1.Immunological considerations and outcomes in cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation
Nicole E JAMES ; Curtis L CETRULO JR ; Alexandre G LELLOUCH ; Jan A PLOCK ; Zhi Yang NG
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2026;40(1):28-38
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has transformed reconstructive surgery for patients with severe tissue defects. Nonetheless, donor shortages remain a major limitation. Cross-sex VCA (CS-VCA) has been proposed as a means of expanding the donor pool, but concerns persist regarding potentially heightened rejection risks in sex-mismatched transplants. This review examines published adult CS-VCA cases up to May 2025. The primary outcomes analyzed were acute rejection episodes, allograft survival, immunological complications, and sequelae affecting form and function.Nine CS-VCA cases were identified (six upper extremity, one lower extremity, and two abdominal wall transplants). Eight involved female donors (median age, 47 years) and male recipients (median age, 30 years). Acute rejection occurred in five of nine cases;however, 11 of 13 allografts remained viable at follow-up (6–41 months) under immunosuppressive therapy. Two cases developed vascular complications, resulting in technical failure and partial amputation, respectively. Higher human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (mean, 5) were associated with complications, while fewer mismatches (mean, 3) correlated with better outcomes. In contrast to trends in solid organ transplantation, female-to-male CS-VCA demonstrated relatively favorable outcomes in the limited cases reported. These findings suggest that CS-VCA may be a feasible strategy to expand the VCA donor pool, provided that patient selection is careful, ABO/Rh and HLA compatibility are prioritized, and rigorous immunological monitoring is maintained.Further studies should investigate sex-specific immune mechanisms to optimize longterm success rates.
2.Reconstruction of post-burn anterior neck contractures using a butterfly design free anterolateral thigh perforator flap
Alexandre G. LELLOUCH ; Zhi Yang NG ; Victor POZZO ; Tabrez SUFFEE ; Laurent A. LANTIERI
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2020;47(2):194-197
Anterior neck burns represent a major reconstructive challenge due to severe sequalae including restriction in movement and poor aesthetic outcomes. Common treatment options include skin grafting with/without dermal matrices, and loco-regional and distant free flap transfers with/without prior tissue expansion. Such variation in technique is largely influenced by the extent of burn injury requiring resurfacing. In order to optimize like-for-like reconstruction of the anterior neck, use of wide, thin and long flaps such as the anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap have been reported with promising results. Of note, some patients have a tendency towards severe scar contractures, which may be contributed by the greater extent of inflammation during wound healing. We report our experience at 4 years’ follow-up after secondary reconstruction of severe, anterior neck burn contractures in two patients by harvesting the ALT flap with a butterfly design. This technique provides adequate wound resurfacing of the burned neck and surrounding areas, and provides good neck extensibility by addressing both anterior and lateral aspects of the scar defect simultaneously. Such a flap design reduces tension on wound edges and thus, the risk of contracture recurrence in what remains a particularly challenging type of burn reconstruction.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail