1.Perioperative pressure ulcer prevention and skin protection strategies in a patient with epidermolysis bullosa undergoing long-duration surgery
Asami ISHII ; Takaya ITO ; Miki YOKOYAMA ; Mana NAKAMURA ; Kouichi SUGITA ; Sayaka ASANO ; Aki KAWAUCHI ; Shigeru MAEDA
Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2026;26(2):169-174
Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB) is a rare inherited skin disorder characterized by extreme fragility of the skin and mucosa that poses significant challenges for anesthetic management. Herein, we report a case of a 65-year-old woman with DDEB who underwent a 13-hour surgery for mandibular cancer under general anesthesia. To prevent skin and mucosal injuries, meticulous perioperative strategies were implemented, including the use of barrier films and pressure-relieving pads and avoiding adhesive devices. High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation enabled awake fiberoptic intubation without the need for mask ventilation, minimizing the risk of blister formation and airway trauma. Despite the prolonged duration, no pressure ulcers or new skin injuries developed, other than minor epidermal peeling of the lips. This case demonstrates that comprehensive preoperative planning and intraoperative protection can ensure safe anesthesia in patients with DDEB undergoing long surgical procedures.
2.Effects of Oral Rinse with Hangeshashinto Alone and Hangeshashinto with Honey for Oral Discomfort in Terminally-ill Cancer Patients
Satoshi MURAKAMI ; Asami IGARASHI ; Kanako MIYANO ; Yasuhito UEZONO ; Wakako YATSUOKA ; Takao UENO ; Eri SUZUKI ; Taeko ISHII ; Hiromi MATSUDA
Palliative Care Research 2019;14(3):159-167
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate hangeshashinto rinse for oral discomfort in terminally-ill cancer patients and to compare the effectiveness of hangeshashinto rinse with or without honey rinse. Methods: Patients with oral discomfort were randomized to receive either hangeshashinto rinse or hangeshashinto with honey rinse as first-line treatment. Patients performed oral rinse three to five times a day for 2 weeks. Further, oral wetness, halitosis, oral mucositis, mouth discomfort, compliance of rinse were then evaluated before and after the intervention. Results: 144 patients were enrolled during this period and 22 patients completed the study (hangeshashinto 13 / hangeshashinto with honey 9). After the intervention, oral wetness was improved, and end-tidal concentration of hydrogen sulfide was decreased in both cases. Although there was no statistically significant difference, oral discomfort by subjective and objective evaluations, also and symptom of oral mucositis were improved. Other volatile sulfur compounds decreased. Frequency of rinsing between groups receiving hangeshashinto or hangeshashinto with honey did not differ, however, the acceptability was slightly better in the honey combination group. Conclusion: Both hangeshashinto rinse and hangeshashinto with honey rinse reduced end-tidal concentration of hydrogen sulfide and improved oral wetness. Oral rinse by hangeshashinto or hangeshashinto with honey may be effective for oral discomfort in terminally-ill cancer patients.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail