The development of burn units in our country is now undergoing a trend of geographic centralization and regionalization. To solve the problems like severe burn patients are too far away from burn units, overloaded operation in regional burn centers when mass burn accidents happen, and growing requirement for aeromedical transportation, etc., it is now the top priority to improve national aeromedical transportation system for burn patients. Expert teams from Chinese Burn Association, National Aeromedical Rescue Base, and China Association for Disaster & Emergency Rescue Medicine discussed and reached a consensus on the key points of aeromedical transportation of burn patients, including organizational structure, staff and materials, and three links before, during, and after aeromedical transportation. The consensus aims to provide guidance for a safe, efficient, and standardized operation of aeromedical transportation for burn patients in China.
Accidents ; Air Ambulances ; Burn Units ; Consensus ; Disasters ; Humans

Recent evidence has demonstrated the survival benefits of helicopter transport for trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of hospital-based helicopter emergency medical services (H-HEMS) in comparison with ground ambulance transport in improving mortality outcomes in patients with major trauma. Study participants were divided into 2 groups according to type of transport to the trauma center; that is, either via ground emergency medical services (GEMS) or via H-HEMS. The study was conducted from October 2013 to July 2015. Mortality outcomes in the H-HEMS group were compared with those in the GEMS group by using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis. The number of participants finally included in the study was 312. Among these patients, 63 were adult major trauma patients transported via H-HEMS, and 47.6% were involved in traffic accidents. For interhospital transport, the Z and W statistics revealed significantly higher scores in the H-HEMS group than in the GEMS group (Z statistic, 2.02 vs. 1.16; P = 0.043 vs. 0.246; W statistic, 8.87 vs. 2.85), and 6.02 more patients could be saved per 100 patients when H-HEMS was used for transportation. TRISS analysis revealed that the use of H-HEMS for transporting adult major trauma patients was associated with significantly improved survival compared to the use of GEMS.
Accidents, Traffic ; Adult ; Air Ambulances ; Aircraft* ; Ambulances ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Medical Services* ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Mortality* ; Transportation ; Trauma Centers ; Wounds and Injuries

In Korea, which still lacks a well-established trauma care system, the inability to transport patients to adequate treatment sites in a timely manner is a cause of low trauma patient survival. As such, this study was conducted to serve as a basis for the establishment of a future trauma transport system. We performed a comparative analysis of the transport time, and treatment outcomes between trauma victims transported by ground ambulance (GAMB) and those transported via the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) through the National Emergency Management Agency's 119 reporting system, which is similar to the 911 system of the United States, from March 2011 to May 2014. The HEMS-transported patients received treatment instructions, by remote communication, from our trauma specialists from the time of accident reporting; in certain instances, members of the trauma medical staff provided treatment at the scene. A total of 1,626 patients were included in the study; the GAMB and HEMS groups had 1,547 and 79 patients, respectively. The median transport time was different between 2 groups (HEMS, 60 min vs. GAMB, 47 min, P<0.001) but for all patients was 49 min (less than the golden hour). Outcomes were significantly better in the HEMS compared to the GAMB, using the trauma and injury severity score (survival rate, 94.9% vs. 90.5%; Z score, 2.83 vs. -1.96; W score, 6.7 vs. -0.8). A unified 119 service transport system, which includes helicopter transport, and the adoption of a trauma care system that allows active initial involvement of trauma medical personnel, could improve the treatment outcome of trauma patients.
Air Ambulances/*utilization ; Emergency Service, Hospital/*statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Prognosis ; Republic of Korea ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Trauma Centers ; Treatment Outcome ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/*mortality/therapy ; Wounds, Penetrating/*mortality/therapy

In Korea, which still lacks a well-established trauma care system, the inability to transport patients to adequate treatment sites in a timely manner is a cause of low trauma patient survival. As such, this study was conducted to serve as a basis for the establishment of a future trauma transport system. We performed a comparative analysis of the transport time, and treatment outcomes between trauma victims transported by ground ambulance (GAMB) and those transported via the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) through the National Emergency Management Agency's 119 reporting system, which is similar to the 911 system of the United States, from March 2011 to May 2014. The HEMS-transported patients received treatment instructions, by remote communication, from our trauma specialists from the time of accident reporting; in certain instances, members of the trauma medical staff provided treatment at the scene. A total of 1,626 patients were included in the study; the GAMB and HEMS groups had 1,547 and 79 patients, respectively. The median transport time was different between 2 groups (HEMS, 60 min vs. GAMB, 47 min, P<0.001) but for all patients was 49 min (less than the golden hour). Outcomes were significantly better in the HEMS compared to the GAMB, using the trauma and injury severity score (survival rate, 94.9% vs. 90.5%; Z score, 2.83 vs. -1.96; W score, 6.7 vs. -0.8). A unified 119 service transport system, which includes helicopter transport, and the adoption of a trauma care system that allows active initial involvement of trauma medical personnel, could improve the treatment outcome of trauma patients.
Air Ambulances/*utilization ; Emergency Service, Hospital/*statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Prognosis ; Republic of Korea ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Trauma Centers ; Treatment Outcome ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/*mortality/therapy ; Wounds, Penetrating/*mortality/therapy

OBJECTIVE: Helicopter ambulance transport (HAT) is a highly resource-intensive facility that is a well-established part of the trauma transport system in many developed countries. Here, we review the benefit of HAT for neurosurgical patients in Korea. METHODS: This retrospective study followed neurotrauma patients who were transferred by HAT to a single emergency trauma center over a period of 2 years. The clinical benefits of HAT were measured according to the necessity of emergency surgical intervention and the differences in the time taken to transport patients by ground ambulance transport (GAT) and HAT. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were transferred to a single university hospital using HAT, of whom 32 were taken to the neurosurgery department. Of these 32 patients, 10 (31.3%) needed neurosurgical intervention, 14 (43.8%) needed non-neurosurgical intervention, 3 (9.4%) required both, and 11 (34.4%) did not require any intervention. The transfer time was faster using HAT than the estimated time needed for GAT, although for a relatively close distance (<50 km) without ground obstacles (mountain or sea) HAT did not improve transfer time. The cost comparison showed that HAT was more expensive than GAT (3,292,000 vs. 84,000 KRW, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this Korean-based study, we found that HAT has a clinical benefit for neurotrauma cases involving a transfer from a distant site or an isolated area. A more precise triage for using HAT should be considered to prevent overuse of this expensive transport method.
Air Ambulances* ; Ambulances ; Developed Countries ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Korea ; Neurosurgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

PURPOSE: HEMS is expected to shorten transportation time to an advanced facility and to enable administration of advanced treatment at the scene. In Korea, HEMS was launched in September 2011. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of HEMS in South Korea during the first year and to provide information for use in improvement. METHODS: Data were collected from September 23. 2011 to September 22. 2012; emergency patients on islands and in vulnerable areas were transported by helicopter. During the one-year study period, a prospective cohort study was conducted. Target diseases were acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and severe trauma. We classified patients according to two groups (severe group vs. mild group), whether they had been admitted to the intensive care unit (included death in the emergency room) or not. RESULTS: During this period, the total request mission number was 555 and the number of patients transported to base hospitals was 322. Differences between severe group and minor group were as follows: (1) final diagnosis; severe trauma (27.7% vs. 3.5%), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (24.3% vs. 4.2%), and acute coronary syndrome (7.3% vs. 2.1%), p<0.001. (2) classification of transport area; islands (45.8% vs. 77.2%), bridge islands (26.0% vs. 15.9%), and inland area (28.3% vs. 6.9%), p<0.001. (3) the median time of call to hospital time was 52 vs. 55 minutes (p=0.289). and the median time of on scene time was 9 vs. 8 minutes (p=0.046). CONCLUSION: During the 12-month period, air ambulance played an important role in medically vulnerable areas (inclusion islands). However, the number of transport missions was still relatively low, and has shown a gradual increase.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Air Ambulances ; Aircraft* ; Classification ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnosis ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Medical Services* ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Islands ; Korea ; Missions and Missionaries ; Prospective Studies ; Rural Health Services ; Stroke ; Transportation

PURPOSE: HEMS is expected to shorten transportation time to an advanced facility and to enable administration of advanced treatment at the scene. In Korea, HEMS was launched in September 2011. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of HEMS in South Korea during the first year and to provide information for use in improvement. METHODS: Data were collected from September 23. 2011 to September 22. 2012; emergency patients on islands and in vulnerable areas were transported by helicopter. During the one-year study period, a prospective cohort study was conducted. Target diseases were acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and severe trauma. We classified patients according to two groups (severe group vs. mild group), whether they had been admitted to the intensive care unit (included death in the emergency room) or not. RESULTS: During this period, the total request mission number was 555 and the number of patients transported to base hospitals was 322. Differences between severe group and minor group were as follows: (1) final diagnosis; severe trauma (27.7% vs. 3.5%), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (24.3% vs. 4.2%), and acute coronary syndrome (7.3% vs. 2.1%), p<0.001. (2) classification of transport area; islands (45.8% vs. 77.2%), bridge islands (26.0% vs. 15.9%), and inland area (28.3% vs. 6.9%), p<0.001. (3) the median time of call to hospital time was 52 vs. 55 minutes (p=0.289). and the median time of on scene time was 9 vs. 8 minutes (p=0.046). CONCLUSION: During the 12-month period, air ambulance played an important role in medically vulnerable areas (inclusion islands). However, the number of transport missions was still relatively low, and has shown a gradual increase.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Air Ambulances ; Aircraft* ; Classification ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnosis ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Medical Services* ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Islands ; Korea ; Missions and Missionaries ; Prospective Studies ; Rural Health Services ; Stroke ; Transportation

PURPOSE: The Ministry of Health and Welfare of korea started operating the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) System in 2011 to improve emergency medical services given by physicians aboard helicopters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the HEMS education program for its effectiveness and satisfaction from trainees. METHODS: A survey of trainees was conducted at the very end of training and education. Trainees for a HEMS crew surveyed included doctors (8), nurses (4), emergency medical technicians (12), pilots (10), flight dispatchers (4) and an administrator (1). The study period was from August 8, 2011 to August 12, 2011. The amount of HEMS education was 16 hours, including 8 hours of theoretical education, 5 hours of simulation and 3 hours of table-top simulation. RESULTS: In an analysis of programs according to trainee satisfaction, the theoretical training program received an average of 4.2+/-0.7 points and; the practical and simulation training program received; 4.4+/-0.8 points. The simulated practical training program thus received a higher score than theoretical education, but the difference was insignificant (p=0.834). CONCLUSION: For the HEMS training programs, the practical and simulation training satisfaction score were higher than the theoretical program. A focus on simulation programs for HEMS could therefore serve as a goal of the HEMS education program.
Administrative Personnel ; Air Ambulances ; Aircraft ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Medical Technicians ; Humans ; Korea ; Republic of Korea

Multiple variables can influence triage decision in multiple trauma. Recognition of priorities and selection of the destination can be successfully achieved by field triage and individualized clinical judgment. This narrative review summarizes the new options and protocols for transport of injured subjects. There are four levels of emergency medical providers including first responders and three levels of emergency medical technicians. Two distinct accepted protocols for transport are known as scoop and run and treat and then transfer. The former provides minimum lifesaving treatment at the scene of accident followed by transferring the patient(s) as soon as possible, and the latter mainly emphasizes the need for complete stabilization as a prerequisite for safe transport. The destination and mode of transport are selected according to clinical capabilities of the receiving hospital, transfer time from the scene to the facility, patient's medical condition, accessibility of the scene, and weather. Two common methods of transfer are ground transport, including various type of ambulances, and air medical transport, i.e. helicopter and airplane.
Air Ambulances ; Decision Making ; Humans ; Mass Casualty Incidents ; Multiple Trauma ; therapy ; Transportation of Patients ; organization & administration ; Triage

OBJECTIVETo analyze the opportunity and condition of aeromedical transportation in critically burn patients.

METHODSEighteen severely burn patients were operated by aeromedical transportation. Among them, four patients were transported in the shock stage and fourteen patients were transported after shock stage. Some aspects of treatment were introduced including escharectomy,clinical index, equipment of medicine, and so on. The transportation card and abstract of case file were recorded carefully before aeromedical transportation. When there were over 2 patients, those with more severe burns received the treatment in the priority.

RESULTSEach aeromedical transportation airplane carried 1 to 6 cases, and flies 420 to 2 500 km for 1.5 to 3. 5 hours. The patients were safely arrived at destination. Except one died for multiple organ failure, others were cured during further treatment.

CONCLUSIONProvide that the conditions were permissive and preparation were adequate, it is safe to carry out aeromedical transportation during shock stage.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Air Ambulances ; Burns ; therapy ; Critical Illness ; Humans ; Male ; Shock ; therapy ; Young Adult