Humans ; COVID-19 ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects* ; Pneumonia ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy*

Objective: To investigate the response characteristics of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first line. Methods: Patients with nsq-NSCLC who achieved complete or partial remission after treatment with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in the RATIONALE 304 study, as assessed by an independent review board, were selected to analyze the response characteristics and safety profile of the responders. Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from randomization to the achievement of first objective response. Depth of response (DpR) was defined as the maximum percentage of tumor shrinkage compared with the sum of the baseline target lesion length diameters. Results: As of January 23, 2020, 128 patients treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy achieved objective tumor response (responders), representing 57.4%(128/223) of the intention-to-treat population, with a TTR of 5.1 to 33.3 weeks and a median TTR of 7.9 weeks. Of the responders (128), 50.8%(65) achieved first remission at the first efficacy assessment (week 6), 31.3%(40) at the second efficacy assessment (week 12), and 18.0%(23) at the third and subsequent tumor assessments. The percentages of responders who achieved a depth of tumor response of 30% to <50%, 50% to <70% and 70% to 100% were 45.3%(58/128), 28.1%(36/128) and 26.6%(34/128), respectively, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7 to 9.9 months), 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.7 months to not reached) and not reached (95% CI: 11.8 months to not estimable), respectively. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy were generally well tolerated in responders with similar safety profile to the overall safety population. Conclusion: Among responders to tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for nsq-NSCLC, 82.0%(105/128) achieves response within the first two tumor assessments (12 weeks) and 18.0%(23/128) achieves response at later (18 to 33 weeks) assessments, and there is a trend toward prolonged PFS in responders with deeper tumor response.
Humans ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology* ; Lung Neoplasms/pathology* ; Treatment Outcome

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer, making the treatment of lung cancer enter the era of immunotherapy, but ICIs will also have adverse reactions, and the incidence of immune-induced hematological toxicity is not very high. Immunotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare adverse event.We report one case of thrombocytopenia induced by ICIs and review the literature on thrombocytopenia associated with ICIs and discuss the clinical features, possible mechanisms, and optimal treatment. 
.
Humans ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects*

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects* ; Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Vinblastine

Traditional replacement therapy is the main treatment method of hemophilia, while inhibitor generation makes replacement therapy ineffective. The emergence of non-factor therapy brings new hope for the treatment of patients with inhibitor. Non-factor products mainly achieve therapeutic purpose by imitating the function of coagulation factor Ⅷ, inhibiting the function of anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitors, the expression of antithrombin mRNA, and the function of activated protein C. This paper reviews the latest research progress of non-factor products in the treatment of hemophilia.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects* ; Factor VIII/therapeutic use* ; Hemophilia A/therapy* ; Humans

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects* ; Myocarditis/drug therapy*

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects* ; Carcinoma ; Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Myocarditis/chemically induced*

BACKGROUND: There have been few real-life dose-comparing studies on the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Chinese patients with plaque psoriasis. We conducted a real-life cohort study to investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 and 300 mg in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A total of 106 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were included in this study. Patients received either secukinumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg according to patients' weights and severity of psoriasis. The treatment continued for at least 24 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated by improvement in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) scores. The safety was also analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (55.7%) were treated with secukinumab 300 mg and 47 patients (44.3%) were treated with secukinumab 150 mg. After 12-week treatment, PASI75/90/100 responses were achieved in 100%, 97.8%, and 95.7% of patients, respectively, in secukinumab 150 mg group, and the efficacy was maintained to week 24. In secukinumab 300 mg group, PASI75/90/100 responses were achieved in 93.2%, 81.4%, and 76.3% of patients, respectively, at week 12. In this group, PASI75/90/100 responses reached 91.5%, 86.4%, and 79.9%, respectively, at week 24. Biologic-experienced patients had lower responses than biologic-naïve patients. Secukinumab 150 and 300 mg were well tolerated. Five patients discontinued treatment due to poor response, adverse event, or economic reasons. CONCLUSIONS This real-life study demonstrated that high PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses were achieved in Chinese psoriasis patients receiving secukinumab 150 or 300 mg. Biologic-naïve was associated with better clinical efficacy.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; China ; Cohort Studies ; Humans ; Psoriasis/drug therapy* ; Severity of Illness Index ; Treatment Outcome

On May 23, 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a treatment for cancer patients with positive microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) markers or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) markers. This approach is the first approved tumor treatment using a common biomarker rather than specified tumor locations in the body. FDA previously approved Keytruda for treatment of several types of malignancies, such as metastatic melanoma, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer, refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, and urothelial carcinoma, all of which carry positive programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 biomarkers. Therefore, indications of Keytruda significantly expanded. Several types of malignancies are disclosed by MSI-H status due to dMMR and characterized by increased neoantigen load, which elicits intense host immune response in tumor microenvironment, including portions of colorectal and gastric carcinomas. Currently, biomarker-based patient selection remains a challenge. Pathologists play important roles in evaluating histology and biomarker results and establishing detection methods. Taking gastric cancer as an example, its molecular classification is built on genome abnormalities, but it lacks acceptable clinical characteristics. Pathologists are expected to act as "genetic interpreters" or "genetic translators" and build a link between molecular subtypes with tumor histological features. Subsequently, by using their findings, oncologists will carry out targeted therapy based on molecular classification.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Humans ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Precision Medicine ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus different chemotherapy regimens in treatment of patients with HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer.

METHODS132 patients with advanced HER-2-positive breast cancer were treated with trastuzumab plus different regimens. The clinical characteristics, efficacy and toxicity of the 132 patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSFive patients had complete response (CR), 61 patients had partial response (PR), 39 patients had stable disease (SD), and 27 patients had progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate was 50.0% and the disease control rate was 79.5%. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months. The median overall survival time was 46.2 months. The 1-, 2-, 5- year survival rates were 98.3%, 81.9% and 40.2%, respectively. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is superior to trastuzumab monotherapy (51.2% vs. 33.3%). The number of metastatic sites, efficacy, different previous treatment lines were independent prognostic factors of PFS (P = 0.002, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Visceral metastases, pathological grade, and PFS were independent prognostic factors of OS (P = 0.041, P = 0.001, P = 0.025, P < 0.001, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Regarding the toxicities, one case discontinued treatment due to the decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction to 47%, two cases had heartbeat tachycardia, 6 cases had palpitation, 17 cases had a fever during first input trastuzumab. No other serious cardiac toxicity was observed. The most common toxicities were chemotherapy-related hematological and non-hematological toxicities.

CONCLUSIONSTrastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is superior to trastuzumab monotherapy. Patients may get benefits for early use of trastuzumab. Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced HER-2 positive breast cancer. No heart failure occurred in this series of patients, and cardiac safety seems better than that in Caucasians because of younger age at the onset in Chinese advanced breast cancer patients.

Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Fever ; chemically induced ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; metabolism ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Taxoids ; administration & dosage ; Trastuzumab ; Vinblastine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Vomiting ; chemically induced