Parturients with both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) present unique challenges to anesthesiologists. Neuraxial analgesia for labor remains the gold standard in obstetric patients. However, in patients with AS, this approach may be deemed difficult to impossible. Administration of systemic opioids for labor analgesia can be an option, bearing in mind the potential respiratory depressant effect to both the mother and the fetus, especially in the setting of concomitant COVID-19. This paper reports the successful management of such a patient using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous remifentanil.
Spondylitis, Ankylosing ; Remifentanil ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Managing acute postoperative pain is challenging for anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients, leading to adverse events despite making significant progress. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is a recommended solution, where oxycodone has depicted unique advantages in recent years. However, controversy still exists in clinical practice and this study aimed to compare two drugs in PCIA. METHODS: We performed a literature search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases up to December 2020 to select specific randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of oxycodone with sufentanil in PCIA. The analgesic effect was the primary outcome and the secondary outcome included PCIA consumption, the Ramsay sedation scale, patients' satisfaction and side effects. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with sufentanil, oxycodone showed lower Numerical Rating Scale scores (mean difference [MD] = -0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.01 to -0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 93%), demonstrated better relief from visceral pain (MD = -1.22, 95% CI: -1.58 to -0.85; P < 0.001; I2 = 90%), promoted a deeper sedative level as confirmed by the Ramsay Score (MD = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.35-1.19; P < 0.001; I2 = 97%), and resulted in fewer side effects (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.35-0.60; P < 0.001; I2 = 11%). There was no statistical difference in the degree of patients' satisfaction (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.88-1.44; P = 0.33; I2 = 72%) and drug consumption (MD = -5.55, 95% CI: -14.18 to 3.08; P = 0.21; I2 = 93%). CONCLUSION: Oxycodone improves postoperative analgesia and causes fewer adverse effects, and could be recommended for PCIA, especially after abdominal surgeries. REGISTRATION PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; CRD42021229973.
Humans ; Oxycodone/therapeutic use* ; Sufentanil/therapeutic use* ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy* ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled

OBJECTIVE: To explore if acupoint injection can improve analgesic effects or delivery outcomes in parturients who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labor analgesia. METHODS: A total of 307 participants were prospectively collected from July 2017 to December 2019. The participants were randomized into the combined acupoint injection with CSEA plus PCEA group (AICP group, n=168) and CSEA plus PCEA group (CP group, n=139) for labor analgesia using a random number table. Both groups received CSEA plus PCEA at cervical dilation 3 cm during labor process, and parturients of the AICP group were implemented acupoint injection for which bilateral acupoint of Zusanli (ST 36) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6) were selected in addition. The primary outcome was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and the secondary outcomes were obstetric outcomes and requirement of anesthetics doses. Safety evaluations were performed after intervention. RESULTS: The VAS scores were significantly lower in the AICP group than in the CP group at 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after labor analgesia (all P<0.05). The latent phase of the AICP group was shorter than that of the CP group (P<0.05). There were less additional anesthetics consumption, lower incidences of uterine atony, fever, pruritus and urinary retention in the AICP group than those in the CP group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION Acupoint injection combined CSEA plus PCEA for labor analgesia can decrease the anesthetic consumption, improve analgesic quality, and reduce adverse reactions in the parturients. (Registration No. ChiMCTR-2000003120).
Acupuncture Points ; Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects* ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/adverse effects* ; Anesthetics/pharmacology* ; Female ; Humans ; Labor, Obstetric ; Pregnancy

There have been several reports of foreign bodies being discovered in the intravenous set. In this case, the patient complained that he found a worm in his intravenous line. It was later confirmed as a long, white fibrin deposit by pathologic examination. This happened even though there was a non-return valve in the intravenous line. Also, since there were few red blood cells in the deposit, it did not look like a blood clot. In cases like this, we suggest that physicians keep this possibility in mind to reassure their patients.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Erythrocytes ; Fibrin ; Foreign Bodies ; Humans

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect on supplementary analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated with electroacupunture, and explore it's mechanism. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis were randomized into an observation group and a control group, 20 cases in each one. During the operation, patients were given epidural anesthesia in the two groups, conventional patient controlled epidural analgesia and oral celecoxib were applied after the operation. In the observation group, electroacupunture was used at Liangqiu (ST 34), Xuehai (SP 10), Yinlingquan (SP 9), Zusanli (ST 36), Fenglong (ST 40) and Qiuxu (GB 40) on the operation side from the 1st to 7th day after the operation to support analgesia, 30 min for each time, once a day. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to record postoperative pain of resting state and active state. The levels of serum prostaglandin E and β-endorphin were measured on the 1st and 7th day after surgery in the two groups. RESULTS: In the observation group, the VAS scores of resting state and active state were superior to the control group on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day after the operaton (all <0.05); after the treatment, the level of serum β-endorphin was increased and the level of serum prostaglandin E was reduced in the two groups (all <0.05), and the change of the observation group was larger than that of the control group (both <0.05). CONCLUSION Electroacupunture has the effect of supplementary analgesia for patients after TKA, the mechanism may be related to promote the synthesis of β-endorphin and inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandin E.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Humans ; Pain Management ; Pain, Postoperative ; Prostaglandins ; beta-Endorphin

Objective To investigate the 50% effective dose(ED)and 95% effective dose(ED)of dexmedetomidine(DEX)combined with 0.032 μg/(kg·h)sufentanil as well as its analgesic effect for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS).Methods Totally 25 patients undergoing elective VATS were enrolled. DEX and 0.032 μg/(kg·h)sufentanil were used for postoperative PCIA. The loading dose of DEX was 0.048 μg/(kg·h),and the dose difference between two adjacent patients was 0.008 μg/(kg·h). The DEX dose of a current patient was determined by whether the previous patient was satisfied with postoperative analgesic effect. If the previous patient was satisfied with postoperative analgesic effect,the DEX dose of the current patient was decreased by 0.008 μg/(kg·h);and if the previous analgestic effect was not satisfactory,DEX dose of the current patient was increased by 0.008 μg/(kg·h). The study endpoint was dexmedetomidine dose was<0.008 μg/(kg· h) within 7 upper and lower cycles in 7 consecutive cases. Finally,the probability unit regression was used to estimate the ED and ED of DEX and their 95% .Results When DEX combined with 0.032 μg/(kg·h) sufentanil was used for postoperative PCIA in young patients undergoing VATS,the ED and EDof DEX were 0.0346 μg/(kg· h)[95%:0.0283-0.0408 μg/(kg·h)] and 0.0459 μg/(kg·h)[95%:0.0400-0.0880 μg/(kg·h)],respectively. No adverse reaction such as vomiting,respiratory depression,or bradycardia occurred. The average Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores at rest(=-5.128,=0.000)and cough(Z=-6.642,=0.000)and the Ramsay sedation score(Z=-2.335,=0.020)within 6 hours after surgery were higher than those after 6 hour.Conclusion DEX combined with 0.032 μg/(kg·h) sufentanil are effective for postoperative PCIA in patients undergoing VATS when the ED and ED are 0.0346 μg/(kg·h)and 0.0459 μg/(kg·h),respectively.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Dexmedetomidine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted

OBJECTIVE: To observe and evaluate the effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at different time points on postoperative analgesia in perioperative period in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery, and to explore the optimal time to use TEAS for shoulder arthroscopic surgery. METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing unilateral shoulder arthroscopy under general anesthesia, graded withⅠtoⅡaccording to ASA criteria were randomly divided into 3 groups, 40 patients in each one. The patients in the group A were treated with preoperative TEAS at sham acupoints combined with postoperative TEAS at Hegu (LI 4) and Neiguan (PC 6); the patients in the group B were treated with preoperative TEAS at Hegu (LI 4) and Neiguan (PC 6) combined with postoperative TEAS at sham acupoints; the patients in the group C were treated with TEAS at sham acupoints before and after operation. The parameters of TEAS were dilatational wave, 2 Hz/100 Hz in frequency, 30 min. When the resting-state visual analogue scale (VAS) of incision was more than 3 points, the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump of sufentanil was administered to maintain the VAS no more than 3 points. The time point when PCIA pump was firstly used, the used dose of sufentanil and effective pressing number of PCIA pump within 24 hours after surgery were recorded. Intraoperative anesthetic doses were recorded in the three groups. The resting-state and task-state VAS were evaluated at 0, 6, 12, 24 hours after surgery; the patient's satisfaction rate and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The time when PCIA pump was firstly used in the group A and the group B was significantly longer than that in the group C, and the used dose of sufentanil and effective pressing number of PCIA pump within 24 hours after surgery in the group A and group B were significantly less than those in the group C (all <0.05); the incidence of postoperative nausea-vomiting and sore throat was reduced (all <0.05). The time when PCIA pump was firstly used in the group A was significantly longer than that in the group B, and the used dose of sufentanil and effective pressing number of PCIA pump within 24 hours after surgery in the group A were significantly less than those in the group B (all <0.05); no significant difference of the incidence of postoperative nausea-vomiting and sore throat was observed between the group A and group B (both >0.05). There were no statistically significant difference in VAS score at different postoperative time points and postoperative analgesia satisfaction rate between the two groups (all >0.05). CONCLUSION Perioperative TEAS could improve the postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery, delay the time when PCIA pump is firstly used, reduce the dosage of postoperative analgesics and adverse events. Compared before surgery, postoperative TEAS has better analgesia.
Acupuncture ; Acupuncture Points ; Acupuncture Therapy ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Arthroscopy ; Humans ; Shoulder ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

INTRODUCTION: Adductor canal block (ACB) is hypothesised to provide superior analgesia to femoral nerve block (FNB) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while preserving quadriceps strength. METHODS: 30 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to receive either ACB or FNB. Baseline tests of quadriceps strength were performed. Ultrasound-guided blocks with 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine were administered before induction of general anaesthesia. Patient-controlled analgesia (morphine) was prescribed for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome of this prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was morphine consumption (mean ± standard deviation) in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were pain scores using a numeric rating scale (median and interquartile range [IQR]), quadriceps strength (% of baseline) and functional outcomes at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in morphine consumption at 24 hours between the ACB and FNB groups (21 ± 11 mg vs. 20 ± 12 mg; p = 0.85). No statistically significant differences were observed between the ACB and FNB groups in pain scores at 24 hours (at rest: 0 [IQR 0-2] vs. 0 [IQR 0-2]; on movement: 5 [IQR 4-8] vs. 5 [IQR 3-8]) and quadriceps strength (24 hours: 28.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.8% ± 19.6% of baseline; 48 hours: 31.5 ± 23.1% vs. 33.7% ± 20.1% of baseline). There were also no statistically significant differences in functional outcomes and length of stay. CONCLUSION We found no statistically significant differences in analgesic effects, quadriceps strength or functional recovery postoperatively between ACB and FNB.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; methods ; Analgesics, Opioid ; therapeutic use ; Anesthetics, Local ; administration & dosage ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Femoral Nerve ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphine ; therapeutic use ; Nerve Block ; methods ; Pain Management ; methods ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Quadriceps Muscle ; drug effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of local infiltration of ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with parecoxib for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted among 98 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Biliary Surgery of West China Hospital between March, 2017 and August, 2018. The patients were randomized to receive perioperative analgesia with local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with parecoxib (experimental group, =50) or postoperative analgesia with dizosin (control group, =48). The regimens for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative pain relief were identical in the two groups. The differences in NRS pain score, use of pain relief agents, the incidences of adverse reactions to analgesia and wound infection, and the time to first ambulation and first flatus passage after the operation were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 12, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days after the operation, the patients in the experimental group had significantly lower NRS scores ( < 0.05) than those in the control group. The rate of use of rescue analgesics was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (32% 66.67%, < 0.05); the rate of tramadol hydrochloride use was also significantly lower in the experimental group ( < 0.05). Compared with those in the control group, the patients in the experimental group showed a significantly lower total incidence of adverse reactions (22% 54.17%, < 0.05) as well as a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting ( < 0.05), an earlier time of first ambulation and first flatus passage after the operation ( < 0.05), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay ( < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, local infiltration of ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with ropivacaine can effectively relieve perioperative pain, reduce the use of relief analgesics, lower the incidence of adverse reactions, and promote the recovery after the surgery.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Anesthetics, Local ; China ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Isoxazoles ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; Ropivacaine

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block for relieving acute pain after posterior lumbar surgery. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients undergoing selective posterior lumbar surgery under general anesthesia in our hospital between January and December, 2018, were recruited. Of these patients, 30 received total intravenous general anesthesia to serve as the control group, 28 received total intravenous general anesthesia (TIVA) combined with erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and 31 had TIVA combined with retrolaminar block (RLB). All the patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for postoperative analgesia, and their heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry were routinely monitored during the anesthesia. VAS scores were evaluated before and at 2, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the surgery. Sufentanil consumption during the operation and PCIA were also recorded. The postoperative complications such as nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, itching and respiratory depression within 48 h after the surgery were also recorded. RESULTS: At 2, 8 and 12 h postoperatively, VAS scores in the ESPB group and RLB group were significantly lower than those in the control group; the scores were significantly lower in RLB group than in ESPB group ( < 0.05). Compared with that in the control group, sufentanil consumption during the operation and PCIA were significantly decreased in both ESPB and RLB groups, particularly in the latter group ( < 0.05). Two patients experienced nausea and vomiting and 1 patient complained of pruritus in control group; 1 patient had over sedation and 1 had urinary retention in ESPB group; 1 patient had urinary retention in RLB group. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-guided RLB has better analgesic effect than ESPB for management of perioperative pain following posterior lumbar surgery.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Humans ; Lumbosacral Region ; surgery ; Nerve Block ; Pain, Postoperative ; Sufentanil