BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are commonly occurred in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, evidence of irAEs derived from the Chinese population is relatively lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of irAEs in Chinese patients with lung cancer after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: Clinical and follow-up data from lung cancer patients who received at least one time of ICIs from January 2018 to September 2021 at Huadong Hospital, Fudan University were included. Statistical descriptions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the overall incidence of irAEs, as well as the incidence and outcomes of each type of irAEs. RESULTS: 135 patients were included in the study. 106 patients (78.5%) presented at least one type of irAEs, and the median time to first irAEs onset was 28 d. Most irAEs occurred at early time after treatment, and most irAEs were mild-moderate and reversible. 57 patients (42.2%) died at the study cutoff. The mortality rate of severe irAEs was 12.6% (n=17), and among them 7 patients (41.2%) died of pneumonitis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time of the total population was 505 d (95%CI: 352-658) and 625 d (95%CI: 491-759), respectively. Patients who presented any irAEs achieved a longer PFS than those who did not (median PFS: 533 d vs 179 d, P=0.037, HR=0.57), while patients who presented skin toxicities achieved a longer OS than patients who did not (median OS: 797 d vs 469 d, P=0.006, HR=0.70). CONCLUSIONS In real-world settings, irAEs in lung cancer patients were commonly observed, with pneumonitis as the most common fatal irAEs. In addition, patients who presented any irAEs may tend to achieve a longer PFS.
Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Incidence ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use* ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: Cancer immunotherapy can lead to various side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAE). This study summarized and analyzed the clinical and pathological characteristics of immune-mediated liver injury caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI). Methods: This is a retrospective case series study involving 11 patients diagnosed with ILICI at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from November 2019 to November 2021. Patient demographic information and clinical data, including gender, age, ILICI onset, clinical and radiological manifestations, pathological features, treatment, and resumption of ICI were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: The patients were primarily males (9/11) with a median age of 65 (range: 32-73) years. ICI mainly resulted in either partial remission (4/11) or stable disease (3/11). ILICI occurred after a median of two cycles of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy, with a median time from the initial and last anti-PD-1 therapy to ILICI onset of 57 days and 17 days, respectively. ILICI was mostly severe (3/11) or very severe (6/11). While the clinical and radiological manifestations were non-specific, the pathological features were active lobular hepatitis and portal inflammation, with prominent CD8⁺T lymphocyte infiltration. The basic treatment was hepatoprotective drugs (10/11). Glucocorticoids were used as the primary therapy (9/11) but were ineffective in 4 of 9 cases. Of these, 3 of 9 cases received combined treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), only one of whom achieved remission. By the end of the study, 2 of 11 cases had resumed ICI and neither had experienced an ILICI relapse. Conclusion: The ILICI patients in this study had a corresponding history of ICI treatment and pathological features. The main treatment included hepatoprotective drugs and glucocorticoids. Immunosuppressive drugs were added for some cases but had poor efficacy.
Male ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects* ; Liver ; Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use*

Objective: To analyze and compare therapy responses, outcomes, and incidence of severe hematologic adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: Data of patients with chronic phase CML diagnosed between January 2006 and November 2022 from 76 centers, aged ≥18 years, and received initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy within 6 months after diagnosis in China were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the bias of the initial TKI selection, and the therapy responses and outcomes of patients receiving initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy were compared. Results: A total of 4 833 adult patients with CML receiving initial imatinib (n=4 380) or flumatinib (n=453) therapy were included in the study. In the imatinib cohort, the median follow-up time was 54 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-85] months, and the 7-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.2%, 88.4%, 78.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. The 7-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 71.8%, 93.0%, and 96.9%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 13-25) months in the flumatinib cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.4%, 86.5%, 58.4%, and 46.6%, respectively. The 2-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 80.1%, 95.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. The PSM analysis indicated that patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) and higher probabilities of FFS than those receiving the initial imatinib therapy (all P<0.001), whereas the PFS (P=0.230) and OS (P=0.268) were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe hematologic adverse events (grade≥Ⅲ) was comparable in the two cohorts. Conclusion: Patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had higher cumulative incidences of therapy responses and higher probability of FFS than those receiving initial imatinib therapy, whereas the incidence of severe hematologic adverse events was comparable between the two cohorts.
Adult ; Humans ; Adolescent ; Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects* ; Incidence ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Pyrimidines/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; Benzamides/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/drug therapy* ; Aminopyridines/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Chemotherapy is one of the main options in clinical tumor treatment. Although chemotherapy drugs have a good therapeutic effect, they can also cause a series of adverse reactions, such as neurotoxicity. Chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is a dose-limi-ting adverse reaction that significantly affects patients' long-term treatment and quality of life. This article reviewed literature from 2000 to the present on chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity and found that oxaliplatin was the most frequently used chemotherapy drug. Based on the clinical characteristics of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, this article summarized the understanding of its pathogenesis from both traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) and western medicine perspectives, discussed the role and mechanism of TCM compounds and monomeric components, and explored the research direction of using cutting-edge biotechnology to reveal the mechanism of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity from a temporal-spatial perspective of intercellular communication and the application prospects of an interdisciplinary model combining TCM pathogenesis, western medicine manifestations, and artificial intelligence in precise intervention decision-making for TCM, aiming to provide research ideas for the prevention and treatment of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and the development of new drugs.
Humans ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Oxaliplatin/adverse effects* ; Artificial Intelligence ; Quality of Life ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Cognition

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of targeted biological agents that link cytotoxic drugs to monoclonal antibodies through linkers. The monoclonal antibody targets tumor cells and transports small-molecule cytotoxic drugs for specific delivery and minimal off-target side effects. September 30, 2022, 14 anti-tumor ADC drugs have been approved for marketing in the world, and four ADCs have been approved in China. With the improvement of the clinical accessibility of ADC drugs, clinicians urgently need to understand the molecular characteristics and mechanisms of ADCs, and clarify the indications for rational use of drugs. Patients' survival mainly depends on the appropriate dose and course of treatment and also on proper management of adverse reactions. In view of this, on the basis of the "Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Antibody-drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Malignant Tumors (2020 edition)" , Professional Committee on Clinical Research of Oncology Drugs, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association fully combines the existing clinical research evidence and the feasibility of current ADC drugs in China to update the consensus content. This consensus aims to provide a systematic overview of ADC drugs, so as to provide practical and effective suggestions and references for clinicians to apply and manage ADC drugs more accurately.
Humans ; Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use* ; Consensus ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use*

As a newly emerged class of anticancer bioagents in the most precise and selectively targeted way, antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) combines the cancer-targeting abilities of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxicity potency of payload, delivering highly cytotoxic drug into tumors via 'targeted chemotherapy'. ADC has revolutionized the treatment landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive and triple negative subtypes in breast cancer. Three ADCs have been approved by U. S. Food and Drug Administration with breast cancer indications, including trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; also approved in China), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) and sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132; also approved in China). Antibodies, cytotoxic drug, linker, and conjugation process are implicated in ADC profile, resulting in unique adverse drug reactions and toxicity heterogeneity within ADC class. For example, more attention should be paid to the management of thrombocytopenia, hepatotoxicity, and reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine; clinical physicians should pay attention to the risk of neutropenia, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, and reductions in LVEF when treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan; sacituzumab govitecan most frequently caused neutropenia, anemia and diarrhea requiring close monitor. ADC has generally favorable safety profiles, and dose modifications and/or symptomatic supporting treatment are effective in terms of toxicity management. This consensus aims at providing guidance for clinical oncologists of early detection, regular assessment, timely management and follow-up monitor of ADC-associated adverse reactions/events.
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use* ; Breast Neoplasms/therapy* ; Camptothecin/adverse effects* ; Consensus ; Cytotoxins/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use* ; Neutropenia/etiology* ; Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism* ; Trastuzumab/therapeutic use* ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy* ; Ventricular Function, Left

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is aberrantly overexpressed in many solid malignancies, making it an important target for anti-cancer biologic agents. Among them, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), which have been widely used in clinical practice, include anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A proportion of patients treated with EGFRIs develop specific, dose-dependent skin toxicity such as papulopustular rash, paronychia, xerosis and itch. These side effects can cause physical and psychosocial discomfort that may result in dose reduction, discontinuance, or replacement of the current EGFRIs treatment. Correct diagnosis and treatment of these skin and mucosal adverse effects associated with EGFRIs is of great significance for the tertiary prevention of malignant tumors. A review on EGFRI-related mucocutaneous adverse reactions is presented here, focusing on the pathogenesis, the various clinical manifestations, the strategies for prevention and treatment of these conditions.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects* ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; ErbB Receptors/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of medical ozone oil and urea ointment for prevention and treatment of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) caused by sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 99 patients diagnosed with advanced HCC according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) who were scheduled to receive sorafenib treatment for the first time were enrolled in this study between April, 2018 and January, 2020. The patients were randomized into medical ozone oil group ( RESULTS: Eight patients were excluded for poor compliance or protocol violations, leaving a total of 91 patients for analysis, including 44 in medical ozone oil group and 47 in urea ointment group. Sixteen (36.4%) of patients in ozone oil group developed HFSR, a rate significantly lower than that in urea ointment group (57.4%; CONCLUSIONS Medical ozone oil can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of HFSR to improve the quality of life of HCC patients receiving sorafenib treatment.
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy* ; Hand-Foot Syndrome/prevention & control* ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Niacinamide/therapeutic use* ; Ozone/therapeutic use* ; Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects* ; Quality of Life ; Sorafenib/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of Lobaplatin and Cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. METHODS: The databases of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP were retrieved so as to search the studies about the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) that compared the Lobaplatin and Cisplatin for malignant pleural effusion. The main outcome indicators include objective response rate, complete response, partial response, nephrotoxicity, chest pain, gastrointestinal reaction, myelosuppression, fever response and hepatotoxicity. Relative risk was used as the effect size, which was expressed as 95% confidence interval. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs and 720 MPE patients were included. The results showed that the ORR (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.15-1.40, P<0.001), CR (RR=1.39, 95%CI: 1.09-1.78, P=0.007), PR (RR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.42, P=0.026) in LBP thoracic perfusion chemotherapy were significantly higher than those in DDP thoracic perfusion chemotherapy. The incidence of nephrotoxicity (RR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71, P=0.005) and gastrointestinal reactions (RR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.62, P<0.001) in the LBP group were significantly lower than those in DDP group. CONCLUSIONS Compared with DDP pleural perfusion chemotherapy, the ORR, CR and PR of LBP pleural perfusion chemotherapy for MPE are significantly better than DDP, and its nephrotoxicity and gastrointestinal reactions are remarkably lower than DDP.
Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cyclobutanes ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant ; drug therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer(CRC). Methods The clinical data of 16 CRC patients treated with apatinib after failure of prior lines of treatment were retrospectively analyzed in terms of objective response rate,disease control rate,progression-free survival,overall survival,adverse events,and prognostic factors. Results The efficacy was evaluable in 14 patients,among whom the objective response rate was 7.1% and the disease control rate was 50%.The median progression-free survival was 3 months(95%CI=1.57-4.42),and the median overall survival was 6.5 months(95%CI=4.10-8.89).The safety was evaluable in 16 patients,among whom the most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertensinon(37.5%)and proteinuria(25%).No grade 4 adverse event was observed.Multivariate analysis did not show any factor directly related to survival.Conclusion Apatinib may be effective in treating advanced CRC,with tolerable side effects.
Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Pyridines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis