OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of plasma exchange and tocilizumab in treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Six patients with severe COVID-19 admitted in First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 25 to February 25, 2020. Three patients were treated with plasma exchange and three patients were treated with tocilizumab. The effect on excessive inflammatory reaction of plasma exchange and tocilizumab was observed. RESULTS: The C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 levels were significantly decreased and the lymphocyte and prothrombin time were improved in 3 patients after treatment with plasma exchange; while inflammation level was not significantly decreased, and lymphocyte and prothrombin time did not improve in 3 patients treated with tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS For severe COVID-19 patients with strong inflammatory reaction, plasma exchange may be preferred.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; administration & dosage ; Betacoronavirus ; isolation & purification ; Coronavirus Infections ; blood ; immunology ; therapy ; Cytokine Release Syndrome ; therapy ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Plasma Exchange ; standards ; Pneumonia, Viral ; blood ; immunology ; therapy ; Prothrombin Time ; Treatment Outcome

Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor α to deplete blood eosinophils and improve the clinical outcomes of allergic asthma. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different doses of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic asthma. All randomized controlled trials involving benralizumab treatment for patients with eosinophilic asthma, which were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published until January 2017, as well as the rate of asthmatic exacerbation, pulmonary functionality, asthma control, quality of life scores, and adverse events were included. Randomized-effect models were used in the meta-analysis to calculate the pooled mean difference, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals. Five studies involving 1951 patients were identified. Compared with the placebo, benralizumab treatment demonstrated significant improvements in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores, decreased asthmatic exacerbation and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) scores. Benralizumab treatment was also not associated with increased adverse events. These findings indicated that benralizumab can be safely used to improve FEV1, enhance patient symptom control and quality of life, and reduce the risk of exacerbations and ACQ-6 scores in patients with eosinophilic asthma. Furthermore, our meta-analysis showed that benralizumab with 30 mg (every eight weeks) dosage can improve the health-related quality of life and appear to be more effective than 30 mg (every four weeks) dosage. Overall, data indicated that the optimal dosing regimen for benralizumab was possibly 30 mg (every eight weeks).
Adult ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Asthma ; drug therapy ; Disease Progression ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Eosinophils ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Leukocyte Count ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The NCCN has recently released its 2017 version 1.0 guideline for colorectal cancer. There are several updates from this new version guideline which are believed to change the current clinical practice. Update one, low-dose aspirin is recommended for patients with colorectal cancer after colectomy for secondary chemoprevention. Update two, biological agents are removed from the neoadjuvant treatment regimen for resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This update is based on lack of evidence to support benefits of biological agents including bevacizumab and cetuximab in the neoadjuvant setting. Both technical criteria and prognostic information should be considered for decision-making. Currently biological agents may not be excluded from the neoadjuvant setting for patients with resectable but poor prognostic disease. Update three, panitumumab and cetuximab combination therapy is only recommended for left-sided tumors in the first line therapy. The location of the primary tumor can be both prognostic and predictive in response to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cetuximab and panitumumab confer little benefit to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the primary tumor originated on the right side. On the other hand, EGFR inhibitors provide significant benefit compared with bevacizumab-containing therapy or chemotherapy alone for patients with left primary tumor. Update four, PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors including pembrolizumab or nivolumab are recommended as treatment options in patients with metastatic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer in second- or third-line therapy. dMMR tumors contain thousands of mutations, which can encode mutant proteins with the potential to be recognized and targeted by the immune system. It has therefore been hypothesized that dMMR tumors may be sensitive to PD-1 inhibitors.
Antibodies, Monoclonal ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Aspirin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab ; therapeutic use ; Biological Products ; therapeutic use ; Brain Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; genetics ; Cetuximab ; therapeutic use ; Clinical Decision-Making ; methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; genetics ; pathology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Contraindications ; Humans ; Mutation ; physiology ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; standards ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; drug therapy ; Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary ; drug therapy ; genetics ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Secondary Prevention ; methods ; standards

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon, characterized by diffuse mucosal inflammation and blood-mixed diarrhea. The main treatment has been 5-aminosalicylic acid, steroid, thiopurine, and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) antibodies including infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab. Golimumab, a new anti-TNF-alpha agent has been recently approved for patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Its efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in line with infliximab and adalimumab in preclinical and clinical studies. This review will focus on golimumab therapy in ulcerative colitis.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood/*therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Colitis, Ulcerative/*drug therapy ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology

Administration, Inhalation ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; therapeutic use ; Adrenergic beta-Agonists ; therapeutic use ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; therapeutic use ; Asthma ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Molecular Targeted Therapy ; Muscarinic Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Omalizumab ; therapeutic use ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Primary Prevention ; Quality Improvement ; Sublingual Immunotherapy

PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients <65, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.003). However, for patients > or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage ; Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage ; Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; *Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Degeneration/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Macular Edema/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Ranibizumab/*administration & dosage ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy/physiopathology

PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients <65, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.003). However, for patients > or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage ; Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage ; Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; *Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Degeneration/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Macular Edema/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Ranibizumab/*administration & dosage ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy/physiopathology

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of combination of icotinib and cetuximab on the acquired drug resistance caused by T790M mutation of EGFR in NSCLC, and provide experimental evidence for rational treatment of NSCLC.

METHODSThe effects of these two agents on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and EGFR-dependent signaling were evaluated using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)- 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, annexin V staining, and Western blotting. The expression of molecular markers of tumor proliferation PCNA and Ki-67 protein was further examined by immunohistochemistry, and the expression of EGFR-signaling-related proteins in tissue sections taken from H1975 tumor xenografts was assessed by Western blot assay. Sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors was detected in human H1975 tumor xenograft in nude mice.

RESULTSThe in vitro experiment showed that the proliferative ability of H1975 cells was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner, along with the increasing doses of cetuximab and icotinib, and the combination of cetuximab with icotinib resulted in a more pronounced growth inhibition of the H1975 cells. The apoptosis rate of H1975 cells after treatment with 0.5 µmol/L icotinib and 1 µg/ml cetuximab was (22.03 ± 2.41)% and that after treatment with 5 µmol/L icotinib and 10 µg/ml cetuximab was (42.75 ± 2.49)%, both were significantly higher than that after treatment with the same dose of icotinib or cetuximab alone (P < 0.05). The nude mouse experiment showed that the transplanted tumor was growing to (614.5 ± 10.8) mm(3) in the blank control group and to (611.2 ± 8.7) mm(3) at 28 days after icotinib treatment, but (30.8 ± 2.0) mm(3) in the cetuximab treatment group and 0 mm(3) in the cetuximab combined with icotinib group. There was a significantly decreased expression of Ki-67 and PCNA proteins and down-regulation of phosphorylation of EGFR signaling-related proteins in the cetuximab combined with icotinib group.

CONCLUSIONSThe combination of icotinib with cetuximab can exert synergistic inhibitory effect on the acquired drug resistance caused by T790M mutation of EGFR in NSCLC H1975 cells, interrupts the EGFR-downstream signaling pathway, and enhances the anticancer activity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Our results provide further experimental evidence for the clinical studies of combination of icotinib with cetuximab in the treatment of NSCLC patients associated with secondary drug resistance caused by T790M mutation of EGFR.

Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Apoptosis ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; genetics ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell Proliferation ; Cetuximab ; Crown Ethers ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Down-Regulation ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; genetics ; Genes, erbB-1 ; genetics ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Mice ; Mice, Nude ; Mutation ; Quinazolines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor ; Signal Transduction

BACKGROUNDIntravitreal ranibizumab injection is effecitve on treating myopic CNVs, but it could be a risk factor for developing more severe retinoschisis in eyes with preexisted retinoschisis and epiretinal membrane. This study aimed to explore the incidence and features of retinoschisis after intravitreal ranibizumab injection for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

METHODSEighty-three eyes of 81 patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injection. The best corrected visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were recorded at baseline and every month thereafter. Central retina thickness and maximal retina thickness were measured. The subjects were divided into three groups. Eleven eyes that had retinoschisis and epiretinal membrane were in group 1, six eyes that had simple epiretinal membrane were in group 2, and 66 eyes that had neither retinoschisis nor epiretinal membrane were in group 3. Six contralateral eyes in group 1 which had retinoschisis and epiretinal membrane but were not treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injection were set as the control group.

RESULTSSeven of the 11 eyes in group 1 developed more severe retinoschisis, the mean maximal retinal thickness increased from (380.28 ± 90.13) to (467.00 ± 70.20) µm (P < 0.05). The retinoschisis of all 6 eyes of the control group did not aggravate. Compared with the control group, the aggravation ratio of retinoschisis increased significantly (P < 0.05). No new onset of retinoschisis took place in group 2 and group 3.

CONCLUSIONIntravitreal ranibizumab injection may be a risk factor for aggravation of retinoschisis in eyes with preexisted retinoschisis and epiretinal membrane.

Adult ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Choroidal Neovascularization ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia, Degenerative ; drug therapy ; Ranibizumab ; Retinoschisis ; drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus different chemotherapy regimens in treatment of patients with HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer.

METHODS132 patients with advanced HER-2-positive breast cancer were treated with trastuzumab plus different regimens. The clinical characteristics, efficacy and toxicity of the 132 patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSFive patients had complete response (CR), 61 patients had partial response (PR), 39 patients had stable disease (SD), and 27 patients had progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate was 50.0% and the disease control rate was 79.5%. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months. The median overall survival time was 46.2 months. The 1-, 2-, 5- year survival rates were 98.3%, 81.9% and 40.2%, respectively. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is superior to trastuzumab monotherapy (51.2% vs. 33.3%). The number of metastatic sites, efficacy, different previous treatment lines were independent prognostic factors of PFS (P = 0.002, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Visceral metastases, pathological grade, and PFS were independent prognostic factors of OS (P = 0.041, P = 0.001, P = 0.025, P < 0.001, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Regarding the toxicities, one case discontinued treatment due to the decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction to 47%, two cases had heartbeat tachycardia, 6 cases had palpitation, 17 cases had a fever during first input trastuzumab. No other serious cardiac toxicity was observed. The most common toxicities were chemotherapy-related hematological and non-hematological toxicities.

CONCLUSIONSTrastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is superior to trastuzumab monotherapy. Patients may get benefits for early use of trastuzumab. Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced HER-2 positive breast cancer. No heart failure occurred in this series of patients, and cardiac safety seems better than that in Caucasians because of younger age at the onset in Chinese advanced breast cancer patients.

Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Fever ; chemically induced ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; metabolism ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Taxoids ; administration & dosage ; Trastuzumab ; Vinblastine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Vomiting ; chemically induced