BACKGROUND

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased risk of developing antimicrobial resistance due to the high utilization of antimicrobial agents. Since antimicrobial utilization is a crucial driver in the development of antimicrobial resistance, the need for antimicrobial use surveillance is crucial in identifying prescription patterns that would help provide proper interventions.

To determine the antibiotic use and prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients admitted at a tertiary government hospital.

A retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted to provide data on antibiotic use and the prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients in a tertiary-level hospital from June 2021 to June 2022.

A total of 342 patient medical records were surveyed. The majority (119, 34.8%) of the patients were in the age group 41-60 years old and there were more male patients (52.34%) than female patients (47.66%). About 88.99% of the patients were considered to have community-acquired COVID-19 infections. Co-morbidities among patients were seen in more than half of the surveyed population (64%). These include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, chronic lung disease, and hematologic disorders.

Empiric antibiotic therapy was high at 88.88%, while definitive treatment with confirmed bacterial infection was only at 11.11%. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic therapies are azithromycin (250, 45.9%), ceftriaxone (188, 32.2%), and cefuroxime (58, 9.9%). Patterns of antibiotic use are attributed to the similarities of respiratory bacterial infections with COVID-19 cases.

Prescription quality indicators assessed in the study include documentation of indication for prescriptions, guideline compliance, collection of culture before antibiotic therapy, and stop/review documentation. Out of 583 antibiotic prescriptions, 464 (79.58%) were properly documented with an indication. Non-compliance to guidelines reached 39.11%, while the stop and review date documentation rate was 20.41%. The collection of culture before the start of antibiotic therapy was at 50.2%.

The results from the study highlighted the need for antimicrobial surveillance and stewardship efforts among COVID-19 and other viral infections.

PURPOSE: We carried out the study aiming to explore and analyze the risk factors, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria, and their antibiotic-resistance characteristics influencing the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI), to provide valuable assistance for reducing the incidence of SSI after traumatic fracture surgery. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study enrolling 3978 participants from January 2015 to December 2019 receiving surgical treatment for traumatic fractures was conducted at Tangdu Hospital of Air Force Medical University. Baseline data, demographic characteristics, lifestyles, variables related to surgical treatment, and pathogen culture were harvested and analyzed. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to reveal the independent risk factors of SSI. A bacterial distribution histogram and drug-sensitive heat map were drawn to describe the pathogenic characteristics. RESULTS: Included 3978 patients 138 of them developed SSI with an incidence rate of 3.47% postoperatively. By logistic regression analysis, we found that variables such as gender (males) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.012, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.235 - 3.278, p = 0.005), diabetes mellitus (OR = 5.848, 95% CI: 3.513 - 9.736, p < 0.001), hypoproteinemia (OR = 3.400, 95% CI: 1.280 - 9.031, p = 0.014), underlying disease (OR = 5.398, 95% CI: 2.343 - 12.438, p < 0.001), hormonotherapy (OR = 11.718, 95% CI: 6.269 - 21.903, p < 0.001), open fracture (OR = 29.377, 95% CI: 9.944 - 86.784, p < 0.001), and intraoperative transfusion (OR = 2.664, 95% CI: 1.572 - 4.515, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SSI, while, aged over 59 years (OR = 0.132, 95% CI: 0.059 - 0.296, p < 0.001), prophylactic antibiotics use (OR = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.042 - 0.164, p < 0.001) and vacuum sealing drainage use (OR = 0.036, 95% CI: 0.010 - 0.129, p < 0.001) were protective factors. Pathogens results showed that 301 strains of 38 species of bacteria were harvested, among which 178 (59.1%) strains were Gram-positive bacteria, and 123 (40.9%) strains were Gram-negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus (108, 60.7%) and Enterobacter cloacae (38, 30.9%) accounted for the largest proportion. The susceptibility of Gram-positive bacteria to Vancomycin and Linezolid was almost 100%. The susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria to Imipenem, Amikacin, and Meropenem exceeded 73%. CONCLUSION Orthopedic surgeons need to develop appropriate surgical plans based on the risk factors and protective factors associated with postoperative SSI to reduce its occurrence. Meanwhile, it is recommended to strengthen blood glucose control in the early stage of admission and for surgeons to be cautious and scientific when choosing antibiotic therapy in clinical practice.
Humans ; Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Risk Factors ; Retrospective Studies ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Fractures, Bone/surgery* ; Aged ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Logistic Models ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Incidence ; Bacteria/drug effects*

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical characteristics and drug resistance profile of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) enteritis in children in Chengdu, China, providing a reference for rational drug use and empirical treatment in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 130 children with invasive bacterial enteritis due to NTS identified by fecal bacterial culture and the results of drug sensitivity tests for NTS in Chengdu from January 2022 to December 2023. RESULTS: NTS infections were mainly observed from April to September (113 cases, 86.9%), with a peak in August (36 cases, 27.7%). Children aged <36 months accounted for 86.2% (112/130) of all cases, and the main symptoms were diarrhea (130 cases, 100%), fever (123 cases, 94.6%), and hematochezia (112 cases, 86.2%). The 130 NTS isolates exhibited a sensitivity rate of 64.6% to ceftriaxone and 63.8% to cefotaxime, and a sensitivity rate of >90.0% to piperacillin-tazobactam and nitrofurantoin (nitrofurans). The detection rate of multidrug-resistant strains was 48.5% (63/130), and the clinical efficacy of third-generation cephalosporins used in 38 patients (29.2%) was inconsistent with the results of drug sensitivity tests. CONCLUSIONS The peak of invasive NTS enteritis in children aged 0-6 years occurs in August in the Chengdu area, with a relatively high incidence rate in children aged <36 months. The situation of drug resistance is severe for NTS, and piperacillin-tazobactam may be an effective option for treating multidrug-resistant NTS infections in children, while nitrofuran antibiotics might be used to treat such infections.
Humans ; Infant ; Child, Preschool ; Enteritis/microbiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Salmonella Infections/microbiology* ; Female ; Child ; Salmonella/drug effects* ; Infant, Newborn ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*

Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) is a common pathogen colonizing or infecting the neonatal respiratory tract. It can be vertically transmitted from mother to infant, irrespective of the duration of premature rupture of membranes and the mode of delivery. UU infection is an important factor contributing to preterm birth and low birth weight and is closely associated with adverse outcomes such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurodevelopmental impairment. Given the immaturity of neonatal immune and organ systems, pharmacologic treatment must balance efficacy and safety. Currently, no unified standard regimen has been established for the treatment of neonatal UU infection. This review summarizes pharmacotherapeutic options for neonatal UU infection to inform clinical practice.
Humans ; Ureaplasma Infections/drug therapy* ; Infant, Newborn ; Ureaplasma urealyticum ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients infected with Listeria monocytogenes (LM) in novel agent era, so as to improve clinicians' understanding. METHODS: Clinical data of 4 MM patients infected with LM in Beijing Chao-yang Hospital from October 2018 to October 2022 was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The average age of the 4 patients was (57.5±4.1) years old. All the patients did not reach deep remission from induction therapy or experienced multiple recurrences of MM, with significant decreased immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte counts. The initial clinical manifestation was all fever. Three patients developed nervous system symptoms 2-3 days after onset and cerebrospinal fluid examination indicated meningitis. The sensitive anti-infection agents were given according to pathogenic test results 4-5 days after onset. After treatment, two patients recovered, one patient gave up treatment and died after discharged from hospital, and one critical patient died despite exposure to sensitive antibiotics. CONCLUSION MM patients, with the application of novel agents, may have increased risk of LM infection, even critical cases. LM prevention and prompt therapy in early stage for suspected patients is key to reducing the risk of severe infection and mortality.
Humans ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Listeriosis/complications* ; Listeria monocytogenes ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Aged

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased risk of developing antimicrobial resistance due to the high utilization of antimicrobial agents. Since antimicrobial utilization is a crucial driver in the development of antimicrobial resistance, the need for antimicrobial use surveillance is crucial in identifying prescription patterns that would help provide proper interventions.

To determine the antibiotic use and prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients admitted at a tertiary government hospital.

A retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted to provide data on antibiotic use and the prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients in a tertiary-level hospital from June 2021 to June 2022.

A total of 342 patient medical records were surveyed. The majority (119, 34.8%) of the patients were in the age group 41-60 years old and there were more male patients (52.34%) than female patients (47.66%). About 88.99% of the patients were considered to have community-acquired COVID-19 infections. Co-morbidities among patients were seen in more than half of the surveyed population (64%). These include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, chronic lung disease, and hematologic disorders.

Empiric antibiotic therapy was high at 88.88%, while definitive treatment with confirmed bacterial infection was only at 11.11%. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic therapies are azithromycin (250, 45.9%), ceftriaxone (188, 32.2%), and cefuroxime (58, 9.9%). Patterns of antibiotic use are attributed to the similarities of respiratory bacterial infections with COVID-19 cases.

Prescription quality indicators assessed in the study include documentation of indication for prescriptions, guideline compliance, collection of culture before antibiotic therapy, and stop/review documentation. Out of 583 antibiotic prescriptions, 464 (79.58%) were properly documented with an indication. Non-compliance to guidelines reached 39.11%, while the stop and review date documentation rate was 20.41%. The collection of culture before the start of antibiotic therapy was at 50.2%.

The results from the study highlighted the need for antimicrobial surveillance and stewardship efforts among COVID-19 and other viral infections.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health threat, with millions of deaths attributed to it annually. Antibiotic stewardship to combat AMR is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals. Despite evidence suggesting that it is unnecessary, dentists routinely prescribe prophylactic antibiotics following third molar (3M) surgeries. METHOD: This mixed-methods study examined the behavioural barriers influencing antibiotic prescribing practices within the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore. This study used the capability, opportunity and motivation for behavioural change or COM-B framework to implement interventions targeting the behavioural barriers. RESULTS: Pre- and post-intervention data over 6 months showed a significant reduction in antibiotic prescriptions from 84.45% to 20.89%, following the implementation of COM-B strategies (P<0.001). Qualitative feedback from focus group discussions highlighted a positive shift in clinicians' attitudes towards antibiotic reduction, acknowledging the minimal infection risk associated with non-prescribing practices. Notably, complication rates remained stable throughout the study period, indicating no adverse effects from reduced antibiotic usage. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrated that the COM-B model can be successfully applied to modify deeply ingrained prescription habits, and underscored the effectiveness of a structured behavioural change intervention in enhancing compliance with antibiotic stewardship guidelines. The study advocates continuation of initiatives to sustain this positive trend and mitigate AMR in clinical practice.
Humans ; Molar, Third/surgery* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Singapore ; Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods* ; Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data* ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Female ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Male ; Tooth Extraction ; Adult ; Focus Groups ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'

BACKGROUND: Owing to the high prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) in China, bismuth-containing quadruple therapies have been recommended for H. pylori eradication. This study compared the efficacy and safety of quadruple regimens containing vonoprazan vs . esomeprazole for H. pylori eradication in a patient population in China. METHODS: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Patients with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized 1:1 to receive quadruple therapy for 14 days: amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg after meals, bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg before meals, plus either vonoprazan 20 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg before meals, all twice daily. The primary outcome was the eradication rate of H. pylori , evaluated using a 13 C urea breath test at 4 weeks after treatment. The non-inferiority margin was at 10%. RESULTS: The study included 510 patients, 506 of whom completed the follow-up assessment. The primary analysis revealed eradication rates of 86.8% (210/242) and 86.7% (208/240) for vonoprazan and esomeprazole therapy, respectively (treatment difference: 0.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.95, 6.17; non-inferiority P  = 0.0009). Per-protocol analysis showed eradication rates of 87.4% for vonoprazan and 86.3% for esomeprazole (treatment difference: 1.2%; 95% CI: -5.03, 7.36; non-inferiority P  = 0.0004). Vonoprazan and esomeprazole were well tolerated, with similar safety profiles. CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan was found to be well-tolerated and non-inferior to esomeprazole for eradicating H. pylori in patients from China. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04198363.
Humans ; Esomeprazole/therapeutic use* ; Double-Blind Method ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Helicobacter pylori/pathogenicity* ; Pyrroles/therapeutic use* ; Sulfonamides/therapeutic use* ; Adult ; Clarithromycin/therapeutic use* ; Amoxicillin/therapeutic use* ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND: The effect of the interval between previous Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and rescue treatment on therapeutic outcomes remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between eradication rates and treatment interval durations in H. pylori infections. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted from December 2021 to February 2023 at six tertiary hospitals in Shandong, China. We recruited patients who were positive for H. pylori infection and required rescue treatment. Demographic information, previous times of eradication therapy, last eradication therapy date, and history of antibiotic use data were collected. The patients were divided into four groups based on the rescue treatment interval length: Group A, ≥4 weeks and ≤3 months; Group B, >3 and ≤6 months; Group C, >6 and ≤12 months; and Group D, >12 months. The primary outcome was the eradication rate of H. pylori . Drug compliance and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare eradication rates between groups. RESULTS: A total of 670 patients were enrolled in this study. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were 88.3% (158/179) in Group A, 89.6% (120/134) in Group B, 89.1% (123/138) in Group C, and 87.7% (192/219) in Group D. The per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were 92.9% (156/168) in Group A, 94.5% (120/127) in Group B, 94.5% (121/128) in Group C, and 93.6% (190/203) in Group D. There was no statistically significant difference in the eradication rates between groups in either the ITT ( P = 0.949) or PP analysis ( P = 0.921). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of AEs ( P = 0.934) or drug compliance ( P = 0.849) between groups. CONCLUSION: The interval duration of rescue treatment had no significant effect on H. pylori eradication rates or the incidence of AEs. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05173493.
Humans ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Helicobacter pylori/pathogenicity* ; Male ; Female ; Prospective Studies ; Middle Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects* ; Adult ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Child ; Humans ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology* ; Meningitis, Bacterial/therapy*