Humans ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ; Endovascular Procedures ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications ; Risk Factors ; Aortic Rupture/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Aortic Dissection/complications* ; Aortic Rupture/etiology* ; Humans

PURPOSE: The use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (r-AAA) is steadily increasing. We report early experiences of EVAR for r-AAA performed in two tertiary referral centers in Korea. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed r-AAA patients treated by EVAR from May 2013 to December 2017. An EVAR-first strategy for r-AAA was adopted whenever feasible. The demographic information, anatomic characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications with special attention to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and 30-day mortality were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 13 patients who underwent EVAR for r-AAA. Mean age was 74.2 years and mean AAA size was 74.2 mm. Two patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation at initial presentation. Bifurcated stent grafts were used in 12 out of 13 cases and physician-modified endografts with fenestrated/chimney techniques were performed in 2 cases with short neck. Successful stent graft deployment was achieved in all cases. Three patients were suspected of having ACS and 2 of them underwent laparotomy for decompression. The 30-day mortality was 7.7% (1 of 13), the only mortality being a patient that refused decompressive laparotomy for suspected ACS. CONCLUSION: Despite the small numbers, the outcomes of EVAR for treatment of r-AAA were very promising, even in selected cases with unfavorable anatomy. These outcomes were achieved by a dedicated and well-trained team approach, and by use of high-end angiographic technology. Finally, ACS after EVAR is not uncommon, and requires a high index of suspicion as well as liberal use of decompressive surgery.
Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Decompression ; Endovascular Procedures ; Humans ; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension ; Korea ; Laparotomy ; Mortality ; Neck ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Tertiary Care Centers

BACKGROUND: The endovascular approach to aortic disease treatment has been increasingly utilized in the past 2 decades. This study aimed to determine the long-term results of using the Seal thoracic stent graft. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair or a hybrid procedure using the Seal thoracic stent graft (S&G Biotech, Seongnam, Korea) from January 2008 to July 2018 at a single institution. We investigated in-hospital mortality and the incidence of postoperative complications. We also investigated the mid-term survival rate and incidence of aorta-related complications. RESULTS: Among 72 patients with stent grafts, 15 patients underwent the hybrid procedure and 21 underwent emergency surgery. The mean follow-up period was 37.86±30.73 months (range, 0–124 months). Five patients (6.9%) died within 30 days. Two patients developed cerebrovascular accidents. Spinal cord injury occurred in 2 patients. Postoperative renal failure, postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and pneumonia were reported in 3, 1, and 6 patients, respectively. Stent-related aortic complications were observed in 5 patients (6.8%). The 1- and 5-year survival and freedom from stent-induced aortic event rates were 81.5% and 58.7%, and 97.0% and 89.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of the Seal thoracic stent graft yielded good mid-term results. Further studies are needed to examine the long-term outcomes of this device.
Aorta, Thoracic ; Aortic Diseases ; Aortic Rupture ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Emergencies ; Endoleak ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Freedom ; Gyeonggi-do ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Pneumonia ; Postoperative Complications ; Renal Insufficiency ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord Injuries ; Stents ; Stroke ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the morphological features and forensic pathological characteristics of cardiac ruptures of different causes for their differential diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 44 autopsy cases of cardiac rupture from 2014 to 2017 in our institute, including 11 cases caused by blunt violence with intact pericardium, 4 caused by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), 9 by myocardial infarction, and 20 by aorta dissection rupture.The gross features and histopathological characteristics of cardiac rupture and pericardial effusion were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Cardiac ruptures caused by blunt violence varied in both morphology and locations, and multiple ruptures could be found, often accompanied with rib or sternum fractures; the volume of pericardial effusion was variable in a wide range; microscopically, hemorrhage and contraction band necrosis could be observed in the cardiac tissue surrounding the rupture.Cardiac ruptures caused by CPR occurred typically near the apex of the right ventricular anterior wall, and the laceration was often parallel to the interventricular septum with frequent rib and sternum fractures; the volume of pericardial blood was small without blood clots; microscopic examination only revealed a few hemorrhages around the ruptured cardiac muscular fibers.Cardiac ruptures due to myocardial infarction caused massive pericardial blood with blood clots, and the blood volume was significantly greater than that found in cases of CPR-induced cardiac rupture ( < 0.05);lacerations were confined in the left ventricular anterior wall, and the microscopic findings included myocardial necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and mural thrombus.Cardiac tamponade resulting from aorta dissection rupture was featured by massive pericardial blood with blood clots, and the blood volume was much greater than that in cases of cardiac ruptures caused by blunt violence, myocardial infarction and CPR ( < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Hemorrhage, inflammatory cell infiltration, and lateral thrombi around the cardiac rupture, along with pericardial blood clots, are all evidences of antemortem injuries.
Aneurysm, Dissecting ; complications ; Aortic Aneurysm ; complications ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; adverse effects ; Forensic Pathology ; Heart Rupture ; etiology ; pathology ; Heart Rupture, Post-Infarction ; pathology ; Humans ; Myocardial Contusions ; complications

Aortic injury during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a rare but severe complication. We experienced aortic injury during TLIF at L3–4 with a 59-year-old woman diagnosed with an adjacent segment disease at L3–4. Severe bleeding occurred during disc space expansion, and the blood pressure dropped to 60/40 mmHg. The patient’s vital sign stabilized after compression with gauze and Gelfoam in addition to blood transfusion. The patient was treated with endovascular repair using a percutaneous technique after intertransverse fusion at L3–4 was completed. She recovered and is being followed-up in the outpatient department.
Aneurysm, False ; Aortic Rupture ; Blood Pressure ; Blood Transfusion ; Endovascular Procedures ; Female ; Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; Intraoperative Complications ; Middle Aged ; Outpatients ; Vital Signs

No abstract available.
Aneurysm, Dissecting/diagnosis/*etiology/physiopathology/therapy ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use ; Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis/*etiology/physiopathology/therapy ; Behcet Syndrome/*complications/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Cerebral Infarction/diagnosis/etiology ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color ; Electrocardiography ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Sinus of Valsalva/physiopathology/ultrasonography ; Thrombosis/diagnosis/drug therapy/*etiology/physiopathology ; Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnosis/*etiology/physiopathology/therapy

OBJECTIVETo evaluate and report surgical management and experience of atypical ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA).

METHODSClinical data of 52 RAAA patients from May 2002 to February 2015 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Thirty-three cases were included into this study based on atypical clinical presentation and etiology, including 6 infected RAAA, 5 inflammatory RAAA, 1 traumatic aortic rupture, 6 tuberculotic RAAA, 2 aoritc-vena cava fistula, 3 intestinal fistula and 5 spine erosion cases. Two of them refused operation during preparation, 19 of them received emergency open repair and 13 of them received endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with 1 case converted to open surgery.

RESULTSThe systolic blood pressure of atypical RAAA before operation was (88±16) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), duration time from admission to diagnosis making was (17±10) hours. Perioperative death occurred in 1 patient because of hemorrhagic shock induced acidosis. During follow-up for 3 to 72 months, no operation related complications occured, such as artificial graft infection.

CONCLUSIONSEmergent operation including open surgery and EVAR is crucial for RAAA treatment. Early diagnosis, excellent operative techniques and comprehensive perioperative management are measures conducive to reduce the mortality rate of RAAA.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; surgery ; Aortic Rupture ; surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures

BACKGROUNDAlthough it is generally acknowledged that patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) obtain the greatest benefit from endovascular repair (EVAR), convincing evidence on the medium-long term effect is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare and summarize published results of rAAA that underwent EVAR with open surgical repair (OSR).

METHODSA search of publicly published literature was performed. Based on an inclusion and exclusion criteria, a systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to compare patient characteristics, complications, short term mortality and medium-long term outcomes. A random-effects model was used to pool the data and calculate pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences. A quantitative method was used to analyze the differences between these two methods.

RESULTSA search of the published literature showed that fourteen English language papers comprising totally 1213 patients with rAAA (435 EVAR and 778 OSR) would be suitable for this study. Furthermore, 13 Chinese studies were included, including 267 patients with rAAA totally, among which 238 patients received operation. The endovascular method was associated with more respiratory diseases before treatment (OR = 1.81, P = 0.01), while there are more patients with hemodynamic instability before treatment in OSR group (OR = 1.53, P = 0.031). Mean blood transfusion was 1328 ml for EVAR and 2809 ml for OSR (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1500 ml, P = 0.014). The endovascular method was associated with a shorter stay in intensive care (WMD 2.34 days, P < 0.001) and a shorter total postoperative stay (WMD 6.27 days, P < 0.001). The pooled post-operative complication rate of respiratory system and visceral ischemia seldom occurred in the EVAR group (OR = 0.48, P < 0.001 and OR = 0.28, P = 0.043, respectively). The pooled 30-day mortality was 25.7% for EVAR and 39.6% for OSR, and the odds ratio was 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.70, P < 0.001). There was not, however, any significant reduction in the medium-long all-cause mortality rate (HR = 1.13, P = 0.381) and re-intervention rate (OR = 2.19, P = 0.243) following EVAR. In EVAR group, nevertheless, incidence of type I endoleak was significantly lower than type II endoleak (OR = 0.33, P = 0.039) at late follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONSOn the basis of this systematic review, rAAA EVAR results in less blood use for transfusion, shorter operation time, shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, and lower 30-day mortality. However, in the medium-long term, it is not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; surgery ; Aortic Rupture ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods

PURPOSE: Despite significant improvements in surgery, anesthesia, and postoperative critical care, the postoperative mortality rate of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has remained at 40% to 50% for several decades. Therefore, we evaluated factors associated with the postoperative mortality of RAAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to December 2008, a retrospective study was performed with 34 patients who underwent open repair of RAAA. The preoperative factors included age, sex, smoking, comorbidities, serum creatinine, hemoglobin, shock, pulse rate, and time from emergency room to operation room. The intraoperative factors included blood loss, transfusion, aortic clamping site and time, aneurysmal characteristics, rupture type, graft type, hourly urine output (HUO), and operative time. The postoperative factors included inotropic support, renal replacement therapy (RRT), reoperation, bowel ischemia, multiple organ failure (MOF), and intensive care unit stay. The 2-day and the 30-day mortality rates were analyzed separately. RESULTS: The 2-day and the 30-day mortality rates were 14.7% and 41.2%, respectively. On univariate analysis, shock, transfusion, HUO, inotropic support and MOF for the 2-day mortality and serum creatinine, transfusion, aortic clamping site, HUO, inotropic support, RRT and MOF for the 30-day mortality were statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, shock, inotropic support and MOF for the 2-day mortality and aortic clamping site, RRT and MOF for the 30-day mortality were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: To decrease the postoperative mortality rate of RAAA, prevention of massive hemorrhage and acute renal failure with infrarenal aortic clamping, as well as prompt operative control of bleeding and maintenance of systemic perfusion are important.
Aged ; Aortic Rupture/*mortality/*surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/*mortality ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies