. Questionnaires were sent to the respondents of each center by email. The survey time range was from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. All data were completely collected before September 7, 2018.Results A total of 110 units participated in the survey.In total, 87.3%(96／110) of the hospitals have conducted BR surgery. The BR after mastectomy was 10.7%( 6 534／61 099), among this, implant BR accounted for 65.7%(4 296／6 534), autologous BR accounted for 20.1%(1 312／6 534), and autologous combined implant BR accounted for 14.2%( 927／6 534 ). Immediate reconstruction accounted for 67.6%(4 417／6 534) of BR, while delayed BR accounted for 32.4%(2 097／6 534). In 2017, 77.8%( 35／45) of the plastic surgery departments cooperated with general surgery departments. General BR could be conducted after mastectomy accounted for 83.6%( 92／110 ). The proportion of reconstruction was positively correlated with the gross domestic product ( GDP) per capita ( r＝0.311, P＝0.002). The one?step implant?based BR(IBBR) was the most preferred type in immediate BR. Two?step IBBR was the most preferred method in delayed BR. Hospitals that routinely evaluated aesthetics after BR accounted for 64.6%( 62／96), while only 16.7%( 16／96) of hospitals used patient?reported outcome measure (PROM). The most commonly used PROM tool was BREAST?Q. Conclusions The overall BR in China is on upward trend, but gap between China and the developed countries still exists. Breast surgery departments should strengthen further cooperation with plastic surgery departments. Simultaneously, the aesthetics evaluation and PROM after BR should be put a high premium.

To investigate the current trends of breast reconstruction ( BR ) after mastectomy in China. Methods A list of hospitals with more than 200 cases of breast cancer surgery per year nationwide was obtained, and 110 institutions were selected according to the geographical distribution. The research was conducted in the form of a questionnaire survey, and 92.3%(169／183) of the questions were single?choice questions. Information such as demographics of surgeons and hospitals, number of mastectomy and BR, type and timing of BR was included in the survey. Survey formal notification letter was issued by the China Anti?Cancer Association Breast Cancer Committee and Chinese College of Surgeons, Committee of Mammary Surgeons. Questionnaires were sent to the respondents of each center by email. The survey time range was from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. All data were completely collected before September 7, 2018.Results A total of 110 units participated in the survey.In total, 87.3%(96／110) of the hospitals have conducted BR surgery. The BR after mastectomy was 10.7%( 6 534／61 099), among this, implant BR accounted for 65.7%(4 296／6 534), autologous BR accounted for 20.1%(1 312／6 534), and autologous combined implant BR accounted for 14.2%( 927／6 534 ). Immediate reconstruction accounted for 67.6%(4 417／6 534) of BR, while delayed BR accounted for 32.4%(2 097／6 534). In 2017, 77.8%( 35／45) of the plastic surgery departments cooperated with general surgery departments. General BR could be conducted after mastectomy accounted for 83.6%( 92／110 ). The proportion of reconstruction was positively correlated with the gross domestic product ( GDP) per capita ( r＝0.311, P＝0.002). The one?step implant?based BR(IBBR) was the most preferred type in immediate BR. Two?step IBBR was the most preferred method in delayed BR. Hospitals that routinely evaluated aesthetics after BR accounted for 64.6%( 62／96), while only 16.7%( 16／96) of hospitals used patient?reported outcome measure (PROM). The most commonly used PROM tool was BREAST?Q. Conclusions The overall BR in China is on upward trend, but gap between China and the developed countries still exists. Breast surgery departments should strengthen further cooperation with plastic surgery departments. Simultaneously, the aesthetics evaluation and PROM after BR should be put a high premium.

Background and purpose: Many factors have impacts on the surgery approach of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence factors of breast reconstruction for patients with breast cancer, focusing on the relationship between travel distance and breast reconstruction. Methods: Retrospective review of all female breast cancer patients staging 0-Ⅱ who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 1999 to 2015 was conducted in the study. Analysis of travel distance and breast reconstruction rate was performed. Results: Non-Shanghai patients have higher breast reconstruction rate after mastectomy compared with Shanghai patients (6.1％ vs 4.5％, P＜0.001). Travel distance may have an influence on the breast reconstruction rate (P=0.035). Univariate regression analysis showed that the increase of travel distance was the predictor of breast reconstruction, and that the increase of age or body mass index (BMI), or the later TNM stage had a negative correlation with breast reconstruction (P＜0.001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the increase of age or BMI, or the later TNM stage was the independent predictor of the refusal of breast reconstruction (P＜0.001), but travel distance was not (P＞0.05). No significant correlation between the travel distance and breast reconstruction types was indicated. Negative correlation was observed between age and travel distance (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Age, BMI and tumor stage are the main influence factors of breast reconstruction, while travel distance shows a linear correlation with it.