1.FOLR1 as a therapeutic target in platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma:unique expression patterns across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and molecular subtypes of low-grade serous carcinoma
Yuen Yee LEUNG ; Marta LLAURADO-FERNANDEZ ; Anna CAMERON ; Annalyn DA-ANOY ; Linda C. COOK ; Joshua HOENISCH ; Chanel GHESQUIERE ; Stephanie GAILLARD ; Josie SCHMID ; Amy DAWSON ; Madison BITTNER ; Hannah KIM ; Nelson K.Y. WONG ; Gurdial DHILLION ; Anna V. TINKER ; Mark S. CAREY ; Martin KÖBEL
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(5):e74-
Objective:
With the development of novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), folate receptor alpha (FOLR1) is a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of platinum-resistant tuboovarian carcinomas. The main aims of this study were to assess FOLR1 protein expression in a large cohort of ovarian carcinoma histotypes. To inform future clinical trial design we identified molecular correlates of FOLR1 expression in low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC).
Methods:
One thousand five hundred forty-seven ovarian carcinoma samples from 5 different Canadian cohorts were successfully evaluated by immunohistochemistry for FOLR1 expression using the PS2+ system. Statistical analyses with clinicopathological parameters, LGSC molecular subtypes, and overall survival (OS) were performed.
Results:
High FOLR1 expression was detected in 44% of high-grade serous carcinomas, and in 30% LGSC, 8% clear cell, 6% endometrioid, and 0% mucinous and/or mesonephrictype adenocarcinomas. In 160 LGSC cases, FOLR1 expression was more frequent in cases with normal MAPK pathway status (37% MAPK wild type vs. 14% canonical MAPK pathway mutations; p=0.002), low progesterone receptor (PR) expression (41%) vs. 23% (Allred score >2; p=0.02), and p16 loss (48% p16 absent vs. 26% normal; p=0.03). Canonical MAPK mutation status and PR expression remained significant on multivariable analysis. No significant associations between OS and FOLR1 expression were observed.
Conclusion
A significant proportion of LGSC express high FOLR1 levels supporting the development of clinical trials to investigate ADCs targeting FOLR1 as novel agents for treating this disease. In LGSC, high FOLR1 expression was associated with fewer MAPK pathway alterations, low PR expression, and p16 loss.
2.Treatment and outcomes in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma
Sarah Nicole HAMILTON ; Anna V. TINKER ; Janice KWON ; Peter LIM ; Iwa KONG ; Sona SIHRA ; Martin KOEBEL ; Cheng Han LEE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2022;33(3):e25-
Objective:
Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is a rare type of uterine malignancy. This study assesses disease characteristics, treatment and survival outcomes in patients with undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma treated at BC Cancer.
Methods:
All patients diagnosed with undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma between 2000 and 2019 at BC Cancer were reviewed centrally. Clinical, pathologic, treatment and outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis.
Results:
Fifty-two patients were included, 33% had undifferentiated carcinoma and 67% dedifferentiated carcinoma. Sixty-nine percent of those who had mismatch repair (MMR) testing of their tumor had an abnormal profile. The 5-year DFS was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]=71%–89%) for stage I/II, 29% (95% CI=28%–40%) for stage III and 10% (95% CI 1%–19%) for stage IV. The 5-year OS was 84% (95% CI=75%–92%) for stage I/II, 38% (95% CI=26%–50%) for stage III and 12% (95% CI=1%–24%) for stage IV. Multivariate analysis showed that receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, lower stage and better Eastern Cooperative Group performance status were associated with improved DFS (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Patients with stage I/II undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma had excellent survival outcomes, those with stage III/IV had worse outcomes, similar to previously reported. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with improved DFS. MMR testing should be performed for these patients due to the high incidence of abnormal profiles.
3.Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy
Ryan URBAN ; Justin WONG ; Peter LIM ; Susan ZHANG ; Ingrid SPADINGER ; Robert OLSON ; Francois BACHAND ; Clement HO ; Anna V. TINKER ; Lovedeep GONDARA ; Sarah Nicole HAMILTON
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2022;33(5):e70-
Objective:
To evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) patient reported outcomes (PROs) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) vs. intensity modulated/volumetric modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT).
Methods:
An analysis of patients treated with definitive RT between 2015–2018 was performed. GI PROs were prospectively collected at baseline, during RT (acute), ≤12 weeks after RT (subacute), and >12 weeks after RT (late). GI PROs evaluated three symptom domains: bowel problems (BPs), bowel bother (BB), and abdominal problems (APs). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between mean changes of symptom scores with clinical and dosimetric variables.
Results:
The cohort included 167 patients. A total of 100 (60%) patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and 67 (40%) with 3DCRT. In the subacute phase, the mean change of symptom scores from baseline in 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT were +0.9 vs. −1.15 (p=0.004) for BP, +2.18 vs. −0.10 (p=0.019) for BB, and +1.41 vs. −0.38 (p=0.021) for AP. Likewise, in the late phase, mean changes were +0.72 vs. −0.82 (p=0.014) for BP, +1.98 vs. −0.03 (p=0.008) for BB, and +1.29 vs. −0.31 (p<0.001) for AP. On multiple linear regression, use of 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT was associated with greater mean changes in subacute BP (p=0.023) and late phase AP (p=0.019). A higher small bowel V50Gy was associated increased symptom scores in late AP (p=0.012).
Conclusion
3DCRT was associated with significantly greater worsening of GI PRO symptom scores in the subacute and late phase. These data support the ongoing use of IMRT/VMAT in routine practice.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail