Introduction: Proximal tibial plateau fractures are one of the major problems in orthopaedic surgery and are associated with high complication rates. Intra-articular proximal tibia plateau fractures represent approximately 1% of fractures in adults. Various modalities of proximal tibial plateau fracture management have been considered, ranging from simple external fixators in impending compartment syndrome to periarticular proximal tibia plates and inter-locking nails with poller screws. Purpose of this study is to determine clinical outcomes of proximal tibial plateau fractures treated with plate. Materials and methods: We did this study of proximal tibial plateau fracture according to Schatzker’s classification treated with proximal tibial periarticular plates in 53 patients prospectively admitted at the author’s institute from June 2018 to May 2020 with follow-up period of 6 months. Results: In our study, the average knee score was 89.30 (ranging from 79 to 93) and functional knee score was 97.92 (ranging from 75 to 100). Fifty-one (51) patients (96.23%) showed excellent results and 2 patients (3.77%) showed good results according to Knee Society Score, which suggest that internal fixation of proximal tibia plateau fracture with plating provides better results. Out of 53 patients, 9 patients had post-operative complications. Average radiological union was seen at 14 weeks. Conclusion: Locking compression plate in proximal tibia plateau fractures act as a good biological fixation provide stable fixation, articular reduction and limb alignment even in difficult fracture situations. Fixation of proximal tibia plateau fractures with plate gives excellent to good knee society score, with satisfactory functional and radiological outcome.

Introduction: Fractures of the distal femur account for 0.4% of all fractures. They involve about 7% of all femur fractures, with bimodal age distribution, commonly occur during high-velocity trauma of motor vehicle accidents in the younger group of patients and are frequently associated with other skeletal injuries. The treatment of distal femoral fractures has evolved from conservative treatment to more aggressive operative treatment. The aim is to achieve and maintain a good reduction of the joint to allow early active mobilisation, thus minimising the joint stiffness and severe muscular atrophy encountered in the conservative treatment. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 25 patients with distal femur fracture with intra-articular extension treated with open reduction and internal fixation with DFLP, admitted at our institute between 2016 to 2019, with a minimum follow-up of six months. Results: In our study, 19 (76%) patients had excellent to good results. Three (12%) patients had fair outcomes, and three (12%) patients had poor outcomes according to Neer’s score. The average time for bone union in closed fractures was earlier (4.25 months) than open fractures, averaging 5.86 months. The outcome was almost similar between closed and open fractures. There were 2 (8%) cases of infection in the early post-operative period, 7 (12%) patients suffered from knee stiffness, and there were 3 (12%) cases with a pre-operative bone loss that required bone grafting. Conclusion: Management of complex intra-articular distal femur fracture has always been a challenge. Anatomical reduction of articular fragments and rigid fixation of these fractures are a must. DFLP provides angular stability with multiple options to secure fixation of both metaphyseal and articular fragments with the restoration of the joint congruity, limb length, alignment and rotation, allowing early mobilisation and aggressive physiotherapy without loss of fixation, resulting in gratifying functional outcome and low complication rate.