Purpose: Due to recent shifts in healthcare reimbursement models, more primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are now being performed in the outpatient setting. However, there is a lack of knowledge around the comparative outcomes of revision outpatient THA. Materials and Methods: Adults undergoing revision THA between 2010 and 2020 with 2-year follow-up data were identified on a large insurance claims database. Following stratification by inpatient versus outpatient revision THA, patients from both groups were matched 1:1 by demographics and revision characteristics. Ninety-day postoperative medical and 1- and 2-year postoperative surgical complications after matching were compared. Results: Among 67,570 patients, mean age was 65.3 years, 57.0% were female, and mean Charlson comorbidity index score was 1.72. Subsequent to 1:1 matching, 1,555 inpatient and outpatient revision THA patients were identified. Outpatient THA patients had significantly lower rates of blood transfusions (3.6% vs 5.1%, P=0.049), broken prosthesis (1 year: 0.1% vs.0.6%, P=0.027; 2 years: 0.2% vs. 0.9%, P=0.015), and other postoperative mechanical complications (1 year: 4.9% vs. 7.1%, P=0.010; 2 years: 6.2% vs. 8.4%, P=0.023). Otherwise, the data for outpatient THA patients was not statistically different from inpatient THA patients across all studied complications. Conclusion Outpatient revision THA may be a safe alternative to inpatient revision THA for carefully selected patients. Establishing patient- and case-specific parameters to optimize outcomes, satisfaction, safety, and value is critical.

Objective: To determine the utility of a highly sensitive troponin assay when utilized in the emergency department. Methods The FAST-TRAC study prospectively enrolled >1,500 emergency department patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome within 6 hours of symptom onset and 2 hours of emergency department presentation. It has several unique features that are not found in the majority of studies evaluating troponin. These include a very early presenting population in whom prospective data collection of risk score parameters and the physician’s clinical impression of the probability of acute coronary syndrome before any troponin data were available. Furthermore, two gold standard diagnostic definitions were determined by a pair of cardiologists reviewing two separate data sets; one that included all local troponin testing results and a second that excluded troponin testing so that diagnosis was based solely on clinical grounds. By this method, a statistically valid head-to-head comparison of contemporary and high sensitivity troponin testing is obtainable. Finally, because of a significant delay in sample processing, a unique ability to define the molecular stability of various troponin assays is possible.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00880802