Objective:To explore the feasibility of the multiple-choice auditory graphical interactive check（MAGIC） screening module in childhood hearing screening in children aged 3 to 6 years. Methods:A hearing screening was conducted on 366 children（732 ears） aged between 3 and 6 years. The screening methods included MAGIC, DPOAE, and acoustic immittance.The cooperation, screening time, pass rate, and correlation of the three screening methods were compared. Results:There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of cooperation among the three screeningmethods（P=0.004）.The MAGIC pure tone screening method was 98.6%, the screening DPOAE was 99.5%,and the acoustic immittance screening was 100%. For the screening duration, the MAGIC pure tone screening method was（116.3±59.1）s, the screening DPOAE was（27.2±19.7）s, and the acoustic impedance screening was（24.6±14.6）s. There was a significant statistical significance differences among the three or two groups（P<0.01）. The passing rates of MAGIC pure tone screening,screening DPOAE and acoustic immittance screening were 64.7%, 65.4%, and 69.3%, respectively, and there was no significant statistical difference among the three or two groups（P>0.05）. There was no significant difference between MAGIC pure tone screening method and screening DPOAE（P=0.827>0.05）, and acoustic impedance（P=0.653>0.05）, while the difference between screening DPOAE and acoustic impedance was statistically significant（P<0.01）. Conclusion:MAGIC pure sound screening method has good feasibility, can comprehensively reflect the hearing level of screened children, and can be promoted for hearing screening in children aged between 3 and 6 years.
Humans ; Child, Preschool ; Child ; Female ; Male ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Mass Screening/methods* ; Feasibility Studies ; Acoustic Impedance Tests/methods* ; Hearing Loss/diagnosis* ; Hearing Tests/methods*

Objective:To investigate the application value of NB CE-Chirp ASSR in the assessment of hearing threshold in children with hearing impairment. Methods:The hearing test results of 44 children with sensorineural hearing loss（88 ears） diagnosed in Shanghai Children's Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were retrospectively studied, including 19 ears in mild hearing loss group, 26 ears in moderate group, 20 ears in severe group and 23 ears in extremely severe group. Correlations between auditory brainstem response（ABR） thresholds, pure tone audiometry（PTA） thresholds and NB CE-Chirp ASSR response thresholds in different hearing loss groups were analyzed. Results:The threshold difference between ABR and NB CE-Chirp ASSR（2 000-4 000 Hz） was between 0.50-4.08 dB in different degrees of hearing loss group. There was a significant correlation between NB CE-Chirp ASSR and ABR response threshold in each group（P<0.001）, and the correlation coefficients of mild, severe and extremely severe groups were all greater than 0.8, showing a strong correlation. The average threshold difference between PTA and NB CE-Chirp ASSR in each group was between 1.88-3.91 dB. The correlation coefficients were all greater than 0.8, showing a strong correlation. The difference between PTA and NB CE-Chirp ASSR response threshold at 500, 1 000, 2 000 and 4 000 Hz in each groupwas between 0.25-3.84 dB. With the increase of frequency, the correlation coefficient between PTA and NB CE-Chirp ASSR response threshold showed an upward trend. The frequency with the highest coefficient was 4 000 Hz, and the r values were all greater than 0.9, followed by 2 000 Hz, and the correlation coefficient was relatively low at 500 Hz. In the extremely severe group, each frequency coefficient was greater than 0.7, showing a strong correlation. Conclusion:NB CE-Chirp ASSR has good frequency specificity and can reliably assess hearing thresholds in hearing-impaired children.
Humans ; Auditory Threshold ; Child ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Male ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Child, Preschool ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology* ; Adolescent

Objective: To analyze the surgical efficacy of patients with mixed hearing loss and otosclerosis with different air bone gap (ABG) before surgery, and to provide reference for the prognosis evaluation of otosclerosis surgery. Methods: The clinical data of 108 cases(116 ears) of otosclerosis who had undergone stapes fenestration technique artificial stapes implantation in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from November 2013 to May 2020 and had mixed hearing loss before surgery were collected, including 71 women(76 ears)and 37 men (40 ears), with an average age of 38.5 years. According to preoperative pure tone audiometry ABG, they were divided into three groups: group S, 15 dB≤ABG<31 dB, a total of 39 ears; group M, 31 dB≤ABG<46 dB, a total of 58 ears; and group L, ABG≥46 dB, 19 ears in total. The hearing outcomes of three groups of patients at 6-12 months after surgery were compared and analyzed using SPSS 24.0 statistical software. Results: A total of 3 patients (group S: 2 cases; group L: 1 case) experienced severe sensorineural hearing loss after surgery and were not included in the statistical analysis. After surgery, the pure tone hearing threshold of patients with otosclerosis in each group was significantly improved compared to before surgery, with an average air conduction threshold improvement of(21.6±13.4) dB. The difference between before and after surgery was statistically significant(t=17.13, P<0.01). The average bone conduction threshold improved by(3.7±7.6) dB, and the difference was statistically significant before and after surgery(t=5.20, P<0.01). The postoperative ABG was(18.3±9.3) dB, which was significantly reduced compared to preoperative(36.2±8.6)dB. Among the three groups of patients, the L group had the highest improvement in air conduction threshold[(29.9±10.8)dB], while the S group had the lowest improvement[(15.7±11.4)dB]. There was no statistically significant difference in post operative pure tone hearing thresholds between the three groups(P>0.05). The postoperative ABG in group S was the smallest[(16.5±9.0)dB], while in group L, the postoperative ABG was the largest[(20.5±10.0)dB]. Compared with group S, group M and group L still had a large residual ABG at 2 000 Hz after surgery. The bone conduction threshold of both S and M groups improved to some extent after surgery compared to before (P<0.01). Conclusions: Surgery can benefit patients with mixed hearing loss and otosclerosis with different preoperative ABG. Patients with small preoperative ABG have better surgical results and ideal ABG closure at all frequencies after surgery. Patients with large preoperative ABG can significantly increase the gas conduction threshold during surgery, but certain frequencies of ABG may still be left behind after surgery. The improvement effect of surgery on bone conduction threshold is not significant. Patients should be informed of treatment methods such as hearing aids based on their actual situation for selection.
Male ; Humans ; Female ; Adult ; Bone Conduction ; Otosclerosis/surgery* ; Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/surgery* ; Stapes Surgery/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Auditory Threshold ; Hearing ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Deafness ; Retrospective Studies

The qualitative, quantitative, and localization analysis of hearing loss is one of the important contents of forensic clinical research and identification. Pure-tone audiometry is the "gold standard" for hearing loss assessment, but it is affected by the subjective cooperation of the assessed person. Due to the complexity of the auditory pathway and the diversity of hearing loss, the assessment of hearing loss requires the combination of various subjective and objective audiometric techniques, along with comprehensive evaluation based on the case situation, clinical symptoms, and other examinations to ensure the scientificity, accuracy and reliability of forensic hearing impairment assessment. Objective audiometry includes acoustic impedance, otoacoustic emission, and various auditory evoked potentials. The frequency-specific auditory brainstem response (ABR), 40 Hz auditory event related potential, and auditory steady-state response are commonly used for objective hearing threshold assessment. The combined application of acoustic impedance, otoacoustic emission and ABR can be used to locate hearing loss and determine whether it is located in the middle ear, cochlea, or posterior cochlea. This article reviews the application value of objective audiometry techniques in hearing threshold assessment and hearing loss localization, aiming to provide reference for forensic identification of hearing loss.
Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Hearing Loss/diagnosis* ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods* ; Clinical Medicine

This paper analyzes the shortcomings of the existing pure tone audiometers, and proposes a system to realize pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry with a new DSP processor. The pure tone test signal produced by the system has accurate frequency, high signal-to-noise ratio, and small harmonic distortion. The noise generator that comes with DSP adds a band-pass filter to realize the generation of narrow-band noise. At the same time, due to the modular structure of software design, the system has good ease of use and scalability. The test results show that the hearing test system has excellent performance and can be better used in hearing medical diagnosis.
Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods* ; Hearing ; Noise ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between the frequency characteristics and response threshold of auditory steady-state response (ASSR), auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP), and their application values in forensic medicine. METHODS: Thirty volunteers with normal hearing (60 ears) were selected to perform pure tone audiometry (PTA) threshold and ASSR, ABR and 40 Hz AERP response threshold tests in the standard sound insulation shielding room, and the results were statistically analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software. RESULTS: At 0.5 kHz and 1.0 kHz frequencies, the correlation between 40 Hz AERP response threshold and PTA threshold was good, which was better than that of ASSR and ABR response threshold. At 2.0 kHz and 4.0 kHz frequencies, the correlation between ASSR and ABR response thresholds and PTA threshold was good, which was better than that of 40 Hz AERP response threshold. CONCLUSIONS To evaluate the hearing at 0.5 kHz and 1.0 kHz frequencies, it is recommended to use 40 Hz AERP and ASSR to comprehensively assess the PTA threshold of the subjects. To evaluate the hearing at 2.0 kHz and 4.0 kHz frequencies, ABR and ASSR are recommended to assess the PTA threshold of subjects comprehensively. The combination of ASSR, ABR and 40 Hz AERP can improve the accuracy of hearing function evaluation.
Acoustic Stimulation/methods* ; Audiometry, Evoked Response ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Forensic Medicine ; Hearing/physiology* ; Humans

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss refers to a condition wherein thresholds increase only at low frequencies in pure-tone audiometry. Systemic steroid treatment is commonly used for acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss without vertigo, but there has been no established treatment in most clinical researches. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the short-term effects of high- and half-dose oral steroid therapy on patients suffering from acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss without vertigo. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Forty-six patients diagnosed with acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss were divided into two groups and treated with high-dose (24 patients) and half-dose (22 patients) steroids, respectively. A retrospective analysis was conducted on their medical records. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the following: age, sex ratio, duration of symptoms before treatment, pure-tone hearing thresholds, low frequency hearing thresholds and speech intelligibility. However, both groups showed significant differences in hearing thresholds before and after treatment. In addition, no significant difference was noted in the recovery and recurrence rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, there is no difference in treatment effect between the high- and half-dose groups. Therefore, half-dose steroids may be used as a treatment option for acute low tone sensorineural hearing loss.
Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural* ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Methods ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Ratio ; Speech Intelligibility ; Steroids ; Therapeutic Uses* ; Vertigo

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the 125 Hz pure-tone thresholds in patients with acute low frequency sensorineural hearing loss (LFHL) and to investigate the value of 125 Hz thresholds for the assessment of LFHL. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Hearing tests including 125 Hz pure-tone were performed in 91 patients with acute LFHL ≤500 Hz and in 46 subjects with normal hearing. Patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss or Meniere's disease were excluded. Inter-group and intra-group comparison of 125 Hz was made between LFHL and the control groups. RESULTS: There was a significant difference of mean pure-tone thresholds at 125 Hz between the acute LFHL and the normal groups (39.8±8.9 vs. 14.3±6.7 dB). Eight (8.8%) patients in the LFHL group showed normal thresholds at 125 Hz, but all other subjects were normal at 125 Hz in the control group. None with the average hearing thresholds at 250 and 500 Hz ≥40 dB had normal threshold at 125 Hz. There was a significant correlation between 125 Hz and other low frequencies in the LFHL group (250 Hz; r=0.81, 500 Hz; r=0.63). CONCLUSION: Not all patients with acute LFHL show abnormal hearing threshold at 125 Hz although every subject with normal hearing is within the normal limits at 125 Hz. Threshold assessment should be made at 125 Hz when a mild LFHL exists in the conventional pure tone audiometry.
Audiometry ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural* ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Meniere Disease ; Methods

OBJECTIVE: To provide supports for the application of auditory evoked potential (AEP) in the evaluation of behavioral threshold, by studying the difference and relevance between the pure tone audiometry (PTA) and three frequency-specific auditory evoked potentials, including 40 Hz auditory event related potentials (40 Hz AERP), tone burst auditory brainstem response (Tb-ABR) and auditory steady-state response (ASSR). METHODS: Three frequency-specific AEP and PTA thresholds were recorded at speech frequency (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) from thirty-four adults with normal hearing (68 ears). Then, the relationship between the AEP thresholds and PTA thresholds were analyzed respectively. RESULTS: There were good correlations between three frequency-specific AEP thresholds and PTA thresholds at speech frequency. However, the difference of thresholds between each frequency-specific AEP and PTA was not same. The difference of thresholds were the smallest and the relevance were the best between 40 Hz AERP and PTA at 0.5 kHz, and between ASSR and PTA at 2, 4 kHz. At 1 kHz, there were not statistical difference between ASSR, 40 Hz AERP and PTA, while the relevance of 40 Hz AERP was better than ASSR. CONCLUSION Different methods should be chosen to assess the objective behavioral thresholds at different frequency.
Acoustic Stimulation/methods* ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods* ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Female ; Forensic Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the difference of subjective hearing threshold and objective hearing threshold, and to discuss the importance of standard for hearing evaluation in forensic medicine. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-five cases (387 ears) of forensic medical identification with hearing impairment were retrospectively analyzed including the items entrusted and hearing test results. All cases were collected from 2004 to 2012 in the forensic science center. RESULTS: In the 387 ears, 218 ears (56.3%) were evaluated the degree of disability and 106 ears (27.4%) were identified the degree of damage. In the disability degree evaluation, the subjective hearing threshold and the objective hearing threshold were significant different in 120 ears (55.0%), while in damage degree evaluation, the subjective hearing threshold and the objective hearing threshold were significant different in 69 ears (65.1%). CONCLUSION Because of camouflaging or exaggerating the hearing impairment by the wounded, the subjective hearing threshold can't accurately assess the existence and the degree of hearing impairment. In the forensic identification, auditory brainstem response, 40 Hz auditory event related potential and auditory steady-state response should be combined in the application to evaluate the hearing impairment for the wounded in order to ensure the reliability of the evaluation of hearing impairment.
Acoustic Stimulation/methods* ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods* ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Disability Evaluation ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Expert Testimony/methods* ; Female ; Forensic Medicine/methods* ; Hearing Disorders/physiopathology* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Young Adult