Extensive porto-mesenteric thrombosis presents a significant challenge in liver transplantation and was previously considered a contraindication. However, advancements in surgical techniques have made liver transplantation feasible. For optimal allograft function, adequate portal flow is crucial, as it generates shear stress that stimulates regeneration. In such cases, portal inflow options include the left renal vein (reno-portal anastomosis; RPA), the inferior vena cava (cavo-portal hemi-transposition; CPHT), any patent splanchnic territory, portal vein arterialization, or multi-visceral transplantation. Among these, CPHT and RPA are the most commonly performed. Generally, CPHT is used in pediatric liver transplantation; however, it is rarely reported in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to technical challenges. In this report, we describe our technical modifications to CPHT and present the results in two patients with extensive porto-mesenteric thrombosis who underwent LDLT.

Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with high mortality, but transplantation improves survival. Optimizing organ function is time-consuming and can increase infection risk. This study investigated the optimal pretransplant waiting period. Methods: In this retrospective study of patients with ACLF who underwent transplantation between January 2021 and August 2024, perioperative details and morbidity were compared between survival and mortality groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cutoff for the pretransplant waiting period. Results: Among 112 patients with ACLF under the European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria, 61 (54.5%) underwent living donor liver transplantation (mean age, 41 years; 51 males [83.6%]). The most common etiology was viral infection (44.2%). The median Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-C) score was 44 (respiratory failure, 14.7%; renal failure, 16.4%). There were 14 (22.9%) posttransplant deaths. The median waiting period between admission and surgery was longer in the mortality group (8 vs.4 days, P=0.2). The area under the ROC curve for the optimal pretransplant waiting period was 0.723 (P=0.01). A cutoff of 5 days predicted mortality with 71.4% sensitivity and 61.9% specificity. On univariate analysis, survivors and nonsurvivors differed significantly in age, hemoglobin level, warm ischemia time, and postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding; on multivariate analysis, postoperative GI bleeding independently predicted mortality. During a median follow-up of 17 months, no deaths occurred. Conclusions A pretransplant waiting period of 5 days predicted mortality; furthermore, postoperative GI bleeding was an independent predictor of mortality. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Background/Aims: Although peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) is one of the important differential diagnoses among cirrhotic patients with ascites, a peritoneal biopsy is not always available. High ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) has been indicative of peritoneal TB. On the other hand, studies to assess its diagnostic utility based on the confirmation of peritoneal biopsy in cirrhotic patients are scarce. Methods: Patients with new-onset ascites were enrolled prospectively from a tertiary hospital. Peritoneal biopsy was applied according to clinical judgment when required. Based on pathology diagnosis of the peritoneum, the diagnostic efficacy of ascitic fluid ADA for peritoneal TB was evaluated in total and cirrhotic patients, respectively. Results: Among 286 patients enrolled, 78 were diagnosed with peritoneal TB. One hundred and thirty-two patients had cirrhosis, and 30 of those were diagnosed with peritoneal TB. The mean ADA was 72.2 U/L and 22.7 U/L in the peritoneal and non-peritoneal TB group, respectively, among the total study population, and 64.0 U/L and 19.1 U/L in the peritoneal and non-peritoneal TB group, respectively, among the subgroup with cirrhosis. The area under the curve for ADA to diagnose peritoneal TB was 0.96 in the total study population with a cutoff value of 41.1 U/L, and 0.93 in cirrhotic patients with a cutoff value of 39.9 U/L. Conclusions The ascitic fluid ADA measurements showed high diagnostic performance for peritoneal tuberculosis in patients with ascites regardless of cirrhosis at a similar cutoff value.

Background/Aims: Although peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) is one of the important differential diagnoses among cirrhotic patients with ascites, a peritoneal biopsy is not always available. High ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) has been indicative of peritoneal TB. On the other hand, studies to assess its diagnostic utility based on the confirmation of peritoneal biopsy in cirrhotic patients are scarce. Methods: Patients with new-onset ascites were enrolled prospectively from a tertiary hospital. Peritoneal biopsy was applied according to clinical judgment when required. Based on pathology diagnosis of the peritoneum, the diagnostic efficacy of ascitic fluid ADA for peritoneal TB was evaluated in total and cirrhotic patients, respectively. Results: Among 286 patients enrolled, 78 were diagnosed with peritoneal TB. One hundred and thirty-two patients had cirrhosis, and 30 of those were diagnosed with peritoneal TB. The mean ADA was 72.2 U/L and 22.7 U/L in the peritoneal and non-peritoneal TB group, respectively, among the total study population, and 64.0 U/L and 19.1 U/L in the peritoneal and non-peritoneal TB group, respectively, among the subgroup with cirrhosis. The area under the curve for ADA to diagnose peritoneal TB was 0.96 in the total study population with a cutoff value of 41.1 U/L, and 0.93 in cirrhotic patients with a cutoff value of 39.9 U/L. Conclusions The ascitic fluid ADA measurements showed high diagnostic performance for peritoneal tuberculosis in patients with ascites regardless of cirrhosis at a similar cutoff value.

Background: Epidural analgesia failure episodes can be reduced by catheter fixation techniques with a lower incidence of catheter migration. In this clinical study, we compared the roles of two epidural catheter tunneling techniques for the prevention of epidural catheter migration. Methods: Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomized into three groups of 50 patients each based on the method used to secure the epidural catheter. In the control group (CG), the epidural catheter was secured without tunneling. Tunneling groups 1 and 2 (TG1 and TG2) were defined as tunneling with and without a catheter loop, respectively. The primary outcome measure was the migration of the epidural catheter, while the secondary outcome measures were the adequacy of analgesia and signs of inflammation. All patients were followed up by the acute pain service team twice daily in the postoperative period until the epidural catheter was removed. The results were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. P values <0.050 were considered significant. Results: The three groups were similar with respect to patient characteristics. Catheter migration was significantly reduced in TG2 (two patients) compared to those in the other two groups, i.e., TG1 (eight patients) (P = 0.045) and CG (17 patients) (P = 0.001). No differences were found amongst the three groups in analgesia adequacy and catheter site inflammation (P > 0.050). Conclusions Catheter migration was significantly reduced by tunneling without a catheter loop in TG2 as compared to the other two groups. Therefore, we suggest routine use of tunneling without a catheter loop technique in anesthesia practice and look forward to future studies with larger sample sizes.

Background: Regional nerve blocks are an integral part of multimodal analgesia and should be chosen based on their efficacy, convenience, and minimal side effects. Here, we compare the use of pectoral (PEC II) and serratus-intercostal fascial plane (SIFP) blocks in breast carcinoma cases undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in terms of the postoperative analgesic efficacy and shoulder mobility. Methods: The primary outcome of this prospective controlled study was to compare the postoperative static and dynamic pain scores, and the secondary outcome was to assess the shoulder pain, range of shoulder joint motion, and hemodynamic parameters. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to three groups and given general anesthesia. All patients received paracetamol, diclofenac, and rescue doses of tramadol based on the Institute's Acute Pain Service (APS) policy. No block was performed in group C (control), whereas groups P and S received PEC II and SIFP blocks, respectively, before surgical incision. Results: The groups were comparable in terms of age, weight, height, and body mass index distribution (P > 0.05). Dynamic pain relief was significantly better 12 and 24 h postoperatively in groups P (P = 0.034 and P = 0.04, respectively) and S (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively) compared to group C. Shoulder pain relief and shoulder mobility were better in group S, while the hemodynamic parameters were more stable in group P. Conclusions Both SIFP and PEC blocks have comparable dynamic and static pain relief with better shoulder pain scores in patients receiving SIFP.

No abstract available.
B-Lymphocytes ; Humans ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma