Gliomatosis peritonei (GP) is a condition characterized by the dissemination of mature glial tissues throughout the peritoneal cavity. It is usually associated with immature ovarian teratoma but presents with mature cystic teratoma (MCT) in 1% of cases. GP, associated with MCT, is a benign disorder. The majority of cases remain asymptomatic and rarely recur. Here, we present a case of a 22-year-old woman with a history of abdominal enlargement and severe abdominal pain who underwent exploratory laparotomy, peritoneal fluid cytology, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, appendectomy, omental biopsy, and Jackson-Pratt drain insertion with histopathologic result of GP with MCT. A month later, the patient had a recurrence of abdominal enlargement, necessitating a second surgery. Immunohistochemistry for histopathologic evaluation and diagnostic imaging are crucial in confirming the diagnosis and guiding the treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team approach in monitoring and comprehensive support is significant in optimizing outcomes for patients with aggressive GPs associated with MCT. Further research and clinical experience are essential to establish a standardized guideline to improve the management and clinical outcome of this condition.

The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional communication pathway connecting the central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract,playing a key role in the occurrence and development of diseases related to this axis.The vermiform appendix,as a part of the gut that is connected to the cecum,has a unique anatomical location,a rich microbiome,and abundant immune cells.Appendicitis and appendectomy have been found to be associated with the development of diseases related to the gut-brain axis.This review first introduces the anatomy and functions of the vermiform appendix and then expounds the associations of appendicitis and appendectomy with diseases related to the gut-brain axis.Furthermore,this review summarizes and prospects the mechanisms of the vermiform appendix in affecting the occurrence and development of diseases related to the gut-brain axis.
Humans ; Appendix/anatomy & histology* ; Brain ; Appendicitis ; Appendectomy/adverse effects* ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Brain-Gut Axis

Objective: The objective of the study is to determine the survival rate, recurrence rate, and complication rate among patients diagnosed with borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumor (MOT) who underwent complete surgical staging with appendectomy. Methodology: Eligibility criteria – A search of published literature was conducted in the electronic databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, and Google Scholar through 2000–2022, using a search strategy based on the PIO framework. Information of sources – The citations were identified with the use of a combination of the following text words: “mucinous ovarian tumors,” “MOT,” “appendectomy,” and “pseudomyxoma peritonei.” All retrospective studies with histopathologic diagnosis of borderline or malignant MOTs with patients who underwent appendectomy during primary surgery, including encompassing data on survival rate, recurrence rate, and/or incidence of complications (postoperative infections, appendectomy site leakage, hemorrhage, abscess, peritonitis, bowel perforation, and intestinal obstruction) that matched the terms set by the researchers were retrieved. Risk of bias – For the methodological quality of the individual clinical trials, the Jadad scale was used, which is based on the three following subscales: randomization (2, 1, or 0), blinding (2, 1, or 0), and dropouts/withdrawals (1 or 0). Guidelines for Cochrane collaboration were used to assess the risk bias. Synthesis of results – Review Manager version 5.3 (RevMan 5.4.1) was used by the researcher to perform the systematic review and meta-analysis of included studies. Results: There were eight retrospective studies included in this study. The random interval for survival rate is 64.9%–99.7% with a P < 0.1. The prediction interval for recurrence rate is 0%–100% with 95% confidence interval. The odds of complications occurring are <0.69–2.99 times with 95% confidence interval, with mean effect size is 0.083, and with a 95% confidence interval is 0.027–0.23. Conclusion The mean prevalence of abnormal histology of the appendix in patients diagnosed with borderline and malignant MOTs and underwent appendectomy during primary surgery is 3%–13%. There is no statistically significant difference in survival rate of patients who were diagnosed with borderline and malignant MOTs with or without appendectomy during primary surgery. The prediction interval for recurrence rate is 0%–100% with 95% confidence interval. There is no significant difference between the rate of complications in patients who underwent appendectomy and those without.
Appendectomy

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the ultrasonographic features of paediatric acute appendicitis and incorporate them into a scoring algorithm that will quantify the risk of complications and the strength of recommendation for surgical intervention. METHODS: 179 patients with suspected appendicitis who had undergone ultrasonographic examination were included in this study. Based on their medical evaluation and post-surgical histopathological results, patients were categorised into confirmed appendicitis (n = 101) and non-appendicitis (n = 78) groups. RESULTS: In the appendicitis group, the appendix was visualised in 66 (65.3%) patients. In cases where the appendix was not visualised, we looked out for secondary inflammatory signs, which were present in 32 (31.7%) patients. Using stepwise logistic regression, Blumberg's sign, free fluid or collection, hyperaemia, non-compressible appendix and an appendix diameter > 7 mm were found to be significant predictive factors for appendicitis. A new scoring system called POPs was developed, combining inflammatory predictors and ultrasonography findings, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% confidence interval 0.929-0.986). CONCLUSION The newly developed POPs-based diagnosis scheme proved a promising alternative to existing scoring systems such as the Alvarado score. Although further calibration would be beneficial, the proposed scoring scheme is simple and easy to understand, memorise and apply in the emergency room.
Acute Disease ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis/surgery* ; Appendix/surgery* ; Child ; Humans ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography/methods*

Background: Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is an acute monophasic paralyzing illness that typically occurs after gastroenteritis and respiratory tract infection. Antecedent surgical procedures are less recognized trigger of GBS. Objectives: This paper aims to report a case of demyelinating variety of GBS that developed after appendectomy. Methods: This is a case of a 39-year-old Filipino male who was admitted due to acute appendicitis. He developed lower extremity weakness 4 days after appendectomy. His motor deficit initially presented distally from lower extremities, which advanced to the trunk, upper extremities, and muscles of speech and deglutition. Paresthesia of the fingers and toes and distal areflexia on both lower extremities were also elicited. Results: Diagnosis was done clinically. Nerve conduction study showed demyelinating variant, uncommon for a post traumatic GBS. Supportive care was rendered which resulted in complete recovery. Conclusion Surgery is a known but less identified cause of GBS. Although rare, we should consider GBS in patients presenting with ascending or progressive weakness after recent surgery because its early identification renders immediate and appropriate treatment.
Guillain-Barre Syndrome ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome ; Appendectomy

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features, surgical methods and prognosis of primary appendiceal neoplasms. Methods: A descriptive case series study was performed. Clinical data of patients diagnosed with primary appendiceal neoplasms in Peking University First Hospital from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent surgery and were confirmed as appendiceal neoplasms by postoperative pathology were included. Cases of cecal tumor invading the appendix and other organ tumors implanting in the appendix and cases of recurrent appendix tumors were excluded Pathological classification was based on the 4th edition of the WHO classification of digestive tract tumors (2010 edition), and the efficacy of operation methods of low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) were analyzed. Results: A total of 115 patients were enrolled, including 52 males and 63 females with a median age of 59 (51, 71) years. Clinical symptoms usually manifested as dormant pain in the right lower quadrant, migrating right lower abdominal pain, fever and bloating. Twenty-four cases were accidentally discovered during surgery, and 21 cases were found by physical examination. The preoperative diagnosis rate of CT and ultrasound was 40.2% (43/107) and 25.5% (24/94) respectively. The postoperative pathological types contained 83 cases of LAMN, 12 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, 9 cases of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (aNEN), 2 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells, 3 cases of serrated adenoma, 2 cases of goblet cell carcinoid, 2 cases of lymphoma, 1 case of leiomyoma and 1 case of schwannomas. All the patients underwent surgical resection, including 41 cases of appendectomy, 21 cases of partial cecectomy, 48 cases of right hemicolectomy, and 5 cases of combined organ resection due to appendiceal tumor infiltration or dissemination. Eighteen cases were diagnosed with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) during operation. A total of 98 patients were enrolled for follow-up. The median follow-up time was 58 (5-172) months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 84.5% and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 88.2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that high-grade malignancy tumors (HR=25.881, 95% CI: 2.827-236.935, P=0.004) and PMP formation (HR=42.166, 95% CI: 3.470-512.439,P=0.003) were independent risk factors for prognosis. Patients undergoing right hemicolectomy presented longer operation time, more blood loss and higher morbidity of complication as compared to those undergoing appendectomy and partial cecectomy (all P<0.05), while no significant differences in 5-year DFS (P=0.627) and 5-year OS (P=0.718) were found. Conclusions: Primary appendiceal neoplasms usually have no typical features, accompanied with low preoperative diagnosis rate. The common pathological types are LAMN, mucinous adenocarcinoma and aNEN. Appendectomy or partial cecectomy for LAMN may achieve satisfactory prognosis. High-grade malignancy tumors and PMP formation are independent risk factors for prognosis.
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery* ; Appendectomy ; Appendiceal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of short-course versus longcourse antibiotic therapy among patients undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. METHODS: The authors conducted an electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCOHost for studies from 2000 to January, 2000 to September, 2018 comparing short-course versus long-course antibiotic therapy in adults undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The outcomes considered were the incidence of superficial surgical site infection and intra-abdominal abscess, and duration of hospital stay. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients in two studies were analyzed. Superficial surgical site infection was identified in 5 out of 123 patients in the short-course antibiotic group (4%), and 5 out of 237 patients in the long-course antibiotic group (2.1%) (95% CI 0.38, 5.51, p=0.58). There was a decrease in the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess in the short-course antibiotic group (6.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.32, 1.77, p=0.52). The duration of hospital stay was significantly less in the short-course antibiotic group (3.95 days) compared to the long-course antibiotic group (4.6 days) (95% CI -0.66, -0.21; p<0.001). CONCLUSION No difference between the <5-day and ≥5-day antibiotic course in terms of surgical site infection and intra-abdominal abscess was detected. However, the hospital stay of the <5-day group was shorter.
Appendectomy

PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) and single-incision, 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SITPLA). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 77 patients who underwent TUSPLA or SITPLA to provide more minimally invasive surgery between May 2017 and April 2018. TUSPLA was performed in 39 patients and 38 underwent SITPLA. In the SITPLA group, two 5-mm trocars were inserted through the umbilicus and an extra puncture site was used for a left-handed instrument. Demographic characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean total operative time in the SITPLA group was shorter than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.003). The mean laparoscopic instrumental time was also shorter (p<0.001) in the SITPLA. The number of postoperative analgesics in the SITPLA group was less than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.002). The length of hospital day after surgery was shorter in the SITPLA group than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.008). There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: SITPLA had a shorter operative time, required less pain management, and had a similar cosmetic outcome when compared with TUSPLA.
Analgesics ; Appendectomy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Operative Time ; Pain Management ; Punctures ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Instruments ; Umbilicus

PURPOSE: This study was aimed at reporting our experience with single-incision laparoscopic appendectomies (SILA) performed by a surgical resident, and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the procedure, together with a comparison of the outcomes of the same procedure performed by a staff surgeon. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series analysis of 60 consecutive patients who underwent SILA. Two surgeons, an attending staff surgeon and a second-year surgical resident, performed the SILA procedures. SILA procedures performed by the resident were intraoperatively guided and supervised by the staff surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 60 case-matched patients with acute appendicitis underwent a SILA performed by either the resident or attending staff. There was no difference in patient demographics between the two groups of patients. The mean operation time was longer in the resident group than in the staff group (43.2±6.0 minutes vs. 32.9±10.5 minutes, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the operative data between the two groups. No conversion to an open procedure occurred in either group. Postoperative pain, time to onset of oral intake, and number of days of postoperative hospital stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: SILA procedures performed by a resident are safe and feasible despite longer operation times. Perioperative supervision and guidance by an attending staff surgeon may facilitate surgical outcomes.
Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Demography ; Education ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Organization and Administration ; Pain, Postoperative ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgeons

PURPOSE: To evaluate the educational value of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) videos on YouTube for surgical trainees. METHODS: The search term “Laparoscopic appendectomy” was used on YouTube. The top 100 videos sorted by the number of views were evaluated. Each YouTube account was analyzed, and only videos uploaded by medical physicians were included in this study. Video quality was evaluated using an arbitrary appendectomy scoring system. Video characteristics and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores were analyzed regarding video quality and upload source. RESULTS: The video quality of 14 (25.0%) videos was graded as good, 36 (64.3%) moderate, and 6 (10.7%) of poor quality. Video characteristic analysis showed no differences in video quality according to the upload source (p=0.573). Video quality and upload source were not related to video length, total views, days online, number of likes, number of dislikes, number of comments, or GOALS score. Among the factors analyzed, only appendicitis severity was found to be associated with video grade (p=0.049). CONCLUSION: The quality of LA YouTube videos varied. Categories considered as viewer feedback were not associated with video grade or upload source. Responsible video uploading by academic institutions, and appropriate censorship by YouTube seems necessary. Further research with objective data on actual application to surgical trainees is necessary.
Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Laparoscopy