Thioacetamide (TAA)-induced liver fibrosis, triggered by inflammation and oxidative stress, is prompted by hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) activation via several pathways. This study explores the hepatoprotective effect of aloe vera gel (AVG) extract and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) transplantation on regulating long intergenic noncoding RNA (lincRNA-p21) and microRNA (miR-17-5p) expressions and their impact on TGF-β1/Smad-3 and Wnt-10a/ β-Catenin cascades in TAA-induced liver damage. The study involved 48 adult male albino rats divided into four groups:control, TAA, TAA treated with BM-MSCs, and TAA treated with BM-MSCs+AVG extract. After 8 weeks, liver enzymes and hepatic oxidative parameters were evaluated alongside lincRNA-p21, miR-17-5p, TGF-β1, Smad-3, Wnt-10a, and β-Catenin expressions. Liver tissue sections were examined by light and electron microscopes and analyzed morphometrically. Group II showed increased aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, malondialdehyde, reduced glutathione levels, and deteriorated hepatocytes with distorted mitochondria and dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum. Group IV restored lincRNA-p21 expression, which downregulated miR-17-5p and suppressed activated HSCs by inhibiting TGF-β1/Smad-3 and Wnt-10a/β-Catenin pathways, and improved hepatic tissue architecture. Additionally, immunohistochemically, alpha-smooth muscle actin and cyclin D1 expressions were markedly decreased in group IV compared to group II. We concluded that AVG suppresses fibrotic pathways, boosts BM-MSCs differentiation, and reduces HSCs activation in liver fibrosis caused by TAA.

Clinical guidelines typically endorse conventional therapies such as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) as the mainstay of ulcerative colitis management. However, the degree of adoption and application of guideline recommendations by physicians within Asia remains unclear. This study aims to understand the prescribing patterns of 5-ASA and implementation of current guideline recommendations across Asian clinical practice. A physician survey was conducted among inflammatory bowel disease specialists in 8 Asian territories to understand practices and preferences in ulcerative colitis management, focusing on the use of 5-ASA and concordance with guideline recommendations. Survey findings were validated by country experts in diverse healthcare settings. Subgroup analyses stratified data by income levels and treatment reimbursement status. Ninety-eight valid responses were received from inflammatory bowel disease specialists or gastroenterologists among 8 economic entities. Significant differences were found in clinical practices and treatment preferences for ulcerative colitis management among different income-level and government-subsidy groups. Survey results are summarized in 8 findings that illustrate trends in 5-ASA use and guideline implementation across Asian territories. This study emphasizes socioeconomic factors that impact the adoption of guideline recommendations in real-world practice. Our findings indicate an eclectic approach to guideline implementation across Asia, based on resource availability and feasibility of treatment goals.

Clinical guidelines typically endorse conventional therapies such as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) as the mainstay of ulcerative colitis management. However, the degree of adoption and application of guideline recommendations by physicians within Asia remains unclear. This study aims to understand the prescribing patterns of 5-ASA and implementation of current guideline recommendations across Asian clinical practice. A physician survey was conducted among inflammatory bowel disease specialists in 8 Asian territories to understand practices and preferences in ulcerative colitis management, focusing on the use of 5-ASA and concordance with guideline recommendations. Survey findings were validated by country experts in diverse healthcare settings. Subgroup analyses stratified data by income levels and treatment reimbursement status. Ninety-eight valid responses were received from inflammatory bowel disease specialists or gastroenterologists among 8 economic entities. Significant differences were found in clinical practices and treatment preferences for ulcerative colitis management among different income-level and government-subsidy groups. Survey results are summarized in 8 findings that illustrate trends in 5-ASA use and guideline implementation across Asian territories. This study emphasizes socioeconomic factors that impact the adoption of guideline recommendations in real-world practice. Our findings indicate an eclectic approach to guideline implementation across Asia, based on resource availability and feasibility of treatment goals.

Clinical guidelines typically endorse conventional therapies such as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) as the mainstay of ulcerative colitis management. However, the degree of adoption and application of guideline recommendations by physicians within Asia remains unclear. This study aims to understand the prescribing patterns of 5-ASA and implementation of current guideline recommendations across Asian clinical practice. A physician survey was conducted among inflammatory bowel disease specialists in 8 Asian territories to understand practices and preferences in ulcerative colitis management, focusing on the use of 5-ASA and concordance with guideline recommendations. Survey findings were validated by country experts in diverse healthcare settings. Subgroup analyses stratified data by income levels and treatment reimbursement status. Ninety-eight valid responses were received from inflammatory bowel disease specialists or gastroenterologists among 8 economic entities. Significant differences were found in clinical practices and treatment preferences for ulcerative colitis management among different income-level and government-subsidy groups. Survey results are summarized in 8 findings that illustrate trends in 5-ASA use and guideline implementation across Asian territories. This study emphasizes socioeconomic factors that impact the adoption of guideline recommendations in real-world practice. Our findings indicate an eclectic approach to guideline implementation across Asia, based on resource availability and feasibility of treatment goals.

Irritable bowel syndrome, a prevalent functional bowel disorder, significantly affects patients' everyday lives and imposes a substantial economic burden on society. However, treatments options for managing diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome are limited. Rifaximin along with metronidazole is proposed as a treatment option for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of rifaximin and metronidazole in the management of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. An open-label, non-comparative, non- randomized, multicentre trial was conducted in 25 subjects presenting with acute diarrheal episodes associated with irritable bowel syndrome. The study was approved by institutional research ethics committee and participants provided signed informed consent. Patients were given fixed dose combination tablet containing rifaximin 200mg and metronidazole 400mg twice daily for 5 days.

Purpose: This study was performed to introduce, evaluate, and compare various novel assessment protocols designed for straightforward, reliable, and reproducible measurement of alveolar bone levels. These protocols are intended for standardized periodontal assessment and follow-up, utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and manipulation of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewer software. Materials and Methods: Two experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists developed 5 distinct radiographic measurement protocols. These techniques were established to assess the alveolar bone level of a periodontally affected upper central incisor using a method that is consistently repeatable across observers. Two additional assessors, blindedto the details of the study, independently applied the protocols to retrieved DICOM files that met the eligibility criteria.A scoring system with 3 subscores was created and used to compare the protocols. Results: Statistically excellent inter-observer reliability was observed for all protocols, other than protocol 1, which demonstrated moderate reliability. The average discrepancy between measurements taken by the 2 observers was 1.2 mm for protocol 1, 0.81 mm for protocol 2, and less than 0.5 mm for the remaining 3 protocols. All approaches except protocol 4 were straightforward to apply. Conclusion This study introduces multiple reliable protocols for the evaluation of periodontal bone levels that ensureconsistency across observers. Based on the findings, the double axial lines and incisocrestal distance protocols are recommended. These new assessment approaches, along with any future modifications, may be useful in periodontal assessment, dental implant follow-up, orthodontic evaluation, research, and artificial intelligence model generation.

Purpose: This study was performed to introduce, evaluate, and compare various novel assessment protocols designed for straightforward, reliable, and reproducible measurement of alveolar bone levels. These protocols are intended for standardized periodontal assessment and follow-up, utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and manipulation of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewer software. Materials and Methods: Two experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists developed 5 distinct radiographic measurement protocols. These techniques were established to assess the alveolar bone level of a periodontally affected upper central incisor using a method that is consistently repeatable across observers. Two additional assessors, blindedto the details of the study, independently applied the protocols to retrieved DICOM files that met the eligibility criteria.A scoring system with 3 subscores was created and used to compare the protocols. Results: Statistically excellent inter-observer reliability was observed for all protocols, other than protocol 1, which demonstrated moderate reliability. The average discrepancy between measurements taken by the 2 observers was 1.2 mm for protocol 1, 0.81 mm for protocol 2, and less than 0.5 mm for the remaining 3 protocols. All approaches except protocol 4 were straightforward to apply. Conclusion This study introduces multiple reliable protocols for the evaluation of periodontal bone levels that ensureconsistency across observers. Based on the findings, the double axial lines and incisocrestal distance protocols are recommended. These new assessment approaches, along with any future modifications, may be useful in periodontal assessment, dental implant follow-up, orthodontic evaluation, research, and artificial intelligence model generation.

Introduction: A prosthesis is an artificial assistive device designed to replace a missing body part (e.g., limb), secondary to a disease, injury or congenital deformities. Prostheses are often used to restore functional capacity while improving the quality of life (QoL). Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among adults aged 19 to 64 years who were permanent residents in Luzon who had undergone unilateral lower leg amputation. This epidemiologic study employed the Modified Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADLs), the Frenchay Activities Index for instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and the WHOQOL-BREF for QoL. Descriptive and analytical statistics of the responses of the Lower Limb Amputees (LLA) were done. Prevalence odds ratio (POR) was calculated, and statistical significance was determined. Results: Among 165 LLA respondents, only 47.88% used prostheses. Unilateral LLA who exhibited greater independence in ADLs (POR=19.22), more actively performed IADLs (POR=5.51), and had good QoL (POR=3.83) were more likely to have been using prosthesis. All these findings were statistically significant. Conclusion This study revealed a statistically significant association between prosthesis use to the physical functioning and QoL among adult unilateral LLAs. It showed that prosthetic use was likely linked with improved performance in ADLs and IADLs, and better QoL compared to those without.
Quality of Life

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an association between COVID-19 and pediatric diabetes. Studies have indicated the increased likelihood of children with COVID-19 infection developing diabetes. Our objective was to assess not only the increase in pediatric diabetes at our hospital and identify possible risk factors, but also to correlate the psychosocial changes resulting from the pandemic with new-onset diabetes. Methods: We analyzed data from 58 children aged 1 to 18 years admitted to our hospital with new-onset diabetes between March 2020 and December 2021. The data included inflammatory biomarkers and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies (Abs), as well as the results of a lifestyle questionnaire. Results: The average number of hospital admissions per month for new-onset diabetes increased from 10 to 18 with the start of the pandemic. Of the 58 children in our analysis, 33% had positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG Ab, 31% had type 1 diabetes mellitus, and 62% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). More than half (54%) were experiencing diabetic ketoacidosis. Those with T2DM were older, majority African American, had higher median body mass index (BMI) percentiles, and lower vitamin D levels. There were no significant correlations between any psychosocial risk factors and either diabetes type or SARS-CoV2 Ab status. Conclusion Despite the increased incidence of new-onset diabetes among children in Mississippi during the pandemic, this study was unable to demonstrate a significant correlation between COVID-19 infection and new-onset diabetes. The findings of this study highlighted the correlation between increased BMI and type 2 diabetes, underscoring the significant problems of obesity and diabetes in our study region. Further research is warranted.

Purpose: This study was performed to introduce, evaluate, and compare various novel assessment protocols designed for straightforward, reliable, and reproducible measurement of alveolar bone levels. These protocols are intended for standardized periodontal assessment and follow-up, utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and manipulation of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewer software. Materials and Methods: Two experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists developed 5 distinct radiographic measurement protocols. These techniques were established to assess the alveolar bone level of a periodontally affected upper central incisor using a method that is consistently repeatable across observers. Two additional assessors, blindedto the details of the study, independently applied the protocols to retrieved DICOM files that met the eligibility criteria.A scoring system with 3 subscores was created and used to compare the protocols. Results: Statistically excellent inter-observer reliability was observed for all protocols, other than protocol 1, which demonstrated moderate reliability. The average discrepancy between measurements taken by the 2 observers was 1.2 mm for protocol 1, 0.81 mm for protocol 2, and less than 0.5 mm for the remaining 3 protocols. All approaches except protocol 4 were straightforward to apply. Conclusion This study introduces multiple reliable protocols for the evaluation of periodontal bone levels that ensureconsistency across observers. Based on the findings, the double axial lines and incisocrestal distance protocols are recommended. These new assessment approaches, along with any future modifications, may be useful in periodontal assessment, dental implant follow-up, orthodontic evaluation, research, and artificial intelligence model generation.