Humans ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects* ; Aspirin/therapeutic use* ; Respiration Disorders ; Respiratory Tract Diseases

PURPOSE: Eperisone is an oral muscle relaxant used in musculoskeletal disorders causing muscle spasm and pain. For more effective pain control, eperisone is usually prescribed together with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). As such, eperisone may have been overlooked as the cause of anaphylaxis compared with NSAIDs. This study aimed to analyze the adverse drug reaction (ADR) reported in Korea and suggest an appropriate diagnostic approach for eperisone-induced anaphylaxis. METHODS: We reviewed eperisone-related pharmacovigilance data (Korea Institute of Drug Safety-Korea Adverse Event Reporting System [KIDS-KAERS]) reported in Korea from 2010 to 2015. ADRs with causal relationship were selected. Clinical manifestations, severity, outcomes, and re-exposure information were analyzed. For further investigation, 7-year ADR data reported in a single center were also reviewed. Oral provocation test (OPT), skin prick test (SPT) and basophil activation test (BAT) were performed in this center. RESULTS: During the study period, 207 patients had adverse reactions to eperisone. The most common ADRs were cutaneous hypersensitive reactions (30.4%) such as urticaria, itchiness or angioedema. Fifth common reported ADR was anaphylaxis. There were 35 patients with anaphylaxis, comprising 16.9% of the eperisone-related ADRs. In the single center study, there were 11 patients with eperisone-induced anaphylaxis. All the patients underwent OPT and all the provoked patients showed a positive reaction. Four of the 11 patients with anaphylaxis also underwent SPT and BAT, which were all negative. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of eperisone-induced anaphylaxis calculated from the KIDS-KAERS database was 0.001%. Eperisone can cause hypersensitive reactions, including anaphylaxis, possibly by inducing non-immunoglobulin E-mediated immediate hypersensitivity.
Anaphylaxis ; Angioedema ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Basophils ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Hypersensitivity, Immediate ; Incidence ; Korea ; Pharmacovigilance ; Skin ; Spasm ; Urticaria

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an irreplaceable measure with minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of endoscopy for biliary and pancreatic diseases, but the related complications associated with ERCP are the highest among the endoscopic procedures. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is one of the most common complications with life-threatening in severe cases. Early active prevention can effectively reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. At present, measures including preoperative rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement, have definite effective strategy in clinic. Aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer's solution is also a safe and effective way to prevent PEP.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; Pancreatitis ; etiology ; Risk Factors ; Stents

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in various clinical situations, with excellent analgesic, anti-pyretic and anti-inflammatory effects. In addition to gastrointestinal bleeding, which was the first adverse effect to be reported, myriad adverse effects from the digestive system, cardiovascular system, renal system and hematology have been also reported. In early 2000s, a few new cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors were developed with the expectation of better gastrointestinal safety profile, most of them were withdrawn from the market due to various adverse effects, and interest in safety of NSAIDs has been increased again. Over the past two decades, research on the safety and adverse effects of NSAIDs has accumulated. In brief, celecoxib is associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse events compared to non-selective NSAIDs. In patients receiving aspirin, the use of non-selective NSAIDs should be avoided, and if an anti-inflammatory drug is required, a COX-2 selective inhibitor should be considered. Celecoxib has been shown to have similar or better safety profile than other non-selective COX inhibitors. Additionally, the new COX-2 selective inhibitors of etorixocib and polmacoxib have been approved. Many factors should be considered when prescribing NSAIDs, as the safety profile of indivisual NSAIDs vary, and NSAIDs have a high risk of duplicate prescription because of the variety of indications and over-the-counter products. Physicians should comprehend the updated guidelines and the results of new clinical studies, and the risk factors for each individual patient should also be reviewed. Physicians should therefore contemplate new prescription strategies.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Aspirin ; Cardiovascular System ; Celecoxib ; Digestive System ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Hematology ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Medication Therapy Management ; Prescriptions ; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases ; Risk Factors

BACKGROUND: Adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDRs) are common and are responsible for increased morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic costs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the common drugs and clinical patterns related to ACDRs using an electronic drug adverse reaction reporting system at a single secondary referral center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the ACDR database between January 2014 and April 2016 at the Ilsan Paik Hospital. RESULTS: The study analyzed 320 patients with ACDRs (male:female ratio=93:227; mean age 50.8±17.8 years). Using a Korean causality evaluation algorithm, the percentage of drugs with a possible relationship with ACDRs was calculated to be 50.6%, while the percentage with a probable relationship was 44.7%. Antibiotics (44.0%), radiocontrast media (15.1%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (14.3%) were the most commonly implicated drugs. Antibiotics, including cephalosporins (30.6%) and quinolones (10.2%), were responsible for the majority of the ACDRs. Acetic acid (5.9%) and propionic acid (5.9%) derivatives of NSAIDs were also common causative agents. The most common clinical presentations were maculopapular exanthema (33.4%), pruritus (30.9%), and urticaria (25.7%). Severe ACDRs were significantly associated with older age, eosinophilia, and underlying heart and renal diseases (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics, radiocontrast media, and NSAIDs were identified as common causes of ACDRs. Older age, eosinophilia, heart disease, and renal disease were associated with severe ACDRs.
Acetic Acid ; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Cephalosporins ; Contrast Media ; Diethylpropion ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Eosinophilia ; Exanthema ; Heart ; Heart Diseases ; Humans ; Mortality ; Pruritus ; Quinolones ; Retrospective Studies* ; Secondary Care Centers* ; Urticaria

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodium orally, which was a kind of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, in extractions of mandibular impacted third teeth. METHODS: There were questionnaires about postoperative pain for patients whose mandibular impacted third teeth were extracted from July 2017 to August 2017 in First Clinical Division of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. All the patients did their routine clinical examinations and imaging examinations. After their mandibular impacted third teeth were extracted, the questionnaires were sent to them. The questionnaires were filled in by the patients on their own and returned one week later. There were 120 questionnaires that were sent and 105 questionnaires returned, of which 98 questionnaires were filled in completely. According to the inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 66 questionnaires were totally selected in this study. According to the time when the patients took their loxoprofen sodium orally firstly, the patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group was for patients who didn't take loxoprofen sodium during their extractions (non-medicine group). The second group was for patients who took 60 mg loxoprofen sodium 30 min before their extractions (preoperative group). The third group was for patients who took 60 mg loxoprofen sodium 30 min after their extractions (postoperative group). The operation time among the 3 groups was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis method. The postoperative time points were 2, 4, 12,24 and 48 h after operation. The scores of visual analogue scales (VAS) for postoperative pain in each group at different postoperative time points were analyzed by Friedman method. At each postoperative time point, VAS scores in the different groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis me-thod. The numbers of the patients taking loxoprofen sodium home and drug adverse reactions were also analyzed. RESULTS: The operation time of the 3 groups was 15.0 (5.0,30.0) min and had no significant differences (P=0.848).VAS scores of non-medicine group 2,4, 12,24 and 48 h after operation were 1.75 (0.1,10.0), 6.25 (1.5,10.0), 2.00 (0.1,8.0), 2.00 (0.1,6.0) and 0.5 (0.1,5.5) separately and had significant differences (P<0.001).The VAS score at 4 h after operation was higher than the VAS scores at other time points after operation (P<0.005). Four hours after the operations, the VAS scores of preoperative group [2.0 (0.1,10.0)] and postoperative group [2.0 (0.1,5.0)] were lower significantly than those of non-medicine group [6.25 (1.5,10.0)] (P<0.001).The numbers of the patients taking loxoprofen sodium home were 9(40.9%) in non-medicine group,5(21.8%) in preoperative group and 7(33.3%) in postoperative group. The number of the patients who had drug adverse reactions in preoperative group (n=3,13.0%) and in postoperative group (n=4,19.0%) was less than the number of the patients who had drug adverse reactions in non-medicine group (n=8,36.4%). CONCLUSION There were two protocols of preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodium orally in extractions of mandibular impacted third teeth, which were taking 60 mg loxoprofen sodium orally 30 min before the extractions and taking 60 mg loxoprofen sodium orally 30 min after the extractions. Both of the two preemptive analgesia protocols could decrease the postoperative pain significantly.
Analgesia ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage* ; Humans ; Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control* ; Phenylpropionates/administration & dosage* ; Tooth Extraction/adverse effects* ; Tooth, Impacted

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diverticular bleeding can occasionally cause massive bleeding that requires urgent colonoscopy (CS) and treatment. The aim of this study was to identify significant risk factors for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2012, 26,602 patients underwent CS at our institution. One hundred twenty-three patients underwent an urgent CS due to acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Seventy-two patients were diagnosed with colonic diverticular hemorrhage. One hundred forty-nine age- and sex-matched controls were selected from the patients with nonbleeding diverticula who underwent CS during the same period. The relationship of risk factors to diverticular bleeding was compared between the cases and controls. RESULTS: Uni- and multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (odds ratio [OR], 14.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.89 to 55.80; p<0.0001), as well as the presence of cerebrovascular disease (OR, 8.66; 95% CI, 2.33 to 32.10; p=0.00126), and hyperuricemia (OR, 15.5; 95% CI, 1.74 to 138.00; p=0.014) remained statistically significant predictors of diverticular bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cerebrovascular disease and hyperuricemia were significant risks for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. The knowledge obtained from this study may provide some insight into the diagnostic process for patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects ; Case-Control Studies ; Cerebrovascular Disorders/complications ; Colonic Diseases/*etiology/surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Diverticulum, Colon/*complications/pathology/surgery ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*etiology/surgery ; Humans ; Hyperuricemia/complications ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of previous gynecologic surgery, hormone use, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the risk of type 1 and type 2 ovarian cancer. METHODS: We utilized data collected for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial. All diagnosed ovarian cancers were divided into three groups: type 1, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, low grade serous, and low grade adenocarcinoma/not otherwise specified (NOS); type 2, high grade serous, undifferentiated, carcinosarcoma, and high grade adenocarcinoma/NOS; and other: adenocarcinoma with grade or histology not specified, borderline tumors, granulosa cell tumors. The odds ratios for type 1, type 2, and other ovarian cancers were assessed with regard to historical information for specific risk factors. RESULTS: Ibuprofen use was associated with a decrease in risk for type 1 ovarian cancer. Tubal ligation and oral contraceptive use were associated with a decrease in risk for type 2 ovarian cancer. A history of ectopic pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk for all ovarian cancers by almost 70%. CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that carcinogenic pathways for type 1 and type 2 ovarian cancer are different and distinct. The marked reduction in all ovarian cancer risk noted with a history of ectopic pregnancy and salpingectomy implies that the fallopian tube plays a key role in carcinogenesis for both type 1 and type 2 ovarian cancer.
Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects ; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects ; *Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects ; Humans ; Ibuprofen/adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Ovarian Neoplasms/chemically induced/diagnosis/*etiology/pathology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori remains controversial. We retrospectively investigated whether H. pylori infection exacerbates severe gastric mucosal injury among chronic NSAID users. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013, a total of 245 long-term NSAID (including low-dose aspirin) users who had undergone an esophagogastroduodenoscopy and had been evaluated for H. pylori infection were enrolled at Okayama University Hospital and Tsuyama Chuo Hospital. The degree of gastric mucosal injury was assessed according to the modified Lanza score (MLS). Severe gastric mucosal injury was defined as an MLS > or =4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age > or =75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 4.2), H. pylori-positivity (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5), and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86) were significantly associated with severe gastric mucosal injury. The multivariate analysis was adjusted by age and sex and demonstrated that H. pylori-positivity (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3) and the concomitant use of PPIs (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.99) significantly contributed to severe gastric mucosal injury. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori infection exacerbates severe gastric mucosal injury among chronic NSAID users.
Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/*adverse effects ; Case-Control Studies ; *Disease Progression ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa/*drug effects/*microbiology ; Helicobacter Infections/*complications/microbiology/pathology ; *Helicobacter pylori/drug effects ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a significant clinical challenge and is the leading cause of acute liver failure in most countries. An aging population that uses more medications, a constant influx of newly developed drugs and a growing risk from unfamiliar herbal and dietary supplements will make DILI an increasing part of clinical practice. Currently, the most effective strategy for disease management is rapid identification, withholding the inciting agents, supportive care and having a firm understanding of the expected natural history. There are resources available to aid the clinician, including a new online "textbook" as well as causality assessment tools, but a heightened awareness of risk and the disease's varying phenotypes and good history-taking remain cornerstones to diagnosis. Looking ahead, growing registries of cases, pharmacoepidemiology studies and translational research into the mechanisms of injury may produce better diagnostic tools, markers for risk and disease, and prevention and therapeutics.
Age Factors ; Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects ; Anticonvulsants/adverse effects ; Biopsy ; Dietary Supplements/adverse effects ; Drug-Induced Liver Injury/*diagnosis/epidemiology ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects ; Incidence ; Liver/pathology ; Liver Function Tests ; Risk Factors ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors