Methods: This study included 36 patients with HGS in whom reduction, posterior instrumentation, and fusion were achieved with MIS– TLIF. They were evaluated for lower back pain and radicular pain, scaled by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Erect radiographs were performed to calculate slip angle (SA) and sacropelvic and spinopelvic parameters preoperatively, postoperatively, and at each follow-up until 4 years. Results: This study identified 30 patients with grade III HGS and six patients with grade IV/V HGS. Spinopelvic parameters were unbalanced in 13 patients. Complete reduction was achieved in 24 patients, with end-stage reduction of grade I with adequate spinopelvic balance achieved in 12 patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring demonstrated no loss of signals throughout the procedure in any of the patients. Excellent functional outcome was achieved with back pain as well as leg pain VAS score improvements postoperatively in all patients. No implant-related complications or pseudoarthrosis incidences were reported at long-term follow-up at 4 years. Conclusions MIS–TLIF for HGS is a specific solution for a complex pathology, enabling one to achieve an excellent clinical as well as radiological outcome.

Methods: This study included 36 patients with HGS in whom reduction, posterior instrumentation, and fusion were achieved with MIS– TLIF. They were evaluated for lower back pain and radicular pain, scaled by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Erect radiographs were performed to calculate slip angle (SA) and sacropelvic and spinopelvic parameters preoperatively, postoperatively, and at each follow-up until 4 years. Results: This study identified 30 patients with grade III HGS and six patients with grade IV/V HGS. Spinopelvic parameters were unbalanced in 13 patients. Complete reduction was achieved in 24 patients, with end-stage reduction of grade I with adequate spinopelvic balance achieved in 12 patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring demonstrated no loss of signals throughout the procedure in any of the patients. Excellent functional outcome was achieved with back pain as well as leg pain VAS score improvements postoperatively in all patients. No implant-related complications or pseudoarthrosis incidences were reported at long-term follow-up at 4 years. Conclusions MIS–TLIF for HGS is a specific solution for a complex pathology, enabling one to achieve an excellent clinical as well as radiological outcome.

Methods: This study included 36 patients with HGS in whom reduction, posterior instrumentation, and fusion were achieved with MIS– TLIF. They were evaluated for lower back pain and radicular pain, scaled by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Erect radiographs were performed to calculate slip angle (SA) and sacropelvic and spinopelvic parameters preoperatively, postoperatively, and at each follow-up until 4 years. Results: This study identified 30 patients with grade III HGS and six patients with grade IV/V HGS. Spinopelvic parameters were unbalanced in 13 patients. Complete reduction was achieved in 24 patients, with end-stage reduction of grade I with adequate spinopelvic balance achieved in 12 patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring demonstrated no loss of signals throughout the procedure in any of the patients. Excellent functional outcome was achieved with back pain as well as leg pain VAS score improvements postoperatively in all patients. No implant-related complications or pseudoarthrosis incidences were reported at long-term follow-up at 4 years. Conclusions MIS–TLIF for HGS is a specific solution for a complex pathology, enabling one to achieve an excellent clinical as well as radiological outcome.

In general, the scientific literature recommends extended fusion of the lumbar decompressed level adjacent to a fused level. Tubular decompression of lumbar canal stenosis defies this concept as it minimizes collateral damage. This study explores the concept of tubular hybrid surgery, where tubular decompression is performed adjacent to a fused level. A descriptive study of the technique is presented with a few case examples. The concept of tubular hybrid surgery wherein tubular minimally invasive spinal fusion is performed at one level and microscopic tubular decompression is executed at the adjacent levels is discussed, along with clinical and biomechanical evidence and case examples. The tubular hybrid method represents a significant advancement in minimally invasive spine surgery. Larger long-term, multicentric, prospective studies are necessary to establish the benefits of the procedure.

Methods: Four FE models of multilevel posterior cervical fixation were created and tested by FEA in various permutations and combinations. Generic differences in fixation were determined, and the following parameters were assessed: (1) maximum moment at failure, (2) maximum angulation at failure, (3) maximum stress at failure, (4) point of failure, (5) intervertebral disc stress, and (6) influence of adding a C2 pars screw to the multilevel construct. Results: The maximum moment at failure was higher in the LMS fixation group than in the TPS group. The maximum angulation in flexion allowed by LMS was higher than that by TPS. The maximum strain at failure was higher in the LMS group than in the TPS group. The maximum stress endured before failure was higher in the TPS group than in the LMS group. Intervertebral stress levels at C6–C7 and C7–T1 intervertebral discs were higher in the LMS group than in the TPS group. For both models where C2 fixation was performed, lower von Mises stress was recorded at the C2–C3 intervertebral disc level. Conclusions Ending a multilevel posterior cervical fixation construct with TPS fixation rather than LMS fixation at the C7 vertebra provides a stiff and more constrained construct system, with higher stress endurance to compressive force. The constraint and durability of the construct can be further enhanced by adding a C2 pars screw in the fixation system.

Methods: Twenty-four patients with AIS (Cobb >65°) underwent surgery at a single center between January 2014 and December 2021. The first 10 patients underwent surgery using only IOT (T group), whereas the subsequent 14 patients underwent surgery with a combination of IOT and PO (TP group). Results: The mean preoperative Cobb angles in the T and TP groups were 89.35°±6.05° and 92.32°±9.28°, respectively (p=0.59). The mean flexibility index (FI) of the T and TP groups were 0.31±0.016 and 0.36±0.03, respectively (p=0.41). The mean postoperative Cobb angle in the T and TP groups were 40.25°±5.95° and 19.1°±3.20°, respectively (p=0.041). Apical vertebral rotation improved from mean grade 3.2 (2–4) to grade 2.6 (1–3) in the T group and from mean grade 3.6 (2–4) to mean grade 1.8 (1–3) in the TP group. Postoperatively, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 13.84°±2.10° and 21.02°±1.68° in T and TP groups (p=0.044). Transient signal-loss intraoperatively was noted in two patients, one in each group. No episodes of postoperative neurological deficits were reported. No incidences of pseudarthrosis/implant-related complications were reported at the end of 2 years in either group. Conclusions IOT and PO complement one another and can be safely combined without an attributable risk of neurological injury.

Methods: Twenty-four patients with AIS (Cobb >65°) underwent surgery at a single center between January 2014 and December 2021. The first 10 patients underwent surgery using only IOT (T group), whereas the subsequent 14 patients underwent surgery with a combination of IOT and PO (TP group). Results: The mean preoperative Cobb angles in the T and TP groups were 89.35°±6.05° and 92.32°±9.28°, respectively (p=0.59). The mean flexibility index (FI) of the T and TP groups were 0.31±0.016 and 0.36±0.03, respectively (p=0.41). The mean postoperative Cobb angle in the T and TP groups were 40.25°±5.95° and 19.1°±3.20°, respectively (p=0.041). Apical vertebral rotation improved from mean grade 3.2 (2–4) to grade 2.6 (1–3) in the T group and from mean grade 3.6 (2–4) to mean grade 1.8 (1–3) in the TP group. Postoperatively, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 13.84°±2.10° and 21.02°±1.68° in T and TP groups (p=0.044). Transient signal-loss intraoperatively was noted in two patients, one in each group. No episodes of postoperative neurological deficits were reported. No incidences of pseudarthrosis/implant-related complications were reported at the end of 2 years in either group. Conclusions IOT and PO complement one another and can be safely combined without an attributable risk of neurological injury.

Methods: Twenty-four patients with AIS (Cobb >65°) underwent surgery at a single center between January 2014 and December 2021. The first 10 patients underwent surgery using only IOT (T group), whereas the subsequent 14 patients underwent surgery with a combination of IOT and PO (TP group). Results: The mean preoperative Cobb angles in the T and TP groups were 89.35°±6.05° and 92.32°±9.28°, respectively (p=0.59). The mean flexibility index (FI) of the T and TP groups were 0.31±0.016 and 0.36±0.03, respectively (p=0.41). The mean postoperative Cobb angle in the T and TP groups were 40.25°±5.95° and 19.1°±3.20°, respectively (p=0.041). Apical vertebral rotation improved from mean grade 3.2 (2–4) to grade 2.6 (1–3) in the T group and from mean grade 3.6 (2–4) to mean grade 1.8 (1–3) in the TP group. Postoperatively, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 13.84°±2.10° and 21.02°±1.68° in T and TP groups (p=0.044). Transient signal-loss intraoperatively was noted in two patients, one in each group. No episodes of postoperative neurological deficits were reported. No incidences of pseudarthrosis/implant-related complications were reported at the end of 2 years in either group. Conclusions IOT and PO complement one another and can be safely combined without an attributable risk of neurological injury.

Methods: This retrospective pilot study was performed at single center on 858 spine surgery patients. The patients were divided into the following two groups: the study group (after implementation of the checklist [2016–2017]) and the control group (before the implementation of the checklist [2015–2016]). The incidence of common preventable human errors and major perioperative complications in spine surgeries were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: The prevalence of wrong-level surgeries was 0%, and the overall prevalence of the preventable errors was 1.63% (7/428). The rate of adverse, near-miss, and no-harm events was 0.23% (1/428), 0.70% (3/428) and 0.70% (3/428), respectively. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative errors were 0.70% (3/428), 0.23% (1/428), and 0.70 (3/428), respectively. The reoperation rate related to preventable errors reduced after the checklist was used. There were significant differences in the total preventable errors related to complications, such as infections, prolonged hospital stays, and unplanned hospital readmission/revision surgeries (p=0.001) Conclusions The authors propose the first-of-its kind spine surgery-specific checklist that is comprehensive and involves perioperative parameters. The checklist is easy to use, safe, and effective for reducing the unforgiving errors and perioperative complications. However, its broader implementation would require validation in large, multi-center, randomized control studies.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: To accurately measure the dimensions of cervical endplates based on computed tomography (CT) scans in Indian population and assess accuracy of match with currently available cervical disc prostheses. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The dimensions of currently available cervical disc replacement implants are based on early published geometrical measurements of vertebrae endplates for Caucasian population. To author's knowledge, similar study has not been published for patients from Indian subcontinent. METHODS: CT scans of cervical spine of patients from Indian subcontinent were collected and reviewed. Seventy patients (54 men and 16 women; aged 18-56 years with average of 37 years) who underwent CT scans of cervical spine were included in study. 3D CT scans of sub axial cervical spine (C3 to C7) were analyzed. The anterior-posterior (AP) and central mediolateral (CML) dimensions of superior and inferior endplates from C3 to C7 were measured using digital measuring system. RESULTS: A total of 560 endplates of 70 patients were included in the study. The AP diameter of cervical endplates ranged from 0.87 to 2.47 cm. The CML diameters ranged from 0.84 to 2.98 cm. For levels C3/C4 and C4/C5 for AP dimension Prestige-LP (90.5%) and Prodisc-C (89%) discs showed higher percentage of matching than Discover discs (58.5%). For CML diameter, Prestige-LP (69.5%), Prodisc-C (70%) and Discover (39.5%) discs showed almost similar matching with measured endplates. For levels C5/C6 and C6/C7 for AP dimension, Prestige-LP (67.25%), Prodisc-C (49.35%) and Discover (51.5%) discs showed similar matching. For CML diameter Prestige-LP (32%), Prodisc-C (27.5%) and Discover (42.2%) discs showed poor matching with measured endplates. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates need for redesign of cervical disc prostheses to match Indian patients. The collected anthropometric dimensions from this study may be used to design and develop indigenous artificial total disc replacement prosthesis and even cervical cages in India. With the present study being a small pilot study, the authors recommend anthropometric CT measurements in larger number of Indian patients in order to validate footprint dimensions for designing better-matched prosthesis.
Anthropometry* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; India ; Male ; Pilot Projects ; Prostheses and Implants ; Spine ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Total Disc Replacement*