1.OCCUPATIONAL STRESS, COPING STRATEGIES, AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG NURSES IN ABHA CITY
Naif Alahmari ; Abdullah Alhati ; Omar Alamri ; Norah Asiri ; Ali Khobrani ; Faris Alshadidi ; Khalid Hakami ; Khalil Asiri ; Ghazi Alotaibi ; Turki Alomari ; Abdulrahman Alfaifi
ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry 2024;25(4):1-14
OCCUPATIONAL STRESS, COPING STRATEGIES, AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG NURSES IN ABHA CITY
Background: The nursing profession is inherently stressful, and nurses in Abha City face
unique challenges due to rapid population growth and evolving healthcare needs.
Objective: The purpose of the present study is to identify the correlation between
“Occupational stress, coping strategies and quality of life” among nurses in Abha city.
Method: The present study utilized a cross-sectional, descriptive survey, and correlational
research design. A convenience sampling throughout an online questionnaire was used
to recruit 411 nurses from three hospitals in Abha city, and data was collected using
three validated instruments: The Expanded Nursing Stress Scale, the Brief Cope Scale,
and the World Health Organization-Quality of Life Scale. SPSS version 26 was used for
data analysis, including descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, ANOVA, and
Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results: Findings revealed a moderate level of occupational stress (mean score 2.31 ± 0.56
on the ENSS-59 scale), with the main sources being dealing with patients and their families
(2.35 ± 0.65), uncertainty concerning treatment (2.33 ± 0.66), and discrimination (2.32 ± 0.88).
Nurses employed coping strategies such as planning (2.49 ± 0.75), religion (2.47 ± 0.72),
and substance use (2.45 ± 0.77), while the least adopted strategies were self-blame (2.40 ±
0.71), self-distraction (2.37 ± 0.73), and behavioral disengagement (2.32 ± 0.73). Significant
associations were found between sources of occupational stress and coping strategies,
such as death and dying stress source correlating with self-distraction (r=0.202), use of
instrumental support (r=0.111), positive reframing (r=0.154), humor (r=0.111), religion (r=0.142), and self-blame (r=0.141). Conflict with peers as a stress source was significantly
correlated with self-distraction (r=0.157), denial (r=0.158), substance use (r=0.183), use
of instrumental support (r=0.130), behavioral disengagement (r=0.106), venting (r=0.121),
humor (r=0.203), religion (r=0.106), and self-blame (r=0.152). A significantly negative
association between occupational stress and quality of life was also identified (r=-0.451).
Conclusion: Significant correlation were found between sources of occupational stress and
coping strategies. The study also demonstrated a significant negative association between
occupational stress and quality of life, emphasizing the need for interventions to reduce
occupational stress and enhance nurses’ well-being. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 25
(2) February, 2024; 1-14.
2.Can the bone marrow harvest volume be reduced safely in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with pediatric sibling donors?
Awatif ALANAZI ; Amer NADEEM ; Khawar SIDDIQUI ; Ali ALAHMARI ; Ibrahim GHEMLAS ; Abdullah ALJEFRI ; Hawazen ALSAEDI ; Saadiya KHAN ; Mouhab AYAS
Blood Research 2023;58(1):28-35
Background:
Reduced harvest volumes in pediatric donors appear to have the potential to reduce donor-associated risks while maintaining engraftment in recipients; however, the allowable harvest volume reduction remains undefined.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed the data pairs of 553 bone marrow (BM) harvests from pediatric (age at harvest <18 yr) sibling donors and clinical outcomes of 553 pediatric (age at infusion <14 yr) transplant-naïve recipients to assess the optimal BM harvest volume needed from pediatric donors to obtain the desired CD34+ cell count (≥3.0×10 6 cells per kg of recipient weight), and to study its impact on the clinical outcomes of transplantation in pediatric recipients.
Results:
The minimum desired CD34+ cell count of ≥3.0×10 6 per kg of recipient weight was achieved for 506 (95.3%) of donor-recipient pairs. The median CD34+ cell yield was 6.4×10 6 per kg of recipient weight (range, 1.2‒33.8×10 6 ) in donors younger than 5 years old at harvest, 4.7×10 6 (range, 0.3‒28.5×10 6 ) in donors aged 5‒10 years and 2.1×10 6 range, 0.3‒11.3×10 6 ) in donors older than 10 years (P <0.001).
Conclusion
The infused CD34+ cell dose (×10 6 cells/kg of recipient weight) had no impact on GRFS; however, a CD34+ cell dose of >7×10 6 cells/kg of recipient weight did not improve hematopoietic recovery


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail