OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of the combined anteversion angle technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS) affecting the hip joint. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 73 patients with AS affecting the hip joint who underwent THA between August 2018 and August 2021. According to whether the combined anteversion angle technique was used in THA, the patients were divided into study group (37 cases, combined anteversion angle technique was used in THA) and control group (36 cases, traditional THA). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, range of motion (ROM), acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular abduction angle, femoral anteversion angle, and combined anteversion angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. The Harris score and hip ROM were compared between the two groups before operation, at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The acetabular component anteversion angle, femoral component anteversion angle, acetabular component abduction angle, and component combined anteversion angle were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: The operation time in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no intraoperative complication such as acetabular and proximal femoral fractures, neurovascular injuries in both groups, and the incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 2-3 years, with an average of 2.4 years; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no complication such as hip dislocation, wound infection, delayed wound healing, deep venous thrombosis, and hip dislocation in both groups. The hip Harris score and ROM of the two groups gradually increased with time after operation, and the differences were significant when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); the above two indicators of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group at each time point after operation ( P<0.05). Extensive bone ingrowth on the surface of the components could be observed in the anteroposterior X-ray films of the hip joint of the two groups at 12 months after operation, and the acetabular components was stable without femoral stem subsidence, osteolysis around the components, and heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the acetabular component anteversion angle, femoral component anteversion angle, and component combined anteversion angle in the study group were significantly superior to those in the control group ( P<0.05), except that there was no significant difference in the acetabular component abduction angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION For patients with AS affecting the hip joint, the use of the combined anteversion angle technique during THA effectively promotes the recovery of hip joint function and enhances the postoperative quality of life of patients when compared to traditional THA.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Hip Dislocation/surgery* ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome ; Hip Joint/surgery* ; Hip Prosthesis

OBJECTIVE: Using the mono-energy reconstruction images and X-ray films to investigate whether the ABG Ⅱ short-stem could improve the filling ratio, stability, and alignment in the Dorr type C femur, compared with the Corail long-stem. METHODS: Among patients who were with Dorr type C femurs and treated with total hip arthroplasty between January 2006 and March 2012, 20 patients with a Corail long-stem (Corail group) and 20 patients with an ABG Ⅱ short-stem (ABG Ⅱ group) were randomly selected. The differences in gender, age, body mass index, and preoperative diagnoses between the two groups were not significant ( P>0.05). The ABG Ⅱ group was with a mean follow-up of 142 months (range, 102-156 months), and the Corail group was with a mean follow-up of 107 months (range, 91-127 months). There was no significant difference in the Harris score and subjective satisfaction score between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, dual-energy CT scans with mono-energy image reconstruction were used to calculate the prosthetic filling ratio and to measure the alignment of the prosthesis in the coronal and sagittal positions. Stability assessment was performed based on X-ray films, and the subsidence distance was measured using EBRA-FCA software. RESULTS: X-ray film observation showed that the prostheses in the two groups were stable and no signs of loosening was found. The incidence of pedestal sign was significantly lower in the ABGⅡ group than in the Corail group ( P<0.05), and the incidence of heterotopic ossification was significantly higher in the ABGⅡ group than in the Corail group ( P<0.05). The subsidence distance of femoral stem in ABG Ⅱ group was significantly greater than that in Corail group ( P<0.05), and the subsidence speed of femoral stem in ABG Ⅱ group was also greater than that in Corail group, but the difference was not significant ( P>0.05). The overall prosthesis filling ratio was significantly higher in the ABG Ⅱ group than in the Corail group ( P<0.05), while the coronal filling ratio at the lesser trochanter, 2 cm below the lesser trochanter, and 7 cm below the lesser trochanter were not significant ( P>0.05). The results of prosthesis alignment showed that there was no significant difference in the sagittal alignment error value and the incidence of coronal and sagittal alignment error >3° between the two groups ( P>0.05), while the coronal alignment error value in the ABG Ⅱ group was significantly greater than that in the Corail group ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION Although the ABG Ⅱ short-stem avoids the distal-proximal mismatch of the Corail long-stem in the Dorr type C femur and thus achieves a higher filling ratio, it does not appear to achieve better alignment or stability.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Femur/surgery* ; Hip Prosthesis ; Lower Extremity/surgery* ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies

For the treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture combined with femoral head necrosis in middle-age patients, it has been controversial whether to perform fracture reduction and fixation first then total hip replacement, or direct total hip replacement. We present a rare case of 53-year-old male patient suffered from bilateral intertrochanteric fracture caused by a road traffic injury. The patient had a history of femoral head necrosis for eight years, and the Harris score was 30. We performed total hip replacement with prolonged biologic shank prostheses for primary repair. One year after the surgery, nearly full range of motion was achieved without instability (active flexion angle of 110°, extension angle of 20°, adduction angle of 40°, abduction angle of 40°, internal rotation angle of 25°, and external rotation angle of 40°). The Harris score was 85. For the middle-aged patient with unstable intertrochanteric fractures and osteonecrosis of the femoral head, we can choose primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement.
Male ; Middle Aged ; Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Femur Head/surgery* ; Femur Head Necrosis/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Biological Products ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture from 55 to 65 years. METHODS: From September 2016 to August 2020, 86 patients with Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ femoral neck fracture were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods. Among them, 38 patients were treated with lag screws for internal fixation, there were 26 males and 12 females, aged 55 to 64 years old with an average of(60.2±3.1) years;the other 48 patients were treated with total hip replacement, including 28 males and 20 females, aged from 57 to 65 years old with an average of(61.3±3.8) years. The time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 3 days. The reoperation rate, incidence of deep infection, Harris score of hip joint function, visual analogue scale(VAS) of pain and patients reported outcome scores(European five-dimensional Health Questionnaire, EQ-5D) were compared between two groups. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 24 to 54 months with an average of (35.8±10.3) months. There was significant difference in reoperation rate between two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on the incidence of deep infection, hip Harris score and VAS between two groups(P>0.05) . The postoperative EQ-5D score of patients with internal fixation was lower than that of total hip replacement, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). CONCLUSION Both the surgery of internal fixation and total hip replacement have similar effect in short-and medium term among the patients aged 55 to 65 years old. However, for the reoperation rate, the group of internal fixation was higher than that of total hip replacement. For the subjective functional score of patients, the group of internal fixation was lower than that of total hip replacement.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Reoperation

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance for hip replacement by analyzing the variation of femoral head rotation center in different hip diseases. METHODS: A total of 5 459 patients were collected from March 2016 to June 2021, who took positive and proportional plain films of both hips for various reasons. The relative position between the rotation center of the femoral head and the apex of the greater trochanter was measured. The positive variation is more than 2 mm above the top of the great trochanter, and the negative variation is more than 2 mm below the top of the great trochanter. A total of 831 patients with variation of femoral head rotation center were collected and were divided into 4 groups according to different diseases, and the variation was counted respectively. There were 15 cases in the normal group involving 10 cases of positive variation and 5 cases of negative variation. There were 145 cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head involving 25 cases of positive variation and 120 cases of negative variation. There were 346 cases of congenital hip dysplasia involving 225 cases of positive variation(including 25 cases of typeⅠ, 70 cases of type Ⅱ, 115 cases of type Ⅲ and 15 cases of type Ⅳ), and 121 cases of negative variation(including 50 cases of crowe typeⅠ, 60 cases of typeⅡ, 10 cases of type Ⅲ and 1 case of type Ⅳ). There were 325 cases of hip osteoarthritis group involving 45 cases of positive variation and 280 cases of negative variation. RESULTS: There was significant difference in variation of femoral head rotation center among the four groups(P<0.05). There was significant difference in variation of femoral head rotation center among different types of congenital hip dysplasia(P<0.05). There were significant differences in cervical trunk angle and eccentricity among different variations of femoral head rotation center(P<0.05). CONCLUSION The variation of femoral head rotation center is related to cervical trunk angle and eccentricity. The variation of femoral head rotation center is an important factor in hip diseases. The variation of femoral head rotation center is different in different hip diseases. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head and osteoarthritis of the hip were mostly negative variations. With the aggravation of congenital hip dysplasia, the variation of femoral head rotation center gradually changed from negative variation to positive variation.The variation of femoral head rotation center should be paid attention to in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty. It is of great significance to select the appropriate prosthesis and place the prosthesis accurately.
Humans ; Femur Head/surgery* ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery* ; Hip Prosthesis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Femur/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term follow-up effect and complications of ceramic on ceramic (CoC) interface and ceramic on polyethyleneon ceramic (CoP) interface in primary total hip arthroplasty, and provide clinical evidence. METHODS: Search PubMed, EMBase, the CoChrane Library databases, Web of science, Wanfang database, and CNKI from January 2000 to September 2021, screening and inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the long-term efficacy and complications of CoC interface and CoP interface in total hip arthroplasty. Literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, using Review Manager 5.3 statistical software. The software was used to perform statistical analysis on joint function, revision, prosthesis fracture, abnormal joint noise, and prosthesis wear rate after CoC or CoP. RESULTS: Seven RCTs studies were included, including 390 cases of hips with CoC artificial joints and 384 cases of hips with CoP artificial joints. The long-term joint function improvement of CoC and CoP artificial joints was similar and there was no significant differences, with an average difference was MD=0.63, 95%CI=(-1.81, 3.07), P=0.61. About the postoperative complications, CoC artificial joints have higher incidence rate of abnormal joint noise, with odds ratio (OR)=11.05, 95%CI=(2.04, 59.84), P=0.005. CoP artificial joints wear faster, with an average MD=-87.11, 95%CI=(-114.40, -59.82), P<0.000 1. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the replacement-related complications such as joint dislocation, prosthesis loosening, osteolysis, and the rate of prosthesis revision caused by various reasons. CONCLUSION The clinical function results and complications of CoC artificial joints are comparable to those of CoP artificial joints. Although CoP artificial joint prosthesis has a faster wear rate, it does not affect joint function and increase complications, and there is no abnormal joint noise. CoC is expensive and the long-term efficacy is equivalent to CoP. Clinicians should consider cost performance when choosing CoC.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Hip Prosthesis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Prosthesis Design ; Polyethylene ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation ; Ceramics ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed hemi-pelvic prosthesis for revision of aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. METHODS: Between February 2017 and January 2020, 11 patients with aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis were revised using 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses. There were 7 males and 4 females with an average age of 44 years (range, 25-60 years). In the first operation, all patients underwent total tumor resection, modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis reconstruction, and autologous femoral head transplantation. According to the Enneking pelvic partition system, 8 cases were resected in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ and 3 cases in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ. The interval from the initial operation to this revision ranged from 14.3-66.2 months, with an average of 35.8 months. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. At 6 months after the first operation, before revision, and at last follow-up, the American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the recovery of lower limb function. The pain-free walking distance of patients without brace assistance was recorded at last follow-up. X-ray films were taken at 1 month after the first operation, before revision, and at 1 month after revision, the acetabulum position was assessed by the differences in weight arm and cup height between bilateral hip joints. At last follow-up, the digital X-ray tomography was taken to evaluate the prosthesis-bone integration and the occurrence of aseptic loosening. RESULTS: The operation time was 182.6-238.0 minutes (mean, 197.4 minutes). The amount of intraoperative bleeding was 400-860 mL (mean, 550.0 mL). All incisions healed by first intention with no infection, hip dislocation, nerve damage, or vascular-related adverse events. The MSTS score and Harris score at last follow-up were significantly higher than those at 6 months after the first operation and before revision ( P<0.05), while the score before revision was significantly lower than that at 6 months after the first operation ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the patients were able to walk more than 1 000 meters painlessly without brace assistance. Imaging review showed that the difference of cup height at 1 month after revision was significantly lower than that at 1 month after the first operation and before revision, and at 1 month after the first operation than before revision operation, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the difference of weight arm among three time points ( P>0.05). All prostheses were well integrated, and no aseptic loosening of the prosthesis or screw fracture occurred. CONCLUSION Revision with 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses benefited in reconstructing stable pelvic ring and natural bodyweight transmission for patients encountering the aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. Early postoperative rehabilitation training can maximize the recovery of patient limb function, reduce pain during walking, and reduce the incidence of complications.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Adult ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Hip Prosthesis ; Treatment Outcome ; Prosthesis Failure ; Fractures, Bone/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE: To review research advances of revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). METHODS: The recent literature on revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH was reviewed. The reasons for revision surgery were analyzed and the difficulties of revision surgery, the management methods, and the related prosthesis choices were summarized. RESULTS: Patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH have small anteroposterior diameter of the acetabulum, large variation in acetabular and femoral anteversion angles, severe soft tissue contractures, which make both THA and revision surgery more difficult. There are many reasons for patients undergoing revision surgery after primary THA, mainly due to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Therefore, it is necessary to restore anatomical structures in primary THA, as much as possible and reduce the generation of wear particles to avoid postoperative loosening of the prosthesis. Due to the anatomical characteristics of Crowe type Ⅳ DDH, the patients have acetabular and femoral bone defects, and the repair and reconstruction of bone defects become the key to revision surgery. The acetabular side is usually reconstructed with the appropriate acetabular cup or combined metal block, Cage, or custom component depending on the extent of the bone defect, while the femoral side is preferred to the S-ROM prosthesis. In addition, the prosthetic interface should be ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-highly cross-linked polyethylene wherever possible. CONCLUSION The reasons leading to revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH and the surgical difficulties have been clarified, and a large number of clinical studies have proposed corresponding revision modalities based on which good early- and mid-term outcomes have been obtained, but further follow-up is needed to clarify the long-term outcomes. With technological advances and the development of new materials, personalized prostheses for these patients are expected to become a reality.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Hip Prosthesis ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery* ; Reoperation ; Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/surgery* ; Acetabulum/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of uncemented total hip arthroplasty(THA) on treatment of traumatic arthritis caused by intramedullary nailing interfixation of intertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: Total of 22 patients treated with THA due to traumatic arthritis caused by intramedullary nailing interfixation of intertrochanteric fractures from January 2012 to January 2017 were studied retrospectively, including 10 males and 12 females with a mean age of (72.5±9.8) years old ranging from 61 to 84 years old. Initial internal fixation method:14 patients were treated with Gamma nails and 8 patients were treated wit PFNA.The time from internal fixation surgery to THA was 10 to 68 months with an average of (32.2±21.3) months.Harris scores of the hip joint before and after surgery were compared, and the position of the prosthesis through postoperative imaging at 3, 6, 12 months and the last follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: One patient was died due to heart failure 1 year after operation. Two patients was died to advanced tumor 2 years after operation. The other 19 patients were followed up for 36 to 64 months with an average of (48.5±11.9) months. At final follow up, 14 patients regained the ability to walk independently, 4 patients needed support of a cane, 1 patient needed assistance of a walker. No serious complications such as joint dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and deep venous thrombosis occurred during follow-up. There were no signs of loosening and subsidence of the prosthesis at the final follow-up. Mean Harris hip score increased from (29.2±12.9) points preoperatively to (74.2±11.2) points at the final follow up(P<0.05);the score was excellent in 9 patients, good in 7 and fair in 3. CONCLUSION Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for traumatic arthritis after intramedullary nail fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture can significantly improve hip function and effectively avoid bone cement implantation syndrome. The medium-term effect is satisfactory.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Bone Nails ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects* ; Arthritis/surgery*

OBJECTIVE: To explore the early clinical efficacy of primary total hip arthroplasty(THA) with Corail standard stems (KS type) and high offset stems (KHO type), by analyzing the postoperative radiographic parameters of different offset of femoral components with Corail stem which has a neck-shaft angle of 135 ° in unilateral primary THA, by comparing the measurement results on both sides and analyzing the reconstruction of the postoperative femoral offset and the hip joint function recovery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 186 patients with unilateral hip joint lesions who underwent the first total hip arthroplasty with Johnson & Johnson Corail prostheses from January 2015 to June 2017. According to the use of femoral prostheses with different eccentricities during the operation, the patients were divided into high eccentricity group and standard eccentricity group. In the high eccentricity group, there were 52 cases of Corail high eccentricity prosthesis(KHO type), including 20 females and 32 males;aged 21 to 71 years old with an average of(50.6±13.2) years;body mass index(BMI) was (26.0±4.1) kg/m². The standard eccentricity group included 134 Corail standard femoral stem prostheses(KS type), 57 females and 77 males;aged 18 to 77 years old with an average of (47.3±14.0) years;BMI was (25.3±3.5) kg/m². The abduction arm, femoral eccentricity, acetabular eccentricity and the length difference of lower limbs were measured on the postoperatively positive X-ray film of the hip joint. Harris score and related complications were recorded before and after the operation, and the stability of the prosthesis was analyzed. RESULTS: There were significant differences in femoral eccentricity, joint eccentricity and abduction arm between the affected side and the healthy side in the high eccentricity group(P<0.05). There were significant differences in femoral eccentricity and acetabular eccentricity between the affected side and the healthy side in the standard eccentricity group(P<0.05). There were significant differences in combined eccentricity, abduction arm and length of lower limbs between two groups(P<0.05). In the high eccentricity group, the abduction arm of the affected hip joint was positively correlated with the femoral eccentricity, acetabular eccentricity and joint eccentricity(r=0.633, P<0.001;r=0.384, P=0.005;r=0.690, P<0.001). The same results were also obtained in the healthy side(r=0.688, P<0.001;r=0.574, P<0.001;r=0.765, P<0.001). In the standard eccentricity group, the abduction arm of the affected hip joint was positively correlated with the femoral eccentricity, acetabular eccentricity and combined eccentricity(r=0.734, P<0.001;r=0.418, P<0.001;r=0.749, P<0.001). The same results were also obtained in the healthy side(r=0.775, P<0.001;r=0.397, P<0.001;r=0.773, P<0.001). The difference of the length of both lower limbs was significantly correlated with the difference of bilateral joint eccentricity and bilateral abduction arm (r=0.376, P=0.006;r=-0.346, P=0.012). There was no significant correlation between the difference of the length of both lower limbs and the difference of bilateral joint eccentricity and bilateral abduction arm (r=-0.009, P=0.919;r=-0.036, P=0.682). There was no significant difference in Harris score between two groups at the last follow-up(P>0.05). At the last follow-up, Trendelenburg was negative in all patients in both groups, and the prostheses were stable. CONCLUSION Both Corail standard stem and high offset stem may be effectively reconstruct the femoral offset, reconstruct the anatomical structure and biomechanics of the hip joint, and maintain the length of lower limbs and the stability of the hip joint in the unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty. Although the offset of the femur was not reconstructed normally in some cases, the stability of the components and postoperative function were not affected.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Adolescent ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Femur/surgery* ; Lower Extremity