Background Lead is a typical persistent environmental pollutant that can accumulate in bones for decades. During pregnancy, alterations in calcium metabolism promote the mobilization of bone lead, resulting in secondary exposure; however, the mechanisms by which pregnancy-associated bone lead mobilization affects maternal renal function remain unclear. Objective To investigate the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in pregnancy-related bone lead mobilization-induced renal injury. Methods Newly weaned female Wistar rats were randomly assigned to a control or a lead-exposed group administered either 0.05% sodium acetate or 0.05% lead acetate in drinking water. Following a 4-week lead exposure and a 4-week washout period, the females were co-housed with healthy age-matched males for mating. Rats were sacrificed at early (gestational day 3) and late (gestational day 17) pregnancystages, respectively. Renal histopathology was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin staining staining. Mitochondria-related indicators, including oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and energy metabolism, were measured. Differential metabolites were identified using serum metabolomics. Results Renal injury in the lead-exposed pregnant rats progressed in a time-dependent manner, characterized by degeneration of proximal tubular epithelial cells, glomerular hyaline changes, and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant interaction between the treatment factor (lead exposure) and the temporal factor (gestational stage) on renal injury (P<0.001). Further analysis of mitochondrial function-related indicators in late-pregnancy renal tissue revealed that the lead exposure group exhibited significantly increased levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (P<0.05), accompanied by a reduction in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced glutathione (GSH) activities (P<0.05); regarding inflammatory markers, levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) were elevated (P<0.01), whereas interleukin-33 (IL-33) was decreased in the lead-exposed group (P<0.05); energy metabolism-related indicators, including adenosine triphosphate (ATP) level, Na⁺-K⁺-ATPase and Ca²⁺-Mg²⁺-ATPase activities, and mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes I, III, and V activities, were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in the lead-exposed gorup. The typical differential metabolite N-methylisoleucine, identified through serum metabolomics analysis, was negatively correlated with blood lead levels, kidney injury scores, and IL-1β, while positively correlated with catalase (CAT) activity and Ca²⁺-Mg²⁺-ATPase. Conclusions Mitochondrial dysfunction may play a critical role in renal injury induced by bone lead mobilization during late gestation.

Objective:To investigate the correlation between the ratio of apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A-I (ApoB/ApoA-I) and unstable carotid plaque in a neurologically healthy population receiving health check-ups.Methods:This cross-sectional study consecutively enrolled 1 149 neurologically healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations at the Health Management Centre of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from October 2021 to September 2022. All eligible participants completed standardized questionnaires, physical examinations and laboratory tests. Laboratory tests of lipid metabolism-related biomarkers included total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), ApoA-I, and ApoB; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the ApoB/ApoA-I ratio were subsequently calculated. The carotid plaque stability was evaluated using superb microvascular imaging technology. The participants were classified into unstable plaque group (341 cases) and stable plaque group (808 cases) according to the presence or absence of intraplaque neovascularization. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the correlation between the ApoB/ApoA-I ratio and unstable carotid plaques.Results:The study enrolled 1 149 participants totally, with a median age of 57 (49-63) years, including 771 males (67.10%) and 378 females (32.90%), and 341 cases (29.68%) were found with unstable carotid plaques. The unstable plaque group had a higher proportion of males, smoking history, diabetes history, along with higher waist-to-hip ratio and ApoB/ApoA-I ratio compared to the stable plaque group [76.54% vs 63.12%, 33.43% vs 22.77%, 19.06% vs 13.37%, 0.91 (0.85, 0.94) vs 0.89 (0.84, 0.93), 0.64 (0.51, 0.76) vs 0.59 (0.48, 0.72)], while HDL-C and ApoA-I levels were lower [1.39 (1.19, 1.63) vs 1.44 (1.24, 1.66) mmol/L, 1.43 (1.29, 1.60) vs 1.51 (1.36, 1.68) g/L] (all P<0.05). An elevated ApoB/ApoA-I ratio was positively associated with the risk of unstable carotid plaque ( OR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.13-2.29, P=0.008; P for trend<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, waist-to-hip ratio, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, history of smoking and estimated glomerular filtration rate, the positive association between elevated ApoB/ApoA-I ratio and the risk of unstable carotid plaque remained significant ( OR=1.48, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16, P=0.044; P for trend=0.004). Conclusion:In a neurologically healthy population receiving health check-ups, an elevated ApoB/ApoA-I ratio may increase the risk of unstable carotid plaque.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have indicated that Angong Niuhuang Pills (ANP) reduce cerebral infarct and edema volumes. This study aimed to investigate whether ANP safely reduces cerebral infarct and edema volumes in patients with moderate to severe acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial included patients with acute ischemic stroke with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ranging from 10 to 20 in 17 centers in China between April 2021 and July 2022. Patients were allocated within 36 h after onset via block randomization to receive ANP or placebo (3 g/day for 5 days). The primary outcomes were changes in cerebral infarct and edema volumes after 14 days of treatment. The primary safety outcome was severe adverse events (SAEs) for 90 days. RESULTS: There were 57 and 60 patients finally included in the ANP and placebo groups, respectively for modified intention-to-treat analysis. The median age was 66.0 years, and the median NIHSS score at baseline was 12.0. The changes in cerebral infarct volume at day 14 were 0.3 mL and 0.4 mL in the ANP and placebo groups, respectively (median difference: -7.1 mL; interquartile range [IQR]: -18.3 to 2.3 mL, P = 0.30). The changes in cerebral edema volume of the ANP and placebo groups on day 14 were 11.4 mL and 4.0 mL, respectively ( median difference: 3.0 mL, IQR: -1.3 to 9.9 mL, P = 0.15). The rates of SAE within 90 days were similar in the ANP (3/57, 5%) and placebo (7/60, 12%) groups ( P = 0.36). Changes in serum mercury and arsenic concentrations were comparable. In patients with large artery atherosclerosis, ANP reduced the cerebral infarct volume at 14 days (median difference: -12.3 mL; IQR: -27.7 to -0.3 mL, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ANP showed a similar safety profile to placebo and non-significant tendency to reduce cerebral infarct volume in patients with moderate-to-severe stroke. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of ANP in reducing cerebral infarcts and improving clinical prognosis. TRAIL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov , No. NCT04475328.
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects* ; Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy* ; Pilot Projects ; Stroke/drug therapy* ; Treatment Outcome

Objective To introduce the concepts and principles of the win ratio method and to analyze it in the context of a case study of a clinical trial in cerebrovascular disease.Methods Based on the study of clopidogrel with aspirin in high risk patients with acute non disabling cerebrovascular events 2,and key prognostic factors,the outcome events were defined sequentially as ① time to death within 90 d,② time to recurrence of ischemic stroke within 90 d,③ time to moderate-to-severe hemorrhage within 90 d.Using clopidogrel combined with aspirin as the reference group,the winning ratio(Rw)of ticagrelor combined with aspirin was analyzed by the win ratio method,and the 95% confidence interval(CI)of Rw was estimated by the Bootstrap method and compared with the hazard ratio(HR)calculated by the competing risk model.Results When only fatal events were considered,the win ratio method suggested that the ticagrelor group was significantly better than the clopidogrel group,Rw=2.00(95% CI:1.52-2.47),and after stepwise inclusion of ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe hemorrhage recurrence,the win ratio method yielded a value of 1.29(95% CI:1.25-1.57),and the HR value from Fine and Gray competing risk regression was 0.78(95% CI:0.65-0.95),both of which indicated that the efficacy of the ticagrelor group was superior to that of the clopidogrel group.Conclusion The win ratio method can be used to analyze clinical trials with composite endpoints after prioritizing multiple outcome variables,showing the advantages of win ratio and its promising application in cerebrovascular disease research.

Acute ischemic stroke(AIS)is associated with high mortality and disability rates,presenting a substantial challenge to global public health challenge.Intravenous thrombolysis(IVT)is recognized as a cornerstone of early AIS treatment and is recommended as the standard therapeutic approach by both national and international guidelines.However,the clinical efficacy of IVT remains suboptimal due to several limitations,including a narrow therapeutic time window and the inevitable activation of the coagulation system and platelet aggregagation during thrombolysis.These factors may contribute to adverse outcomes such as early neurological deterioration(END)and vascular re-occlusion.Antiplatelet therapy(APT),which inhibits platelet aggregations,reduces microthrombus formation,and stabilizes the vascular endothelium with multifaceted mechanisms,has emerged as a promising adjunctive strategy to IVT,offering potential synergistic effects.This review summarized the latest evidence from both domestic and international studies,focusing on the mechanisms of APT,recent clinical advancements in IVT combined with APT,and the safety and efficacy of APT administration at different time windows relative to IVT.Emphasis is placed on the influence of various antiplatelet agents,dosing regimens,and initiation timing on therapeutic outcomes,alongside a comprehensive evaluation in the context of current guideline recommendations and clinical practice.Current guidelines recommend initiating APT 24 h after IVT,following imaging confirmation to exclude the risk of intracranial hemorrhage.However,the efficacy and safety of earlier APT initiation remain inconclusive.Individualized treatment strategies,such as early administration of low-dose,short-acting APT or combination therapy in specific patient subgroups,may effectively balance therapeutic benefits and risks.The adjunctive use of APT in IVT holds promise for enhancing efficacy and improving clinical outcomes,but precise stratification of safety and efficacy is essential.Future research should focus on optimizing combination IVT and APT strategies through individualized patient profiling,appropriate drug selection,and dynamic imaging monitoring to achieve precision management in AIS treatment.

Performing multiple tests without adjusting the test level results in a higher-than-intended overall familywise error rate(FWER).This phenomenon is known as the multiplicity problem.In this paper,we first introduced the mechanism of multiplicity problem based on the classification and characterization of clinical endpoints.Then,strategies and methods to solve the multiplicity problem were introduced,including the parallel strategy/single-step method,the sequential strategy/multistep method/stepwise method,and their combinations.The results of different analytic strategies may vary.The practical application of the above common strategies and statistical methods were introduced through the case studies of domestic and foreign investigator initiated clinical trial.Multiplicity adjustment for multiple endpoints in clinical trials can be achieved by a single strategy or a combination of strategies.Depending on the selected strategy or combination,the statistical methods and significance level(denoted as α)for each test hypothesis are determined to effectively control the multiplicity problem.

The"promising zone"is a method used to analyze interim data from adaptive design clinical trials in an unblinded state.It allows for the adjustment of sample size based on interim results to enhance the trial's probability of success or minimize investment in unnecessary sample size.Mehta and Pocock proposed rules for increasing sample size based on interim analysis results using the concept of the"promising zone"(MP design).Furthermore,combination of the MP design with group sequential design can set up early stopping boundaries in trials,allowing for a reduction in sample size under favorable or unfavorable zone.The combination test(CT)design further optimizes the framework of the"promising zone",by considering sample size and conditional power in combination to achieve the highest conditional power with the smallest sample size.This review summarizes the principles of the"promising zone",introduces the method of determining the"promising zone"and re-estimating sample size,and further illustrates the feasibility of this method in clinical trials with a practical case.

Objective To introduce the concepts and principles of the win ratio method and to analyze it in the context of a case study of a clinical trial in cerebrovascular disease.Methods Based on the study of clopidogrel with aspirin in high risk patients with acute non disabling cerebrovascular events 2,and key prognostic factors,the outcome events were defined sequentially as ① time to death within 90 d,② time to recurrence of ischemic stroke within 90 d,③ time to moderate-to-severe hemorrhage within 90 d.Using clopidogrel combined with aspirin as the reference group,the winning ratio(Rw)of ticagrelor combined with aspirin was analyzed by the win ratio method,and the 95% confidence interval(CI)of Rw was estimated by the Bootstrap method and compared with the hazard ratio(HR)calculated by the competing risk model.Results When only fatal events were considered,the win ratio method suggested that the ticagrelor group was significantly better than the clopidogrel group,Rw=2.00(95% CI:1.52-2.47),and after stepwise inclusion of ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe hemorrhage recurrence,the win ratio method yielded a value of 1.29(95% CI:1.25-1.57),and the HR value from Fine and Gray competing risk regression was 0.78(95% CI:0.65-0.95),both of which indicated that the efficacy of the ticagrelor group was superior to that of the clopidogrel group.Conclusion The win ratio method can be used to analyze clinical trials with composite endpoints after prioritizing multiple outcome variables,showing the advantages of win ratio and its promising application in cerebrovascular disease research.

Acute ischemic stroke(AIS)is associated with high mortality and disability rates,presenting a substantial challenge to global public health challenge.Intravenous thrombolysis(IVT)is recognized as a cornerstone of early AIS treatment and is recommended as the standard therapeutic approach by both national and international guidelines.However,the clinical efficacy of IVT remains suboptimal due to several limitations,including a narrow therapeutic time window and the inevitable activation of the coagulation system and platelet aggregagation during thrombolysis.These factors may contribute to adverse outcomes such as early neurological deterioration(END)and vascular re-occlusion.Antiplatelet therapy(APT),which inhibits platelet aggregations,reduces microthrombus formation,and stabilizes the vascular endothelium with multifaceted mechanisms,has emerged as a promising adjunctive strategy to IVT,offering potential synergistic effects.This review summarized the latest evidence from both domestic and international studies,focusing on the mechanisms of APT,recent clinical advancements in IVT combined with APT,and the safety and efficacy of APT administration at different time windows relative to IVT.Emphasis is placed on the influence of various antiplatelet agents,dosing regimens,and initiation timing on therapeutic outcomes,alongside a comprehensive evaluation in the context of current guideline recommendations and clinical practice.Current guidelines recommend initiating APT 24 h after IVT,following imaging confirmation to exclude the risk of intracranial hemorrhage.However,the efficacy and safety of earlier APT initiation remain inconclusive.Individualized treatment strategies,such as early administration of low-dose,short-acting APT or combination therapy in specific patient subgroups,may effectively balance therapeutic benefits and risks.The adjunctive use of APT in IVT holds promise for enhancing efficacy and improving clinical outcomes,but precise stratification of safety and efficacy is essential.Future research should focus on optimizing combination IVT and APT strategies through individualized patient profiling,appropriate drug selection,and dynamic imaging monitoring to achieve precision management in AIS treatment.

Performing multiple tests without adjusting the test level results in a higher-than-intended overall familywise error rate(FWER).This phenomenon is known as the multiplicity problem.In this paper,we first introduced the mechanism of multiplicity problem based on the classification and characterization of clinical endpoints.Then,strategies and methods to solve the multiplicity problem were introduced,including the parallel strategy/single-step method,the sequential strategy/multistep method/stepwise method,and their combinations.The results of different analytic strategies may vary.The practical application of the above common strategies and statistical methods were introduced through the case studies of domestic and foreign investigator initiated clinical trial.Multiplicity adjustment for multiple endpoints in clinical trials can be achieved by a single strategy or a combination of strategies.Depending on the selected strategy or combination,the statistical methods and significance level(denoted as α)for each test hypothesis are determined to effectively control the multiplicity problem.