Based on Guidelines for the Management of Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Drugs(trial version 2021), this study aims to sort out the clinical evidence of Huangkui Capsules(HC) in the treatment of chronic kidney diseases in aspects of safety, effectiveness, economy, innovation, suitability, accessibility, and characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine( "6+1" dimensions) from real-world data, secondary literature evaluations, questionnaires, and public data, with the methods in evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, and health technology. Furthermore, with multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA) model and CSC v2.0, the clinical value of the medicine is comprehensively assessed. All the above are to highlight the advantages and characteristics of HC and lay a basis for scientific decision-making by the medical management department. The dimensions are graded A, B, C, or D. According to the conclusions from phase Ⅳ clinical trial, spontaneous reporting system(SRS), systematic review and Meta-analysis, acute toxicity and long-term toxicity tests, it mainly results in the adverse reactions of nausea, abdominal distension, vomiting, pruritus, rash, and good prognosis in patients. According to the available research, the safety evidence is sufficient and the risk is controllable, so the safety of this medicine is grade B. According to Meta-analysis, HC in combination with conventional drugs in the treatment of chronic kidney disease is superior to conventional drugs alone in reducing urinary protein, serum creatinine concentration, and blood urea nitrogen. In addition, HC combined angiotensin receptor blocker(ARB) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACEI) is outstanding in improving total clinical effective rate, reducing 24 h urinary protein quantity, urinary albumin excretion rate, serum creatinine concentration, triglyceride, and total cholesterol in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy as compared with ARB or ACEI alone. As for chronic nephritis, the application together with ARB or ACEI can raise the total effective rate, reduce 24 h urinary protein content, serum creatinine concentration, and blood urea nitrogen, and delay the progress of the disease. HC boasts high-quality evidence in treating chronic kidney disease, diabetic nephropathy, and chronic nephritis. It has obvious clinical significance in treating chronic kidney disease and thus its efficacy in this aspect is grade B. It has outstanding clinical significance for diabetic nephropathy and chronic nephritis and corresponding and the effectiveness is grade A. As for the pharmacoeconomic value, HC combined with ARB or ACEI is more economical in the treatment of chronic kidney disease than Bailing Capsules combined with ARB or ACEI, with high-quality evidence, and thus the economy of the formula is grade B. HC is a key solution to the high urinary protein in patients with hypotension and chronic kidney disease. The innovation is evidenced by the methods to ensuring drug supply, community-level supply, drug safety, effectiveness, and reasonable price, as wells as the aspects of enterprise philosophy, equipment management, research and development in process and technology, enterprise management and marketing. Thus, the prescription is grade A in innovation. The suitability, as evidenced in drug administration, technical management, drug storage, information service, and medication, is grade B. The course of the medicine is affordable, and it is accessible in a wide range of areas and hospitals. Thus, the accessibility is grade A. HC was developed from an in-hospital preparation, with application in numerous patients and thus large-scale real-world data. As a result, HC is grade B in terms of characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine. After comprehensive evaluation, the clinical value of HC in treating chronic kidney disease is class B, and that for diabetic nephropathy and chronic nephritis is class A. The result is of great reference value for the basic clinical medication management.
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects* ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; Capsules ; Diabetic Nephropathies/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy*

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects* ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects* ; Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/etiology* ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/physiology* ; Pneumonia, Viral/etiology* ; SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Olmesartan, a widely used angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), has been linked to sprue-like enteropathy. No cases of olmesartan-associated enteropathy have been reported in Northeast Asia. We investigated the associations between olmesartan and other ARBs and the incidence of enteropathy in Korea. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service to identify 108,559 patients (58,186 females) who were initiated on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), olmesartan, or other ARBs between January 2005 and December 2012. The incidences of enteropathy were compared among drug groups. Changes in body weight were compared after propensity score matching of patients in the ACEis and olmesartan groups. RESULTS: Among 108,559 patients, 31 patients were diagnosed with enteropathy. The incidences were 0.73, 0.24, and 0.37 per 1,000 persons, in the ACEis, olmesartan, and other ARBs groups, respectively. Adjusted rate ratios for enteropathy were: olmesartan, 0.33 (95% confidential interval [CI], 0.10 to 1.09; p = 0.070) and other ARBs, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.83; p = 0.017) compared to the ACEis group after adjustment for age, sex, income level, and various comorbidities. The post hoc analysis with matched cohorts revealed that the proportion of patients with significant weight loss did not differ between the ACEis and olmesartan groups. CONCLUSIONS: Olmesartan was not associated with intestinal malabsorption or significant body weight loss in the general Korean population. Additional large-scale prospective studies of the relationship between olmesartan and the incidence of enteropathy in the Asian population are needed.
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; Asia ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Body Weight ; Cohort Studies* ; Comorbidity ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Humans ; Incidence ; Insurance Claim Review ; Intestinal Diseases ; Korea ; National Health Programs ; Propensity Score ; Prospective Studies ; Receptors, Angiotensin ; Retrospective Studies ; Weight Loss

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have not been adequately evaluated in patients without left ventricular (LV) dysfunction or heart failure after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Between November 2005 and January 2008, 6,781 patients who were not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or ARBs were selected from the Korean AMI Registry. The primary endpoints were 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including death and recurrent AMI. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the patients were Killip class 1 and had a LV ejection fraction > or = 40%. The prescription rate of ARBs was 12.2%. For each patient, a propensity score, indicating the likelihood of using ARBs during hospitalization or at discharge, was calculated using a non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model, and was used to match the patients 1:4, yielding 715 ARB users versus 2,860 ACEI users. The effect of ARBs on in-hospital mortality and 12-month MACE occurrence was assessed using matched logistic and Cox regression models. Compared with ACEIs, ARBs significantly reduced in-hospital mortality(1.3% vs. 3.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.379; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.190 to0.756; p = 0.006) and 12-month MACE occurrence (4.6% vs. 6.9%; HR, 0.661; 95% CI, 0.457 to 0.956; p = 0.028). However, the benefit of ARBs on 12-month mortality compared with ACEIs was marginal (4.3% vs. 6.2%; HR, 0.684; 95% CI, 0.467 to 1.002; p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ARBs are not inferior to, and may actually be better than ACEIs in Korean patients with AMI.
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Logistic Models ; Multivariate Analysis ; Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis/*drug therapy/mortality/physiopathology ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Registries ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Factors ; Secondary Prevention/*methods ; Stroke Volume ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Function, Left

BACKGROUNDAntihypertensive drugs have been linked to new-onset osteoporotic fracture (NOF), and different classes of antihypertensive drugs may alter the risk for the development of NOF; however, the classic effect of different antihypertensive drugs on the development of NOF in the elderly has not been well studied during long-term follow-up.

METHODSIn this study, we investigated the association between different classic antihypertensives and the development of NOF in the elderly. This was a longitudinal cohort study performed using data from claim forms submitted to the Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance in Central Taiwan, China including case patients with NOF aged 65-80 years from January 2002 to December 2012 and non-NOF controls. Prescriptions for antihypertensives before the index date were retrieved from a prescription database. We estimated the hazard ratios (HR s) of NOF associated with antihypertensive use. Non-NOF controls served as the reference group.

RESULTSA total of 128 patients with NOF were identified from among 1144 patients with hypertension during the study period. The risk of NOF after adjusting age, sex, comorbidities, and concurrent medications was higher among the users of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.66) than among nonusers. Patients who took calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99) were at a lower risk of developing NOF than nonusers. Loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blocker, and alpha-blocker were not associated with the risk of NOF.

CONCLUSIONSElderly with hypertension who take CCBs are at a lower risk of NOF and that the use of ACE inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing NOF during the 11-year follow-up.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antihypertensive Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Calcium Channel Blockers ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; chemically induced ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Taiwan ; epidemiology

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With the increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease, angiocardiography using contrast-enhancing media has become an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool, despite the risk of contrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI). CIAKI may be exacerbated by renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) blockers, which are also used in a variety of cardiovascular disorders. This study evaluated the effects of RAS blockade on CIAKI after coronary angiography. METHODS: Patients who underwent coronary angiography in our hospital between May 2009 and July 2011 were reviewed. Serum creatinine levels before and after coronary angiography were recorded. CIAKI was diagnosed according to an increase in serum creatinine > 0.5 mg/dL or 25% above baseline. RESULTS: A total of 1,472 subjects were included in this study. Patients taking RAS blockers were older, had a higher baseline creatinine level, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and had received a greater volume of contrast medium. After propensity score matching, no difference was observed between the RAS (+) and RAS (.) groups. Multiple logistic regression identified RAS blockade, age, severe heart failure, contrast volume used, hemoglobin level, and eGFR as predictors of CIAKI. Multiple logistic regression after propensity matching showed that RAS blockade was associated with CIAKI (odds ratio, 1.552; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the incidence of CIAKI was increased in patients treated with RAS blockers.
Acute Kidney Injury/*chemically induced/diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology ; Aged ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/*adverse effects ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/*adverse effects ; Biological Markers/blood ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Contrast Media/*adverse effects/diagnostic use ; Coronary Angiography/*adverse effects ; Creatinine/blood ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney/*drug effects/physiopathology ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Propensity Score ; Renin-Angiotensin System/*drug effects ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors

INTRODUCTIONThe incidence of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been reported to be 5%-20%, with less than half of affected patients requiring discontinuation due to persistent cough. However, the incidence in the local Asian population has not been studied. This study aimed to objectively evaluate the incidence of discontinuation of ACE inhibitors due to cough, in a primary healthcare centre in Singapore.

METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records, both electronic and written, of patients who attended Tampines Polyclinic to identify those who were newly prescribed ACE inhibitors. The written medical records were analysed to identify patients who discontinued the use of ACE inhibitors and to find out the reasons for discontinuation.

RESULTSA total of 424 patients were identified during the study period. Out of the 424 patients, 129 (30.4%) discontinued the use of ACE inhibitors due to cough. Overall, 90 (21.2%) patients who were initially started on ACE inhibitors were eventually switched to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

CONCLUSIONIn our cohort, the incidence of discontinuation of ACE inhibitors due to cough is higher than most other studies. The relationship between ethnicity and tolerance of medications should not be underestimated. As there is a high incidence of discontinuation of ACE inhibitors due to cough in the local population, ARBs may be a reasonable substitute as a first-line medication, if clinically indicated.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; Cough ; chemically induced ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Physicians ; Primary Health Care ; organization & administration ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUNDCombination therapy is an effective method to reduce the blood pressure (BP) for patients with hypertension. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of benazepril/lercanidipine compared with benazepril alone in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

METHODSOne hundred and eighty-one patients with mild-to-moderate primary hypertension were assigned in this randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study and were randomly divided into group A (benazepril 10 mg/lercanidipine 10 mg) and group B (benazepril 10 mg) for 8 weeks. At 4 weeks, the dosage of Benazepril was titrated up to 20 mg if the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) remained ≥ 90 mmHg. BP control and side effects were evaluated at the end of 1, 4 and 8 weeks.

RESULTSThe baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. The BP in both groups decreased from the baseline (P < 0.05). At the end of 4 and 8 weeks, Benazepril/Lercanidipine produced greater BP reduction than Benazepril alone (P < 0.05). The comparison of the rate of BP control for the benazepril/lercanidipine and benazepril groups at the end of 1, 4, and 8 weeks were 41.2% vs. 37.6% (P > 0.05), 67.1% vs. 44.7% (P < 0.05), and 71.8% vs. 45.9% (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of side effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONThe benazepril/lercanidipine combination is more effective in reducing BP than benazepril alone, while it does not increase the incidence of side effects.

Aged ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Benzazepines ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Calcium Channel Blockers ; administration & dosage ; Dihydropyridines ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Single-Blind Method

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) on diabetic kidney disease. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from CoChrane library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI and VIP. Eleven RCTs involving 602 patients were included and analyzed with Rev Man 5.1 software. RESULTS: Compared with ACEI alone, combined treatment with ARB and ACEI was more effective on decreasing 24 h albuminuria, systolic pressure, average 24 h systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and average 24 h diastolic pressure but with a high level of serum potassium. Compared with ARB alone, combined treatment with ARB and ACEI was more effective on decreasing systolic pressure and diastolic pressure. Compared with ACEI or ARB alone, we didn't get a definite conclusion that whether combined treatment with ARB and ACEI was more effective on decreasing 24 h proteinuria. CONCLUSION Based on this Meta analysis, combined treatment with ARB and ACEI is safer and has positive effect on diabetic kidney disease. However, small sample size and low methodological quality appeared in most of the trials included in this systematic review. Therefore, available evidence is insufficient to recommend a routine clinical application of combined treatment with ARB and ACEI on diabetic kidney disease.
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Diabetic Nephropathies ; drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

BACKGROUNDThere have been no mortality/morbidity endpoint studies with losartan in Chinese heart failure patients. The objective was to evaluate the effects of high-dose vs. low-dose losartan on clinical outcomes in Chinese subjects with heart failure.

METHODSThis study was a post hoc analysis of the Heart failure Endpoint evaluation of Angiotensin II Antagonist losartan (HEAAL) trial (n = 545). Chinese adults with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV) intolerant of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were randomized to losartan 150 mg or 50 mg daily. The primary endpoint was the composite event rate of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. Safety and tolerability were assessed.

RESULTSMedian follow-up was 4.8 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar to the overall HEAAL cohort. Overall, 120 (44.1%) subjects in the losartan 150 mg group and 137 (50.2%) subjects in the losartan 50 mg group died (any cause) or were hospitalized for heart failure (hazard ratio (OR) 0.807, 95%CI 0.631 - 1.031). There were no notable differences between treatment groups in the proportion of subjects with adverse experiences.

CONCLUSIONThe results of this post hoc analysis in Chinese subjects, although not powered to show significance, were generally consistent with the main study results, which demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure with daily losartan 150 mg vs. losartan 50 mg in subjects with symptomatic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors, supporting the use of the higher dose for optimum clinical benefit.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Heart Failure ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Losartan ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged