1.Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Fracture Complicated With Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis.
Shi-Qiang LIAO ; Shu-Ming SHI ; Qiang ZHANG ; Chuan-Yong LI ; Guang-Feng ZHENG ; Zhi-Chang PAN ; Jian-Jie RONG
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2025;47(2):237-243
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic thrombolysis(ST)and standard anticoagulation(SA)in the treatment of lower extremity fracture complicated with distal deep vein thrombosis(DDVT).Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 patients with lower extremity fracture complicated with DDVT treated from January 2021 to December 2023.When the lower limb venography indicated a calf thrombus burden score ≥3 points,a retrievable inferior vena cava filter(IVCF)was successfully placed in the healthy femoral vein before orthopedic surgery.The patients who received further anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy after surgery were allocated into a ST group(n=30,urokinase ST and SA)and a SA group(n=30,only SA).The two groups were compared in terms of calf thrombus burden score,thrombus dissolution rate,IVCF placement time,IVCF retrieval rate,intercepted thrombi,hemoglobin level,platelet count,D-dimer level,and complications.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the calf thrombus burden score between the two groups before treatment(P=0.431).However,after treatment,the scores in both groups decreased(both P<0.001),with the ST group showing lower score than the SA group(P=0.002).The thrombus dissolution rate in the ST group was higher than that in the SA group(P<0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in the IVCF placement time between the two groups(P=0.359),and the IVCF retrieval rate was 100% in both groups.The ST group had fewer intercepted thrombi than the SA group(P=0.002).There was no statistically significant difference in hemoglobin level(P=0.238),platelet count(P=0.914),or D-dimer level(P=0.756)between the two groups before treatment.However,after treatment,both groups showed an increase in platelet count(both P<0.001)and a decrease in D-dimer level(both P<0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of complications between the two groups(P=0.704).Conclusions Both SA and ST demonstrate safety and efficacy in the treatment of lower extremity fractures complicated with DDVT,serving as valuable options for clinical application.Compared with SA,ST not only enhances the thrombus dissolution in the calf but also mitigates the risk of thrombosis associated with IVCF.
Humans
;
Venous Thrombosis/therapy*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Thrombolytic Therapy/methods*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Middle Aged
;
Fractures, Bone/complications*
;
Lower Extremity/injuries*
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*
;
Aged
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Adult
2.Research Progress in Bleeding Risk Assessment of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant in Atrial Fibrillation.
Chao YU ; Wei ZHOU ; Tao WANG ; Ling-Juan ZHU ; Hui-Hui BAO ; Xiao-Shu CHENG
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2025;47(3):452-461
The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) into clinical use heralds a new age for anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).However,anticoagulation-related bleeding is currently a major challenge in the anticoagulation process.Assessing the risk of anticoagulation-related bleeding is an important part for the management of patients with AF.Clinical risk factor scores have moderate ability to predict the risk of anticoagulation-related bleeding.To improve the anticoagulation safety of NOACs,additional clinical and biological markers and genetic polymorphisms should be considered to enhance the predictive capability for anticoagulation-related bleeding.This review summarizes the challenges in the management of anticoagulation therapy,with emphases on the bleeding risk scores,biomarkers,clinical indicators,and genetic loci currently used to guide the risk assessment of anticoagulation-related bleeding in AF patients.This review is expected to provide research insights and reference frameworks for predicting and evaluating the bleeding risk associated with NOACs.
Humans
;
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy*
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*
;
Hemorrhage/chemically induced*
;
Risk Assessment
;
Administration, Oral
;
Risk Factors
3.Steroids combined with anticoagulant in acute/subacute severe cerebral venous thrombosis.
Shimin HU ; Yaqin GU ; Tingyu ZHAO ; Kaiyuan ZHANG ; Jingkai LI ; Chen ZHOU ; Haiqing SONG ; Zhi LIU ; Xunming JI ; Jiangang DUAN
Chinese Medical Journal 2025;138(15):1825-1834
BACKGROUND:
Inflammation plays a critical role in severe cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) pathogenesis, but the benefits of anti-inflammatory therapies remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between steroid therapy combined with anticoagulation and the prognosis of acute/subacute severe CVT patients.
METHODS:
A prospective cohort study enrolled patients with acute/subacute severe CVT at Xuanwu Hospital (July 2020-January 2024). Patients were allocated into steroid and non-steroid groups based on the treatment they received. Functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS]) were evaluated at admission, discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) IL-6, and intracranial pressure were measured at admission and discharge in the steroid group. Fundoscopic Frisén grades were assessed at admission and 6 months after discharge. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluat associations between steroid use and favorable outcomes (mRS ≤2) at the 6-month follow-up. Paired tests assessed changes in hs-CRP and other variables before and after treatment, and Spearman's correlations were used to analyze relationships between these changes and functional improvements.
RESULTS:
A total of 107 and 58 patients in the steroid and non-steroid groups, respectively, were included in the analysis. Compared with the non-steroid group, the steroid group had a higher likelihood of achieving an mRS score of 0-2 (93.5% vs . 82.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, P = 0.037) at the 6-month follow-up. After adjusting for confounding factors, the result remained consistent. Pulsed steroid therapy did not increase mortality during hospitalization or follow-up, nor did it lead to severe steroid-related complications (all P >0.05). Patients in the steroid group showed a significant reduction in serum hs-CRP, IL-6, CSF IL-6, and intracranial pressure at discharge compared to at admission, as well as a significant reduction in the fundoscopic Frisén grade at the 6-month follow-up compare to at admission (all P <0.001). A reduction in serum inflammatory marker levels during hospitalization positively correlated with improvements in functional outcomes ( P <0.05).
CONCLUSION:
Short-term steroid use may be an effective and safe adjuvant therapy for acute/subacute severe CVT when used alongside standard anticoagulant treatments, which are likely due to suppression of the inflammatory response. However, these findings require further validation in randomized controlled trials.
TRAIL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05990894.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*
;
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism*
;
Interleukin-6/metabolism*
;
Intracranial Thrombosis/drug therapy*
;
Prospective Studies
;
Steroids/therapeutic use*
;
Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy*
5.Research progress on perioperative anticoagulants in perioperative period of free flap transplantation.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2025;39(11):1474-1484
OBJECTIVE:
To review current status of clinical application and research progress of different anticoagulants in perioperative period of free flap transplantation.
METHODS:
A comprehensive review of recent relevant literature was conducted, focusing on clinical research concerning the application of anticoagulants in the perioperative period of free flap transplantation. The administration route, timing, dosage selection, effectiveness, and safety of commonly used and novel anticoagulants were summarized.
RESULTS:
At present, the anticoagulants mainly used in the perioperative period of free flap transplantation include drugs for venous thrombosis prophylaxis, drugs for arterial thrombosis prophylaxis, and physical/colloidal anticoagulants, etc. The administration strategies can be classified into two major categories: single-agent anticoagulation and combined anticoagulation. Single-agent anticoagulation mainly includes unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, aspirin, and novel anticoagulants. Combined anticoagulation is commonly a synergistic anticoagulation regimen dominated by heparin drugs, combined with aspirin, different antiplatelet drugs, and expansion agents. Studies indicate that perioperative anticoagulant administration can effectively reduce the risk of thrombosis in free flaps and improve the overall flap survival rate. However, significant differences exist in the impact of drug types, administration routes, initiation timing, and dosage intensity on efficacy and bleeding risk. A unified, standardized application protocol has not yet been established. In addition, there has been a growing number of studies on novel anticoagulant drugs. However, their superiority and optimal application strategies in the field of free flap transplantation still necessitate more high-quality evidence.
CONCLUSION
Perioperative anticoagulation therapy represents one of the key strategies for improving the survival rate of free flaps. However, there is still a lack of high-level evidence to establish a standard protocol. Future research should focus on the optimization of individualized anticoagulation strategies, the validation of the effectiveness of new anticoagulants, and the exploration of the advantages of different anticoagulation strategies. At the same time, attention should be paid to balancing anticoagulation and bleeding risks to promote the standardization of clinical practice and the improvement of treatment safety.
Humans
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*
;
Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply*
;
Thrombosis/prevention & control*
;
Perioperative Care/methods*
;
Heparin/therapeutic use*
;
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage*
;
Perioperative Period
;
Aspirin/therapeutic use*
6.The timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of the anticoagulation in patients suffered from perioperative pericardial tamponade during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation and uninterrupted dabigatran: Experiences from 20 cases.
Xin ZHAO ; Wen Li DAI ; Xin SU ; Jia Hui WU ; Chang Qi JIA ; Li FENG ; Man NING ; Yan Fei RUAN ; Song ZUO ; Rong HU ; Xin DU ; Jian Zeng DONG ; Chang Sheng MA
Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2023;51(1):45-50
Objective: To investigate the timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of the anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) suffered from perioperative pericardial tamponade during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation and uninterrupted dabigatran. Methods: A total of 20 patients with pericardial tamponade, who underwent AF catheter ablation with uninterrupted dabigatran in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to August 2021, were included in this retrospective analysis. The clinical characteristics of enrolled patients, information of catheter ablation procedures, pericardial tamponade management, perioperative complications, the timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of anticoagulation were analyzed. Results: All patients underwent pericardiocentesis and pericardial effusion drainage was successful in all patients. The average drainage volume was (427.8±527.4) ml. Seven cases were treated with idarucizumab, of which 1 patient received surgical repair. The average timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of anticoagulation in 19 patients without surgical repair was (1.4±0.7) and (0.8±0.4) days, respectively. No new bleeding, embolism and death were reported during hospitalization and within 30 days following hospital discharge. Time of removal of pericardial drainage catheter, restart of anticoagulation and hospital stay were similar between patients treated with idarucizumab or not. Conclusion: It is safe and reasonable to remove pericardial drainage catheter and restart anticoagulation as soon as possible during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with uninterrupted dabigatran independent of the idarucizumab use or not in case of confirmed hemostasis.
Humans
;
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy*
;
Dabigatran/therapeutic use*
;
Cardiac Tamponade/complications*
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Drainage/adverse effects*
;
Catheter Ablation
;
Catheters/adverse effects*
7.Summary of the best evidence for anticoagulation and bleeding risk management in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Xiaojing GUO ; Yubiao GAI ; Wei WANG ; Yuchen ZHANG ; Huiting SUN
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2023;35(9):963-967
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate and summarize the relevant evidence of anticoagulation and bleeding risk management in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and provide the evidence-based basis for the management of anticoagulation and bleeding during ECMO treatment.
METHODS:
According to the evidence "6S" pyramid model, all evidence on ECMO anticoagulation management and bleeding risk was searched in relevant databases, organizations and guideline websites at home and abroad. Evidence types included guidelines, expert consensus, systematic evaluation, Meta-analysis and original study. The search time limit was from May 31, 2012 to May 31, 2022. Two researchers with evidence-based research background conducted independent literature quality evaluation of the retrieved evidence, and the evidence that met the quality standards was extracted and summarized based on the opinions of industry experts.
RESULTS:
A total of 315 articles were retrieved, and 13 articles were included, including 3 guidelines, 6 expert consensus, and 4 Meta-analysis. A total of 27 best evidences were summarized from 7 aspects, including the selection of ECMO anticoagulation, anticoagulation in priming, anticoagulation in operation, anticoagulation monitoring, bleeding and treatment, thrombosis and treatment, and prevention and management of terminal limb ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides evidence-based basis for bleeding prevention and anticoagulant management in ECMO patients. It is recommended to selectively apply the best evidence after evaluating the clinical environmental conditions of medical institutions, so as to improve the prognosis of ECMO patients.
Humans
;
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects*
;
Blood Coagulation
;
Hemorrhage/etiology*
;
Anticoagulants/adverse effects*
;
Thrombosis/prevention & control*
;
Retrospective Studies
8.Predictive effect of combined procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and antithrombin III on the severity and prognosis of patients with sepsis.
Zhao CAO ; Mingyan WU ; Yue LI ; Ruiqi DING ; Jing ZHANG ; Lingling LIU ; Hongsheng REN
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2023;35(10):1033-1038
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the correlation of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and antithrombin III (AT III) with the severity of sepsis, and to compare the predictive value of the above indicators alone or in combination.
METHODS:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Eighty-five patients with sepsis admitted to the department of intensive care medicine of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from April 2021 to September 2022 were enrolled. General information, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score within 24 hours of admission, inflammatory indicators [PCT, IL-6, serum amyloid A (SAA), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and coagulation indicators (D-dimer and AT III) levels at admission, and 28-day prognosis were collected. The differences of the above indicators were compared among patients with different prognosis at 28 days and different severity of sepsis. The correlation between PCT, IL-6, AT III and the severity of sepsis was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation method. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of PCT, IL-6 and AT III alone or in combination on the 28-day death of patients with sepsis.
RESULTS:
Eighty-five patients were enrolled finally, 67 cases survived and 18 cases died at 28 days. The mortality was 21.2%. There were no statistical significant differences in gender, age and other general data between the two groups. The patients in the death group were more serious than those in the survival group, and PCT, IL-6, and CRP levels were significantly higher than those in the survival group [PCT (μg/L): 4.34 (1.99, 14.42) vs. 1.17 (0.31, 3.94), IL-6 (ng/L): 332.40 (50.08, 590.18) vs. 61.95 (31.64, 194.20), CRP (mg/L): 149.28 (75.34, 218.60) vs. 83.23 (48.22, 174.96), all P < 0.05], and AT III activity was significantly lower than that in the survival group [(53.67±28.57)% vs. (80.96±24.18)%, P < 0.01]. However, there were no significant differences in D-dimer, NLR and SAA between the two groups. Among the 85 patients, 36 had sepsis with single organ dysfunction, 29 had sepsis with multiple organ dysfunction, and 20 had septic shock with multiple organ dysfunction. With the increase of the severity of sepsis, PCT and IL-6 levels gradually increased [PCT (μg/L): 0.36 (0.19, 1.10), 3.00 (1.22, 9.94), 4.34 (2.18, 8.86); IL-6 (ng/L): 43.99 (20.73, 111.13), 100.00 (45.37, 273.00), 332.40 (124.4, 693.65)], and the activity of AT III decreased gradually [(89.81±21.42)%, (71.97±24.88)%, and (53.50±25.41)%], all with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.01). Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that PCT and IL-6 levels in sepsis patients were significantly positively correlated with the severity of the disease (r values were 0.562 and 0.517, respectively, both P < 0.01), and AT III activity was significantly negatively correlated with the severity of the disease (r = -0.523, P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that PCT, IL-6, and AT III alone or in combination had some predictive value for the death of sepsis patients at 28 days. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the above three indicators in combination was higher than that of the individual tests (0.818 vs. 0.722, 0.725, and 0.770), with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 73.1%.
CONCLUSIONS
PCT, IL-6, and AT III were significantly correlated with the severity of sepsis patients. The combined assay of the above three indicators can effectively improve the prediction of the prognosis of sepsis patients.
Humans
;
Procalcitonin
;
Interleukin-6
;
Antithrombin III
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Multiple Organ Failure
;
ROC Curve
;
Sepsis/diagnosis*
;
Prognosis
;
C-Reactive Protein/analysis*
;
Anticoagulants
9.Prognosis analysis of multi-indicator combined with sequential organ failure assessment in patients with sepsis.
Lilin ZHANG ; Jinpeng ZHANG ; Lyu JIN ; Hongyue XU ; Xiaohui ZHAO ; Yadong YANG
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2023;35(12):1245-1249
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the prognostic value of early multiple detection indicators in combination with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) in sepsis patients.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was conducted. Patients with sepsis admitted to the department of critical care medicine of Huanggang Central Hospital of Yangtze University from May 2020 to May 2022 were selected as the research subjects. Coagulation indicators, inflammatory factors, blood routine, liver and kidney function, and blood gas analysis were collected at admission. Organ dysfunction was assessed based on the SOFA score within 24 hours after admission. Patients were divided into a survival group and a death group according to the outcome of 28 days in ICU. Differences in the above indicators between the two groups were compared. Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze prognostic factors of 28-day mortality in sepsis patients. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to analyze the predictive performance of various indicators, the SOFA score, and the combine model for the 28-day outcome in patients with sepsis.
RESULTS:
A total of 101 patients with sepsis were enrolled, 56 patients survived and 45 patients died. Compared to the survival group, patients in the death group were older, the proportion of patients with septic shock was larger, the SOFA score, and the proportion of pulmonary infection were higher, the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were significantly prolonged, the prothrombin activity (PTA) was significantly shortened, and antithrombin (AT) was significantly decreased, the levels of hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), total bilirubin (TBil), and lactic acid (Lac) were significantly increased, while the platelet count (PLT) was significantly decreased. Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis showed that pulmonary infection [odds ratio (OR) = 0.010, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.001-0.164, P = 0.001], AT (OR = 0.944, 95%CI was 0.910-0.978, P = 0.002), hs-CRP (OR = 1.008, 95%CI was 1.001-1.015, P = 0.017), Lac (OR = 1.619, 95%CI was 1.195-2.193, P = 0.002), and SOFA score (OR = 1.363, 95%CI was 1.076-1.727, P = 0.010) were independent prognostic factors for 28-day mortality in patients. A combined model was constructed using pulmonary infection, AT, hs-CRP, Lac, and SOFA score. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the combine model in predicting sepsis prognosis was 0.936 (95%CI was 0.869-0.975, P < 0.001), which was higher in value compared to single indicators (AUC of AT, hs-CRP, Lac, and SOFA score were 0.775, 0.666, 0.802, 0.796, respectively, all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The predictive ability of the SOFA score for sepsis patient outcomes is limited. The combine model combining infection site, AT, hs-CRP, and Lac shows better predictive ability.
Humans
;
Organ Dysfunction Scores
;
Retrospective Studies
;
C-Reactive Protein
;
ROC Curve
;
Sepsis/metabolism*
;
Prognosis
;
Anticoagulants
;
Antithrombin III
;
Intensive Care Units
10.Xuebijing injection, a Chinese patent medicine, against severe pneumonia: Current research progress and future perspectives.
Mei ZHANG ; Rui ZHENG ; Wen-Jing LIU ; Jun-Ling HOU ; Yu-Lei YANG ; Hong-Cai SHANG
Journal of Integrative Medicine 2023;21(5):413-422
Severe pneumonia is one of the most common infectious diseases and the leading cause of sepsis and septic shock. Preventing infection, balancing the patient's immune status, and anti-coagulation therapy are all important elements in the treatment of severe pneumonia. As multi-target agents, Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has shown unique advantages in targeting complex conditions and saving the lives of patients with severe pneumonia. This review outlines progress in the understanding of XBJ's anti-inflammatory, endotoxin antagonism, and anticoagulation effects. From the hundreds of publications released over the past few years, the key results from representative clinical studies of XBJ in the treatment of severe pneumonia were selected and summarized. XBJ was observed to effectively suppress the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, counter the effects of endotoxin, and assert an anticoagulation effect in most clinical trials, which are consistent with experimental studies. Collectively, this evidence suggests that XBJ could play an important and expanding role in clinical medicine, especially for sepsis, septic shock and severe pneumonia. Please cite this article as: Zhang M, Zheng R, Liu WJ, Hou JL, Yang YL, Shang HC. Xuebijing injection, a Chinese patent medicine, against severe pneumonia: Current research progress and future perspectives. J Integr Med. 2023; 21(5): 413-422.
Humans
;
Nonprescription Drugs
;
Shock, Septic/drug therapy*
;
Sepsis/drug therapy*
;
Endotoxins
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail